387:
The consensus is that all generals, at least in cases where this represents commanding a significant number of soldiers, are notable. There are probably some armies that have given out the title of general too freely for it to show notability, but in the case of the Indian army, being a general is a
168:
323:. I added a source. two star generals are generally notable per SOLDIER. Fairly high ranking Muslim in Indian army. Possibly more non-English sources - his fairly common name makes sourcing a somewhat difficult.
162:
121:
207:, or above, are considered notable. Two-star rank officers aren't notable unless they have any other significant contribution or role, which is not the case here. Regards,
344:. No idea where the nom got the "fact" that two-star officers aren't notable. Even one-star officers (including brigadiers and commodores) are considered notable. --
252:
228:
276:
94:
89:
98:
288:
264:
240:
216:
128:
81:
444:- I added a reliable source for his rank, I see no reason not to follow the convention set in NSOLDIER, given that his rank seems to pass WP:V.
183:
150:
284:
260:
236:
212:
17:
144:
280:
256:
232:
208:
85:
140:
448:
432:
418:
397:
377:
353:
332:
315:
292:
268:
244:
220:
63:
190:
362:
467:
428:
393:
40:
309:
77:
69:
57:
156:
463:
373:
36:
199:
Not a notable army officer. Searches doesn't show anything to establish the subject's notability. Per
424:
414:
404:
389:
349:
305:
176:
53:
204:
341:
328:
200:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
462:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
410:
345:
445:
324:
300:
Point of order: "Flag or general officers" are generally consered notable. That's
115:
456:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
365:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
111:
107:
103:
175:
371:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
470:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:list of Military-related deletion discussions
203:, generally officers of three-star rank i.e.
189:
8:
275:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:Note: This debate has been included in the
229:list of People-related deletion discussions
277:list of India-related deletion discussions
274:
250:
226:
423:Oops, I meant keep. Sorry for the typo.
7:
24:
409:So, do you mean "keep" then? --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
449:18:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
433:01:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
419:13:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
398:03:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
378:04:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
354:14:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
333:07:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
316:04:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
293:04:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
269:04:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
245:04:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
221:04:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
64:23:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
304:stars on their shoulders. -
487:
459:Please do not modify it.
281:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
257:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
233:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
209:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
78:Sultan Mahmood (general)
70:Sultan Mahmood (general)
32:Please do not modify it.
388:sign of notability.
205:Lieutenant general
425:John Pack Lambert
390:John Pack Lambert
380:
295:
271:
247:
478:
461:
408:
376:
370:
368:
366:
312:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
474:
468:deletion review
457:
405:Johnpacklambert
402:
381:
372:
361:
359:
314:
310:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
473:
472:
452:
451:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
369:
358:
357:
356:
335:
318:
308:
306:The Bushranger
297:
296:
272:
248:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
56:
54:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
471:
469:
465:
460:
454:
453:
450:
447:
443:
440:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
406:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
382:
379:
375:
374:North America
367:
364:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
311:One ping only
307:
303:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:One ping only
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
458:
455:
441:
384:
360:
337:
320:
301:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
279:. Regards,
255:. Regards,
231:. Regards,
163:free images
411:Necrothesp
346:Necrothesp
342:WP:SOLDIER
201:WP:SOLDIER
464:talk page
442:Weak Keep
321:Weak Keep
37:talk page
466:or in a
446:Smmurphy
363:Relisted
122:View log
39:or in a
325:Icewhiz
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
141:Google
99:delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
429:talk
415:talk
394:talk
385:Keep
350:talk
340:per
338:Keep
329:talk
289:mail
285:talk
265:mail
261:talk
241:mail
237:talk
217:mail
213:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:keep
302:any
191:TWL
120:– (
431:)
417:)
396:)
352:)
331:)
291:)
287:•
267:)
263:•
243:)
239:•
219:)
215:•
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
427:(
413:(
407::
403:@
392:(
348:(
327:(
283:(
259:(
235:(
211:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.