98:. Internet handles are not encyclopedic. Out of curiousity, why do you continue to phrase your nominations as questions when you know it pisses off a large number of people? Are you trying to intentionally spite them? Do you seriously think that phrasing as a question is a superior way to nominate? Or do you just enjoy being contrary?
209:
Star Wars fandom, not just some random fanboy with delusions. The man and his site are a constant cause of discussion and controversy among (online) Star Wars fans, and I can't think of any major SW website that hasn't written something about him (check out the external links), so I don't consider an
220:, out of all the star wars pages this is by far the most enclylopedic, as it describes something extrinisic to the plot. This is the exact opposite of the ghastly and horrible 7 styles of lightsabre fighting page which I believe it is a grand atrocity that it was allowed to be kept.
311:. Notable, for reasons stated. I think the article was much better before a lot of the information in the past 15 or so edits was added, and it certainly should be cleaned up. But it's notable, as others have stated. 5,080 Google hits, at least the first 6 pertain to this article.
210:
entry on him to be 'vanity' (a somewhat paradoxical term when you consider what it actually says about him). However, it does need to be changed; the structure is really all-over-the-place, most of the subheadings about the sections of his site aren't really necessary.
261:: The guy is completely off his rocker. The problem is that some might not see this and will believe that he actually has the connections he claims to have. It would be good to see some improvements, though, as already mentioned. - Treesloth, 9:54 AM, 11 Apr 05
439:
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.
135:: he is nuts, but people need to know that he's a fraud. This entry needs to be modified, though, as it is almost an entire copy paste of "About the REAL SuperShadow" website. - Tokakeke 8:45, March 30, 2005
108:
All the important things in it are unverifiable, according to the article itself. Almost certainly vanity. Notability not established by anything presented in the article.
52:
To some, this may appear to be a vanity article for the operator of a Star Wars rumor mill and fan-fiction website. Should this be deleted in accordance with the
75:- It is important to warn people about this guy. As long as George Lucas is not doing anything about this guy, it is important, to inform people about this
329:. I think it is notable, Supershadow is a pretty controversial figure from what I have checked so far and this article explains that he is a fraud.--
160:: This is not a vanity page by definition, since it affects a larger group of people, namely Star Wars fans. - J. Swift 7:59, March 31, 2005
393:
165:
140:
266:
224:
17:
31:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
352:. It is necessary so that Star wars fans won't be ripped off for money by this phony again. [[User:RM 21:52, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
419:
53:
375:
57:
389:
126:
356:
318:
415:
372:
235:
285:
270:
112:
65:
61:
46:
317:. A useful reference for anyone who wants background on this guy or just wants a good laugh. --
211:
122:
427:
401:
343:
173:
148:
79:
37:
27:
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below.
99:
89:
283:
250:
109:
298:
196:
371:
This is a hoot. It also could keep some people from being ripped off by this guy.
423:
397:
340:
330:
186:
169:
144:
34:
297:
he may be a famous crank, but outside of star wars fandom he's not notable.
288:
360:
245:
384:- this page is about someone who actively influences star wars fandom
282:
as vanity. It doesn't have to be self-written to be considered vain.
121:: notable net-loon. The whole point is that he talks cobblers. --
76:
205:: As J. Swift said, Supershadow is something/someone that
410:'Keep'* To many people believe that SS is the real deal.
88:- this page needs to be deleted so badly that it hurts.
60:? Is there an appropriate place to merge this?
234:as part of Star Wars culture. Not vanity. --
8:
244:- borderline nonsense, vanity, junk.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
33:The result of the debate was keep.
24:
54:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion_policy
1:
442:Please do not edit this page
29:This page is no longer live.
430:) 15:54, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
404:) 11:34, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
68:\ 18:30, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
461:
305:™ 19:59, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
273:\ 16:56, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
176:) 01:41, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
151:) 01:41, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
355:Above is not User:RM but
346:21:52, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
291:18:35, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
129:12:01, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
42:23:21, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
378:5:10 PM EST Apr. 15, '05
363:16:16, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
333:21:51, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
321:15:37, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
255:17:39, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
238:16:08, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
199:23:50, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
115:21:34, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
102:20:41, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
92:18:52, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
82:13:48, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
189:02:07, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
106:Delete, unverifiable.
214:18:05, April 2 (EST)
431:
405:
274:
253:
248:
185:, nn lucascruft.
177:
152:
40:
452:
413:
387:
339:. As per above.
303:
264:
259:Keep, but modify
251:
246:
207:actively affects
203:Keep, but modify
163:
138:
133:Keep, but modify
38:
460:
459:
455:
454:
453:
451:
450:
449:
448:
414:The above from
390:208.180.133.103
388:The above from
359:'s first edit.
299:
265:The above from
223:Anon vote from
164:The above from
139:The above from
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
458:
456:
447:
446:
435:
434:
433:
432:
408:
407:
406:
379:
373:Doug teh H-Nut
366:
365:
364:
347:
334:
323:
322:
312:
306:
292:
277:
276:
275:
256:
239:
236:Riffsyphon1024
229:
228:
227:
215:
200:
190:
180:
179:
178:
166:208.39.131.105
155:
154:
153:
141:63.191.200.162
130:
116:
103:
93:
83:
49:
44:
32:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
457:
445:
443:
437:
436:
429:
425:
421:
418:; it was his
417:
412:
411:
409:
403:
399:
395:
392:; it was his
391:
386:
385:
383:
380:
377:
374:
370:
367:
362:
358:
357:192.88.94.254
354:
353:
351:
348:
345:
342:
338:
335:
332:
328:
325:
324:
320:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
302:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
272:
268:
267:70.56.102.154
263:
262:
260:
257:
254:
249:
243:
240:
237:
233:
230:
226:
225:67.180.61.179
222:
221:
219:
216:
213:
208:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
175:
171:
167:
162:
161:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
137:
136:
134:
131:
128:
124:
120:
117:
114:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
91:
87:
84:
81:
78:
74:
71:
70:
69:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
45:
43:
41:
36:
30:
19:
441:
438:
381:
368:
349:
336:
326:
319:DarthGroznii
314:
308:
300:
294:
279:
258:
241:
231:
217:
212:Colonelcraud
206:
202:
195:. Trivial.
192:
182:
157:
132:
118:
105:
95:
85:
72:
51:
28:
26:
80:LordofHavoc
58:vanity page
47:SuperShadow
420:first edit
394:third edit
100:DaveTheRed
90:Gorrister
416:D.Breezy
110:Dpbsmith
301:ALKIVAR
286:Radiant
197:Indrian
62:No vote
424:Korath
398:Korath
376:(talk)
344:(talk)
341:Meelar
331:Milicz
295:Delete
280:Delete
271:GRider
252:(talk)
242:Delete
193:Delete
187:ComCat
183:Delete
170:Korath
145:Korath
113:(talk)
96:Delete
86:Delete
66:GRider
369:Keep.
64:. --
56:as a
16:<
428:Talk
402:Talk
382:Keep
350:Keep
337:Keep
327:Keep
315:Keep
309:Keep
269:. --
232:Keep
218:Keep
174:Talk
158:Keep
149:Talk
127:Talk
123:Phil
119:Keep
77:hoax
73:Keep
35:ugen
422:. —
396:. —
361:jni
247:CDC
168:. —
143:. —
289:_*
125:|
39:64
444:.
426:(
400:(
172:(
147:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.