346:- Author: I am still not sure why this user thinks the sources are "questionable"? There are lesser traces of this person online and so these are the best sources I could find. In addition, could he please elaborate as to which exact sources are deemed "questionable", most of them are directly from organization's websites and the person's official CV. Once he does, I will go through each one of them to prove their reliability.
479:
too many sources that are actually articles written by her, not establishing notability. Other sources that are not independent from the subject matter. WP:GNG is the bar, and I don't see this passing it. Any BLP should have at least a few rock solid sources and this doesn't.
202:
I had originally put this up for speedy deletion, but the author came in and added sources. This said, the sources provided are all biographical sources and at least one article that the subject has written. My assertion is that this is not demonstrating notability as per
400:
CVs are allowable for factual and uncontroversial information about the subject (like her education and employment history). They do not contribute to notability, but in cases such as this one, notability is based on the criteria of
171:
296:
541:. If you need a "sanity check" on your work, that's fine - but please don't just find stuff, throw it up there, and hope for the best, because often times that still won't make the grade! --
695:
248:
165:
276:
124:
256:
236:
131:
686:
as argued above. The remaining problems (e.g., instances of overly promotional language) can be fixed in the normal course of editing.
97:
92:
554:
332:
224:
101:
17:
570:
515:
361:
84:
186:
153:
319:- I have retracted the speedy deletion on the basis that more has been added, but the sources are yet questionable. --
712:
304:
284:
264:
40:
666:
624:
466:
440:
410:
391:
147:
566:
670:
649:
628:
603:
582:
558:
519:
492:
487:
470:
444:
414:
395:
365:
336:
308:
288:
268:
228:
143:
66:
708:
691:
244:
36:
550:
503:
500:
Author: I have made numerous edits, please review them and let me know if the problem still exists.
349:
328:
300:
280:
260:
220:
193:
662:
645:
620:
507:
462:
436:
406:
387:
377:
353:
179:
599:
578:
511:
433:
357:
88:
481:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
707:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
687:
432:
American HCI...". If kept, it would need to be rewritten to be encyclopedic and comply with
383:
240:
159:
542:
320:
212:
62:
573:
including four works with 890, 791, 486 and 137 cites respectively. That passes WP:PROF.
683:
679:
658:
641:
637:
612:
591:
402:
54:
595:
574:
526:
454:
204:
80:
72:
616:
611:
In light of the info James5000 has posted, I'm changing my opinion to keep. Passes
534:
458:
208:
118:
538:
530:
58:
428:: The article seems blatantly advertorial, with peacock words like "...an
382:
They are unreliable exactly because they are from the person's CV. Fails
703:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
386:, w.r.t. "the article is not based primarily on such sources."
297:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
461:. The article is primarily based on selfpublished sources.
114:
110:
106:
178:
615:, article has been updated so that doesn't violate
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
715:). No further edits should be made to this page.
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
235:Note: This discussion has been included in the
661:, along with the pass of #C1 discussed above. —
277:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
640:. The article (like most) could be improved.
192:
8:
569:has a GScholar h-index of 17 and a total of
257:list of People-related deletion discussions
525:It does not, Kumarsh6. Please read up on
501:
347:
294:
274:
254:
237:list of Women-related deletion discussions
234:
533:(more to the point than GNG) as well as
207:and the sources are insufficient as per
405:, not on the availability of sources. —
565:Notable if this is who I think it is.
52:. Consensus is that she meets WP:PROF
7:
24:
527:our general notability guidelines
657:. ACM Fellow is a clear pass of
535:our reliable sources guidelines
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
529:, then turn your attention to
1:
732:
696:14:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
671:06:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
650:00:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
629:07:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
604:07:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
583:03:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
559:23:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
531:our notability guidelines
520:03:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
493:23:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
471:23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
445:23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
415:06:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
396:23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
366:22:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
337:19:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
309:19:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
289:19:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
269:19:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
249:18:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
229:17:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
67:21:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
705:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
55:(non-admin closure)
522:
506:comment added by
368:
352:comment added by
311:
291:
271:
251:
57:
723:
546:
545:Dennis The Tiger
537:- then focus on
453:: Seems to fail
381:
324:
323:Dennis The Tiger
216:
215:Dennis The Tiger
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
53:
34:
731:
730:
726:
725:
724:
722:
721:
720:
719:
713:deletion review
544:
375:
322:
301:The Mighty Glen
281:The Mighty Glen
261:The Mighty Glen
214:
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
729:
727:
718:
717:
699:
698:
673:
663:David Eppstein
652:
631:
621:deadwikipedian
606:
594:. That's her.
585:
563:
562:
561:
495:
474:
463:deadwikipedian
447:
437:deadwikipedian
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
407:David Eppstein
388:deadwikipedian
370:
369:
340:
339:
313:
312:
292:
272:
252:
200:
199:
136:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
728:
716:
714:
710:
706:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
540:
539:verifiability
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
499:
496:
494:
491:
490:
485:
484:
478:
475:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
446:
442:
438:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
379:
374:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
345:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
318:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
210:
206:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:Susan M. Dray
78:
77:
74:
73:Susan M. Dray
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
704:
702:
675:
654:
633:
608:
587:
543:
502:— Preceding
497:
488:
483:Dennis Brown
482:
476:
450:
449:
429:
425:
348:— Preceding
343:
321:
316:
213:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
619:completely
434:WP:BLPSTYLE
430:experienced
166:free images
688:XOR'easter
684:WP:PROF#C3
680:WP:PROF#C1
659:WP:PROF#C3
571:3343 cites
567:Susan Dray
241:XOR'easter
709:talk page
642:StrayBolt
384:WP:RS/SPS
37:talk page
711:or in a
596:Hmlarson
575:James500
516:contribs
508:Kumarsh6
504:unsigned
378:Kumarsh6
362:contribs
354:Kumarsh6
350:unsigned
125:View log
39:or in a
678:Passes
638:WP:PROF
613:WP:PROF
592:WP:PROF
498:Comment
426:Comment
403:WP:PROF
344:Comment
317:Comment
172:WP refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
477:Delete
455:WP:GNG
451:Delete
205:WP:GNG
144:Google
102:delete
617:WP:RS
555:stuff
459:WP:RS
333:stuff
225:stuff
209:WP:RS
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
59:Szzuk
16:<
692:talk
682:and
676:Keep
667:talk
655:Keep
646:talk
636:per
634:Keep
625:talk
609:Keep
600:talk
590:per
588:Keep
579:talk
553:and
551:Rawr
512:talk
467:talk
457:and
441:talk
411:talk
392:talk
358:talk
331:and
329:Rawr
305:talk
285:talk
265:talk
245:talk
223:and
221:Rawr
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
63:talk
50:keep
194:TWL
123:– (
694:)
669:)
648:)
627:)
602:)
581:)
557:)
518:)
514:•
489:2¢
486:-
469:)
443:)
413:)
394:)
364:)
360:•
335:)
307:)
299:.
287:)
279:.
267:)
259:.
247:)
239:.
227:)
211:.
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
65:)
690:(
665:(
644:(
623:(
598:(
577:(
549:(
510:(
465:(
439:(
409:(
390:(
380::
376:@
356:(
327:(
303:(
283:(
263:(
243:(
219:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:·
121:)
83:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.