423:
Well it is a reason to delete?... If there's no evidence of notability then it doesn't really deserve an article, Anyway I know I said this elsewhere but I've nominated tons of these radio stations this
November and half have already been deleted so atleast IMHO BROADCAST doesn't mean anything here
372:"- I did find those results but clearly you're unable to understand the fact that mentions aren't good enough and to be totally honest they're worse than the last AFD!, Find better sources or this AFD stays up. –
339:
161:
230:
114:
335:
155:
247:
213:
314:: Looking at the page, I see its a youth run and not may names that looks familiar to me so. To the general user that will be the same so delete it.
121:
343:
17:
87:
82:
176:
91:
52:. Poor sourcing is a reason to delete if there is clear evidence of diligent searching and sufficient time has passed
143:
290:
266:
458:
74:
40:
192:
Non notable radio station, Am finding everything for a
Baltimore radio station but nothing on this, Fails GNG. –
403:). The state of sourcing in the article needs improvement, but poor sourcing alone isn't a reason to delete.
400:
137:
454:
301:
252:
235:
218:
36:
330:
Once again, the NOM seems unable to use google. There is local media coverage showing that it exists
318:
279:
133:
437:
414:
396:
385:
363:
321:
305:
281:
256:
239:
222:
205:
169:
56:
331:
183:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
453:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
409:
315:
276:
425:
373:
359:
193:
149:
399:
based on the claim that the radio station produces much of its own content (see also
78:
349:
53:
108:
404:
355:
70:
62:
370:
Am finding everything for a
Baltimore radio station but nothing on this
447:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
293:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
269:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
104:
100:
96:
168:
299:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
275:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
231:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
424:(If it did then these would've all been kept?), –
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
461:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:
8:
368:..... I did use Google as I clearly stated "
246:Note: This debate has been included in the
229:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:list of Wales-related deletion discussions
245:
228:
214:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
211:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
438:18:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
415:17:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
386:13:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
364:08:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
322:05:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
306:02:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
282:12:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
57:00:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
257:15:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
240:15:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
223:15:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
206:13:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
478:
450:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
395:I believe this passes
338:, it is mentioned in
308:
284:
259:
242:
225:
469:
452:
435:
430:
401:WP:BCASTOUTCOMES
383:
378:
353:
304:
298:
296:
294:
274:
272:
270:
255:
238:
221:
203:
198:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
477:
476:
472:
471:
470:
468:
467:
466:
465:
459:deletion review
448:
431:
426:
413:
379:
374:
347:
309:
300:
289:
287:
285:
265:
263:
251:
234:
217:
199:
194:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
475:
473:
464:
463:
443:
442:
441:
440:
418:
417:
407:
390:
389:
388:
297:
286:
273:
262:
261:
260:
243:
226:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
474:
462:
460:
456:
451:
445:
444:
439:
436:
434:
429:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
411:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
387:
384:
382:
377:
371:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
354:for comment.
351:
345:
344:OFCOM license
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
324:
323:
320:
317:
313:
307:
303:
302:North America
295:
292:
283:
280:
278:
271:
268:
258:
254:
253:North America
249:
244:
241:
237:
236:North America
232:
227:
224:
220:
219:North America
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
202:
197:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
449:
446:
432:
427:
397:WP:BROADCAST
392:
380:
375:
369:
342:, it has an
327:
311:
310:
288:
264:
200:
195:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
156:free images
346:. Tagging
316:Matt294069
277:Sam Sailor
455:talk page
393:Weak keep
340:this book
319:is coming
37:talk page
457:or in a
291:Relisted
267:Relisted
115:View log
71:Point FM
63:Point FM
39:or in a
350:Bearcat
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
405:clpo13
312:Delete
134:Google
92:delete
50:delete
428:Davey
376:Davey
328:Keep:
196:Davey
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
433:2010
410:talk
381:2010
360:talk
356:JMWt
336:here
334:and
332:here
201:2010
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
184:TWL
113:– (
362:)
250:.
233:.
216:.
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
412:)
408:(
358:(
352::
348:@
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.