746:. However, there is definitely a difference between this article and the one for Hansen-Aarøen. There are numerous articles written specifically about Pipi, in Spanish, Japanese and English, while the coverage for Hansen-Aarøen is relatively small. While I am surprised that the coverage for Hansen-Aarøen hasn't been larger, it just isn't enough to satisfy
812:
article looks very promising in terms of passing GNG, but is subscription locked. However you cannot argue that there are less sources for Pipi or Mejbri, because you are including articles about transfer speculation, the eventual transfer and brief mentions in articles - of which both Pipi and
264:
in his cohort (according to the
Guardian). The heck more do you want. He plays for Real Madrid, one of the top and most famous teams in the world, in a top league, so he meets NFOOTBALL, and he meets the GNG too as there are 11 refs which is enough to support this reasonably-sized article.
886:. Numerous sources, all signifying his notability as future prospects for Real Madrid. The coverage from Guardian also further adds to his notability. His international play for Japan U-15 didn't establish notability, but coupled with others he is surely notable.
470:. I also found several articles in Japanese about the subject but I'm not knowledgeable enough about Japanese media to know which ones are reliable so those do not factor into my opinion. All in all, it is my opinion that the subject comfortably passes
807:
You're the one who brought up Hansen-Aarøen earlier in this AfD, and from that moment it became clear why exactly you have started this. If I'd seen the AfD for Hansen-Aarøen, and seen the sources provided, I probably would've voted keep -
813:
Mejbri have (minus Pipi from transfer speculation because there have never been any rumours about him leaving Madrid). These kinds of articles are not really enough to suffice for GNG, from what I've gathered in my time on
Knowledge.
792:
are just the examples as there is no logic and consistency in assessment of young footballers' notability. For example, Spanish, Japanese and
Malaysian newspapers are good for GNG, but, say, Norway newspapers are not reliable?
585:
again. Never explains why 'Player A' meets GNG and 'Player B' fails GNG. No explanation, just pure subjective opinion. I think that the lack of consistency and strict criteria about reliable sources is highly damaging.
540:. In the case of Mejbri, as good as the Le Parisien article is, GNG requires multiple significant sources over some time for the subject to pass. For the record, Mejbri seems to pass with the sources in his article.
203:
532:
I can't comment on the quality of the articles in the case of Isak Hansen-Aarøen as none of them are referenced in his AFD. Substantial articles in those publications would definitely go towards
789:
743:
689:
366:
467:
696:
Knowledge's policy is that each of these processes is not decided based on a head count, but on the strength of the arguments presented and on the formation of consensus.
197:
164:
346:
511:
are not? Goal.com and AS.com are good sources? Then in another case the same sources are 'not enough' to keep the article. Such a shame that such bias exists. --
742:- It is clear that you have started this AfD as you feel there is not much difference between Pipi and Isak Hansen-Aarøen, whose page you created and was later
279:
Not every Real Madrid youngster is notable and not every 'wonderkid' in The
Guardian's list of '60 of the best young talents in world football' is notable. --
722:
111:
96:
759:
416:
260:
and really articles like this should not be nominated for destruction, that's not what AfD is for. For notability, he's one of the top 50 players
420:
834:
While wunderkids are not always notable, there's clearly enough sourcing here across different languages to support an article. Easily passes
809:
751:
137:
132:
141:
296:- he has never actually played a match for Real Madrid, so in fact he doesn't meet NFOOTBALL, as the nominator correctly states...... --
852:
124:
755:
536:. If there were multiple articles from them of a similar quality as the Le Parisien article then Hansen-Aarøen probably passes
322:. One game or 100 games, there always has do be significant coverage (which I believe is the case here, as I argue for below).
91:
84:
17:
218:
386:
462:
GNG requires multiple reliable sources so they all contribute to it. There is more substantial coverage found, for instance
185:
626:
There is surprisingly a lot of coverage for this young player, I feel there is more than enough around to easily pass GNG.
62:
105:
101:
294:"He plays for Real Madrid, one of the top and most famous teams in the world, in a top league, so he meets NFOOTBALL"
818:
785:
775:
942:
798:
707:
591:
516:
446:
284:
247:
179:
40:
925:
895:
874:
857:
822:
802:
779:
731:
711:
677:
654:
635:
614:
595:
572:
549:
520:
483:
450:
436:
396:
378:
358:
331:
305:
288:
274:
251:
66:
767:
844:
504:
488:
Maybe that's enough, maybe not, I just don't understand the logic of some posters. For example, in one case
175:
58:
702:) provided some specific sources, the others said about some 'coverage' and 'GNG' without any arguments. --
463:
611:
569:
393:
301:
128:
314:
does not mean the subject is automatically notable. It only means that the subject is likely to have the
938:
814:
771:
270:
36:
225:
794:
703:
602:
587:
527:
512:
457:
442:
280:
243:
673:
650:
311:
235:
211:
763:
424:
839:
891:
608:
580:
566:
545:
489:
479:
432:
390:
374:
354:
327:
297:
120:
80:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
937:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
191:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
412:
315:
266:
870:
683:
631:
565:- I agree the coverage is beyond that usually given to young prospects and he meets GNG.
920:
726:
669:
646:
54:
904:
883:
835:
747:
665:
537:
533:
471:
408:
319:
239:
788:(I doubt you have already checked all the sources). Hansen-Aarøen, Hannibal Mejbri,
887:
699:
541:
475:
428:
370:
350:
323:
158:
508:
866:
627:
500:
441:
Two
Spanish newspapers and Goal.com NXGN Series, is it enough to pass GNG? --
784:
We discuss Pipi here. If you want to discuss Hansen-Aarøen sources welcome
495:
is enough for GNG, in the other he states that multiple newspaper mentions
770:
Japanese article (and many other
Japanese articles) are more than enough.
499:. With no explanation. Le Parisien is 'is very significant' while
933:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
415:
available that goes into the subject in detail, including from
664:: The subject has received significant coverage and meets
865:
Clearly meets GNG with extensive international coverage.
688:
Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process,
496:
492:
154:
150:
146:
607:
stop badgering participants / being rude and uncivil.
210:
389:'s list of association football-related deletions.
367:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
945:). No further edits should be made to this page.
721:Note: This discussion has been included in the
365:Note: This discussion has been included in the
345:Note: This discussion has been included in the
347:list of Football-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
903:- despite not passing the SNG, he does meet
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
385:Note: This discussion has been included in
723:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
720:
364:
344:
493:states that 1 article in French newspaper
7:
464:this article from China's Sina.com
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
907:due to significant coverage in
698:Only one person in discussion (
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
919:and other major publications
690:it does not operate like one
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
962:
823:14:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
803:13:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
780:12:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
732:17:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
712:13:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
678:13:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
655:13:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
636:11:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
615:17:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
596:11:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
573:11:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
550:16:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
521:15:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
484:14:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
451:13:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
437:11:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
397:10:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
379:07:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
359:07:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
332:14:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
306:13:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
289:07:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
275:07:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
252:05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
935:Please do not modify it.
468:this from the Daily Mail
32:Please do not modify it.
926:21:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
896:03:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
875:23:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
858:18:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
505:Manchester Evening News
67:05:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
790:Luqman Hakim Shamsudin
497:are not enough for GNG
85:Articles for deletion
577:Double standards by
413:significant coverage
387:WikiProject Football
316:significant coverage
55:(non-admin closure)
59:Extraordinary Writ
734:
399:
381:
361:
121:Pipi (footballer)
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
73:Pipi (footballer)
57:
953:
923:
855:
847:
815:Davidlofgren1996
772:Davidlofgren1996
729:
645:: As per above.
606:
584:
531:
461:
384:
229:
228:
214:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
961:
960:
956:
955:
954:
952:
951:
950:
949:
943:deletion review
921:
917:El Confidencial
882:Clearly passed
851:
843:
795:Corwin of Amber
727:
704:Corwin of Amber
603:Corwin of Amber
600:
588:Corwin of Amber
578:
528:Corwin of Amber
525:
513:Corwin of Amber
458:Corwin of Amber
455:
443:Corwin of Amber
417:El Confidencial
281:Corwin of Amber
244:Corwin of Amber
171:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
959:
957:
948:
947:
929:
928:
898:
877:
860:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
736:
735:
717:
716:
715:
714:
639:
638:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
401:
400:
382:
362:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
232:
231:
168:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
958:
946:
944:
940:
936:
931:
930:
927:
924:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
878:
876:
872:
868:
864:
861:
859:
856:
854:
848:
846:
841:
840:SportingFlyer
837:
833:
830:
824:
820:
816:
811:
806:
805:
804:
800:
796:
791:
787:
783:
782:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
738:
737:
733:
730:
724:
719:
718:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
691:
685:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
616:
613:
610:
604:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
582:
576:
575:
574:
571:
568:
564:
561:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
529:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
459:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
398:
395:
392:
388:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
934:
932:
916:
912:
908:
900:
879:
862:
850:
842:
831:
739:
695:
687:
661:
642:
641:
640:
623:
581:GiantSnowman
562:
490:GiantSnowman
411:as there is
404:
312:WP:NFOOTBALL
298:ChrisTheDude
293:
262:in the world
261:
257:
236:WP:NFOOTBALL
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
766:as well as
509:Aftenposten
267:Herostratus
198:free images
750:, whereas
501:Nettavisen
939:talk page
922:Spiderone
728:Spiderone
670:ColinBear
647:ColinBear
425:Diario AS
407:- Passes
37:talk page
941:or in a
684:WP:AFDEQ
421:Goal.com
318:to pass
310:Passing
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
888:SunDawn
744:deleted
700:Alvaldi
666:WP: GNG
612:Snowman
570:Snowman
542:Alvaldi
476:Alvaldi
429:Alvaldi
394:Snowman
371:SunDawn
351:SunDawn
324:Alvaldi
204:WP refs
192:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
905:WP:GNG
884:WP:GNG
836:WP:GNG
748:WP:GNG
694:Also:
538:WP:GNG
534:WP:GNG
472:WP:GNG
409:WP:GNG
320:WP:GNG
240:WP:GNG
234:Fails
176:Google
142:delete
909:Marca
867:Nfitz
628:Govvy
609:Giant
567:Giant
391:Giant
219:JSTOR
180:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
901:Keep
892:talk
880:Keep
871:talk
863:Keep
832:Keep
819:talk
810:this
799:talk
786:here
776:talk
768:this
764:this
760:this
756:this
752:this
740:Keep
708:talk
682:Per
674:talk
662:Keep
651:talk
643:Keep
632:talk
624:Keep
592:talk
563:Keep
546:talk
517:talk
480:talk
466:and
447:talk
433:talk
423:and
405:Keep
375:talk
355:talk
328:talk
302:talk
285:talk
271:talk
258:Keep
248:talk
242:. --
238:and
212:FENS
186:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
668:.
226:TWL
163:– (
915:,
913:AS
911:,
894:)
873:)
838:.
821:)
801:)
793:--
778:)
762:,
758:,
754:,
725:.
710:)
686::
676:)
653:)
634:)
594:)
586:--
548:)
519:)
507:,
503:,
482:)
474:.
449:)
435:)
427:.
419:,
377:)
369:.
357:)
349:.
330:)
304:)
287:)
273:)
250:)
206:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
52:.
890:(
869:(
853:C
849:·
845:T
817:(
797:(
774:(
706:(
692:.
672:(
649:(
630:(
605::
601:@
590:(
583::
579:@
544:(
530::
526:@
515:(
478:(
460::
456:@
445:(
431:(
373:(
353:(
326:(
300:(
283:(
269:(
246:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.