Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Publican Party - Knowledge

Source 📝

132:
While this particular party is a bit more notable than the other ones I've nominated for merger/deletion, I don't feel that the Publician Party quite measures up to notability standards and therefore ought to be dropped or merged. I do feel that this one is a bit more of a borderline case (it did
133:
get over 5000 votes in the Scottish Parliament elections last time), but it still has the same feel as a number of the other one-shot parties I've brought up, and therefore I think it should probably go in the same pile as the rest of them (for merger or deletion).
152: 256: 282: 125: 172:
into the necessary Scottish Parliament election article. They have stood more than once, I'm sure of it, but they are no longer registered with the EC.
92: 87: 96: 79: 17: 193:- is it wise to merge it into the Scottish Parliament election article, when they also stood in the 2005 UK general election? 49: 151:- looks pretty clear-cut to me; it may not have polled well, but 5,000 votes is a considerable tally, and there was 330: 36: 48:. No arguments for deletion except the nominator. The issue of merging can continue on the article's talk page ( 329:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
311: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
315: 297: 271: 246: 223: 202: 181: 164: 142: 61: 293: 214:- definitely should be included - there are more sources that could be used, it just needs a little work. 83: 198: 160: 57: 75: 67: 307: 177: 289: 219: 138: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232: 194: 156: 53: 242: 237: 267: 173: 215: 134: 113: 231:- actual political party. I only made a few small adjustments but yes, this 263: 323:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120: 109: 105: 101: 257:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
306:Evidently notable as even the nominator tells us. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 333:). No further edits should be made to this page. 283:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 8: 153:plenty of coverage of the party at the time 277: 251: 281:: This debate has been included in the 255:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 350: 326:Please do not modify it. 316:08:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 298:03:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 272:21:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 247:16:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 224:10:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 203:09:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 182:22:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 165:13:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 143:06:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 62:00:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 233:needs cleanup, not afd 44:The result was 300: 286: 274: 260: 50:non-admin closure 341: 328: 287: 261: 123: 117: 99: 34: 349: 348: 344: 343: 342: 340: 339: 338: 337: 331:deletion review 324: 180: 119: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 347: 345: 336: 335: 319: 318: 308:Colonel Warden 301: 275: 249: 226: 208: 207: 206: 205: 185: 184: 176: 167: 130: 129: 76:Publican Party 70: 68:Publican Party 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 346: 334: 332: 327: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 299: 295: 291: 284: 280: 276: 273: 269: 265: 258: 254: 250: 248: 245: 244: 240: 239: 234: 230: 227: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 209: 204: 201: 200: 196: 192: 189: 188: 187: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 140: 136: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 325: 322: 303: 290:TexasAndroid 278: 252: 241: 236: 228: 211: 197: 190: 169: 159: 148: 131: 45: 43: 31: 28: 195:Warofdreams 157:Warofdreams 54:Ron Ritzman 126:View log 243:Milenko 216:Smartse 191:Comment 174:doktorb 135:Tyrenon 93:protect 88:history 121:delete 97:delete 178:words 170:Merge 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 312:talk 304:Keep 294:talk 279:Note 268:talk 264:Artw 253:Note 229:Keep 220:talk 212:Keep 199:talk 161:talk 149:Keep 139:talk 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 46:keep 288:-- 238:Zab 314:) 296:) 285:. 270:) 259:. 235:. 222:) 155:. 141:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:) 310:( 292:( 266:( 262:— 218:( 137:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
non-admin closure
Ron Ritzman
talk
00:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Publican Party
Publican Party
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Tyrenon
talk
06:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
plenty of coverage of the party at the time
Warofdreams
talk
13:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
doktorb
words
22:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Warofdreams

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.