Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Publican Party (3rd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

470:
I thank the nominator for using my "template" for AfD nominations, my influence is finally rubbing off! I agree that this party has not proven notability. I do accept that some coverage was made of them but ultimately their achievements are minimal to non-existent, and outside proving they exist, the
252:
which are active parties that are running candidates show there are recent precedents for the wider Knowledge community agreeing that not all political parties are notable, and notability does not attach itself to political parties as a right. This article has sources, but no evidence of
488:- I would agree with the above arguments that the party fails to meet notability requirements. They attracted some passing interest at the time, but nothing that would mean lasting notability and their electoral performance would certainly not be enough to justify an article. 213: 81: 361:- as the article itself says, the party was only a minor party, and only existed for a couple of years. I do not recall this political party ever getting a single mention on the BBC news. 298: 318: 261:
and general achievement. This former political party has no evidence of achievement or notability prior to, or following, elections in its 2 years of existence 14 years ago.
207: 174: 471:
coverage does not prove notable achievements. Standing for election is what I'd expect from a political party and that shouldn't be enough to host a Knowledge article.
338: 278: 76: 425:
since the party did not gather enough popularity or coverage to establish notability, plus there is so little content that no sections have been created. --
121: 106: 446: 458: 392: 147: 142: 151: 497: 480: 462: 429: 417: 396: 370: 350: 330: 310: 290: 270: 61: 134: 101: 94: 17: 228: 195: 115: 111: 514: 40: 189: 245: 442: 185: 454: 388: 366: 138: 510: 249: 36: 235: 346: 342: 326: 322: 306: 302: 286: 282: 266: 262: 130: 67: 476: 244:
Knowledge is not a gazetteer of political parties. Recent discussions and consequent deletions for
221: 57: 379:
Getting mentioned on the BBC News isn't a great test of notability. Even then, the BBC wrote a
450: 413: 384: 362: 90: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
509:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
493: 201: 426: 472: 53: 258: 254: 409: 438: 380: 168: 489: 505:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
437:
passes GNG as it is the primary subject of articles from
164: 160: 156: 220: 82:
Articles for deletion/Publican Party (3rd nomination)
299:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
319:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 517:). No further edits should be made to this page. 337:Note: This discussion has been included in the 317:Note: This discussion has been included in the 297:Note: This discussion has been included in the 277:Note: This discussion has been included in the 339:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 279:list of Scotland-related deletion discussions 234: 8: 122:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 336: 316: 296: 276: 74: 7: 77:Articles for deletion/Publican Party 24: 107:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 408:. Coud not find any sig cov. 97:(AfD)? Read these primers! 534: 498:22:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 481:23:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 463:17:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 430:11:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC) 418:21:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 397:17:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 371:19:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 351:19:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 331:19:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 311:19:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 291:19:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 271:19:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 62:02:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC) 445:and industry publication 507:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 246:Independent Green Voice 73:AfDs for this article: 447:The Morning Advertiser 250:Scottish Family Party 95:Articles for deletion 383:on them in 2005. 353: 333: 313: 293: 112:Guide to deletion 102:How to contribute 525: 239: 238: 224: 172: 154: 92: 34: 533: 532: 528: 527: 526: 524: 523: 522: 521: 515:deletion review 479: 181: 145: 129: 126: 89: 86: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 531: 529: 520: 519: 501: 500: 483: 475: 465: 432: 420: 402: 401: 400: 399: 374: 373: 355: 354: 334: 314: 294: 242: 241: 178: 131:Publican Party 125: 124: 119: 109: 104: 87: 85: 84: 79: 72: 70: 68:Publican Party 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 530: 518: 516: 512: 508: 503: 502: 499: 495: 491: 487: 484: 482: 478: 474: 469: 466: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 433: 431: 428: 424: 421: 419: 415: 411: 407: 404: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381:whole article 378: 377: 376: 375: 372: 368: 364: 360: 357: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 274: 273: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 251: 247: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 187: 184: 183:Find sources: 179: 176: 170: 166: 162: 158: 153: 149: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 127: 123: 120: 117: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 99: 98: 96: 91: 83: 80: 78: 75: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 506: 504: 485: 467: 451:PinkPanda272 434: 422: 405: 385:PinkPanda272 363:Rollo August 358: 243: 231: 225: 217: 210: 204: 198: 192: 182: 88: 49: 47: 31: 28: 208:free images 443:The Herald 343:Angryskies 323:Angryskies 303:Angryskies 283:Angryskies 263:Angryskies 511:talk page 54:Barkeep49 37:talk page 513:or in a 459:contribs 439:BBC News 427:K. Peake 393:contribs 175:View log 116:glossary 39:or in a 473:doktorb 410:JBchrch 214:WP refs 202:scholar 148:protect 143:history 93:New to 490:Dunarc 486:Delete 468:Delete 423:Delete 406:Delete 359:Delete 259:WP:ORG 255:WP:GNG 186:Google 152:delete 50:delete 477:words 229:JSTOR 190:books 169:views 161:watch 157:links 16:< 494:talk 455:talk 435:Keep 414:talk 389:talk 367:talk 347:talk 327:talk 307:talk 287:talk 267:talk 257:and 248:and 222:FENS 196:news 165:logs 139:talk 135:edit 58:talk 236:TWL 173:– ( 496:) 461:) 449:. 441:, 416:) 395:) 369:) 349:) 341:. 329:) 321:. 309:) 301:. 289:) 281:. 269:) 216:) 167:| 163:| 159:| 155:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 60:) 52:. 492:( 457:/ 453:( 412:( 391:/ 387:( 365:( 345:( 325:( 305:( 285:( 265:( 240:) 232:· 226:· 218:· 211:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 188:( 180:( 177:) 171:) 133:( 118:) 114:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Barkeep49
talk
02:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Publican Party
Articles for deletion/Publican Party
Articles for deletion/Publican Party (3rd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Publican Party
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.