566:
Hornet is a social networking site, which, by its own description, includes curated content. The key measure of reliability is that a the source has a good reputation for fact checking and that it is working in its fact-reporting voice. The Hornet article relies heavily on what Raging
Stallion and
967:
this is the third time I ask you to leave me alone. stop chasing me around. I told him to do it and I didn't do it myself because I didn't want to "still" sources he found. it would take me less than 5 minutes to include them. all you have to do is to write one sentence and put the source, done. if
677:, seem to think others should drop everything their working on to prove you wrong. I did that last week and I’m no longer willing to play your game. If you’re not willing or able to do the needed research then move onto something you are good at, it’s unfair to make others clean up your mistakes.
836:. An editor opens themselves up to criticism, however, when they do not follow the required steps for deletion discussions. I have no ill intent in saying this: I would encourage you to slow down on the deletion nominations and do thorough BEFORE checks on each. That's just my opinion, though. --
242:
The sources do not prove any notability. I did some research myself and spite the company name comes out a lot (it's a company in the show business after all) I couldn't find any independent, extended, in-depth, secondary source which is what it is needed to establish notability.
775:
would have shown this company is notable. Not all gay porn articles are the same. I found six articles solely about the company (not including the XBIZ ones). I have no problem with deletion nominations, but editors must carry out the appropriate steps beforehand.
633:
this is not the fist time you personal attack me. I have created an article and improved many. So far when I have nominated an article, most of the times, was deleted because my nomination was right. now, leave me alone and if you care improve the source.
745:
you shall see that being a big company doesn't necessarily imply being notable. I will keep nominating all the bad article that I can't improve myself. so far it seems that 90% of my nominations where right and wikipedia encourage us to be bold.
418:
with only trivial mentions by independent reliable secondary sources. Porn trade press consists of repackaged press releases and routine announcements. Porn or mainstream, industry awards count for little, if anything, towards
985:
Second, the sources don’t have to be slapped onto an article to satisfy AFD. For AFD we only have to prove a good article is *possible*. If you’re not able to understand that it might not be a good area for you to practice.
211:
533:
for "instinct" you are right actually, is "Hornet" a blog?. anyhow, those sources are either focused only on the fact that the company is doing bare back movies or are mentions. not a significant coverage as required in
52:. Disregarding the comments on contributors, rather than content; there appears to be consensus that the available sources indicate that the subject of the article meets the relevant notability guidelines.
946:
Again, that’s not how this works. All anyone has to do is show that a good article is possible, not actually improve the article. Someone else will have to do the actual work of improving the article.
391:
552:
I fixed the link. Sorry about that. Hornet is a news site, and has bylines. As for the mentions, they describe the subject well. But the first three articles are in depth in RS. --
1099:
I perfectly know what you are doing, you are pushing and pushing me to make me react so you can make me block on wikipedia, I just hope that someone will see this and help me. --
205:
716:
It does seem somewhat odd that for an editor that focuses so much on deletion of gay porn bios, you wouldn't know Raging
Stallion is a major player in that field. Was a
328:
1011:, which states, "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination." --
1032:
If you don't mind i will add your sources to the article as at the moment there are no reliable good sources and withdraw the nomination. thank you for finding them.--
308:
164:
461:
457:
611:. A disruptive nom at best. Raging Stallion is the largest gay porn producer in the world. Easily meets GNG, etc. Nom, again, has willfully ignored following
968:
in a few hours he didn't do it I will do it myself and than withdraw the nomination as I believe that these sources are good enough to prove notability. --
371:
137:
132:
111:
351:
141:
96:
652:
but it seems that more than one here believes that everything related to porn should have a free pass to wikipedia no matter if there are no sources. --
492:
none of these is an article about raging stallion, they are all article about people who work for raging stallion and incidental mention of the studio.
171:
124:
797:
is this a trial? I searched for sources but I kept finding only mentions related to porn actor that have worked with them. i added your sources. --
741:
I know raging stalion for being a big company in the gay porn industry, what I didn't know is that it is actually notable. I f you read carefully
465:
673:
Cleaning up articles is fine, deleting ones on notable subjects is not. You don’t seem to recognize the difference and in violation of
226:
1129:. I could care less if you get blocked, what I care about is you keep trying to delete these articles on notable gay porn subjects.
348:
193:
879:
when you say other who do you refer to? so far Kbabej is the only one who showed some sources(three that pass passing mention). --
441:
287:
91:
84:
17:
187:
1104:
1079:
1037:
973:
937:
903:
884:
802:
751:
700:
657:
639:
543:
499:
266:
248:
128:
1138:
1108:
1083:
1062:
1041:
1020:
995:
977:
955:
941:
923:
888:
872:
845:
806:
785:
755:
729:
704:
686:
661:
643:
624:
603:
576:
561:
547:
521:
503:
477:
432:
403:
383:
363:
340:
320:
299:
270:
252:
66:
932:
can you just shortly include them into the article and let me know when you are down so that withdraw my nomination.--
105:
101:
720:
done on this? You've been asked in the past to slow down on article deletion. Not all gay porn bios are the same. --
183:
445:
1153:
40:
233:
1100:
1075:
1048:
1033:
1007:
Only the existence of sources needs to be found; they do not need to be added to the article. Please review
1002:
969:
933:
880:
868:
827:
798:
762:
747:
711:
696:
653:
635:
539:
495:
281:
262:
244:
120:
72:
599:
1149:
1134:
991:
951:
682:
620:
36:
199:
62:
742:
692:
649:
535:
420:
359:
336:
316:
219:
648:
Is this your own opinion or it can be proved by sources? so far I can't see any source fulfilling
864:
902:
on how "Raging
Stallion’s Move to Bareback Sex Marks a Huge Shift in Today’s Gay Porn"; an Xtra
595:
572:
428:
399:
379:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1148:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
982:
You’re not getting it. First, I’m not following you around, I’m watching for articles at AFD.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1130:
1094:
1074:
Done, if you have time give it a look, as you can see my english is not that good at all. --
1058:
1016:
987:
962:
947:
919:
841:
781:
772:
768:
725:
717:
678:
667:
666:
There is no personal attack, I’m pointing out you’ve again made mistakes, and again ignored
616:
612:
557:
517:
473:
295:
415:
58:
911:
449:
899:
674:
355:
332:
312:
54:
1126:
1008:
860:
833:
568:
424:
395:
375:
158:
1069:
1054:
1027:
1012:
915:
856:
837:
792:
777:
736:
721:
553:
528:
513:
487:
469:
291:
508:
Did you even look at the articles? The
Instinct, Out, and Hornet articles are
832:
My intention isn't to make this into a trial, and I'm trying to be civil and
695:, than if you have sources that fulfill it add it and stop talking to me. --
898:. I did more digging and found three further sources. There's a Hornet
468:". I think there's definitely enough to support a short article. --
456:
has tons of articles on the studio. PinkNews called the studio a "
453:
1144:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
615:
and should likely be banned from Xfd for their disruption.
859:
and others have found more than indicate notability under
392:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
452:
about the release of a controversial film; and others.
154:
150:
146:
906:
on a how Raging
Stallion did a porn spoof of the film
218:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1156:). No further edits should be made to this page.
390:Note: This discussion has been included in the
370:Note: This discussion has been included in the
327:Note: This discussion has been included in the
307:Note: This discussion has been included in the
329:list of California-related deletion discussions
466:one of America's biggest producers of gay porn
444:about when the studio decided to go bareback;
309:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
232:
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
448:about incorporating a MAGA hat in a film;
389:
369:
326:
306:
372:list of Film-related deletion discussions
347:Note: This debate has been added to the
567:its filmmakers say. Not very strong.
7:
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
914:by GayDemon, a NSFW website. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
290:to have this AfD withdrawn. --
1:
1053:Sounds good to me. Thanks! --
767:WP does encourage editors to
1125:No, you are again violating
670:, these are apparent facts.
464:". Vice called the studio "
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1173:
1139:04:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
1109:21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1084:22:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1063:21:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1042:21:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1021:17:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
996:13:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
978:13:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
956:12:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
942:09:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
924:00:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
889:22:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
873:21:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
846:22:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
807:21:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
786:21:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
756:21:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
730:00:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
705:10:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
687:10:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
662:09:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
644:09:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
625:09:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
604:19:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
577:01:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
562:19:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
548:18:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
522:18:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
504:18:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
478:17:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
433:15:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
404:11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
384:11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
364:09:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
341:09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
321:09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
300:22:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
271:22:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
253:09:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
1146:Please do not modify it.
440:. There's coverage from
286:You will need to follow
67:01:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
512:about the studio. ?? --
349:WikiProject Pornography
121:Raging Stallion Studios
73:Raging Stallion Studios
259:Withdrawn by nominator
85:Articles for deletion
912:very in depth review
55:(non-admin closure)
1101:AlejandroLeloirRey
1076:AlejandroLeloirRey
1049:AlejandroLeloirRey
1034:AlejandroLeloirRey
1003:AlejandroLeloirRey
970:AlejandroLeloirRey
934:AlejandroLeloirRey
881:AlejandroLeloirRey
828:AlejandroLeloirRey
799:AlejandroLeloirRey
763:AlejandroLeloirRey
748:AlejandroLeloirRey
712:AlejandroLeloirRey
697:AlejandroLeloirRey
654:AlejandroLeloirRey
636:AlejandroLeloirRey
540:AlejandroLeloirRey
496:AlejandroLeloirRey
282:AlejandroLeloirRey
263:AlejandroLeloirRey
245:AlejandroLeloirRey
855:the sources that
771:, but a thorough
406:
386:
352:list of deletions
343:
323:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
1164:
1098:
1073:
1052:
1031:
1006:
966:
908:Clockwork Orange
831:
796:
766:
740:
715:
532:
491:
366:
285:
237:
236:
222:
174:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1154:deletion review
1092:
1067:
1046:
1025:
1000:
960:
825:
790:
760:
734:
709:
691:Read carefully
594:as per Kbabej--
526:
485:
346:
279:
179:
170:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1170:
1168:
1159:
1158:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
983:
927:
926:
892:
891:
876:
875:
849:
848:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
671:
646:
628:
627:
606:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
481:
480:
435:
423:requirements.
408:
407:
387:
367:
344:
324:
304:
303:
302:
274:
273:
240:
239:
176:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1169:
1157:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1096:
1091:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1004:
999:
998:
997:
993:
989:
984:
981:
980:
979:
975:
971:
964:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
894:
893:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
874:
870:
866:
865:Cardiffbear88
862:
858:
854:
851:
850:
847:
843:
839:
835:
829:
824:
808:
804:
800:
794:
789:
788:
787:
783:
779:
774:
770:
764:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
744:
738:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
713:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
669:
665:
664:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
645:
641:
637:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
589:
578:
574:
570:
565:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
530:
525:
524:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
417:
413:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
345:
342:
338:
334:
330:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
283:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
173:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1145:
1143:
907:
895:
852:
743:WP:CORPDEPTH
693:WP:CORPDEPTH
650:WP:CORPDEPTH
608:
591:
536:WP:CORPDEPTH
509:
484:
462:high profile
458:major studio
437:
421:WP:CORPDEPTH
411:
258:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
167:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1131:Gleeanon409
1095:Gleeanon409
988:Gleeanon409
963:Gleeanon409
948:Gleeanon409
679:Gleeanon409
617:Gleeanon409
288:these steps
206:free images
59:Jack Frost
1150:talk page
773:WP:BEFORE
769:WP:BEBOLD
718:WP:BEFORE
668:WP:Before
613:WP:Before
596:Yiğitcank
569:• Gene93k
425:• Gene93k
396:• Gene93k
376:• Gene93k
356:Shellwood
333:Shellwood
313:Shellwood
37:talk page
1152:or in a
910:; and a
446:Out News
442:Instinct
416:WP:NCORP
414:. Fails
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
904:article
900:article
896:Comment
675:WP:DINC
460:" and "
212:WP refs
200:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
1127:WP:AGF
1070:Kbabej
1055:Kbabej
1028:Kbabej
1013:Kbabej
1009:WP:AFD
916:Kbabej
861:WP:GNG
857:Kbabej
838:Kbabej
834:WP:AGF
793:Kbabej
778:Kbabej
737:Kbabej
722:Kbabej
554:Kbabej
529:Kbabej
514:Kbabej
510:solely
488:Kbabej
470:Kbabej
450:Hornet
412:Delete
292:Kbabej
184:Google
142:delete
227:JSTOR
188:books
172:Stats
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
1135:talk
1105:talk
1080:talk
1059:talk
1038:talk
1017:talk
992:talk
974:talk
952:talk
938:talk
920:talk
885:talk
869:talk
853:Keep
842:talk
803:talk
782:talk
752:talk
726:talk
701:talk
683:talk
658:talk
640:talk
621:talk
609:Keep
600:talk
592:Keep
573:talk
558:talk
544:talk
518:talk
500:talk
474:talk
454:XBIZ
438:Keep
429:talk
400:talk
380:talk
360:talk
337:talk
317:talk
296:talk
267:talk
249:talk
220:FENS
194:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
234:TWL
163:– (
1137:)
1107:)
1082:)
1061:)
1040:)
1019:)
994:)
976:)
954:)
940:)
922:)
887:)
871:)
863:.
844:)
805:)
784:)
776:--
754:)
746:--
728:)
703:)
685:)
660:)
642:)
634:--
623:)
602:)
575:)
560:)
546:)
538:--
520:)
502:)
494:--
476:)
431:)
402:)
394:.
382:)
374:.
362:)
354:.
339:)
331:.
319:)
311:.
298:)
269:)
261:--
251:)
214:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
1133:(
1103:(
1097::
1093:@
1078:(
1072::
1068:@
1057:(
1051::
1047:@
1036:(
1030::
1026:@
1015:(
1005::
1001:@
990:(
972:(
965::
961:@
950:(
936:(
918:(
883:(
867:(
840:(
830::
826:@
801:(
795::
791:@
780:(
765::
761:@
750:(
739::
735:@
724:(
714::
710:@
699:(
681:(
656:(
638:(
619:(
598:(
571:(
556:(
542:(
531::
527:@
516:(
498:(
490::
486:@
472:(
427:(
398:(
378:(
358:(
335:(
315:(
294:(
284::
280:@
265:(
247:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
168:·
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.