Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Redfield & Wilton Strategies - Knowledge

Source 📝

200: 194: 134: 129: 138: 377:
Agree on failure of WP:CORP, coverage of a survey conducted by a company does not confer notability on the surveying company. And Savanta, Comres et all, even if we set
256: 121: 161: 280: 108: 93: 327:
doesn't bear on notability: the question is whether there's significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. All I'm seeing is single-sentence
331:, which don't cut it. If in-depth coverage about the company itself is found, I'm glad to reëvaluate, but my searches aren't yielding anything. 215: 182: 415: 390: 367: 340: 315: 306:- not sure why that should warrant a page if Redfield & Wilton Strategies doesn't? Happy to have some clarification though. 291: 272: 248: 176: 63: 88: 81: 17: 172: 125: 336: 222: 117: 102: 98: 69: 349: 432: 386: 40: 406:
is provided. I am sure they had done some work, but none of them are notable enough for inclusion to Knowledge.
332: 188: 428: 36: 382: 328: 307: 268: 244: 208: 378: 363: 311: 58: 411: 284: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
427:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
403: 399: 303: 260: 236: 232: 359: 324: 53: 407: 155: 381:
aside (which we do not) have all been around longer than under a year! Best
423:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
352:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
302:
Most other UK polling firms have Knowledge pages such as
151: 147: 143: 402:. Surely the corporation existed, but nothing that is 207: 358:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 435:). No further edits should be made to this page. 279:Note: This discussion has been included in the 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 257:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 221: 8: 281:list of England-related deletion discussions 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 278: 254: 7: 24: 118:Redfield & Wilton Strategies 94:Introduction to deletion process 70:Redfield & Wilton Strategies 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 452: 425:Please do not modify it. 416:09:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC) 391:13:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC) 368:02:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC) 341:05:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC) 316:23:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC) 292:17:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC) 273:16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC) 249:16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC) 64:01:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 82:Articles for deletion 333:Extraordinary Writ 325:other stuff exists 370: 294: 275: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 443: 357: 355: 353: 329:trivial mentions 323:- the fact that 289: 265: 241: 226: 225: 211: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 451: 450: 446: 445: 444: 442: 441: 440: 439: 433:deletion review 383:Alexandermcnabb 371: 348: 346: 285: 261: 237: 168: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 449: 447: 438: 437: 419: 418: 393: 356: 345: 344: 343: 318: 304:Savanta ComRes 296: 295: 276: 229: 228: 165: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 448: 436: 434: 430: 426: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 394: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 373: 372: 369: 365: 361: 354: 351: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 319: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298: 297: 293: 290: 288: 282: 277: 274: 270: 266: 264: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 240: 234: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170:Find sources: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 424: 422: 395: 374: 347: 320: 299: 287:CAPTAIN RAJU 286: 262: 238: 230: 218: 212: 204: 197: 191: 185: 179: 169: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 379:WP:ITEXISTS 231:Firm fails 195:free images 429:talk page 404:WP:SIGCOV 263:Dewritech 239:Dewritech 37:talk page 431:or in a 400:WP:NCORP 360:Missvain 350:Relisted 308:Mattftom 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 408:SunDawn 233:WP:CORP 201:WP refs 189:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 398:Fails 396:Delete 375:Delete 321:Delete 173:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 216:JSTOR 177:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 412:talk 387:talk 364:talk 337:talk 312:talk 300:Keep 269:talk 245:talk 209:FENS 183:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 271:) 247:) 223:TWL 160:– ( 414:) 389:) 366:) 339:) 314:) 283:. 259:. 235:. 203:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 410:( 385:( 362:( 335:( 310:( 267:( 243:( 227:) 219:· 213:· 205:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 175:( 167:( 164:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
01:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Redfield & Wilton Strategies

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Redfield & Wilton Strategies
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.