205:. I'm not sure if that is enough for the liking of users here, if indeed notability is a 'policy' for the keeping of pages, but it certainly does add something to his notability, at any rate. It's up to everyone else to decide. The page is only a stub at the moment, and would no doubt be developed given the chance.--
156:
It isn't the
Internet that's only for famous people. It's an encyclopedia that's only for influential people. This is an encyclopedia that happens to be on the Internet. As a Marxist, I only noted that anyone who detects higher consciousness in the proletariat and thus becomes an Anarchist is not
278:
Delete. Rubbing elbows with a few top dogs and having dinner with others does not automatically confer notability. I see no body of literature in the reference section, or anything for that matter that would indicate that this gentleman's ideas have much greater following than his reflection in the
113:
I don't see a problem, are we going to delete Marx too because he came up with the idea? Or are we selecting only "special people" for this? Pfft, this isn't what the internet is about, this is perhaps the stupidest arguement "OMg, he's a marxist! Let's kick him off our encyclopedia! But let's keep
255:
I'd just like to note that the page has been edited and expanded with more suitable content. He represents a fairly unique theoretical standpoint and an audience of at least 7500 ain't bad at all. I'm sure we have content on political figures who were involved in much smaller organizations. I also
138:
Oh, good. Just so long as the internet remains only for the influential people! Thank God, that only the influential orators remain in this internet for the demagog. Please, if the only arguement for deletion is because he isn't a "well-renowned and extremely influential writer", then indubitably
196:
He made a point of it at one time, and then pontificated on it a couple of times at his "internet message board home" on request. That is little known at any rate, since he doesn't exactly go around boasting about it. The revealing of that claim came about a character question on
Guevara.
129:; as a published, well-renowned and extremely influential writer his notability is beyond question. I believe it's not so for our friend Red Star, and so far no-one is yet to prove otherwise. If you wish the article to be kept, please indicate why you think this person is notable.
191:
Keep: Redstar2000 claims to have met
Ernesto Guevara in 1964, and had a three-hour discussion, along with a group of students through the use of an interpretor. There is credible evidence to suggest such, as there indeed were two groups of students who visited Cuba in
95:
keep: I don't understand what's wrong with it, and as far as I know the man is not an
Anarchist. Whoever wrote it was not very well informed on the guy, but your comments stink of personal point of view. It needs reworking, but give the guy a
197:
Unfortunately, some of the posts in question the "Chit Chat" forum at the Che-Lives
Community have been deleted, as there was a cropping of posts some times ago, but he can relate more details to you if you ask. Here is one reference:
78:
Ahh...NO. Proletariat Vanity. When you see phrases like "currently 're-thinking the communist project'" and "new communist paradigm", it SCREAMS "hit me with the Delete stick!".
88:
Delete: It's not so
Marxist after all, if it's anarchist, and the proletariat don't never get higher consciousness. You've got to make do with the consciousness it already has.
227:
Fascist, communist or naturist, one website isn't enough to be notable. Not even if he met
Guevara. If more information becomes available I'll change my vote. Delete.
157:
a
Marxist. There are lots of people writing web pages and blogs. When they're famous and influential, they go in an encyclopedia. Redstar2000 isn't that yet.
267:
It's not the quality of the article that's the problem, however, it's whether he should be an encyclopedia at all. On that note, my vote remains unchanged.
260:
created by him, he was amused to find it as was I. I'm still trying to figure out who originally created it, though I have edited it myself a few times--
202:
198:
279:
mirror. I support revolutionary thought, but it does not have a place here unless it has shaped, to some degree, public thought.
184:
The more I think about it, Redstar is more notable than
Gounoud. Or, for that matter, more noteworthy than someone like Hitler.*
164:
If you're looking for a website to publish information about little-known people then this site is indeed a waste of your time.
17:
305:
40:
242:
301:
36:
61:
261:
97:
235:
103:
We may live to regret this when our backs are against the wall after the revolution. Nevertheless,
185:
174:
146:
140:
115:
268:
228:
219:
215:
206:
165:
150:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
300:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
283:
130:
107:
82:
178:
249:
158:
89:
53:
280:
126:
71:
218:
has made only one contribution (to a talk page) other than to this debate.
122:
173:
Delete as non-notable. Comment: If deleted, also delete the redirect
241:
Delete: proletarian vanity. Just when I thought I'd seen it all....
121:
Comment: the argument isn't that he must be deleted because he's a
294:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
70:" with several websites. Indications of notability welcome. --
52:. AfD was never closed or decided. Non-admin closure.
149:
has made no contributions other than to this debate.
68:
alias of a popular and controversial
Marxist writer
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
308:). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:Plus, there is the reference to his 1964 trip
8:
114:Marx because he's all right with me!"*
256:would like to note that the page was
139:this entire site is a waste of time.*
7:
24:
199:Fidel & Major League Baseball
125:. Nobody's suggesting we delete
248:Delete for reasons given above.
234:Delete for reasons given above.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
62:01:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
325:
209:22:51, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)
264:07:03, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)
252:15:10, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
143:22:40, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
118:22:40, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
100:22:38, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)
74:17:58, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
297:Please do not modify it.
188:22:40, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
181:23:42, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
133:23:05, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
110:22:39, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
92:19:24, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
85:18:27, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
288:00:10, 2004 Sep 6 (UTC)
271:09:42, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
245:14:44, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
238:04:46, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
231:04:28, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
222:15:08, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
168:04:28, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
161:02:40, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
153:15:08, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
243:Wile E. Heresiarch
316:
299:
286:
50:procedural close
48:The result was
34:
324:
323:
319:
318:
317:
315:
314:
313:
312:
306:deletion review
295:
284:
262:Che y Marijuana
98:Che y Marijuana
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
322:
320:
311:
310:
290:
289:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
246:
239:
232:
225:
224:
223:
194:
193:
189:
182:
171:
170:
169:
162:
154:
136:
135:
134:
111:
101:
93:
86:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
321:
309:
307:
303:
298:
292:
291:
287:
282:
277:
270:
266:
265:
263:
259:
254:
253:
251:
247:
244:
240:
237:
233:
230:
226:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
208:
204:
200:
190:
187:
183:
180:
176:
172:
167:
163:
160:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
142:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
117:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
94:
91:
87:
84:
81:
77:
76:
75:
73:
69:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
296:
293:
257:
229:DJ Clayworth
220:DJ Clayworth
216:C Blackberry
207:C Blackberry
195:
175:Redstar 2000
166:DJ Clayworth
151:DJ Clayworth
104:
79:
67:
65:
49:
47:
31:
28:
131:Lacrimosus
108:Lacrimosus
302:talk page
236:Fire Star
127:Karl Marx
37:talk page
304:or in a
83:Terrapin
39:or in a
186:Kashkin
179:Rossami
147:Kashkin
141:Kashkin
123:Marxist
116:Kashkin
105:Delete.
96:break--
250:Andris
159:Geogre
90:Geogre
80:Delete
54:Safiel
281:Denni
192:1964.
16:<
269:Ambi
203:here
72:Ianb
58:talk
258:not
177:.
60:)
285:☯
66:"
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.