460:]; 2. Georg Biemann, Kinderbilder für einen Weggefährten: Zur Biographie des Publizisten and Politikwissenschaftlers Reinhard Opitz; in: Forum Wissenschaft, 1/1998, pp. 50-54 (a short biographical sketch); 3.1. Richard Albrecht, Reinhard Opitz´ These von der Bewußtseinsfalsifikation - 30 Jahre später; in: Topos. Internationale Beiträge zur dialektischen Theorie, Novembre 2005, No. 24, pp. 123-146; 3.2. the enlarged online-version, with English summary, is completely free of charge publ. by GRIN Verlag Munich, 2004
365:. It is written in a decent amount on the German wikipedia, so we can definitely expand on the article in the English wikipedia. A total rewrite is needed for the article, and whoever's doing the rewrite should at least know a bit of German, as it seems like 90% of the 200,000+ Google hits on Reinhard Opitz that one could use for research are written in German or in other foreign languages. --
464:]; 4.2. abridged printed version: Internationale wissenschaftliche Korrespondenz zur Geschichte der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung (iwk), 4/2004, pp. 465-487; 4.3. second printed version: Wolfgang Abendroth fĂĽr Einsteiger und Fortgeschrittene, ed. Friedrich-Martin Balzer. CD-Rom; 2nd, enlarged ed.; Bonn: Pahl-Rugenstein, 2006 . Aug. 23, 2006,
457:
feels able to rewrite, perhaps a look on these contributions might be useful: 1.1. Reinhard Opitz: Liberalismus - Faschismus - Integration; Edition in drei Bänden (Bd.1: Liberalismus - Integration, Bd.2: Faschismus; Bd.3: Die »Röhm-Affäre«). BdWi-Verlag, Marburg 2000, 1 450 pp.; 1.2. reviewed by Jean
160:
is actually pretty obvious judging from his article on the German
Knowledge and the hits I get for his name in an online library catalogue (held professorial chairs at several German universities, finally at Marburg; there are at least two festschrifts dedicated to him, one of them proceedings from a
484:
Comment: Abendroth was also respected by political opponents. His personal integrety is e. g. documented by beeing a member of the constitutional courts of the German states of Bremen (1949) and Hesse (1959-1963). It seems there is a rough consence on the notability of
Abendroth and that the article
281:
and therefore it should be "delete": The bulk of this article is a copyvio. The header was by one hand, it seems, and the body by another. The header struggles from non-native idiom, but the body is fairly useless as a recreation of the lead page/review of a book. The author deserves discussion,
432:
So then, if we have some German speakers interested in dead
Marxists, we can close. A problem that remains, though, is that not many people in WP are interested in dead Marxists (unlike baseball players and anime characters). What may happen is that the same crud that nobody here much likes gets
403:. The German article on Abendroth looks fine, and could be the basis for a total rewrite. No fishing of Marxist scholar red herrings over there, thankfully. The one on Opitz is not that great, and does not establish his academic notability that well, though he seems to have a cult.
75:"Reinard Opitz was never invited to an academic position or convened as chair holder a 51 year old German egg-head who had (in the sense of J.W. Goethe) attempted striving to solve one of the still undetected mysteries of social sciences named genesis and prevention of fascism."
165:
from 1988) seems to be somewhat important in left-wing German historiography. Regardless of the quality of the current articles, I can't see how these would be less valuable as subjects of articles than the thousands of insignificant baseball and cricket players we have.
462:]; 3.3. the abridged version in: junge Welt, 26. Novembre 2004, pp. 10-11; 4.1. Richard Albrecht, „...denkt immer an den ´mittleren Funktionär´... Wolfgang Abendroth (2. Mai 1906 bis 15. September 1985); publ. by GRIN-Verlag Munich 2005, completely free of charge:
140:- The articles themselves are junk, but a look at the links inside seem to show that these were both authors of many many books. Someone who could read german would be able to better analyze them.
415:. Often the afd process can be quite helpful in drawing attention to an inadequate article and motivating constructive people to work on improving the it. Sounds like this is the case here.
121:"Dr.iur. Wolfgang Abendroth (1906-1985) was in fact as a Marxist scholar a good red herring, and that's why there is no reason at all either to fish him when stylising him "
282:
but the article is wretched. If anyone closes this as "no consensus" or "keep," I urge him or her to get in there and do some editing to at least remove the fishy chunk.
353:
101:], and tell me whether this man should be a representative of the en-wikipedia-community any longer, or not; su, ma.beauty1atgmx.net
340:
17:
475:
Abendroth, an outstanding political scientist. He has been much more important than either Opitz or
Albrecht, anyhow. --
391:
Strip it back to a stub if needed, and then get some German speakers to help. Also, really needs a few incoming links.
324:: The Leibniz-spoors, Aug. 19, 2006, show a personal annihilation policy of Mr. Leibniz against these three entries:
489:
to withdraw that the page is deleted. I have no account and sign with 4 tildes, which will be converted to my IP.
510:
36:
509:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
183:
I take your point about the notability of
Abendroth. From the article, however, I got the opposite impression.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
349:
493:
479:
437:
419:
407:
395:
383:
286:
271:
238:
205:
187:
170:
148:
131:
105:
52:
490:
345:
102:
392:
201:
Opitz as a fine social scientist and intellectual. But, rewrite the article, this should be done! --
300:
263:
230:
325:
215:
I've added a link to
Reinhard Opitz in the German National Library Catalogue into the article.
157:
115:
49:
476:
202:
145:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
329:
304:
336:- all of them German social scientist & left-wing scholars … M. Falke, Aug. 20, 2006
454:
366:
333:
249:
216:
58:
485:
should be improved on the basis of the German article. Therefore I would like to ask
434:
404:
308:
184:
167:
128:
416:
283:
68:
90:
486:
94:
84:
67:, therefore delete. Most of the page is an advert for an essay from an
81:
Commentary: Beware of pickpockets, tricksters, and academic swindlers
161:
symposium in his name). Opitz (and especially his two-volume work
83:, whether they may have got a Ph.D. or not, name themselves today
503:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
356:) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
125:
for the same reason. They have a certain comedy value, though.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
513:). No further edits should be made to this page.
112:I am also nominating the following related page
8:
433:reinserted by the same anons as before.
458:Cremet in: Jungle World 29. Maerz 2000
307:, which I have nominated for vanity.
71:, in truly horrendous prose. Sample:
7:
303:) concerns material attributed to
24:
248:- Total rewrite is fine by me.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
299:The copyvio (now removed by
163:Faschismus und Neofaschismus
97:. Moreover, please, look at
494:12:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
480:19:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
438:11:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
420:15:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
408:20:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
396:19:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
384:18:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
287:12:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
272:18:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
239:11:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
206:19:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
188:12:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
171:07:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
149:02:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
132:18:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
106:22:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
53:13:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
530:
451:Keep Abendroth. Keep Opitz
506:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
341:single purpose account
279:Total rewrite needed
156:: the notability of
65:Total rewrite needed
301:User_talk:Dlyons493
326:Wolfgang Abendroth
158:Wolfgang Abendroth
116:Wolfgang Abendroth
357:
521:
508:
381:
376:
371:
363:Keep and Rewrite
337:
330:Richard Albrecht
305:Richard Albrecht
269:
266:
261:
258:
255:
252:
236:
233:
228:
225:
222:
219:
34:
529:
528:
524:
523:
522:
520:
519:
518:
517:
511:deletion review
504:
393:StuffOfInterest
377:
372:
367:
267:
264:
259:
256:
253:
250:
234:
231:
226:
223:
220:
217:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
527:
525:
516:
515:
499:
498:
497:
496:
469:
468:
455:User:Dlyons493
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
423:
422:
410:
398:
386:
359:
358:
334:Reinhard Opitz
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
290:
289:
275:
274:
242:
241:
209:
208:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
174:
173:
151:
123:
122:
111:
109:
108:
77:
76:
61:
59:Reinhard Opitz
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
526:
514:
512:
507:
501:
500:
495:
492:
491:85.167.175.70
488:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
471:
470:
467:
463:
461:
459:
456:
452:
449:
448:
439:
436:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
402:
399:
397:
394:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
375:
370:
364:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
346:80.136.97.247
343:
342:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
285:
280:
277:
276:
273:
270:
262:
247:
244:
243:
240:
237:
229:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
200:
197:
189:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
172:
169:
164:
159:
155:
152:
150:
147:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
126:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
107:
104:
103:80.136.127.41
100:
98:
96:
92:
89:]], tomorrow
88:
86:
82:
79:
78:
74:
73:
72:
70:
66:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
505:
502:
472:
465:
450:
412:
400:
388:
378:
373:
368:
362:
339:
321:
278:
245:
212:
198:
162:
153:
146:Daniel Olsen
141:
137:
127:
124:
114:
110:
80:
64:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
338:— Possible
144:for now. --
69:essay mill
91:Nietzsche
354:contribs
168:up+l+and
87:or Keks
487:Leibniz
466:M. Eser
435:Leibniz
413:Comment
405:Leibniz
401:Comment
309:Leibniz
246:Comment
185:Leibniz
142:No vote
138:Comment
129:Leibniz
95:Bahlsen
85:Leibniz
417:GBYork
332:, and
284:Geogre
99:],
16:<
473:Keep
389:Keep
369:Nish
350:talk
322:Keep
213:Keep
199:Keep
154:Keep
48:. -
46:keep
477:€pa
453:If
374:kid
260:493
227:493
203:€pa
93:or
379:64
352:•
344::
328:,
268:lk
265:Ta
257:ns
254:yo
251:Dl
235:lk
232:Ta
224:ns
221:yo
218:Dl
348:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.