445:, was a straightforward and literal translation of International draughts rules, from the 10x10 board and onto a hex board. (How much time did that inspiration consume? Probably less than one second. Yet the game is a place for draughts to go to escape what the inventor predicts to be the death of competetive International draughts due to high incident of draws and played-out positions.) It is easy to say something was easy that anybody could have done, when there is advantage of hindsight and a rear-view mirror. Is a game more notable simply because the inventor sweated over it over a longer period of time? I don't think wall-clock time or sweat-equity are reliable gauges to reject notability.
518:• The de WP decision is the de decision, it shouldn't weigh in on the en WP decision, which should be objective and independent (until such time WP is all-world consensus). Because de WP is German and Scharnagl is German too, it is still individual person(s) rendering assessment re notability (and/or whatever) at de. Why can't the en assessment be *better than* the de assessment? (And in the event of
204:), implying that the article was written by the person himself. Looks like self-promotion and the person might not be notable. Only one source listed and that source is written by the person himself. I don't understand all of the text, but it seems that the page was deleted from the article namespace on German Knowledge because of self-promotion and lack of notability:
437:, a game he believes and advocates as more deserving as the basic competitive "checkers" game, to replace International draughts: "That is why Dameo happened, quite unintentionally. Its rules fell into place in less than a minute."
161:
387:
are both re notability. Is
Schanagl's Chess960 numbering scheme (see below) not "worthy of notice" that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."?
424:. That took less than 1 minute of thought. As for as the chess960 numbering scheme, any math undergraduate could come up with something like that in 10 minutes, in my opinion.
205:
122:
155:
536:• (One more thing.) If it concerns !voters that the current article is majorly written by the subject and is thus NPOV, I promise to rewrite it NPOV if the article is
285:
263:
372:
is satisfied if "2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique." (See below re Chess960 numbering scheme.)
95:
90:
99:
82:
176:
143:
17:
380:
474:)?: "This mapping of starting arrays and numbers stems from Reinhard Scharnagl and is now used worldwide for Chess960."
137:
568:
471:
40:
549:
531:
483:
454:
428:
407:
359:
314:
299:
277:
254:
237:
216:
64:
545:
527:
479:
450:
403:
133:
86:
493:
250:
183:
564:
78:
70:
36:
197:
193:
541:
523:
475:
446:
399:
169:
246:
149:
470:– Doesn't this achievement alone render at least one but significant slice of notability (from
420:
For
Capablanca Random Chess, he did what Fischer (and others) did for chess and applied it to
295:
273:
212:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
563:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
497:
421:
369:
355:
323:
225:
Per the 2005 de discussion. Does not meet WP:GNG. (there is a german review of his book
347:
339:
55:
226:
510:
376:
343:
327:
230:
201:
425:
391:
335:
311:
291:
269:
208:
433:
Here's what
Christian Freeling, an established game inventor, said about creating
116:
384:
351:
331:
506:
206:
de:Knowledge:Löschkandidaten/29. November 2005#Reinhard
Scharnagl (Gelöscht)
442:
200:
has more or less the same text (but in German) on his German use page (
522:
at en, is it impossible that the editors(s) at de would reconsider? )
338:. Obviously just a non-notable guy writing an article about himself.
434:
557:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:
on a german chess site, but I don't think that's sufficient.)--
492:• Another achievement to consider lending notability (from
245:- just not seeing (or finding) any evidence of notability.
112:
108:
104:
168:
509:
article references
Scharnagl and his program Smirf:
192:
Article about
Reinhard Scharnagl largely written by
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
571:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:
8:
286:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
284:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
283:
264:list of Games-related deletion discussions
261:
394:(See below articles at ChessBase.com and
512:Chess960 Computer World Champtionship
441:(Summer 2002), p. 10. Also, his game
7:
496:): winner, game invention contest,
24:
310:for reasons of the nominator.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
550:14:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
532:13:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
484:11:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
455:04:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
429:04:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
408:12:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
360:06:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
315:03:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
300:01:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
278:01:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
255:01:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
238:03:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
217:21:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
65:06:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
588:
472:Chess960 numbering scheme
560:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
499:The Chess Variant Pages
494:Capablanca random chess
381:WP:Notability (people)
505:• And this 5/5/2005
396:Chess Variants Pages
79:Reinhard Scharnagl
71:Reinhard Scharnagl
48:The result was
302:
289:
280:
267:
236:
202:de:User:Scharnagl
63:
579:
562:
422:Capablanca chess
290:
268:
235:
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
575:
569:deletion review
558:
129:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
574:
573:
554:
553:
552:
542:Ihardlythinkso
534:
524:Ihardlythinkso
516:
503:
487:
486:
476:Ihardlythinkso
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
447:Ihardlythinkso
439:Abstract Games
413:
412:
411:
410:
400:Ihardlythinkso
388:
373:
363:
362:
317:
304:
303:
281:
258:
257:
240:
198:User:Scharnagl
194:User:Scharnagl
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
572:
570:
566:
561:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
515:
513:
508:
507:Chessbase.com
504:
502:
500:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
465:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
287:
282:
279:
275:
271:
265:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
247:Eddie.willers
244:
241:
239:
233:
232:
227:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
559:
556:
537:
519:
511:
498:
467:
438:
395:
319:
307:
242:
229:
222:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
156:free images
58:Sandstein
565:talk page
370:WP:AUTHOR
324:WP:AUTHOR
292:• Gene93k
270:• Gene93k
37:talk page
567:or in a
468:Question
322:. Fails
231:Milowent
123:View log
39:or in a
501:(2005).
443:Hexdame
426:Bubba73
348:WP:SPAM
340:WP:AUTO
312:Bubba73
209:Stefan2
162:WPÂ refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
540:! Ok,
383:) and
377:WP:BIO
352:Qworty
350:, etc.
344:WP:COI
328:WP:BIO
320:Delete
308:Delete
243:Delete
223:Delete
196:, and
134:Google
100:delete
50:delete
435:Dameo
392:WP:RS
336:WP:RS
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
546:talk
538:Kept
528:talk
520:Keep
480:talk
451:talk
404:talk
385:WP:N
356:talk
332:WP:N
296:talk
274:talk
251:talk
213:talk
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
398:.)
184:TWL
121:– (
548:)
530:)
482:)
453:)
406:)
390:•
375:•
368:•
358:)
346:,
342:,
334:,
330:,
326:,
298:)
288:.
276:)
266:.
253:)
234:•
215:)
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
544:(
526:(
514:.
478:(
449:(
402:(
379:(
354:(
294:(
272:(
249:(
211:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.