409:
453:
office, I'd probably lean towards Keep. So there are two ways you can convince me: show me a significant treatment of it in a reputable source (I will not be convinced by Google Book hits for trivial mentions) or show me it actually existed. Either one will convince me the topic is notable. I think both are quite reasonable and following guidelines too. Once again, I'm leaning toward
377:, but proposer is right: 1. Topic has not been the subject of serious, reputable study (there are no English scholarly histories on the topic, just brief mentions on other subjects) 2. And the brief mentions which do exist, seem to make clear that it was a political aspiration and never anywhere close to an "Unrecognized state" or even "embryonic state." I will vote to
370:
452:
which has a few scholarly treatments (although not the article) may be a good example of an imaginary state that is notable. But even if there isn't that scholarly treatment, I said I would be convinced of its notability if it ever was an "Unrecognized state" or even "Embryonic State". If it had an
246:
which states "The Greeks of
Trebizond asked the Peace Conference to detach Trebizond from Turkey and to form of it a separate State to be known as the Republic of Pontus". The topic is notable and any problems can be solved via normal editing, as Metropolitan90 said. For examples of articles on other
381:
if someone can show me: A. A major reputable treatment of the subject (without this, there is no notability for a historical entity) or B. Someone shows something that says this wasn't just an idea by a handful of people with good diplomatic connections, but an actually existing entity. Otherwise,
197:
Article on a non existent body, written totally in POV, without serious (let alone reliable) sources. Distortion of history. Even "flag" imposed on a "proposed" state (?) which was supposed to be called "Republic of Pontus", by the concerned WP editor who made up the article.
366:
362:
443:@Athenean. Thanks for the comments. No sources in that search, except the Eccumenical one, spend more than a line or two on the Pontic Republic. All of them use the term once, if at all (seriously click on the books and you will only find trivial mentions).
238:, but I can't access the entire thing from Google Books. A cursory search turns up at least a dozen books that could be used as future references in the article, including works by the American-Hellenic Society, the US War Department, and
447:
is clear that
Notability has to be more than trivial mentions, although not necessarily the full subject of the article. We need a couple of sources that spend a page or two on the Republic of Pontus to clearly say it is notable.
411:. Yeah, so it was never implemented, only proposed. That has nothing to do with whether the subject is notable or not. By the way, who is it you are following around? Me, or E4024? If it's me I would prefer it it if you stopped.
219:, the Republic of Pontus was at least a serious proposal for a state that might have been formed due to the territorial changes at the end of World War I. Any problems with the article can be dealt with through normal editing. --
533:@Sprutt: As you will most possibly agree with me, if a state has not been formally proclaimed any supposed recognition is out of question; therefore maybe you should strike that word in your comment. Thanks in advance. --
166:
356:
Yeah, there are good reasons behind this request that are not just that E doesn't like it. Can anyone find a link source to support this claim: "the
Republic of Pontus was never officially proclaimed, but a
252:
427:
When I open a discussion I always hope many people to follow me and join the talk, not only two or three users. So thanks to everyone who are kind enough to join the discussion. --
119:
160:
569:
549:
371:
The Greek
Republic of Pontus never became a reality, and in the abortive struggle to create it the Pontic Greeks were displaced with enormous loss of life
126:
217:
92:
87:
96:
311:
79:
517:. Great, finally found a substantive source on it. Had to really look for it. Will be doing my part to improve content on the page.
181:
148:
17:
248:
449:
500:. But perhaps the article should be renamed to reflect the idea that no republic was formally proclaimed or recognized.
522:
478:
462:
391:
310:: Although this article involves inaccurate information, we can find reliable sources even in Turkish language. See:
142:
599:
40:
581:
561:
542:
526:
509:
482:
466:
436:
420:
395:
348:
327:
302:
281:
264:
226:
207:
61:
223:
138:
298:
83:
235:
518:
474:
458:
387:
260:
188:
595:
336:
315:
57:
36:
272:
The above referred writer mentions a "desire" to have a republic not a state or a project thereof... --
444:
290:
412:
340:
220:
174:
416:
344:
294:
253:
List of United States territories that failed to become states#Proposed but non-existent entities
75:
67:
154:
577:
557:
323:
256:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
594:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
505:
53:
538:
432:
277:
203:
373:" or, "How and why the Republic of Pontus did not materialize". I'm leaning toward
573:
553:
319:
457:, but don't think dismissing the arguments by E is helpful in figuring this out.
113:
501:
534:
428:
273:
199:
382:
the content should probably be merged with Paris Peace
Conference page or
588:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
335:: Easily a notable topic. This is just a major case of
109:
105:
101:
173:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
602:). No further edits should be made to this page.
359:central government of an embryonic state existed
187:
8:
568:Note: This debate has been included in the
548:Note: This debate has been included in the
570:list of Turkey-related deletion discussions
550:list of Greece-related deletion discussions
361:." All I can find is people calling it a "
567:
547:
242:of London. There's also an article from
234:. The book by Forster does mention the
7:
367:plans to declare a Pontus Republic
24:
314:. I think this case is a kind of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
582:01:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
562:01:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
543:18:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
527:17:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
510:17:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
483:17:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
467:16:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
437:16:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
421:15:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
404:Are you kidding me? There is
396:15:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
349:16:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
328:14:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
303:12:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
282:10:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
265:19:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
249:List of proposed state mergers
227:17:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
208:15:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
62:23:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
450:United States of Latin Africa
289:per Metropolitan90. Topic is
408:of material on the subject
619:
247:non-existent bodies, see
591:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
473:Thanks, I found one.
365:" or that there were "
445:Knowledge:Notability
363:political aspiration
312:(Pontus Cumhuriyeti)
244:The New York Times
236:Republic of Pontus
76:Republic of Pontus
68:Republic of Pontus
48:The result was
584:
564:
519:AbstractIllusions
475:AbstractIllusions
459:AbstractIllusions
388:AbstractIllusions
610:
593:
386:Pontic Greeks.
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
618:
617:
613:
612:
611:
609:
608:
607:
606:
600:deletion review
589:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
616:
614:
605:
604:
585:
565:
545:
530:
529:
512:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
425:
424:
423:
399:
398:
351:
337:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
330:
316:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
305:
284:
267:
229:
221:Metropolitan90
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
615:
603:
601:
597:
592:
586:
583:
579:
575:
571:
566:
563:
559:
555:
551:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
496:
495:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
451:
446:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
403:
402:
401:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
318:. Thank you.
317:
313:
309:
306:
304:
300:
296:
295:Gun Powder Ma
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:Clarification
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
228:
225:
222:
218:
216:. As seen at
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
590:
587:
514:
497:
454:
405:
384:Trabzon page
383:
378:
374:
358:
353:
332:
307:
286:
269:
257:Braincricket
243:
239:
231:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
596:talk page
574:• Gene93k
554:• Gene93k
240:The Times
50:Snow Keep
37:talk page
598:or in a
413:Athenean
341:Athenean
120:View log
39:or in a
369:", or "
354:Comment
320:Takabeg
291:notable
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
502:Sprutt
406:plenty
224:(talk)
139:Google
97:delete
535:E4024
429:E4024
274:E4024
200:E4024
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
578:talk
558:talk
539:talk
523:talk
515:Keep
506:talk
498:Keep
479:talk
463:talk
455:Keep
433:talk
417:talk
392:talk
379:Keep
375:Keep
345:talk
333:Keep
324:talk
308:Keep
299:talk
287:Keep
278:talk
261:talk
251:and
232:Keep
214:Keep
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
189:TWL
118:– (
580:)
572:.
560:)
552:.
541:)
525:)
508:)
481:)
465:)
435:)
419:)
394:)
347:)
339:.
326:)
301:)
293:.
280:)
263:)
255:.
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
576:(
556:(
537:(
521:(
504:(
477:(
461:(
431:(
415:(
390:(
343:(
322:(
297:(
276:(
259:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.