362:
effort, many articles have been removed or merged. As part of that process, the mini-games article has had a drastic revamp, some of the remaining articles are still in the process of being merged and rewritten. Once combat, weapons/armour and mini-games are taken care of, the RS gods article would be a good follow-up. To remove it now before that process has even begun is to ignore completely what has been achieved recently and what will continue to be achieved. The statement of intent is there, if flinging another article on the fire is more important than adding a clean-up notice and allowing contributors a chance, then there's nothing pleasant that can be said.
210:- true, it could do with a cleanup, but this article provides an insight into the rich background story of the game, something which every other fictional franchise on Knowledge (XXG) is entitled to. The background story of RuneScape is often manipulated by its gods, hence the title. Maybe rename it to 'History of RuneScape', or similar? Furthermore, if being a target for vandals and crufters is a criterion for deletion, you'd better put the
277:. Now, I would potentially agree that RuneScape gods could be merged into a larger article on the basis that RuneScape is a relatively minor game, and any attempt to treat its gods authoritatively would potentially result in simple duplication of what minimal documentation exists. However, I'll leave that to others to determine, and above suggestions indicate that I'm not the first to have thought this way (per
361:
RS doesn't have a plot in the typical sense, but the gods are often the only link between quests and various aspects of the game. Yes, it's fancrufty, of course it's fancrufty - attention has been elsewhere. In the past month the focus of the RS series has been wrenched back on course by a combined
335:
This article is as close as RS will ever get to a 'plot', has not had a great deal of attention regarding NN and cruft because contributors have been busy repairing the other daughter articles. Removing this article from the WP right now before it has received enough attention results in a loss of
336:
info and nothing else. In the fullness of time this article could perhaps be merged into the main article or be made stronger and resist crufty additions, but to throw it away now is to punish contributors for not having eight pairs of hands.
81:! All this gets is stupid anons putting in their stupid stuff. I see not how this serves any purpose other than a vandal pool. Not necessarily a game guide, just useless info. Why would anyone care about RS' gods?
427:
399:
345:
This brings up a really good point, which is that RS has no plot. Which is why any article based solely on RS plot elements is inevitably going to be a bunch of really fancrufty inane minor details. ;-)
403:
237:, seems like Runescape players would be interested in Runescape gods, and also those wishing to compare them with other ficitional deities such as the D&D ones mentioned above.
411:
419:
407:
395:
423:
391:
415:
153:
per below comments. After a few days of thinking about this, I have reconsidered. Needs cleanup, but the backstory of a popular MMORPG is a notable subject. —
147:. Nomination is useless and doesn't give any valid reasons for deleting this article, but on the other hand I doubt anyone here really needs a list of them ;).
443:
455:
110:
23:
182:
249:- per the 3 above, The gods are significant background characters within a fantasy genre, so what if it's a game rather than a book?
17:
434:
382:
366:
350:
340:
327:
315:
301:
285:
253:
241:
218:
202:
190:
138:
126:
114:
89:
65:
62:
471:
43:
323:. If one wanted to learn about RS Gods, they could look around in theh RuneScape Knowledge Base, not the wiki.
470:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
451:
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
107:
324:
199:
177:
447:
135:
104:
390:- Knowledge (XXG) is not a large collection of unsuccessful AFD nominations of RuneScape articles. See
278:
215:
347:
123:
229:
154:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
363:
337:
250:
86:
59:
274:
266:
379:
265:, is contrary to the spirit of Knowledge (XXG), and could be construed as a violation of
293:- and while we're thinking about the relative mertis of "fancruft" leave us recall that
71:
431:
312:
228:- Poor nom, articles about rpg and fantasy gods exist (like tiamat from d&d)-
298:
282:
56:
238:
294:
211:
134:, these characters seem really non-notable in the big scheme of things.
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods (second nomination)
428:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour (3rd nomination)
400:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour (2nd nomination)
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
404:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Construction (RuneScape)
311:
please per kappa and capatain vindallo with possible renaming
263:
All this gets is stupid anons putting in their stupid stuff
269:. Please, do not bite the newbies. Second, the statement,
412:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape
Community
273:, is nonsensical. A "game guide" would be a violation of
420:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape skills
408:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape skills
396:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour
424:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods
392:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kalphite Queen
46:). No further edits should be made to this page.
416:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Runecrafting
474:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
297:was a front-page featured article. -
122:per nom. Fairly extreme fancruft.
31:
378:and improve sources/references.
77:A page about RuneScape's gods?
435:00:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
383:00:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
367:03:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
351:03:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
341:02:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
328:00:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
316:20:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
302:13:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
286:13:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
254:11:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
242:09:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
219:01:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
203:01:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
66:21:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
191:20:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
139:20:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
127:19:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
115:19:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
90:19:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
271:Not necessarily a game guide
214:up for deletion right now.
55:with cleanup reccommended.
491:
467:Please do not modify it.
39:Please do not modify it.
261:- First the statement,
446:comment was added by
430:. Enough is enough!
98:Useless rune-cruft.
440:Keep: we need this
148:
459:
230:User:Merlin Storm
200:Danny Lilithborne
143:
22:(Redirected from
482:
469:
441:
189:
174:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
113:
41:
27:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:deletion review
465:
442:—The preceding
279:CaptainVindaloo
216:CaptainVindaloo
187:
176:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
155:
111:52278 Alpha 771
105:Fenton, Matthew
99:
75:
51:The result was
44:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
477:
476:
448:204.11.191.254
438:
437:
385:
372:
371:
370:
369:
356:
355:
354:
353:
348:My Alt Account
330:
318:
306:
305:
304:
256:
244:
232:
222:
221:
205:
198:per everyone.
193:
183:
141:
129:
124:My Alt Account
117:
74:
72:RuneScape gods
69:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
475:
473:
468:
462:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
445:
436:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
381:
377:
374:
373:
368:
365:
360:
359:
358:
357:
352:
349:
344:
343:
342:
339:
334:
331:
329:
326:
322:
319:
317:
314:
310:
307:
303:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
255:
252:
248:
245:
243:
240:
236:
233:
231:
227:
224:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
201:
197:
194:
192:
188:
186:
181:
178:
175:
152:
146:
142:
140:
137:
136:Andrew Levine
133:
130:
128:
125:
121:
118:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
97:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
84:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
61:
58:
54:
47:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
466:
463:
439:
387:
375:
332:
320:
308:
290:
270:
262:
258:
246:
234:
225:
212:main article
207:
195:
184:
179:
150:
144:
131:
119:
100:
95:
82:
78:
76:
52:
50:
38:
35:
364:QuagmireDog
338:QuagmireDog
333:Strong Keep
251:Ace of Risk
380:MasterRune
108:Lexic Dark
295:Bulbasaur
79:Pluh-ease
456:contribs
444:unsigned
185:contribs
432:John254
313:Yuckfoo
291:comment
87:Richard
426:, and
325:Makoto
321:Delete
299:Harmil
283:Harmil
275:WP:NOT
267:WP:CIV
196:Delete
145:Delete
132:Delete
120:Delete
101:thanks
96:Delete
83:Delete
57:Goldom
239:Kappa
16:<
452:talk
388:Keep
376:Keep
309:keep
281:). -
259:Keep
247:Keep
235:Keep
226:Keep
208:Keep
151:Keep
53:Keep
458:) .
85:.--
60:‽‽‽
454:•
422:,
418:,
414:,
410:,
406:,
402:,
398:,
394:,
169:ar
166:ik
163:Sh
160:rk
157:Da
450:(
180:/
172:i
149:*
103:/
63:⁂
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.