199:- Rapists in Canada and Murderers in Canada are next? its totally undue - there is no special problem with war criminals in Canada - we have no War criminals in any other country article, and there are other countries with far greater coverage of the issue - the whole story, such minor as it is , is easily coverable at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, the group that is focusing on the one or two cases that have been brought to trial. - a couple of not notable books commenting about war criminals in Canada do not make a notable NPOV topic for an encyclopedic article.
365:
376:
I came to this page on fairly routine newpage patrol. I was intrigued by what was going on there and decided to help the creator find a new consensus. I believe that the way this has always been done on wikipedia is by editing the article - not by engaging in edit wars over the NPOV tag. The NPOV is
388:. Infact YouRealyCan has not participated in the attempt to form a new consensus by explaining what POV, facts, opinion are missing from the article. If s/he has such opinions he has kept them to himself. I would call his work disruptive editing - but he has not edited the article -
377:
a tag is one that we can live with Canada's immigration policy has not been neutral either. But it does not mean that
Wikipidia should distort facts. If there is a risk of confusing the public the NPOV tag should stay until resolved - but this is
439:. However the sources indicate that the same claims have made by a much larger group of organizations - Canadian and independent. The role of SWC is marginal when compared with those of Lawyers, Judges and the Canadian legislatures.
164:
52:. The idea that this is a content fork has dramatically failed to gain any purchase in this discussion. I cannot see any other reason given for deletion, let alone a reason that has rallied any consensus. —
158:
466:
435:
As pointed out already on the talk page, the role of the SWC in this subject is currently high-profile since they have kept the issue current with their global initiative
349:
What are you alleging this is a content fork of? Did you mean POV fork? Cleanup is necessary, and perhaps a rename. "Status of war criminals in Canada" might be better. --
395:- for example a dearth of swiss war criminals is not an indicator about this article. This type of sensationalism is the reason we argue from policy not from norms.
119:
221:
290:
Canada has had a long history of allowing war criminals to reside in their country. This article has plenty of citations and has very little to do with the
265:
92:
87:
243:
124:
96:
410:
to give unlimited safe Harbor to Nazi war criminals. (Though the USA has had a similar stain in the past - one also worth an article in the future.)
79:
413:
Since policy without norms is difficult to interpret the following are a number of subject that would be censored in a less open encyclopedia:
427:
179:
146:
17:
311:- I also have issues with the articles neutrality and there are comments on the talkpage of the article in this regards - a
385:
140:
83:
507:
484:
358:
341:
303:
279:
257:
235:
213:
61:
136:
526:
196:
40:
186:
291:
75:
67:
494:. How is this a content fork? It looks like its a notable category in its own regard, and I think it meets
436:
368:
If an edit war develops, participants should try to discuss the issue on the talk page and work things out.
336:
208:
522:
480:
364:
36:
152:
57:
503:
416:
299:
172:
446:
of the books in the further reading section. This claim is rather blatant evidence of a lack of
384:
However the NPOV has not been added in accordence to the recomendation of
Responsible Tagging
328:
275:
253:
231:
200:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
521:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
475:
447:
403:
315:
template I added has been removed without addressing the content issues by the above user -
458:
421:
392:
53:
499:
407:
312:
295:
495:
354:
324:
271:
249:
227:
113:
462:
454:
470:
391:
The non existence of an article as a proof of non-noteablity is based on a
350:
320:
402:- the sources indicate that Canada is the only participant in the
363:
294:, i.e. it is not a fork! In addition, it is written from a NPOV.
515:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
450:. These text books a frequently cited in scientific literature.
457:
is a noted
Canadian lawyer and academic who was named to the
379:
not a reason for censoring the article on political grounds
424:- provides a good balance between two controversial POV
316:
109:
105:
101:
171:
467:Organ harvesting in the People's Republic of China
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
529:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:
8:
327:talkpage is also further detail to consider.
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:Note: This debate has been included in the
222:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
266:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
263:
241:
219:
244:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
428:Historical revisionism (negationism)
24:
195:The article is a content fork -
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
461:and nominated in 2010 for the
1:
386:Knowledge:Responsible tagging
465:for his work related to the
546:
197:Knowledge:Content forking
518:Please do not modify it.
508:19:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
485:20:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
430:- what is going on here.
359:17:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
342:12:24, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
304:09:25, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
280:02:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
258:02:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
236:02:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
214:03:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
62:23:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
292:Simon Wiesenthal Centre
76:War criminals in Canada
68:War criminals in Canada
369:
437:operation last chance
367:
323:about the article on
400:uniqueness of Canada
417:Japanese war crimes
370:
48:The result was
282:
269:
260:
247:
238:
225:
537:
520:
483:
478:
404:Nuremberg Trials
339:
335:
331:
270:
248:
226:
211:
207:
203:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
545:
544:
540:
539:
538:
536:
535:
534:
533:
527:deletion review
516:
474:
473:
459:Order of Canada
422:Dachau massacre
408:Tokyo Tribunals
393:logical fallacy
337:
333:
329:
321:This discussion
209:
205:
201:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
543:
541:
532:
531:
511:
510:
489:
488:
487:
451:
442:Regarding the
440:
433:
432:
431:
425:
419:
411:
398:Regarding the
396:
389:
362:
361:
344:
306:
284:
283:
261:
239:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
542:
530:
528:
524:
519:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
486:
482:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
445:
441:
438:
434:
429:
426:
423:
420:
418:
415:
414:
412:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
390:
387:
383:
382:
380:
375:
372:
371:
366:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
343:
340:
332:
326:
325:User:Bwilkins
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
267:
262:
259:
255:
251:
245:
240:
237:
233:
229:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
204:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
517:
514:
491:
443:
399:
378:
373:
346:
308:
288:Strong Keep:
287:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
463:Nobel Prize
455:David Matas
453:The author
159:free images
471:Falun Gong
444:notability
54:Tom Morris
523:talk page
500:Lord Roem
448:WP:Before
296:JunoBeach
272:• Gene93k
250:• Gene93k
228:• Gene93k
37:talk page
525:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
374:Abstain
313:WP:NPOV
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
496:WP:GNG
334:really
206:really
137:Google
97:delete
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
504:talk
492:Keep
481:talk
406:and
355:talk
347:Keep
317:diff
309:Note
300:talk
276:talk
254:talk
232:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
469:of
351:BDD
338:can
330:You
210:can
202:You
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
506:)
498:.
479:;
476:BO
381:.
357:)
319:-
302:)
278:)
268:.
256:)
246:.
234:)
224:.
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
502:(
353:(
298:(
274:(
252:(
230:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.