409:- I found out about this party from a BBC show "Daily Politics" which did not feature Nikki Sinclair, but another woman Katie Hopkins (sp?). I vote to keep, since this is now a party with notoriety thanks to the BBC and some newspapers as others have mentioned. I have no political connect to this or any British party.
197:
Fails notability and political policies. Fails GNG. Fails our policies and consensus on notable lobby/pressure groups. Lobby group without notability beyond the
Internet. Has no constant, consistent non-Internet coverage. Article suffers from bias. Not a political group in any definition of the term
219:
Proponent claims WDAR has no notability beyond the
Internet. Yet the Sun and Express articles, for example, have been published both online and in their print versions. It has also been widely discussed on radio programmes, of which the source quoted in the article itself is just one example. Other
284:
Proponent claims this is not a political group in any definition of the term in the UK. Yet the party has been registered with the
Electoral Commission since June this year; if being registered with the EC as a political party is not a definition of "political group", then what
166:
310:, until there's clear evidence this is a real political party that stands in elections, rather than one person's crusade that could peter out before the euro elections. There are some sources, but mostly about Sinclaire
260:
The original work is by the BBC, which is what should count for the purposes of judging notability. Sinclaire just uploaded the video, nothing else. She clearly didn't stage the interview on a fake BBC set.
281:
Proponent claims the article suffers from bias. Yet the main contributor to the article (me) is staunchly pro-EU, so accusing me of trying to embellish information on WDAR is ridiculous.
427:
119:
160:
447:
52:. It looks like there is consensus not to delete, but no consensus as to whether the article should be kept or merged. I suggest opening a merge discussion on the talk page.
311:
467:
92:
87:
126:
96:
358:
giving us significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources (assuming you believe 2 is "multiple"). And I didn't really want a photo of
79:
315:
410:
181:
148:
372:
253:
17:
142:
520:
503:
479:
459:
439:
418:
397:
374:
326:
296:
272:
255:
207:
83:
61:
313:
138:
539:
40:
386:: source 1 has been replaced with a non-primary source, making it at least three independent, reliable sources.
188:
414:
322:
221:
516:
392:
291:
267:
75:
67:
535:
499:
57:
36:
370:
251:
154:
203:
174:
318:
512:
475:
455:
435:
387:
335:
286:
262:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
495:
53:
491:
363:
307:
244:
199:
359:
351:
471:
451:
431:
347:
343:
229:
113:
339:
240:
235:
That video link is by the user "nikkisinclairemp", and therefore a
317:- it's mostly local press from around Sinclaire's constituency. --
528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
198:
in the UK, not to mention any of the constituent parts.
109:
105:
101:
173:
428:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
448:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
216:Accusations levelled at the article are baseless.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
542:). No further edits should be made to this page.
222:an interview of a party candidate on the BBC's
468:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
466:Note: This debate has been included in the
446:Note: This debate has been included in the
426:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:high-profile non-Internet coverage includes
362:thrown in my face while eating my lunch. --
465:
445:
425:
342:. 3 is a press release, and hence not
7:
346:. That leaves an article each from
24:
334:- sources 1, 3, 5 and 6 are all
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
521:00:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
504:19:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
480:01:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
460:01:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
440:01:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
419:00:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
398:12:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
375:11:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
327:11:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
297:08:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
273:12:42, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
256:12:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
208:20:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
62:20:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
228:alongside UKIP deputy leader
338:, not suitable for testing
559:
511:to founder, as per above.
531:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
239:- no good for helping
76:We Demand a Referendum
68:We Demand a Referendum
494:per Colapeninsula.
48:The result was
482:
462:
442:
550:
533:
368:
249:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
548:
547:
546:
540:deletion review
529:
492:Nikki Sinclaire
364:
336:primary sources
308:Nikki Sinclaire
245:
206:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
556:
554:
545:
544:
524:
523:
506:
484:
483:
463:
443:
422:
421:
403:
402:
401:
400:
378:
377:
329:
300:
299:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
237:primary source
224:Daily Politics
217:
202:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
555:
543:
541:
537:
532:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
464:
461:
457:
453:
449:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
424:
423:
420:
416:
412:
411:78.52.102.235
408:
405:
404:
399:
395:
394:
389:
385:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
373:
371:
369:
367:
361:
360:Katie Hopkins
357:
353:
352:Daily Express
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
319:Colapeninsula
316:
314:
312:
309:
305:
302:
301:
298:
294:
293:
288:
283:
280:
274:
270:
269:
264:
259:
258:
257:
254:
252:
250:
248:
242:
238:
234:
233:
231:
227:
225:
218:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
530:
527:
513:Stuartyeates
508:
487:
406:
391:
388:Leptictidium
383:
365:
355:
331:
303:
290:
287:Leptictidium
266:
263:Leptictidium
246:
230:Paul Nuttall
223:
214:Speedy keep:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
496:MilborneOne
344:independent
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
366:Ritchie333
340:notability
247:Ritchie333
241:notability
536:talk page
472:• Gene93k
452:• Gene93k
432:• Gene93k
332:Weak keep
37:talk page
538:or in a
350:and the
120:View log
39:or in a
384:Comment
348:The Sun
200:doktorb
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
139:Google
97:delete
509:Merge
488:Merge
304:merge
285:is?--
204:words
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
517:talk
500:talk
476:talk
456:talk
436:talk
415:talk
407:Keep
356:just
323:talk
243:. --
226:show
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
490:to
306:to
189:TWL
118:– (
519:)
502:)
478:)
470:.
458:)
450:.
438:)
430:.
417:)
396:)
393:mt
354:,
325:)
295:)
292:mt
271:)
268:mt
261:--
232:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
515:(
498:(
474:(
454:(
434:(
413:(
390:(
321:(
289:(
265:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.