291:- The club closed in 2010, but it was a major social institution in Tacoma beginning in 1930, with many prominent members. A stub tag should be added and the article further tagged for development, but there's no cause to delete it.
399:. The closure of the club isn't relevant, lots of notable things aren't around anymore. But the fact that the article doesn't even try to assert notability is telling. It probably should have been speedy deleted, in fact.
165:
438:
for the
Seattle area is enough to turn up many notable members. The article should be tagged appropriately, but kept because the club was one of the most prominent gentlemen's clubs in the US in its day.
344:
from a charity fund-raiser held at the club. Gives more than just a passing mention to the club, though is obviously written to promo the event and should be considered to be at least partially
338:. It's a passing reference (mentioned in a list) but is perhaps useful for confirming the location and prominence of the subject as an "anchor tenant", if we can establish notability.
120:
213:
159:
353:
My concern is that there is still not a great deal there in terms of history for the subject. Everything I can find is essentially a passing reference, eg.
321:
458:
Yes, I understand that; my point was in relation to venues - the sort of venue is irrelevant. I'm sure the club appeared in many directories but
125:
459:
366:
431:
93:
88:
17:
97:
180:
147:
80:
334:
from Unico
Properties. Obviously not independent (is from the club's landlord), so not great for notability against
571:
40:
369:
but I'm not sure the above will be enough. I'm probably now on the fence and have changed by position above to
247:. I note the club may have closed, or at least closed temporarily. So we might be dealing with something that
141:
505:
567:
544:
487:
382:
279:
137:
55:
36:
552:
525:
490:
447:
418:
385:
300:
282:
227:
205:
62:
84:
536:
439:
443:
244:
187:
173:
296:
76:
68:
427:
521:
463:
256:
223:
201:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
479:
374:
325:
271:
331:
435:
345:
153:
400:
341:
540:
396:
335:
311:
292:
517:
509:
475:
219:
197:
114:
310:- Okay, so taking the above into account, I had another look in the interests of
471:
267:
504:- not all social clubs are notable, and this one would not become notable
259:. That said, having done a search, I can't find anything to suggest it
478:. If we had some then we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.
468:"was one of the most prominent gentlemen's clubs in the US in its day"
560:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
314:. There's not a lot but there are a couple that might be usable:
470:. But like everything else on Knowledge that claim needs to be
535:
per above and nom, not notable. It should also be noted that
466:
notability from its members. I'm happy for you to claim it,
110:
106:
102:
172:
214:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
196:This club does not meet the notability criteria.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
243:- can't see anything to establish that it meets
426:Stalwart111, not a club like Studio54; it's a
186:
8:
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
506:merely because of its past membership list
363:"the venue for x event is the Tacoma Club"
355:"so-and-so got married at the Tacoma Club"
211:
543:are sockpuppets and have been blocked.
7:
516:or the notability of its clubhouse.
432:Union Club of the City of New York
359:"we had dinner at the Tacoma Club"
24:
255:, and we need to remember that
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
553:04:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
526:20:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
491:23:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
448:14:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
419:22:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
386:01:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
301:15:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
283:06:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
228:02:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
206:02:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
63:09:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
263:notable previously either,
257:notability is not temporary
251:rather than something than
591:
563:Please do not modify it.
365:. Yes, it obviously did
32:Please do not modify it.
460:Existence ≠ Notability
512:about what the club
462:. Nor does the club
508:. I'd like to see
434:. As search of the
373:. Thoughts anyone?
312:assuming good faith
48:The result was
230:
217:
582:
565:
550:
547:
484:
476:reliable sources
428:gentlemen's club
416:
413:
410:
407:
379:
326:The News Tribune
276:
218:
191:
190:
176:
128:
118:
100:
58:
57:Mr. Stradivarius
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
561:
548:
545:
482:
436:Social Register
414:
411:
408:
405:
377:
308:Further comment
274:
133:
124:
91:
75:
72:
56:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
556:
555:
529:
528:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
451:
450:
421:
401:Andrew Lenahan
389:
388:
351:
350:
349:
339:
329:
328:(from Tacoma).
316:
315:
304:
303:
286:
232:
231:
194:
193:
130:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
569:
564:
558:
557:
554:
551:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
499:
492:
489:
486:
485:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
420:
417:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
380:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
343:
340:
337:
333:
330:
327:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
238:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
60:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
562:
559:
532:
513:
510:good sources
501:
480:
467:
423:
404:
392:
375:
370:
362:
358:
354:
307:
288:
272:
264:
260:
252:
248:
245:WP:CORPDEPTH
240:
236:
235:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
54:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
77:Tacoma Club
69:Tacoma Club
270:. Cheers,
568:talk page
537:Wikophile
440:Wikophile
430:like the
324:from the
268:Studio 54
220:• Gene93k
37:talk page
570:or in a
549:Thompson
546:Matthew
541:Clubwiki
481:Stalwart
472:verified
376:Stalwart
346:WP:PROMO
293:Clubwiki
273:Stalwart
121:View log
39:or in a
518:Bearian
464:inherit
371:Comment
241:Comment
198:Mootros
166:WP refs
154:scholar
94:protect
89:history
533:Delete
502:Delete
488:(talk)
397:WP:ORG
393:Delete
383:(talk)
336:WP:GNG
280:(talk)
237:Delete
138:Google
98:delete
50:delete
367:exist
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
539:and
522:talk
444:talk
424:Keep
395:per
342:This
332:This
322:This
297:talk
289:Keep
265:a la
224:talk
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
52:. —
514:did
483:111
474:by
412:bli
378:111
361:or
357:or
275:111
261:was
249:was
188:TWL
123:•
119:– (
524:)
446:)
415:nd
409:ar
406:St
403:-
299:)
253:is
226:)
216:.
204:)
168:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
520:(
442:(
348:.
295:(
285:.
222:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.