512:. There is more usable, non-duplicated material here than there was the first time this went through AfD. I do think that material from the university can be considered independent of the alumni association, and I think that enough reliable sourcing has been shown to sustain this article against a non-notability finding; in any event, this material (including the history of the organization, its facilities, and its "services") is certainly appropriate for inclusion somewhere in the articles about Texas Tech. On a general note, it may be true that every university has an alumni organization, but that doesn't make them unworthy of coverage. For me, the question in these alumni association AfDs is whether there's enough such material to justify a separate article or whether coverage of the organization fits more comfortably within a more general article or articles. In this case, I don't have any real problem with the separate article standing on its own, but a thoughtful merger could be considered, as long as that merger preserves the edit history and doesn't result in the disappearance of substantial valuable content. That could be a subject for editorial discussion after AfD. On one point, I do agree with the nominator: I didn't see support in the cited sources to which we have online access (such as
328:
I am not familiar with the specifics of TTAA, but wouldn't most alumni associations be somewhat independent of their parent institution? They might have official recognition, have an office on campus, but usually they are run by alumni and independent of the university/college administration.
408:
The
Handbook of Texas article cites the year that Texas Technological College was renamed Texas Tech University since the first references excludes the year the name changed. Maybe that citation would benefit from the addition of the quote parameter?
213:
without multiple third party references. The book cited was published by the university and can hardly be considered intellectually independent. Otherwise, all of the sources are either published by the university or the alumni association.
85:
178:
496:- As per NThomas, several independent sources exist satisfying notability requirements. Additionally, playing the main role in the difficult process of changing the name of the university also further implies notability.
520:
played a role in the choice to keep "Tech" in the university name. I'd like to see better inline citations for that assertion. But as noted above, I think there's enough sourced content on other points to justify the
80:
399:
you cite does it mention anything about the alumni association. It should be removed from the article no matter what because it does not even support the sentence it supposedly cites.--
172:
429:
310:
I fail to see how the Texas Tech Alumni
Association, Texas Tech University, and the Texas Tech University Press could be considered "Independent of the subject" as required by
139:
112:
107:
116:
361:
Reading through WP:N again, as two separate organizations, Texas Tech Press prior to 1971 would still be a third-party reference to Texas Tech Alumni
Association.
99:
472:
As NThomas has explained above, that is debatable. It is certainly borderline, but the
University itself is indeed independent of the alumni association.
239:: "Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic.) fail to establish notability.--
530:
504:
480:
467:
453:
443:
418:
403:
388:
370:
356:
343:
The technical details of organizational independence are beside the point: one cannot say that these are independent fo each other for the purpose of
338:
323:
301:
268:). As the organisation is independent from Texas Tech University, any Texas Tech University publication would be a third-party reference. Regardless,
248:
218:
64:
379:
I've already listed the rational why the Texas Tech Alumni
Association is, and Texas Tech Press was until 1971, independent from the university.
193:
160:
103:
260:, a Texas Tech Alumni Association publication. The Texas Tech Alumni Association is an independent organization affiliated with
154:
17:
449:
The citation has absolutely nothing to do with the alumni association and should not be described as a source for the TTAA.--
150:
95:
70:
273:
200:
549:
288:
232:
40:
166:
265:
545:
261:
36:
314:. Certainly, coverage in these closely related publications isn't an indication of the notability.--
526:
463:
352:
334:
319:
292:, give the article multiple third-party references, the issue in question for this AfD nomination.
244:
186:
410:
380:
362:
293:
439:
414:
384:
366:
297:
282:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
544:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
396:
498:
474:
522:
459:
348:
330:
315:
240:
55:
210:
435:
133:
450:
400:
344:
311:
236:
215:
458:
Agreed. That leaves only 1 source that is not connected to the university. --
272:
was published in 1956, only since 1971 has Texas Tech Press (now the
277:
86:
Articles for deletion/Texas Tech Alumni
Association (2nd nomination)
538:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
270:
The First Thirty Years: a
History of Texas Technological College
280:). The aforementioned book along with the references from
276:) been the publishing office for Texas Tech University (
129:
125:
121:
256:
The only first-party reference in the article is from
185:
227:
Agree with nom that the lack of third party sources (
81:
430:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
552:). No further edits should be made to this page.
199:
8:
428:Note: This debate has been included in the
427:
264:according to the organization's bylaws (
78:
516:) for the proposition that the alumni
7:
77:
397:here in the Texas Handbook article
24:
231:there's a single article in the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
96:Texas Tech Alumni Association
71:Texas Tech Alumni Association
65:21:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
531:00:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
505:21:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
481:21:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
468:05:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
454:05:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
444:01:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
419:23:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
404:13:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
389:23:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
371:23:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
357:19:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
339:18:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
324:04:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
302:01:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
249:23:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
219:20:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
274:Texas Tech University Press
569:
289:Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
233:Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
541:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
76:AfDs for this article:
262:Texas Tech University
266:Article I, Section 2
48:The result was
446:
433:
283:Handbook of Texas
63:
560:
543:
501:
477:
434:
204:
203:
189:
137:
119:
62:
60:
53:
34:
568:
567:
563:
562:
561:
559:
558:
557:
556:
550:deletion review
539:
499:
475:
146:
110:
94:
91:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
566:
564:
555:
554:
534:
533:
514:Texas Handbook
507:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
393:
392:
391:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
305:
304:
251:
207:
206:
143:
90:
89:
88:
83:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
565:
553:
551:
547:
542:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
519:
515:
511:
508:
506:
503:
502:
495:
492:
491:
482:
479:
478:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
447:
445:
441:
437:
431:
426:
420:
416:
412:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
285:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:Texas Techsan
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
141:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
84:
82:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
540:
537:
517:
513:
509:
497:
493:
473:
287:
281:
269:
257:
253:
228:
224:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
518:association
173:free images
521:article.--
500:Falcon8765
476:Falcon8765
286:, and the
58:Sandstein
546:talk page
523:Arxiloxos
510:Weak keep
460:GrapedApe
436:• Gene93k
349:GrapedApe
331:LoveUxoxo
316:GrapedApe
241:GrapedApe
37:talk page
548:or in a
395:Nowhere
140:View log
39:or in a
411:NThomas
381:NThomas
363:NThomas
294:NThomas
235:. See
179:WP refs
167:scholar
113:protect
108:history
225:Delete
211:WP:GNG
209:Fails
151:Google
117:delete
229:edit:
194:JSTOR
155:books
134:views
126:watch
122:links
16:<
527:talk
494:Keep
464:talk
440:talk
415:talk
385:talk
367:talk
353:talk
345:WP:N
335:talk
320:talk
312:WP:N
298:talk
254:Keep
245:talk
237:WP:N
187:FENS
161:news
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
347:.--
278:Ref
201:TWL
138:– (
529:)
466:)
451:TM
442:)
432:.
417:)
401:TM
387:)
369:)
355:)
337:)
322:)
300:)
247:)
216:TM
181:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
52:.
525:(
462:(
438:(
413:(
383:(
365:(
351:(
333:(
318:(
296:(
243:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
136:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.