272:
One of the reasons that it has been so difficult for others to put together a definitive history of Drum and Bass (for example) is because those involved consciously at the start remained underground and didn't give a title to the new form and so didn't contribute. The result is one mess of a page
280:
Their publishers, record co's and global distributors are supporting the genre and are also talking with many of the shippers to prepare them to follow suit in the near future as more releases come out, supported by live performances at top venues around the world starting early this year (2012).
268:
RE: few participants - Whilst I accept that there are currently few patricipants, Tech Beat was created by the same group of people that created Drum and Bass (roots era of 1989 - 1991 when known as 'Progressive
Hardcore') and Raggamuffin Hip Hop (2001). Most are now internationallly known and as
292:
Also, surely
Knowledge requires content submitted from those directly involved, and who therefore know the history intimately, rather than various commentators who may of had little direct involvement. (More artists will me added to the list very soon)
288:
New genres do not tend to just pop up overnight globally from nowhere. In 25 years of working in the industry as a sound engineer I have always found that it is just small pockets of people working together who initially evolve genres into a new form.
351:
I have to say that , I do understand and accept the argument. On this basis, more than happy to let you guys decide what to do . Was just trying to prevent potential future problems re: content accuracy. Thanks for trying to sort it with me anyway.
276:
To avoid a potential future repetition of all of this with Tech Beat, I'm just trying to do what I feel should have been done first time around (with the relevant 3rd parties at the time) but for Tech Beat - the latest genre from these guys.
284:
In light of all of this, it would seem that this form is destined to take-off this year and so would it not be easier all-around, to let the page build naturally over the next 6 months, with a view to deleting it if this doesn't happen?
425:
160:
415:
403:
395:
121:
154:
399:
411:
391:
244:
407:
273:
that is in need of much attention and I feel that this is because it has been left to others outside of the industry to put it all together years later.
57:
269:
with these previous forms, there were only a handful to begin with until it became promoted by 3rd parties as well as by the artists themselves.
53:
334:- so that those who do not have intimate knowledge can confirm what the article says (which is one of the main failings of this article)
191:
Non notable musical genre, with one practitioner. References are not reliable (and several are wikipedia links). Article is full of OR
17:
94:
89:
175:
98:
265:
RE: "Continuing to remove maintenance templates" - Was completely unintentional and did not know that I had done this.
142:
81:
482:
40:
205:
There are many other practitioners of Tech Beat - entry coming very soon when the current list is collated
136:
478:
36:
132:
464:
456:
448:
441:
369:
361:
353:
343:
310:
302:
294:
258:
237:
217:
206:
200:
85:
63:
460:
452:
365:
357:
306:
298:
221:
210:
168:
379:
339:
233:
196:
182:
318:
If fact, wikipedia prefers those directly involved NOT to be editing related pages. Please see
77:
69:
437:
254:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
477:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
148:
429:
383:
335:
319:
229:
192:
433:
420:
327:
323:
250:
115:
331:
387:
228:
I have posted to your talk page to discuss questions you may have.
216:
Trying my best to comply but having much trouble understanding all
426:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Alternative metal (2nd nomination)
418:(Nov. 2010). We have "kept" such new genres only when there is
471:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Alternative bubblegum pop
404:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Christian fantasy metal
396:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Christian post-hardcore
111:
107:
103:
167:
424:that it is catching on with other musicians; see
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
485:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:(July 2010). The sad thing is, that even in a
400:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chelpedo punk
181:
8:
412:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Trance metal
392:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Electrocrunk
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
447:I accept your point, thanks for explaining.
408:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Slow grass
245:list of Music-related deletion discussions
242:
386:; see for example, over the years these
455:) 20:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)editman20
360:) 11:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Editman20
301:) 12:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Editman20
7:
432:, new music genres rarely catch on.
24:
54:The Blade of the Northern Lights
224:) 16:42, 13 January 2012 (GMT)
213:) 16:40, 13 January 2012 (GMT)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
326:.This is why we also required
1:
465:20:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
442:18:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
370:11:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
344:14:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
311:12:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
259:00:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
238:16:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
201:14:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
64:01:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
502:
384:newly-named musical genres
380:almost always have deleted
474:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
382:recently-created or
48:The result was
414:(June 2010), and
410:(all Mar. 2010),
261:
248:
493:
476:
430:postmodern world
249:
186:
185:
171:
119:
101:
60:
34:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
489:
483:deletion review
472:
128:
92:
76:
73:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
499:
497:
488:
487:
445:
444:
394:(Sept. 2007),
349:
348:
347:
346:
263:
262:
240:
189:
188:
125:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
498:
486:
484:
480:
475:
469:
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:some evidence
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:(July 2009),
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
260:
256:
252:
246:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
203:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
473:
470:
446:
419:
375:
350:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
215:
204:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
155:free images
388:precedents
479:talk page
457:Editman20
449:Editman20
362:Editman20
354:Editman20
303:Editman20
295:Editman20
251:• Gene93k
218:Editman20
207:Editman20
78:Tech Beat
70:Tech Beat
37:talk page
481:or in a
336:Gaijin42
230:Gaijin42
193:Gaijin42
122:View log
39:or in a
434:Bearian
161:WP refs
149:scholar
95:protect
90:history
376:Delete
320:WP:COI
133:Google
99:delete
59:話して下さい
50:delete
378:- We
328:WP:RS
324:WP:OR
176:JSTOR
137:books
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
461:talk
453:talk
438:talk
406:and
402:and
366:talk
358:talk
340:talk
332:WP:V
330:and
322:and
307:talk
299:talk
255:talk
234:talk
222:talk
211:talk
197:talk
169:FENS
143:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
183:TWL
120:– (
463:)
440:)
390::
368:)
342:)
309:)
257:)
247:.
236:)
199:)
163:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
52:.
459:(
451:(
436:(
364:(
356:(
338:(
305:(
297:(
253:(
232:(
220:(
209:(
195:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.