Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The Open Source Science Project (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

417:. In several years, this may (or may not) have become notable, but right now it's minimally notable, and not notable enough for a stand-alone article at this point in my opinion. Furthermore, the article is basically promotional in tone at the present time. 408:
without prejudice against recreation in a few years. Right now, this project is very much in the start-up phase and has generated very little comment in reliable sources, and even then it's discussed in terms of what may happen in the future. Delete per
82: 181: 77: 469:
The project has gotten a little bit of notice from Independent Reliable Sources - most notably the mention in the article in Nature - but not enough for notability. As DV suggests, possibly just
175: 141: 109: 104: 113: 136: 96: 262: 243: 482: 457: 426: 398: 273: 254: 236: 221: 61: 373: 196: 163: 473:
at this time. (Judging from the comments at the previous AfD discussion, it is a lot closer to notability now than it was in 2008.) --
157: 17: 153: 395: 284:
Article has problems with promotional tone, and if kept will need a rewrite. For review, here are some possible refs:
100: 203: 367: 92: 67: 333: 501: 422: 40: 451: 169: 302: 497: 410: 268: 249: 232: 217: 57: 36: 418: 447: 189: 323: 478: 392: 470: 414: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
496:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
436: 307: 228: 213: 53: 328: 474: 389: 212:
Cannot find reliable independent sources to establish notability for this project.
130: 348: 439:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
368:"Micro-financing pilot program will help fund UMBC research this fall" 83:
Articles for deletion/The Open Source Science Project (2nd nomination)
490:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
And seems to have been recreated after earlier deletion.
126: 122: 118: 188: 78:
Articles for deletion/The Open Source Science Project
446:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 504:). No further edits should be made to this page. 349:"Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within" 263:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 244:list of Business-related deletion discussions 202: 8: 261:Note: This debate has been included in the 242:Note: This debate has been included in the 324:"Microfinancing to solve academic poverty?" 303:"Finding philanthropy: Like it? Pay for it" 260: 241: 374:University of Maryland, Baltimore County 293: 75: 7: 347:Wagner, Vivian (November 20, 2009). 74: 24: 366:Paul, Alethea (August 9, 2009). 301:Giles, Jim (January 18, 2012). 93:The Open Source Science Project 68:The Open Source Science Project 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 322:Sattary, Leila (August 2010). 1: 521: 483:21:50, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 334:Royal Society of Chemistry 62:23:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 458:23:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 427:13:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 399:12:57, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 274:23:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 255:23:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 237:22:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 222:22:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 493:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 372:The Retriever Weekly ( 73:AfDs for this article: 355:. ECT News Network. 376:Student Newspaper) 48:The result was 460: 396:(COI Declaration) 276: 272: 257: 253: 512: 495: 454: 445: 441: 380: 379: 363: 357: 356: 344: 338: 337: 319: 313: 312: 298: 271: 269:Northamerica1000 266: 252: 250:Northamerica1000 247: 207: 206: 192: 144: 134: 116: 34: 520: 519: 515: 514: 513: 511: 510: 509: 508: 502:deletion review 491: 456: 452: 434: 419:Dominus Vobisdu 385: 384: 383: 365: 364: 360: 346: 345: 341: 329:Chemistry World 321: 320: 316: 300: 299: 295: 267: 248: 149: 140: 107: 91: 88: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 518: 516: 507: 506: 486: 485: 463: 462: 461: 450: 448:The Bushranger 443: 442: 431: 430: 429: 411:WP:CRYSTALBALL 402: 401: 382: 381: 358: 339: 314: 292: 291: 287: 286: 285: 278: 277: 258: 239: 210: 209: 146: 87: 86: 85: 80: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 517: 505: 503: 499: 494: 488: 487: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 465: 464: 459: 455: 453:One ping only 449: 444: 440: 438: 433: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 407: 404: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 387: 386: 377: 375: 369: 362: 359: 354: 350: 343: 340: 335: 331: 330: 325: 318: 315: 310: 309: 304: 297: 294: 290: 283: 280: 279: 275: 270: 264: 259: 256: 251: 245: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 205: 201: 198: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 155: 152: 151:Find sources: 147: 143: 138: 132: 128: 124: 120: 115: 111: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 89: 84: 81: 79: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 492: 489: 466: 435: 405: 371: 361: 353:LinuxInsider 352: 342: 327: 317: 306: 296: 288: 281: 211: 199: 193: 185: 178: 172: 166: 160: 150: 49: 47: 31: 28: 467:Weak delete 388:Cheers. -- 229:MakeSense64 214:MakeSense64 176:free images 54:Crisco 1492 471:WP:TOOSOON 415:WP:TOOSOON 289:References 498:talk page 37:talk page 500:or in a 475:MelanieN 437:Relisted 390:Eclipsed 282:Comment: 137:View log 39:or in a 182:WP refs 170:scholar 110:protect 105:history 406:Delete 393:(talk) 308:Nature 154:Google 114:delete 50:delete 197:JSTOR 158:books 142:Stats 131:views 123:watch 119:links 52:.  — 16:< 479:talk 423:talk 413:and 233:talk 218:talk 190:FENS 164:news 127:logs 101:talk 97:edit 58:talk 204:TWL 139:• 135:– ( 481:) 425:) 370:. 351:. 332:. 326:. 305:. 265:. 246:. 235:) 220:) 184:) 129:| 125:| 121:| 117:| 112:| 108:| 103:| 99:| 60:) 477:( 421:( 378:. 336:. 311:. 231:( 216:( 208:) 200:· 194:· 186:· 179:· 173:· 167:· 161:· 156:( 148:( 145:) 133:) 95:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Crisco 1492
talk
23:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
The Open Source Science Project
Articles for deletion/The Open Source Science Project
Articles for deletion/The Open Source Science Project (2nd nomination)
The Open Source Science Project
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.