215:); unsourced. I do not believe this article can be improved to the point where its inclusion can be justified. The article (and the book) is much like presenting one of Jack Chick's tracts as a Catechism, and is about as notable as a specific tract (as opposed to "Jack Chick" in general; and the analogy holds, as there is a "Malachi Martin" article, in which this should be a bibliographic mention - not an article of its own) Edit, note: the article itself doesn't represent much of what is in the book, claiming instead that it is "church history from Martin's perspective"; this snippet view from
256:. I don't know whether the claims within the book are accurate, as I had never heard of it until a few minutes ago. Nevertheless, we need to distinguish between describing Malachi Martin's claims and endorsing those claims. It is certainly possible to discuss a controversial book as making certain claims without Knowledge taking a position as to whether the book's claims are accurate. As indicated by news articles such as
263:
216:
171:
399:
Where did you find those sources? I searched Google, Google Books, and Google
Scholar and came up empty (although I got enough refs on Gibbon to fill a truck). In any case, I withdraw my nomination in face of unanimous opposition.
280:
The 3 sources
Metropolitan90 just provided, two serious reviews and an in depth discussion (critical of the book) show its notability. Material from these sources should be added to the article.
165:
99:
94:
103:
86:
126:
131:
298:
260:
257:
90:
186:
153:
82:
74:
373:
412:
388:
363:
312:
289:
272:
247:
68:
408:
243:
227:
147:
332:
143:
193:
17:
159:
57:
56:. The nominator withdrew their nomination, and no other !votes (other than the nomination) to delete were posted. (
433:
343:
as the nom suggests) about the concept. That way the article is defined as being about a particular book and the
40:
269:
429:
372:. A sufficiently notable book (as shown by Metropolitan90's sources) by a clearly notable author. Here
360:
336:
335:
to make it very clear that the article is about a book and not about the actual decline and fall of the
63:
36:
401:
384:
331:. Though more a matter of naming convention, I wonder if it would be worth renaming the article to
266:
236:
220:
179:
308:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
352:
340:
285:
212:
204:
380:
376:
328:
324:
208:
265:, it seems that the book may indeed be notable enough to warrant an article here. --
379:
review of the book, which can also be added to a "critical reception" section.. --
348:
304:
53:
120:
344:
281:
422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
112:
108:
178:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
436:). No further edits should be made to this page.
203:Lacking notability; filled with dubious claims;
333:The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church (book)
299:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
192:
8:
297:Note: This debate has been included in the
323:- while I think the nomination was made in
296:
213:Unwarranted promotion of fringe theories
83:The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church
75:The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church
207:(conspiracy theories; specifically the
351:) can be resolved from there. Cheers,
327:, I also think the subject does meet
7:
262:, and references in books such as
24:
339:or some broader theory (or even
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
217:Google books is useful to see.
1:
413:02:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
389:15:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
364:04:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
313:03:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
290:02:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
273:02:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
248:02:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
231:02:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
69:03:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
453:
58:Non-administrator closure.
425:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
347:of that book (against
211:rules as expounded in
337:Roman Catholic Church
315:
302:
67:
444:
427:
357:
303:
197:
196:
182:
134:
124:
106:
66:
64:Northamerica1000
61:
48:The result was
34:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
440:
434:deletion review
423:
411:
404:John Chrysostom
355:
246:
239:John Chrysostom
230:
223:John Chrysostom
139:
130:
97:
81:
78:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
450:
448:
439:
438:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
407:
392:
391:
367:
317:
316:
293:
292:
275:
267:Metropolitan90
242:
226:
200:
199:
136:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
437:
435:
431:
426:
420:
414:
410:
406:
405:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
358:
350:
346:
342:
341:fringe theory
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
300:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
274:
271:
268:
264:
261:
258:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
240:
235:
232:
229:
225:
224:
218:
214:
210:
206:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
424:
421:
403:
369:
353:
320:
277:
253:
238:
233:
222:
202:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
49:
47:
31:
28:
166:free images
50:Speedy keep
325:good faith
430:talk page
381:Arxiloxos
305:• Gene93k
234:Withdrawn
205:WP:FRINGE
37:talk page
432:or in a
354:Stalwart
127:View log
39:or in a
375:is the
172:WP refs
160:scholar
100:protect
95:history
54:WP:SK#1
377:Kirkus
361:(talk)
329:WP:GNG
282:Borock
270:(talk)
209:WP:NOT
144:Google
104:delete
349:WP:BK
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
385:talk
370:Keep
345:WP:N
321:Keep
309:talk
286:talk
278:Keep
259:and
254:Keep
180:FENS
154:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
52:per
402:St
356:111
237:St
221:St
194:TWL
129:•
125:– (
409:τω
387:)
311:)
301:.
288:)
244:τω
228:τω
219:.
174:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
60:)
383:(
366:.
307:(
284:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.