208:
Thomas H. Ince was one of the most important figures in early cinema history and the film also stars
Francis Ford, again an important figure in early cinema. The film was screened in 2006 as part of a retrospective on Ince at the MoMA, so this passes point 2 of
213:("The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release.") Difficult to find sources, but not impossible, for a film from one hundred years ago. I'm sure there are press reviews from that time too.
349:
345:
380:
155:
238:. Seems to me this all goes to the notability of Ince and possibly Ford, but not to the film itself. Also, the screening of the film at a museum exhibition as part of a retrospective on
149:
116:
405:
Nice work. I'll withdraw the nomination. Anyone who feels comfortable closing the AfD, either as an administrator or as a non-administrative closure, feel free.--
89:
84:
285:
93:
76:
170:
246:. I don't see sufficient notability for a separate article, although I do agree that with silent films it's much harder to find sources.--
137:
17:
131:
80:
267:. Deleting verified material about an extant Ince film from 1912 can't possibly improve our coverage of silent films. --
127:
414:
392:
375:
361:
336:
327:. Given that very few productions from the Silent Era exist, I would argue that extant works are automatically notable.
319:
299:
276:
255:
226:
199:
58:
177:
435:
40:
72:
64:
332:
366:
Even with the first reference, it passes "The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.".
143:
431:
36:
272:
163:
328:
295:
222:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
430:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
315:
410:
251:
195:
388:
371:
357:
268:
187:
53:
291:
215:
210:
110:
311:
406:
247:
191:
384:
367:
353:
352:
which is a review that states that it is one of his few surviving films.
424:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
162:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:). No further edits should be made to this page.
176:
8:
284:Note: This debate has been included in the
283:
286:list of Film-related deletion discussions
211:Knowledge:NF#Other_evidence_of_notability
7:
24:
242:is not really a screening at a
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
415:01:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
393:01:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
376:00:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
362:01:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
337:23:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
320:21:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
300:19:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
277:19:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
256:19:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
227:18:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
200:18:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
59:02:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
455:
427:Please do not modify it.
73:The Deserter (1912 film)
65:The Deserter (1912 film)
32:Please do not modify it.
381:1912 review snippets
50:Nomination Withdrawn
346:Library of Congress
302:
289:
446:
429:
290:
218:
181:
180:
166:
114:
96:
56:
48:The result was
34:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:deletion review
425:
344:: It is at the
216:
123:
87:
71:
68:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
441:
440:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
398:
397:
396:
395:
378:
339:
322:
304:
303:
280:
279:
261:
260:
259:
258:
230:
229:
184:
183:
120:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
439:
437:
433:
428:
422:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
329:Eddie.willers
326:
323:
321:
317:
313:
310:Per Lugnuts.
309:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
287:
282:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
219:
212:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
426:
423:
348:. Here is a
341:
324:
307:
264:
243:
239:
235:
214:
205:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
150:free images
432:talk page
350:paragraph
292:• Gene93k
269:Arxiloxos
37:talk page
434:or in a
244:festival
117:View log
55:Lenticel
39:or in a
236:Comment
217:Lugnuts
156:WP refs
144:scholar
90:protect
85:history
312:Edison
188:WP:GNG
186:Fails
128:Google
94:delete
407:Bbb23
248:Bbb23
192:Bbb23
171:JSTOR
132:books
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
411:talk
389:talk
385:SL93
372:talk
368:SL93
358:talk
354:SL93
342:Keep
333:talk
325:Keep
316:talk
308:Keep
296:talk
273:talk
265:Keep
252:talk
240:Ince
223:talk
206:Keep
196:talk
164:FENS
138:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
178:TWL
115:– (
413:)
391:)
383:.
374:)
360:)
335:)
318:)
298:)
288:.
275:)
254:)
225:)
198:)
190:.
158:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
409:(
387:(
370:(
356:(
331:(
314:(
294:(
271:(
250:(
221:(
194:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.