240:
borderline spam and I see that the same editor has started creating a mass of
Weather related articles as well. I hate to say it, but I do think that there's a COI involved here given that this editor seems to be a SPA and one that appears to only be here to promote Weathers and his work. Going back to this film, I can't find anything to really show notability - the strongest source was
285:
I've gotten rid of the other articles as sheer, unadulterated spam. Other than some of his early work, almost none of his films pass NFILM and all of the ones created by this editor were unambiguously promotional. This current article is no different and I'd actually endorse a speedy deletion as
239:
after a bunch of them were created en masse by the same editor - the person who also created this article. The problem with this guy's films is that very few of them gain any sort of substantial coverage in reliable sources that would show independent notability. Weathers's article was also
290:
here. However way this is deleted, I would recommend not leaving the article history intact since there is a strong chance that there will be an attempt to recreate this, given that we've had the same person spamming for this director since 2009. It's likely that they'll be back.
244:, which is just a reprint of a press release. The others are all SPS and unusable. I say that this needs to be deleted with no history, since a look at the editor's past actions has shown that he's reverted some of my attempts to redirect
268:
Actually, given the spammy nature of the articles and the fact that they've been doing this for years and haven't responded to prior deletions or attempts to communicate, I'm just going to block them as a spam/advertising only account.
163:
335:
per
Tokyogirl79. Search My Trash is a good source source for interviews, but I'm unconvinced that it can show notability. The other sources are even worse, such as Blogspot and Tumblr.
157:
116:
198:, I cannot see how this is notable. Most of the references listed do not look reliable (blogs, websites with no editorial control, etc.) There is a connection with the
236:
214:
248:, so it's likely that he'll just revert any attempts to redirect with history. Like I said, this guy seems to only be here to promote Weathers's work.
89:
84:
314:
per
Tokyogirl79. This looks a clear case of the advertising behaviour for non-notable films for which the article creator has got himself blocked.
123:
93:
76:
178:
145:
17:
139:
135:
344:
340:
323:
302:
280:
259:
221:
206:
58:
363:
199:
40:
185:
80:
319:
241:
72:
64:
359:
336:
295:
273:
252:
36:
151:
171:
315:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
358:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
292:
270:
249:
287:
231:
218:
203:
195:
110:
235:. I remember this director - I had to nominate some of his films for deletion
352:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
245:
106:
102:
98:
170:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:
8:
213:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:
215:list of Film-related deletion discussions
7:
202:, but notability is not inherited.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
345:00:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
324:16:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
303:14:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
281:14:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
260:14:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
222:09:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
207:09:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
59:17:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
194:Comparing this article with
383:
200:2014 celebrity photo hack
355:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
230:Delete and redirect to
246:past article creations
52:under criterion G11.
73:The Fappening (film)
65:The Fappening (film)
48:The result was
224:
57:
374:
357:
337:NinjaRobotPirate
299:
277:
256:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
56:
50:speedily deleted
34:
382:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:deletion review
353:
297:
275:
254:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
380:
378:
369:
368:
348:
347:
326:
308:
307:
306:
305:
283:
263:
262:
226:
225:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
379:
367:
365:
361:
356:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
325:
321:
317:
316:Chiswick Chap
313:
310:
309:
304:
301:
300:
294:
289:
284:
282:
279:
278:
272:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
258:
257:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
233:
232:Sean Weathers
228:
227:
223:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
54:Seraphimblade
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
354:
351:
332:
328:
311:
296:
274:
253:
237:back in 2013
229:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
293:Tokyogirl79
271:Tokyogirl79
250:Tokyogirl79
158:free images
360:talk page
37:talk page
362:or in a
333:redirect
242:this one
117:View log
39:or in a
298:(｡◕‿◕｡)
276:(｡◕‿◕｡)
255:(｡◕‿◕｡)
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
329:Delete
312:Delete
288:WP:G11
136:Google
94:delete
196:WP:NF
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
341:talk
331:and
320:talk
219:sst✈
204:sst✈
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
343:)
322:)
217:.
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
339:(
318:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.