343:
A quick Google News search shows plenty of reliable sources, such as the
Chicago Daily Herald, Examiner, and several local publications without even digging into archives or investigating deeper. Suggest COI tags for the user and article and taking an axe to the article to remove uncited promotion.
206:
I was about to start abbreviating this outrageously promotional article, but I don't think the subject is notable . It's been here from 2009; about a dozen eds. made trivial corrections, but nobody seems to have thought whether it belongs here in the first place. I think that's typical for articles
429:
both as hopelessly promotional and also as no true evidence of notability I would consider rewriting it, but it cannot be done without sources. And no matter what the published sources are that might be findable, the present article would need total rewriting--it could not possibly be abridged.
175:
169:
287:
357:- People have said that there are lots of reliable sources, yet have not provided any, either here or on the article. Unless and until that happens, I will vote delete.
265:
103:
98:
130:
107:
135:
90:
395:
66:
190:
157:
241:
227:
The article in its current form seems promotional. However, clicking on the news button above, leads me to think that this passess
245:
17:
151:
469:
441:
421:
401:
361:
349:
331:
301:
279:
258:
218:
72:
147:
94:
197:
488:
86:
78:
40:
390:
61:
237:
163:
484:
463:
327:
36:
454:
385:
382:
183:
56:
53:
414:
297:
275:
249:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
483:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
371:
323:
312:
253:
437:
358:
345:
228:
214:
293:
271:
207:
from that period, when it seems we accepted a remarkable level of promotionalism.
124:
374:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
315:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
432:
209:
451:
lack of third party reliable sources and due to promotional concerns --
477:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
182:
381:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
322:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
288:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
413:Needs independent coverage, and I don't see any.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
491:). No further edits should be made to this page.
266:list of Education-related deletion discussions
196:
8:
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
285:
263:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
348:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
1:
87:The Golden Apple Foundation
79:The Golden Apple Foundation
508:
480:Please do not modify it.
470:06:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
442:17:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
422:14:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
402:10:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
362:20:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
350:07:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
73:20:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
332:00:50, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
302:23:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
280:23:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
259:00:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
219:22:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
48:The result was
404:
334:
304:
291:
282:
269:
257:
499:
482:
466:
460:
457:
419:
398:
393:
388:
380:
376:
321:
317:
292:
270:
235:
201:
200:
186:
138:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
507:
506:
502:
501:
500:
498:
497:
496:
495:
489:deletion review
478:
464:
458:
455:
415:
396:
391:
386:
369:
310:
143:
134:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
505:
503:
494:
493:
473:
472:
446:
445:
444:
407:
406:
405:
378:
377:
366:
365:
364:
352:
337:
336:
335:
319:
318:
307:
306:
305:
283:
261:
204:
203:
140:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
504:
492:
490:
486:
481:
475:
474:
471:
468:
467:
462:
461:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
428:
427:Speedy Delete
425:
424:
423:
420:
418:
417:Tigerboy1966
412:
409:
408:
403:
399:
394:
389:
384:
379:
375:
373:
368:
367:
363:
360:
356:
353:
351:
347:
346:User:King4057
342:
339:
338:
333:
329:
325:
320:
316:
314:
309:
308:
303:
299:
295:
289:
284:
281:
277:
273:
267:
262:
260:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
211:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
137:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
479:
476:
453:
452:
448:
431:
426:
416:
410:
370:
354:
340:
311:
233:TonyTheTiger
224:
208:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
49:
47:
31:
28:
324:Ron Ritzman
170:free images
250:WP:CHICAGO
485:talk page
294:• Gene93k
272:• Gene93k
225:Weak Keep
37:talk page
487:or in a
372:Relisted
359:ItsZippy
313:Relisted
131:View log
39:or in a
383:King of
254:WP:FOUR
176:WP refs
164:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
449:Delete
411:Delete
355:Delete
229:WP:GNG
148:Google
108:delete
50:delete
438:talk
215:talk
191:JSTOR
152:books
136:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
465:XЯaɣ
341:Keep
328:talk
298:talk
276:talk
184:FENS
158:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
459:ℬig
433:DGG
246:BIO
231:.--
210:DGG
198:TWL
133:•
129:– (
440:)
400:♠
330:)
300:)
290:.
278:)
268:.
256:)
217:)
178:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
52:.
456:Ð
436:(
397:♣
392:♦
387:♥
326:(
296:(
274:(
252:/
248:/
244:/
242:C
240:/
238:T
236:(
213:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.