137:, the links that are cited are not to the standard required for Knowledge. Only one is from a reputable source, the BBC, but is actually a discussion page and merely collates reader contributions. Even allowing that and the other two links, none make any reference to the 'Ropsley Panther' or 'El Diablo'. In fact, the BBC refers to the Lindsey Leopard, a totally different species! The authors do make the case that other non-notable articles exist. However, according to
386:
Well thanks and i should have with held myself a bit more. I just seem to find it a bit disturbing that sodomy and beastiality or zoophilia as its called, is acceptable. Maybe if i practised these on the beast and wrote a book about it, the page could stay? I'm just saying that there appears to be
156:
As one of the authors, i would just like to say that we mean no harm by this, we would like to share our knowlegde of this animal and hope that others will add info as and when. Any reference to 'El diablo' (as is known locally by children and adults alike) this was removed as it was feared
122:
This was declined a speedy, hence brought here. The authors of the article are clearly acting in good faith (see the lengthy discussion on the article's talk page) but unfortunately the subject fails on a number of
Knowledge criteria.
387:
more offensive/tabooed pages than some bloody black cat, and yes i realise i cant compare whats going on on other pages. As the page is not up to scratch would you mind hurrying up and deleting it, thankyou.--
271:
So its like a pig to the communist slaughter, my article is to be deleted. Well thanks for you time, i hope you all lead dull, boring and un-interesting lives then die gracefully of old age, over and out!!!--
219:
Article is mostly about the Black
Panther and its habitats, with a tiny bit at the top about the fact a few people in the Ropsley area have claimed to see one. Encylopedic, I think not.
115:
173:
I share the same view as Do Dar, however I do believe that the article has promise, and would be of interest to the local people in our community.
88:
83:
92:
75:
287:
Oh and thanks
BlinkingBlimey, this has been mostinteresting, i suppose you should really get back to your job of poo licker, thankyou.--
130:, I have been unable to find any online references to the 'Ropsley Panther' or 'El Diablo' as the article originally titled the beast.
141:
this is not a valid argument for an article's retention. Unfortunately, in this instance the subject is just not notable enough.
17:
424:
324:
256:
375:
429:
396:
379:
357:
329:
296:
280:
261:
228:
207:
182:
166:
150:
57:
449:
36:
448:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
392:
292:
276:
203:
162:
146:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
157:
BlinkingBlimey would delete the page. Hope for the best and prepare for the worst:) Thankyou for your time,--
71:
63:
370:
178:
194:
I should add that references to 'El Diablo' were removed from the article following discussions about
388:
288:
272:
199:
158:
142:
420:
351:
320:
252:
237:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
342:
53:
305:
224:
198:, although this still leaves the problem that the Ropsley Panther itself is not notable.
413:
409:
405:
346:
313:
309:
245:
138:
174:
109:
366:
241:
195:
134:
127:
49:
220:
369:
in this article nor its references and have deleted an earlier version.
341:, perhaps, into some more general article on UK cryptozoology, such as
412:
aren't up for debate here. AfDs stay open for five days, usually. --
442:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
240:for other information, the subject fails
244:due to a lack of reliable sources. --
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
48:, appears to be unverifiable.
1:
430:21:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
397:19:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
380:04:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
358:00:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
330:01:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
297:23:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
281:23:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
262:23:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
229:23:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
208:22:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
183:22:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
167:22:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
151:22:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
58:11:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
469:
406:Knowledge is not censored
445:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
308:, please, and try to
365:. I can't find any
72:The Ropsley Panther
64:The Ropsley Panther
428:
378:
354:
328:
310:assume good faith
260:
133:Second, it fails
460:
447:
418:
374:
371:Accounting4Taste
352:
343:British big cats
318:
250:
126:First, it fails
113:
95:
34:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:deletion review
443:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
455:
454:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
410:other articles
400:
399:
389:The do dar man
383:
382:
360:
335:
334:
333:
332:
300:
299:
289:The do dar man
284:
283:
273:The do dar man
265:
264:
231:
213:
212:
211:
210:
200:BlinkingBlimey
186:
185:
170:
169:
159:The do dar man
143:BlinkingBlimey
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
453:
451:
446:
440:
439:
438:
431:
426:
422:
417:
416:
411:
407:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
385:
384:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
361:
359:
356:
355:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
331:
326:
322:
317:
316:
311:
307:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
263:
258:
254:
249:
248:
243:
239:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
171:
168:
164:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
131:
129:
124:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
444:
441:
436:
414:
362:
350:
338:
314:
268:
246:
233:
216:
191:
132:
125:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
238:coatracking
236:. Besides
367:notability
425:Contribs
415:lifebaka
347:Grutness
325:Contribs
315:lifebaka
306:Civility
257:Contribs
247:lifebaka
116:View log
192:Comment
175:Dbxlr8r
89:protect
84:history
363:Delete
339:Smerge
234:Delete
217:Delete
139:WP:WAX
93:delete
50:Canley
46:delete
312:. --
221:RMHED
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
421:Talk
408:and
393:talk
376:talk
353:wha?
321:Talk
293:talk
277:talk
253:Talk
242:WP:N
225:talk
204:talk
196:WP:N
179:talk
163:talk
147:talk
135:WP:V
128:WP:N
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
349:...
114:– (
423:-
395:)
345:?
323:-
295:)
279:)
269:OK
255:-
227:)
206:)
181:)
165:)
149:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
427:)
419:(
391:(
373::
327:)
319:(
291:(
275:(
259:)
251:(
223:(
202:(
177:(
161:(
145:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.