246:
Before was followed. I have actually been checking all these articles today and suspect major conflict of interest and puppetry going with these pages. The movie and none of the actors in them appear to pass notability and many of the articles seem to be created by users with similar editing styles
392:
While the subject of the article is not yet famous, that's not the only criteria for notability. His roles in his (somewhat) limited repertoire have been sufficient to be noted in press articles in Sneak Peek, The Movie Pool, Horror Asylum amongst others. One article, noting his dropping OUT of a
325:. I'm assuming that the 2004 Times article is more substantial and direct, as it is cited as directly praising the subject. If this is the case, this probably is enough to constitute notability alongside the other sources.
179:
265:
173:
134:
139:
107:
102:
111:
247:
and patterns, some of whom have been blocked from editing. If have a real reason why the article should be kept you are welcome to comment.
94:
194:
161:
71:
17:
393:
film produced a news article, so I don't think notability can really be the argument for deletion. He clearly passes
155:
57:
410:
384:
363:
334:
309:
279:
256:
237:
219:
76:
429:
151:
98:
40:
201:
425:
359:
305:
36:
90:
82:
380:
187:
66:
167:
252:
215:
406:
275:
233:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
424:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
355:
344:
330:
301:
290:
394:
61:
376:
248:
211:
53:
402:
322:
271:
229:
128:
398:
326:
347:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
293:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
321:. Many references, although most are either trivial or of uncertain
418:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:- Has WP:BEFORE been followed? What did the nominator find?
397:
and given the coverage in reliable sources, seems to pass
266:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
124:
120:
116:
186:
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
300:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
375:The BBC ref and the Times article seem to satisfy
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
432:). No further edits should be made to this page.
200:
8:
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
449:
77:00:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
421:Please do not modify it.
411:02:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
385:06:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
364:00:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
335:18:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
310:00:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
280:13:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
257:01:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
238:00:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
220:00:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
91:Thomas James Longley
83:Thomas James Longley
210:Non-notable actor.
48:The result was
366:
312:
282:
269:
58:non-admin closure
440:
423:
353:
349:
299:
295:
270:
205:
204:
190:
142:
132:
114:
74:
69:
64:
34:
448:
447:
443:
442:
441:
439:
438:
437:
436:
430:deletion review
419:
381:William Thweatt
342:
288:
147:
138:
105:
89:
86:
72:
67:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
446:
444:
435:
434:
414:
413:
387:
369:
368:
367:
351:
350:
339:
338:
337:
315:
314:
313:
297:
296:
285:
284:
283:
261:
260:
259:
241:
240:
208:
207:
144:
85:
80:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
445:
433:
431:
427:
422:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
391:
388:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
365:
361:
357:
352:
348:
346:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
311:
307:
303:
298:
294:
292:
287:
286:
281:
277:
273:
267:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
145:
141:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
75:
70:
65:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
420:
417:
389:
372:
343:
318:
289:
225:
209:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
49:
47:
31:
28:
356:Ron Ritzman
323:reliability
302:Ron Ritzman
174:free images
401:as well.
426:talk page
319:Weak keep
272:• Gene93k
37:talk page
428:or in a
395:WP:BASIC
345:Relisted
291:Relisted
249:Ridernyc
212:Ridernyc
135:View log
39:or in a
403:Vertium
230:Carrite
226:Comment
180:WP refs
168:scholar
108:protect
103:history
377:WP:ENT
327:JulesH
152:Google
112:delete
54:WP:ENT
52:. per
195:JSTOR
156:books
140:Stats
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
407:talk
399:WP:N
390:Keep
373:Keep
360:talk
331:talk
306:talk
276:talk
253:talk
234:talk
216:talk
188:FENS
162:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
60:) —
50:keep
383:|
202:TWL
137:•
133:– (
73:Lum
68:Sat
63:Hue
409:)
379:--
362:)
333:)
308:)
278:)
268:.
255:)
236:)
218:)
182:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
405:(
358:(
329:(
304:(
274:(
251:(
232:(
214:(
206:)
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
146:(
143:)
131:)
93:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.