Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Timothy Lincoln Beckwith - Knowledge

Source 📝

316:– Beckwith does not appear to be poor, either financially (with a large settlement gained near adulthood) or because he has a WP article. There's no sourced mention of 'hounding', just that he doesn't grant interviews and said "let's let the past be the past." History is what happened; we may not like what happened, but that's not a justification for covering it up. Let it be. For the subject's supposed insignificance, the article has been receiving on average 247:, however, with two exceptions they simply mention this guy's existence in relation to the paternity lawsuit his mother launched when he was an infant. The two exceptions are articles which basically report on the subject politely saying "no comment" when being hounded by reporters for quotes followed by, what appears to be, simply a regurgitation of this very WP entry. 378:
I disagree that all the info is there. The article about his birth certificate father, Robert, also does not include: his birthplace, which court ordered the blood test, educa to tion information, how his mother came to meet Robert, any info about the financial settlement given, or any info on where
340:
In principal I have no issue with this, however, all that content is currently in his mother's article. In fact, with the exception of the last two sentences - establishing that he's a lawyer and doesn't give interviews - this is basically a duplication of his mother's article.
524:
I can't see any real notability here. It's all about Abe. Perhaps a brief mention in the article on Abraham Lincoln on how his line has died out would be appropriate and this person could be mentioned as a claimant, but I don't see anything else worth saving here.
209: 556:
is all about AL. But the only reason anybody is interested in this person at all is because of Abe. Whatever (if anything) there is to say about him can go into the article on Abraham Lincoln. --
203: 162: 275: 543:
Abraham, of whom you write the article is 'all about', is only mentioned once. As noted above, the information is reliably sourced to prominent newspapers. —
135: 130: 139: 109: 294: 94: 169: 122: 583:
obviously applies here. As far as I can tell, the subject has done nothing of note other than being the distant descendant of somebody famous. --
240:
This poor fellow got the Scarlet Letter of a Knowledge BLP for being the illegitimate child of the wife of Abraham Lincoln's great-great grandson.
224: 191: 453:
is also not releveant as it is about notability being inherited when the subject does not otherwise satisfy notability guidelines.--
445:. The New Yorker article and the Palm Beach Post article represent signficant coverage about the subject in reliable sources. 89: 82: 17: 185: 631: 599: 590: 565: 547: 534: 514: 485: 459: 431: 399: 373: 359: 350: 328: 321: 305: 286: 267: 64: 103: 99: 181: 496: 416: 126: 648: 40: 231: 118: 70: 644: 427: 36: 197: 615: 561: 530: 510: 449:
refers to events and is not relevant here, the subject is notable for one reason, not for one event.
627: 611: 580: 481: 473: 454: 450: 369: 346: 263: 255: 217: 587: 298: 279: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
643:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
557: 526: 507: 469: 446: 251: 623: 477: 365: 342: 259: 55: 619: 603: 584: 442: 607: 544: 396: 356: 325: 317: 244: 156: 337: 320:. If deletion is decided, I suggest that content be merged with his 472:
there would have been no Knowledge article. The article rides on
379:
he or his mother went. The sources for much of this include the
639:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
499:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
419:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
364:
Sorry, typo, I meant his mother's former husband's article.
338:"If deletion is decided, I suggest that content be merged" 152: 148: 144: 468:
Without the claim that the subject is a descendant of
216: 505:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 425:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 651:). No further edits should be made to this page. 293:Note: This discussion has been included in the 274:Note: This discussion has been included in the 258:I think we should dispense with this article. 276:list of Virginia-related deletion discussions 230: 8: 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 292: 273: 295:list of Law-related deletion discussions 612:related to someone historically famous 7: 602:. The contested article is about a 24: 618:. All that remains is a claim to 610:, on account of supposedly being 322:mother's former husband's article 355:Where is his mother's article? — 95:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 632:06:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 591:02:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 566:22:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC) 548:20:07, 13 December 2018 (UTC) 535:14:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC) 486:06:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 460:10:02, 29 November 2018 (UTC) 432:05:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC) 400:01:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 374:19:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 360:19:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 351:18:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 329:14:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 306:11:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 287:11:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 268:10:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 65:10:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 515:13:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC) 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 668: 641:Please do not modify it. 614:. Then, even that claim 119:Timothy Lincoln Beckwith 71:Timothy Lincoln Beckwith 32:Please do not modify it. 598:per nomination and our 552:I'm not saying that th 608:a single claim to fame 318:over 200 views per day 250:On the basis of both 83:Articles for deletion 600:merciful disposition 385:The Washington Post 457: 517: 455: 434: 308: 289: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 63: 659: 620:Wikipedian space 504: 502: 500: 430: 424: 422: 420: 339: 303: 284: 235: 234: 220: 172: 160: 142: 80: 62: 60: 53: 34: 667: 666: 662: 661: 660: 658: 657: 656: 655: 649:deletion review 518: 495: 493: 470:Abraham Lincoln 435: 426: 415: 413: 381:Chicago Tribune 299: 280: 177: 168: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 665: 663: 654: 653: 635: 634: 593: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 538: 537: 503: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 463: 462: 456:Pontificalibus 423: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 389:The New Yorker 332: 331: 310: 309: 290: 238: 237: 174: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 664: 652: 650: 646: 642: 637: 636: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 606:who once had 605: 604:living person 601: 597: 594: 592: 589: 586: 582: 578: 575: 574: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 550: 549: 546: 542: 541: 540: 539: 536: 532: 528: 523: 520: 519: 516: 513: 512: 509: 501: 498: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 466: 465: 464: 461: 458: 452: 448: 444: 440: 437: 436: 433: 429: 428:North America 421: 418: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362: 361: 358: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 312: 311: 307: 304: 302: 296: 291: 288: 285: 283: 277: 272: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 248: 246: 241: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 640: 638: 595: 581:WP:INHERITED 576: 553: 521: 506: 494: 474:WP:INHERITED 451:WP:INHERITED 438: 414: 392: 388: 384: 380: 313: 301:CAPTAIN RAJU 300: 282:CAPTAIN RAJU 281: 256:WP:INHERITED 249: 242: 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 165: 76: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 204:free images 558:Randykitty 527:Randykitty 441:Satisfies 243:There are 58:Sandstein 645:talk page 624:The Gnome 616:collapsed 478:The Gnome 393:USA Today 366:Chetsford 343:Chetsford 260:Chetsford 37:talk page 647:or in a 585:RoySmith 497:Relisted 476:tails. - 447:WP:BLP1E 417:Relisted 252:WP:BLP1E 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 554:article 545:ADavidB 397:ADavidB 357:ADavidB 326:ADavidB 210:WP refs 198:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 596:Delete 588:(talk) 577:Delete 522:Delete 511:Sailor 443:WP:GNG 391:, and 182:Google 140:delete 50:delete 245:WP:RS 225:JSTOR 186:books 170:Stats 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 628:talk 562:talk 531:talk 482:talk 439:Keep 370:talk 347:talk 314:Keep 264:talk 254:and 218:FENS 192:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 622:. - 579:. 508:Sam 395:. — 324:. — 232:TWL 161:– ( 630:) 564:) 533:) 525:-- 484:) 387:, 383:, 372:) 349:) 297:. 278:. 266:) 212:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 52:. 626:( 560:( 529:( 480:( 368:( 345:( 262:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 166:· 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
10:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Timothy Lincoln Beckwith

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Timothy Lincoln Beckwith
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.