Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/UFMOD - Knowledge

Source 📝

624:. In brief, that means multiple reliable sources are available. This AFD has become quite confusing because you have been filling it up with personal observations and links (some of which you have said yourself are not reliable sources) that don't have anything to do with Knowledge's definition of notability. - 678:
No, self published web sites such as WASM.RU are not reliable sources. Even if they are styled as magazines(VR-Online) or as an official publication of a niche operating system(Kolibri N10). They must have independent editorial processes and a reputation for fact checking. Reliable sources are things
276:
As far as I know, the uFMOD is the only XM player written in pure assembly. It's the first one available for FreeBSD and KolibriOS. Maybe there are other reasons why it's notable. I'm still researching the topic. Some sources are so old that they are available through web archive only. An interesting
407:
I'm not claiming that Habr is a reliable source. That reference is useful to identify the author of the original article: real name, address, other publications and so forth. On the other hand, I don't understand why Sudo Null is not a reliable news site. They appear as a reference in many articles
324:
sudonull is an IT news site, not a blog; kolibri-n.org is a news site about KolibriOS, probably the oldest one, known since 2007. There are references to this site in the official kolibrios.org website. WASM.RU was one of the very first low level programming sites, older than the Knowledge. I can't
372:
I've been digging and finding more interesting sources. This one is a review published in Russian in 2011. It's interesting because the reviewer is saying that uFMOD is the only XM library written in assembly. He also mentions support for x64.Regarding that article in SudoNull mentioned earlier, I
605:
I think that's exactly what Randall Hyde et al were discussing in that mailing list 15 years ago (the first reference I posted above). Personally I don't think that writing a big project in assembly is notable per se. However, I do think that a multiplatform project written in pure assembly is
566:, the author of many programming books. Note that these articles were published as an electronic magazine, including cover, editorial, serial numeration, from 2000 to 2012. Apparently they stopped publishing in March 2012. This is their article about uFMOD: 663:
magazine. Some of their editions are still available for download in PDF. You can also find their books on Apple books and other bookstores. I didn't say that the other sources are not reliable. I just didn't find enough facts to prove their reliability.
281:...Another source mentions that uFMOD is the preferred option in demo scene and gamedev when the size limit is 115K or less.Another interesting source is WASM.RU. It is long dead, but still available through web archive.I've found over 20 citations on 408:
in the Knowledge. They are not self publishing because the article was originally published in a different site, in a different language. Even if you don't like Sudo Null, there are still other references like WASM and Kolibri N10.
654:
The WASM community pioneered the Zen Programming subculture. If you google for "History of one byte by Dmitry Galuscenko" you will find that it was originally published in WASM. Another suitable, independent and reliable source is
606:
notable. Moreover, the fact that it was the first XM player available for BSD and Kolibri and the only static player for Linux seems rather notable as well. Based on the other references, I think it's also the smallest XM player.
198: 277:
15yo discussion, which mentions uFMOD as one of the reasons why assembly programming is still alive. Notice that the people in this discussion are really famous. For example, there is
697:(RIP). You can keep insisting in selfediting, lack of fact checking and peer reviews when referring to all those guys and even qualify their work as "niche". I'm off this discussion. 159: 253: 620:
On Knowledge, especially in deletion discussions, when someone says 'notable' they mean that it meets the Knowledge's notability guideline, which you can find at
192: 391:. Self published sites and user generated content, even if they style themselves 'news sites', are not the kind of sources we need to establish notability. - 106: 91: 52:. This debate suffered from a low participation rate. No prejudice against re-nominating this in 2 or 3 months if convincing sources cannot be found. 587:
I don't understand why the fact that this is written in "pure assembly" has any bearing on its notability. Please explain this a bit better,
443: 325:
imagine more reliable sources. Obviously there are no articles about demoscene or low level programming on CNN, NYT, Bloomberg.
86: 79: 17: 455: 423: 100: 96: 213: 532: 467: 345: 180: 734: 132: 127: 40: 136: 596: 119: 730: 36: 650:
a suitable, independent, reliable source? There are many direct references to WASM.RU in Google.books:
174: 411: 57: 547: 307: 230: 206: 170: 702: 669: 611: 577: 419: 378: 360: 330: 294: 261: 241: 706: 688: 673: 633: 615: 600: 581: 551: 400: 382: 365: 334: 319: 298: 265: 245: 61: 684: 629: 592: 396: 315: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
729:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
220: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
679:
like newspaper articles, peer reviewed journals, or books from major academic publishers. -
234: 479: 53: 694: 543: 651: 306:. Blogs, web forums, and USENET postings are not reliable sources. This does not meet 698: 665: 607: 588: 573: 506: 415: 374: 355: 326: 290: 257: 237: 680: 625: 392: 388: 311: 278: 186: 153: 639: 621: 570: 373:
found that it was originally written in Russian and published in Habr in 2014.
123: 286: 494: 518: 483: 282: 115: 67: 725:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
659:. They are the official Kolibri magazine. The same goes about 558:
I found another interesting source. This one was published in
535:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
348:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
149: 145: 141: 205: 652:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=wasm.ru
644:
existence of suitable independent, reliable sources
542:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 495:"Music in KolibriOS: full review and latest news" 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 737:). No further edits should be made to this page. 252:Note: This discussion has been included in the 638:The definition of notability is very simple. 571:http://www.vr-online.ru/content/xm-player-494 254:list of Software-related deletion discussions 219: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 251: 233:, unable to find any RS while looking for 285:.AC97SND, the built-in audio player for 436: 7: 456:"Development of the game in 115 kb" 24: 693:FYI, one of the WASM editors was 92:Introduction to deletion process 480:"Search for uFMOD on Pouet.net" 387:More blog postings. Please see 289:, uses uFMOD to play XM files. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 754: 642:defines notability as the 616:21:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 601:20:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 582:05:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 552:00:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 519:"Разработка игры в 115 кб" 401:16:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 383:15:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 366:03:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 335:16:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC) 320:15:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC) 562:, the website founded by 299:16:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC) 266:18:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 246:18:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 727:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 707:18:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 689:17:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 674:17:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 634:16:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 62:14:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 497:, Kirill Lipatov, 2015 468:"Multimedia projects" 80:Articles for deletion 646:. For example, is 229:No way satisfying 554: 414:comment added by 368: 268: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 745: 541: 538: 536: 522: 516: 510: 504: 498: 492: 486: 477: 471: 465: 459: 453: 447: 441: 427: 363: 358: 353: 351: 349: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 753: 752: 748: 747: 746: 744: 743: 742: 741: 735:deletion review 721: 531: 529: 527: 526: 525: 517: 513: 505: 501: 493: 489: 478: 474: 470:, WASM.RU, 2006 466: 462: 454: 450: 442: 438: 409: 369: 361: 356: 344: 342: 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 751: 749: 740: 739: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 695:Kris Kaspersky 568: 567: 564:Mikhail Flenov 539: 528: 524: 523: 511: 509:, Gnomov, 2011 499: 487: 472: 460: 448: 435: 434: 430: 429: 428: 405: 404: 403: 352: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 301: 270: 269: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 750: 738: 736: 732: 728: 723: 722: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 662: 658: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 604: 603: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 572: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 553: 549: 545: 537: 534: 520: 515: 512: 508: 503: 500: 496: 491: 488: 485: 481: 476: 473: 469: 464: 461: 457: 452: 449: 445: 440: 437: 433: 425: 421: 417: 413: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 371: 370: 367: 364: 359: 350: 347: 336: 332: 328: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 236: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 726: 724: 660: 656: 647: 643: 593:Phil Bridger 569: 563: 559: 540: 530: 521:, 28-11-2014 514: 502: 490: 475: 463: 451: 444:"NASM dead?" 439: 431: 410:— Preceding 343: 308:WP:NSOFTWARE 303: 279:Randall Hyde 273: 231:WP:NSOFTWARE 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 657:Kolibri N10 193:free images 432:References 54:Randykitty 731:talk page 661:VR-Online 560:VR-Online 544:Barkeep49 287:KolibriOS 235:WP:Before 37:talk page 733:or in a 699:Dr.KBAHT 666:Dr.KBAHT 608:Dr.KBAHT 589:Dr.KBAHT 574:Dr.KBAHT 533:Relisted 424:contribs 416:Dr.KBAHT 412:unsigned 375:Dr.KBAHT 346:Relisted 327:Dr.KBAHT 291:Dr.KBAHT 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 681:MrOllie 648:WASM.RU 626:MrOllie 507:"uFMOD" 393:MrOllie 312:MrOllie 258:Chirota 238:Chirota 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 458:, 2014 446:, 2006 362:plicit 304:Delete 171:Google 137:delete 484:Pouet 389:WP:RS 283:Pouet 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 116:UFMOD 68:UFMOD 16:< 703:talk 685:talk 670:talk 640:WP:N 630:talk 622:WP:N 612:talk 597:talk 578:talk 548:talk 420:talk 397:talk 379:talk 331:talk 316:talk 310:. - 295:talk 274:Keep 262:talk 242:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 221:TWL 158:– ( 705:) 687:) 672:) 632:) 614:) 599:) 591:. 580:) 550:) 482:, 426:) 422:• 399:) 381:) 333:) 318:) 297:) 264:) 256:. 244:) 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 701:( 683:( 668:( 628:( 610:( 595:( 576:( 546:( 418:( 395:( 377:( 357:✗ 329:( 314:( 293:( 260:( 240:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Randykitty
talk
14:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
UFMOD

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
UFMOD
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.