Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/UGOPlayer (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

151:. If neccassary, I'll bring in my username, but I trust you all know that I have one and don't use it very regularly. It has high alexi ratings, it has many google hits, and it is probably one of the 5 largest non-centered forums on the web (EbaumsWorld, YTMND, Newgrounds, SomethingAwful, and Flashplayer. All are based on user submitted work, and have no direct focus on any topics). If that is not notable, then I do not know what is. It has 60,000 members, unless you for some reason believe the site lies regularly. I disagree with the notabiltiy "Requirements" for a website, and this is the most obvious case. I think keep, and change the notability requirements to include something on ratings or hits. 138:
it fails, but it has a popularity greater than that of many other sites on Knowledge (XXG). So it seems very possible that someone might visit that site, then look here to find out more information on it. But because it seems not to have any references outside of its own domain, the article cannot be
139:
sourced, so only things that are self-evident from visiting UGOplayer itself can really be included. And that means this article will provide no new information that couldn't be discovered from just visiting the site, rendering it fairly pointless. I will remain neutral, for the time being
91:
had a discussion which involved alexa rankings. Alexa rankings may show this topic has appeal; it cannot, however, provide us with sources from which to write an article. Knowledge (XXG) is not a primary source. Either we change that principle or we enforce it.
255:
This is a fairly new article, I think you should keep it up just because it need long enough for it to grow. Sources can be found, links can be made and etc. so dont kill the baby, its like abortion.
194:
for now, since I've been involved in an edit war and am tempted to vote to delete for the wrong reason. The IP above is the other party, and nominator has been editing the article recently also.
75:, google links, once you strip out the links on the site itself, amount to six pages. This can be seen by typing UGOPlayer into google yourself. The page is vanity whewre it is not spam and 210:
a web directory; therefore we require independent sources from which to document a given topic. In this instance they do not currently exist, and thus an article which does not violate
206:
The question should not be one of notability here, it should be that there are no sources from which to build an encyclopedic article. Knowledge (XXG) is, quite clearly,
55:. I did not count votes from anonymous IPs are users whose only edits were to the page in question and to this AFD. Without those votes the decision was unanimous. 88: 17: 23: 298: 271: 259: 247: 231: 198: 184: 172: 155: 143: 126: 114: 101: 59: 313: 43: 122:. It seems extremely popular which makes me wonder why there's so little written about it outside of this article. 83:
on which to build an article, and so I bring it here asking the community to discuss whether policies should be
312:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
163:: Unless you login and post a comment, the closing admin is highly likely to discount your recommendation. 140: 152: 256: 65: 36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
268: 244: 227: 168: 97: 56: 211: 135: 76: 72: 80: 280: 181: 123: 111: 215: 195: 236:
If no reputable third-party sources are covering this website, we cannot either.
241: 223: 164: 93: 222:. There are no credible third party sources for this article to rely upon. 79:. There are no references provided, there are no external sources meeting 24:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UGOPlayer (second nomination)
306:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
87:
to allow this article's inclusion. The original discussion, at
134:. I honestly can't decide either way about this article. Under 220:
Articles should rely on credible, third-party sources
267:
as spam (IP editors), advertisement, non-notable. --
46:). No further edits should be made to this page. 316:). No further edits should be made to this page. 110:as spam, advertisement, non-notable (per nom). 89:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UGOPlayer 8: 180:Here. I'm logged it. I vote strong keep. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 31: 77:wikipedia is not a web directory 1: 214:cannot be written. Note that 51:The result of the debate was 240:for lack of verifiability. 279:per verifiability, WP:WEB. 333: 299:12:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 272:14:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 260:22:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 248:15:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 232:19:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 199:05:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 185:01:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 173:00:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 156:19:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 144:17:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 127:17:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 115:15:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 102:13:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 60:16:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 309:Please do not modify it. 39:Please do not modify it. 228:The wikipedian meme 98:The wikipedian meme 71:The website fails 230: 212:original research 100: 22:(Redirected from 324: 311: 296: 293: 290: 287: 226: 96: 41: 27: 332: 331: 327: 326: 325: 323: 322: 321: 320: 314:deletion review 307: 294: 291: 288: 285: 253:Keep the monkey 69: 44:deletion review 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 330: 328: 319: 318: 302: 301: 281:Andrew Lenahan 274: 262: 250: 234: 218:requires that 201: 189: 188: 187: 175: 146: 129: 117: 68: 63: 49: 48: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 329: 317: 315: 310: 304: 303: 300: 297: 282: 278: 275: 273: 270: 266: 263: 261: 258: 254: 251: 249: 246: 243: 239: 235: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 197: 193: 190: 186: 183: 179: 178:Certification 176: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 158: 157: 154: 153:68.192.25.106 150: 147: 145: 142: 137: 133: 130: 128: 125: 121: 118: 116: 113: 109: 106: 105: 104: 103: 99: 95: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 54: 47: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 308: 305: 284: 276: 264: 252: 237: 219: 207: 203: 191: 177: 160: 148: 131: 119: 107: 84: 70: 52: 50: 38: 35: 269:MaNeMeBasat 149:Strong Keep 120:Weak delete 57:Chick Bowen 182:Sbloemeke 124:AKADriver 112:Slowmover 66:UGOPlayer 257:Arby A3K 196:Fagstein 204:Comment 192:Abstain 161:Comment 132:Comment 277:Delete 265:Delete 245:(talk) 242:Friday 238:Delete 224:Hiding 165:Stifle 141:Trebor 136:WP:WEB 108:Delete 94:Hiding 73:WP:WEB 53:delete 81:WP:RS 16:< 216:WP:V 169:talk 85:bent 292:bli 208:not 295:nd 289:ar 286:St 283:- 171:) 167:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UGOPlayer (second nomination)
deletion review
Chick Bowen
16:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
UGOPlayer
WP:WEB
wikipedia is not a web directory
WP:RS
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UGOPlayer
Hiding
The wikipedian meme
13:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Slowmover
15:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
AKADriver
17:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
WP:WEB
Trebor
17:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
68.192.25.106
19:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Stifle
talk
00:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Sbloemeke
01:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Fagstein
05:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
original research

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.