72:, ("does not exist" - what, do we have to turn an accelerator over to making it 24/7 to keep an atom of it in existence at all times for it to be worthy of treatment?), and the concept of a "vanity element" is nonsensical.
194:, and this should be reason enough to keep this article - roentgenium (unununium) also does not exist in principle, but we can make this element should we want it, and the same applies with ununbium. --
57:- more sciencecruft vanity elements. This does not exist and is not officially recognized. Google searches throw up no serious literature, only Knowledge (XXG) mirrors.
17:
235:
36:
90:? The only fundamental difference is that one has been named and one hasn't (they're pretty slow about these things).
234:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
It is simply not notable enough. How many people are really interested in this? It's extreme sciencecruft.
181:
80:
58:
195:
111:
104:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
208:
191:
145:
133:
91:
73:
87:
171:
155:
130:
48:
220:
although it's quite likely to still be a stub for the next 10 years.
228:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
164:. Delete the VfDcruft. ] 15:30, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
238:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
180:. VfDcruft! Haha... I like that term. --
124:by the lister. ] 22:26, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
110:Keep. I am fed up with deletion trolls.
154:. Clearly encyclopedic. Abuse of VfD.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
44:The result of the debate was - kept
24:
120:. This is clear and categorical
207:article, delete VfD submitter. —
201:Keep ] 06:39, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
1:
255:
213:18:39, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
107:21:01, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
83:21:04, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
76:20:59, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
61:20:40, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
231:Please do not modify it.
198:19:50, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
184:00:59, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
174:21:43, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
158:09:22, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
148:08:09, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
138:23:06, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
114:22:25, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
94:21:33, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
136:
86:Why this and not
246:
233:
134:
70:been synthesised
34:
254:
253:
249:
248:
247:
245:
244:
243:
242:
236:deletion review
229:
52:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
252:
250:
241:
240:
223:
215:
214:
202:
199:
192:Periodic Table
190:. It's in the
185:
182:Idont Havaname
175:
165:
159:
149:
139:
125:
115:
108:
99:
98:
97:
96:
95:
51:
46:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
251:
239:
237:
232:
226:
225:
224:
221:
219:
212:
211:
206:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
137:
132:
129:
126:
123:
119:
116:
113:
112:Mark Richards
109:
106:
105:DCEdwards1966
103:
100:
93:
89:
85:
84:
82:
78:
77:
75:
71:
67:
64:
63:
62:
60:
56:
50:
47:
45:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
230:
227:
222:
217:
216:
209:
204:
187:
177:
167:
161:
151:
141:
127:
121:
117:
101:
81:Trollminator
69:
65:
59:Trollminator
54:
53:
43:
31:
28:
188:Strong keep
178:Strong keep
88:Roentgenium
66:Strong keep
210:tregoweth
146:Skysmith
92:Shimgray
74:Shimgray
49:Ununbium
68:; it's
196:Andrew
55:Delete
172:Jayjg
122:abuse
16:<
218:Keep
205:Keep
168:Keep
162:Keep
152:Keep
142:Keep
128:Keep
118:Keep
102:Keep
156:jni
131:fvw
170:.
144:-
135:*
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.