520:. Notability can be inferred from the various sources cited on the page (including articles from national broadsheet newspapers), in addition to the links provided here. Furthermore, the biographical page on Robin Banerjee can't be clubbed with this place which is now getting reconstructed to become a tourist attraction, unbeknown to you, but not to the citizens of the region, else there wouldn't have been any print media coverage. And the argument that it is a
693:, point is not to promote Knowledge as a Travel Guide, clearly it isn't, but a place that has been taken up by Government Ministry for preservation, besides current reconstruction to open it up for general public and that's being written about in various newspapers (enough sources here and on the relevant page), it is worthy enough to be an independent article. National broadsheet newspapers -
537:
fallen apart. I would still reemphasise that the criterion for nominating the article for deletion just based on search engine hits is illegitimate to begin with, and hence, the page should be reinstated so that with time more information from various other sources could be incorporated so that it evolves in the due course.
420:
if appears too short (believe, that should've been done at the first place to encourage more edits to bring it to Wiki standards instead of marking it for deletion without any due diligence) however, in its current form and structure, the page is adequately informative. The updated page with sources
381:
and The Assam Travel Guide entry (which demonstrates the museum is a recognised tourist attraction). The one problem that will need resolving is the common name for the museum, but rather than repeatedly moving the page while this discussion is going on, it's a problem that can be addressed later.
536:
can't be a determining factor to consider eligibility of a page when it doesn't violate any wikipedia policies. If the editors feel that only topics that have high media coverage or relate to places of grandeur are fit to be on wikipedia then clearly, the whole concept of constructive editing has
411:
because
Knowledge is not based on # of search engine hits. It is a world encyclopedia with the objective to provide information on many subjects irrespective of whether the topic is highest or least rated on internet or has no electronic media coverage. There are multiple articles written about
674:
can be unambiguously ruled out. The argument that the place can't have a separate article based on # of search engine hits can't be a premise for any conclusion, Knowledge can include topics supported with multiple sources irrespective of electronic or print media coverage.
55:. There is clear consensus that this should not exist as a stand-alone article. Beyond that, opinion is pretty evenly split between redirect, merge, and delete, with no particularly compelling argument to make one of those stand out.
283:
669:
for the pointer, noted. I stand by my proposition to retain this article as the place has been mentioned in different newspapers, sufficient to support it as an independent article, thereby the 'not-notable' as stated by
220:
620:
277:
173:
146:
141:
214:
150:
133:
826:, with no prejudice to an independent article at some future date if museum thrives and attracts coverage. At present, the coverage has been minor, sufficient to make
487:
as I concur this is simply a localized place, and there's nothing to suggest genuine substance for independent notability or that there exists signs of better.
600:
559:
I've struck out your second 'Keep' vote because, while you are welcome to comment as many times as you like in a discussion, you should only 'vote' once.
805:
with Robin
Banerjee. The articles cited lean heavily on the notability of Banerjee as owner/founder. The museum on its own has little or no notability.
314:
Non-notable musem. Virtually zero hits on the search engines (except to this
Wikipage). Current sourcing consists of... well, doesn't exist, actually.
100:
95:
180:
104:
298:
87:
137:
378:
265:
422:
374:
758:
680:
517:
454:
would be appropriate. Merge instead of just redirect because there is info about the museum here that is not in the target article.
235:
129:
259:
202:
373:
I've amended my !vote to 'Keep' on the basis of the additional convincing sources found by AnjanBorah, in particular the lengthy
62:. Perhaps not everything needs to be merged, but I'll leave that up to whoever performs the merge. Leave a redirect behind. --
791:
764:
325:
17:
255:
516:
the museum is currently being reconstructed to make it appealing to a wider audience and will be reopened for public viewing
416:
however, that doesn't take away the credibility of listing it with a dedicated
Knowledge page. The page might be tagged as
305:
196:
843:
814:
726:
687:
article stated earlier. The page warrants enough sources to stand as an independent write-up, thus should be retained.
660:
632:
612:
591:
568:
546:
505:
479:
460:
438:
399:
364:
69:
429:
newspaper (a premier Indian broadsheet newspaper) and thus known (if not popular) to people in that geographic area.
91:
773:
735:
192:
862:
787:
40:
753:
587:
500:
271:
242:
345:
58:
Numerically, there's a slight leaning towards delete, but I'm going to call this a merge, in deference to
671:
583:
858:
839:
810:
656:
83:
75:
36:
783:
722:
542:
434:
208:
748:
745:
488:
291:
228:
827:
66:
450:. I don't think there is enough to warrant an article about this "museum", but a paragraph in
628:
608:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
857:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
835:
806:
690:
652:
421:
shows that the place has been mentioned from time to time on various print media, including
528:
on the basis of which this deletion has been proposed by the initiator in the first place.
718:
710:
564:
538:
430:
395:
387:
360:
823:
644:
451:
447:
339:
51:
706:
475:
383:
315:
63:
59:
624:
604:
834:
preserving the sources is the most efficient way to retain the useful information.
342:, on the basis organisations have a higher notability threhold than people. Though
167:
121:
651:. Knowledge is not a travel guide to have an article on every travel attraction.
714:
666:
560:
391:
356:
683:
Govt. of India in, besides reconstruction of the building as per the other
470:
455:
354:
I don't think that is enough to support a separate
Knowledge article.
352:(India) reporting the announcement of the creation of the museum,
851:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
679:
article that you mentioned, states preservation of this site by
776:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
738:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
468:- A small personal collection, of no encyclopedic concern.
621:
list of
Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
163:
159:
155:
117:
113:
109:
290:
227:
782:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
744:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
412:places lesser know to the world in general, e.g.,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
865:). No further edits should be made to this page.
382:Sufficient reliable secondary coverage to pass
518:as per this latest article, dated August 2016
304:
241:
8:
619:Note: This debate has been included in the
599:Note: This debate has been included in the
618:
601:list of India-related deletion discussions
598:
830:a significan tfactor, but I think that a
645:Robin_Banerjee#Uncle_Robin.27s_Museum
7:
705:entry qualify the article to pass
24:
130:Natural History Museum - Golaghat
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
844:13:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
815:05:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
792:07:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
765:04:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
727:02:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
661:00:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
633:00:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
613:00:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
70:03:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
592:20:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
569:23:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
547:22:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
534:the # of search engine hits
530:Collection how big or small
526:the # of search engine hits
506:02:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
480:02:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
461:04:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
439:17:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
400:23:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
365:13:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
326:11:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
882:
854:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
524:is as insubstantial as
703:The Assam Travel Guide
74:
375:article in The Hindu
84:Uncle Robin's Museum
76:Uncle Robin's Museum
713:norms as stated by
377:, smaller piece in
820:Merge and Redirect
794:
767:
701:, in addition to
635:
615:
873:
856:
781:
779:
777:
761:
756:
751:
743:
741:
739:
522:small collection
503:
498:
322:
319:
309:
308:
294:
246:
245:
231:
183:
171:
153:
125:
107:
34:
881:
880:
876:
875:
874:
872:
871:
870:
869:
863:deletion review
852:
795:
784:Spirit of Eagle
772:
770:
768:
759:
754:
749:
734:
732:
681:DoNER Ministry,
582:. Not notable.
501:
489:
320:
317:
251:
188:
179:
144:
128:
98:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
879:
877:
868:
867:
847:
846:
824:Robin Banerjee
817:
780:
769:
742:
731:
730:
729:
688:
672:Sportsfan 1234
663:
637:
636:
616:
595:
594:
584:Sportsfan 1234
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
552:
551:
550:
549:
482:
463:
452:Robin Banerjee
448:Robin Banerjee
441:
414:Hum in Croatia
405:
404:
403:
402:
368:
367:
340:Robin Banerjee
312:
311:
248:
185:
126:
78:
73:
52:Robin Banerjee
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
878:
866:
864:
860:
855:
849:
848:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
818:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
797:
796:
793:
789:
785:
778:
775:
766:
762:
757:
752:
747:
740:
737:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:The Telegraph
692:
689:
686:
682:
678:
677:The Telegraph
673:
668:
664:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
639:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
597:
596:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
577:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
548:
544:
540:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
513:
509:
508:
507:
504:
499:
496:
492:
486:
483:
481:
477:
473:
472:
467:
464:
462:
459:
458:
453:
449:
445:
442:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
419:
415:
410:
407:
406:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
350:The Telegraph
347:
343:
341:
336:
335:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
323:
307:
303:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
257:
254:
253:Find sources:
249:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:Find sources:
186:
182:
178:
175:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
148:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
72:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
853:
850:
831:
819:
802:
798:
771:
733:
702:
698:
694:
685:The Sentinel
684:
676:
648:
640:
579:
533:
529:
525:
521:
511:
510:
494:
490:
484:
469:
465:
456:
443:
426:
423:this article
417:
413:
408:
379:The Sentinel
353:
349:
346:this article
337:
333:
331:
316:
313:
301:
295:
287:
280:
274:
268:
262:
252:
238:
232:
224:
217:
211:
205:
199:
189:
176:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
836:E.M.Gregory
828:WP:PRESERVE
807:Glendoremus
691:K.e.coffman
653:K.e.coffman
278:free images
215:free images
719:AnjanBorah
539:AnjanBorah
431:AnjanBorah
859:talk page
699:The Hindu
625:• Gene93k
605:• Gene93k
427:The Hindu
344:there is
50:merge to
37:talk page
861:or in a
832:redirect
774:Relisted
736:Relisted
711:WP:NCORP
641:Redirect
388:WP:NCORP
334:Redirect
174:View log
64:RoySmith
39:or in a
746:King of
665:Thanks
514:because
284:WP refs
272:scholar
221:WP refs
209:scholar
147:protect
142:history
101:protect
96:history
799:Delete
707:WP:GNG
649:delete
580:Delete
497:wister
493:wister
485:Delete
466:Delete
384:WP:GNG
256:Google
193:Google
151:delete
105:delete
67:(talk)
60:WP:ATD
803:Merge
715:Sionk
667:Sionk
561:Sionk
476:talk
444:Merge
392:Sionk
357:Sionk
332:Keep
299:JSTOR
260:books
236:JSTOR
197:books
181:Stats
168:views
160:watch
156:links
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
840:talk
811:talk
788:talk
723:talk
709:and
657:talk
629:talk
609:talk
588:talk
565:talk
543:talk
512:Keep
502:talk
435:talk
418:stub
409:Keep
396:talk
386:and
361:talk
321:5969
318:Onel
292:FENS
266:news
229:FENS
203:news
164:logs
138:talk
134:edit
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
822:to
801:or
647:or
643:to
532:or
471:DGG
446:to
425:in
348:in
338:to
306:TWL
243:TWL
172:– (
842:)
813:)
790:)
763:♠
725:)
717:.
697:,
659:)
631:)
623:.
611:)
603:.
590:)
567:)
545:)
478:)
457:MB
437:)
398:)
390:.
363:)
286:)
223:)
166:|
162:|
158:|
154:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
838:(
809:(
786:(
760:♣
755:♦
750:♥
721:(
655:(
627:(
607:(
586:(
563:(
541:(
495:T
491:S
474:(
433:(
394:(
359:(
310:)
302:·
296:·
288:·
281:·
275:·
269:·
263:·
258:(
250:(
247:)
239:·
233:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:(
184:)
177:·
170:)
132:(
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.