324:
Clearly the VLHC is an extant project, even on the drawing boards. I would argue it is notable as the follow on to the largest particle accelerator in the world. In that case, it would probably be much better if we found some sources that allowed us to use the words "planned" or "projected" instead
305:
302:
299:
226:
325:
of "hypothetical". It would also do to show how this accelerator fits into the plan for future particle physics, maybe cross link it to something on the higgs-boson. Either way, it can't be kept as is but the subject itself deserves an article.
269:
No worries. I almost did the same thing when I saw that wikipedia was going to delete the Nathan Hale article. Turns out it was another nathan hale. In the revolutionary war.
220:
121:
88:
83:
92:
154:, there don't seem to be any sources on this yet. I was a little worried, since when I first saw the title, I had the "D" and "R" in "Hadron" transposed...
75:
293:
79:
17:
389:
368:
351:
334:
316:
278:
262:
246:
197:
164:
141:
57:
223:
71:
63:
407:
36:
406:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
128:
Its a collider that might possibly exist at some undetermined date in the future. WP:CRYSTAL applies here.
180:
347:
342:
with rewrite. This is a very notable idea, but the way it's presented doesn't make that notability clear.
211:
48:(non-admin closure). Consensus puts forward sources and suggests rewrite; nominator withdrew nomination.
172:
important idea and project that is well-attested on the web in reliable scientific sources, including
383:
135:
155:
364:
314:
296:
260:
244:
235:
232:
214:
53:
238:. Nominator may want to review these sources and consider withdrawal per obvious notability.
343:
330:
274:
151:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
377:
188:. The article understates its importance and the level of active interest surrounding it.
183:
129:
217:
360:
309:
255:
239:
193:
49:
326:
270:
229:
109:
308:. Nominator may want to review the available sources and consider withdrawal.
292:. Like the LHC, this is also an extremely notable idea in particle physics.
186:
189:
173:
400:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
359:
but, like said above, with serious rewrites and sourcing.
376:. Based on the article, I thought it was just made up.
116:
105:
101:
97:
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
254:Sorry, I thought this was for the LHC.
7:
210:notable idea in particle physics.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
322:Keep with changes and sources
427:
390:10:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
369:05:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
352:04:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
335:04:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
317:04:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
279:04:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
263:04:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
247:04:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
198:03:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
165:02:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
142:02:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
72:Very Large Hadron Collider
64:Very Large Hadron Collider
58:11:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
403:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
204:Strongest possible keep
306:assert notability
162:
418:
405:
380:
160:
158:
157:Ten Pound Hammer
132:
119:
113:
95:
44:The result was
34:
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:deletion review
401:
386:
378:
156:
138:
130:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
413:
412:
395:
393:
392:
384:
371:
354:
337:
319:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
251:
250:
221:New York Times
206:. This is an
200:
167:
161:and his otters
136:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
411:
409:
404:
398:
397:
396:
391:
388:
387:
381:
375:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
328:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
312:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
291:
288:
287:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
259:
258:
253:
252:
249:
248:
245:
243:
242:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
176:'s web site:
175:
171:
168:
166:
159:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
139:
133:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
402:
399:
394:
382:
373:
356:
344:Ketsuekigata
339:
321:
310:
289:
256:
240:
207:
203:
202:
169:
147:
134:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
340:Strong keep
290:Strong keep
170:Strong Keep
379:RogueNinja
236:notability
152:WP:CRYSTAL
131:RogueNinja
227:available
218:including
208:extremely
374:Withdraw
361:Spell4yr
311:Celarnor
294:Numerous
257:Celarnor
241:Celarnor
212:Numerous
174:Fermilab
122:View log
50:WilliamH
327:Protonk
297:sources
271:Protonk
215:sources
89:protect
84:history
233:assert
148:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
300:exist
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
385:talk
365:talk
357:Keep
348:talk
331:talk
275:talk
194:talk
150:per
137:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
224:are
190:JJL
163:•
367:)
350:)
333:)
303:to
277:)
230:to
196:)
185:,
182:,
179:,
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
363:(
346:(
329:(
273:(
192:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.