Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Via Anelli Wall - Knowledge

Source 📝

204: 157: 219:- I added a few references to the article, including the Guardian Unlimited article. There is a lot of coverage but unfortunately it is in foreign language media. If there is an article on the problems of immigrants in Europe on Knowledge, perhaps it could be merged there. To my thinking, Padua is an example of the problem but the issue is not Padua so it would be inappropriate to merge it with Padua. 371:- If I have enough time (it may take more than a month) I should write an article about Via Anelli (not only that wall), I've just to see if I find something really interesting. I'll write in Italian, of course, but then I'll ask someone to translate it for me :-) -- 236:
English language sources, for the convenience of editors and readers (although at the same time we prefer originals to translations, in order to eliminate sources of error), but non-English language sources are
90:
The wall is real, it is controversial, and it deserves an article. If you feel that the article is currently POV, why not make it balanced instead of trying to delete it?
326:
article. Controversial or not, subject is not large enough to merit a separate article at this time. Lots of topics covered by newspapers do not merit articles.
133:. Wall has received media attention from non-trival publications, so mention of the wall should be given. However, a full article is probably not needed. — 99:
that's the matter, I don't think it deserves an article; it's presented like the new Berlin Wall, seems to be important and scandalous, but it's not so --
392: 345: 347:
Certainly there's enough information out there to expand the article, and certainly as time passes there will be more news about the wall.
71:
the article is very POV and I don't consider it an argument for an encyclopedia (it's not an important fact); see more explanations in the
283: 195: 148: 17: 296: 388: 229: 167: 442: 55: 36: 441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
427: 411: 378: 363: 351: 330: 314: 277: 259: 223: 207: 175: 160: 117: 106: 94: 81: 59: 49: 112: 292: 72: 188: 141: 245: 342: 401: 375: 103: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
327: 420: 65: 407: 348: 311: 181: 134: 114: 91: 424: 396: 372: 359:- I added those references to the article. Now it has plenty of good references. 256: 180:
In stating non-trivial publications, I was implying reliable as well, of course. —
172: 100: 75: 203: 156: 360: 339: 288: 274: 220: 323: 230:
Knowledge:Reliable sources#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English
130: 435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
299:) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic. 48:. I have tagged for neutrality per discussion on talk page -- 273:- irrelevant comment above. Doesn't have to do with topic. 384: 111:
An article by the Guardian Unlimited disagrees with you.
423:
for myself in case it gets deleted. Is that allowed?
419:- I don't understand German so I would like to userfy 310:
Controversial topic covered by major daily newspapers
344:
Sydney Morning Herald has an article about the wall.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 445:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 341:TimesOnline has an article about the wall. 338:BBC News has an article about the wall. 7: 24: 202: 155: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 241:excluded. Bear in mind that 428:12:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 412:07:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 379:20:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 364:23:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 352:01:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 331:01:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 315:19:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 278:00:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 260:10:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 224:19:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 208:18:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 176:10:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 161:02:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 118:01:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 107:01:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 95:01:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 82:01:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 60:06:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 462: 438:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 284:single purpose account 383:Remark: I'm admin on 387:, and we decided to 127:Merge & Redirect 171:publications, yes? 165:You actually mean 410: 404: 300: 58: 453: 440: 406: 400: 280: 250: 244: 206: 200: 193: 186: 159: 153: 146: 139: 54: 34: 461: 460: 456: 455: 454: 452: 451: 450: 449: 443:deletion review 436: 421:Via Anelli Wall 248: 242: 196: 189: 182: 149: 142: 135: 69: 66:Via Anelli Wall 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 459: 457: 448: 447: 431: 430: 414: 393:AfD discussion 391:this article ( 381: 366: 354: 333: 317: 304: 303: 302: 301: 265: 264: 263: 262: 254: 239:definitely not 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 124: 123: 122: 121: 120: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 458: 446: 444: 439: 433: 432: 429: 426: 422: 418: 415: 413: 409: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 380: 377: 374: 370: 367: 365: 362: 358: 355: 353: 350: 346: 343: 340: 337: 334: 332: 329: 325: 321: 318: 316: 313: 309: 306: 305: 298: 294: 290: 286: 285: 279: 276: 272: 269: 268: 267: 266: 261: 258: 252: 247: 240: 235: 231: 227: 226: 225: 222: 218: 215: 209: 205: 201: 199: 194: 192: 187: 185: 179: 178: 177: 174: 170: 169: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 152: 147: 145: 140: 138: 132: 128: 125: 119: 116: 113: 110: 109: 108: 105: 102: 98: 97: 96: 93: 89: 86: 85: 84: 83: 80: 77: 74: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 437: 434: 416: 368: 356: 335: 319: 307: 282: 270: 238: 233: 216: 197: 190: 183: 166: 150: 143: 136: 126: 87: 70: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 328:SteveHopson 281:— Possible 255:parameter. 88:Speedy Keep 349:Dionyseus 312:JChap2007 246:cite news 115:Dionyseus 92:Dionyseus 73:talk page 425:NLOleson 297:contribs 253:language 168:reliable 417:Comment 397:Sarazyn 369:Comment 357:Comment 336:Comment 308:Keep — 271:Comment 257:Uncle G 173:Uncle G 361:GBYork 289:STYoto 275:STYoto 251:has a 234:prefer 221:GBYork 376:tasso 373:piero 324:Padua 322:with 320:Merge 232:, we 191:Chico 144:Chico 131:Padua 104:tasso 101:piero 79:tasso 76:piero 51:Samir 16:< 402:TALK 389:keep 293:talk 228:Per 217:Keep 56:धर्म 46:keep 395:). 385:de: 129:to 408:DE 405:• 399:• 295:• 287:: 249:}} 243:{{ 198:24 184:NM 151:24 137:NM 291:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Samir
धर्म
06:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Via Anelli Wall
talk page
piero
tasso
01:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Dionyseus
01:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
piero
tasso
01:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Dionyseus
01:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Padua
NM
Chico
24

02:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
reliable
Uncle G
10:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
NM
Chico
24

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.