Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Vincent M. Ward - Knowledge

Source 📝

740: 793:
satisfied? You link to the NY Times is a directory entry that provides no information that I can see that details his roles that would allow one to determine that the roles are significant. Relying on the information in the article, he has a bunch of single episode appearances in TV shows with only
338:
7 out of 34 to me indicates information on this actor probably best belongs on the Walking Dead article, in the Characters section (recurring, clearly not a main character at all). Not a substantial role; zero biographical coverage by reliable sources.
556: 619: 682: 430: 493: 746:
is the easiest or laziest (no offense intended) manner through which to allow presumption of enough notability to merit an article, it is not the only way... else there would be no need for any of the various common sense
364:- I can find no significant coverage about him. In particular, if his recurring role in Walking Dead was is significant, this should be established with coverage in reliable sources. I can find no such coverage. -- 165: 798:
mentioning his name in passing in a list of celebrities. How are these articles demosntrating that the inclusion criteria for entertainers is satisified? They certainly fail to establish anything under
229: 550: 249: 613: 676: 424: 487: 930:
It is somewhat. I know that I try to check in there a few times a year, but I pretty much focus on the movie, actor, and book entries because that's what I'm more familiar with.
732: 794:
Starter Wife and Walking Dead being an exception. The remainder of the links are to event announcements. That includes the pqarchiver article which is available online
159: 118: 751:'s in the first place. Though it makes our task in informing our readers more difficult, we do not "punish" those perhaps-notables for keeping a low media profile.... 571: 634: 538: 601: 759:
that despite the non-disclosure agreements he signed (production's means to keep plots secret and stifling spoilers and related coverage) he feels
697: 125: 664: 381:
Looks like he mostly worked as an extra or appeared in minor roles. I can't locate significant coverage/roles or evidence of a large fanbase.
902:: Is the incubator at all active? If it is I see no reason not to incubate but I suspect it would be in a perpetual purgatory. Incubate or 532: 445: 595: 412: 91: 86: 508: 528: 95: 658: 475: 591: 578: 78: 654: 641: 17: 180: 406: 147: 704: 795: 469: 736: 402: 317: 277: 544: 738: 607: 465: 452: 983: 959: 838: 778: 670: 141: 40: 515: 725:. Ward's having more-significant roles in television projects and smaller roles in multiple notable film's 962: 941: 921: 890: 855: 841: 812: 781: 390: 373: 348: 329: 325: 307: 289: 285: 261: 241: 221: 137: 60: 721:
is met, specially as notability is not a popularity contest to see who has the most press coverage. See
418: 979: 934: 321: 281: 36: 821:
of significant roles in mutiple notable productions does not require that such verifiability itself be
187: 481: 952: 831: 771: 82: 886: 690: 627: 564: 501: 438: 173: 722: 846:
I agree, but none of the material you provided proves that any of the roles are significant. --
386: 257: 237: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
978:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
153: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
931: 907: 871: 822: 761: 273: 209: 344: 303: 217: 205: 74: 66: 298:
What role was substantial? What role was significant in the grand scheme of what series?
730: 916: 882: 851: 808: 369: 826: 800: 790: 748: 743: 718: 201: 382: 253: 233: 197: 54: 112: 734: 818: 756: 340: 299: 213: 874:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
912: 847: 804: 765:
is the true beginning of recognition for his acting career", perhaps we can
365: 950:
Same here, as I keep an eye on those topics with which I have familiarity.
972:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
769:
this for a while as he now finally gets the coverage he is due.
280:
and has substantial amount of work prior to receiving the role.
208:). The roles — largely unsubstantiated — fall very far short of 230:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
250:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
825:. But as I concluded above, and in not !voting a "keep", 52:. without prejudice to incubation or future recreation. 108: 104: 100: 689: 626: 563: 500: 437: 172: 829:
allows the article to be improved OUT of mainspace.
881:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 276:. He had a recurring role on the television show 198:substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 986:). No further edits should be made to this page. 703: 640: 577: 514: 451: 186: 8: 248:Note: This debate has been included in the 228:Note: This debate has been included in the 247: 227: 316:He played Oscar on seven episodes of 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 272:. I think the subject has met 1: 755:as Ward himself states in a 196:This is not the subject of 1003: 827:userfication or incubation 349:20:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 330:20:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 308:19:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 290:06:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 262:13:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 242:13:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 222:01:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 61:21:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 963:17:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 942:13:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 922:11:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 891:10:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 856:09:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 842:04:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 813:01:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 782:23:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 391:20:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 374:16:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 975:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 893: 789:- In what way is 264: 244: 994: 977: 955: 938: 920: 880: 876: 834: 774: 762:The Walking Dead 708: 707: 693: 645: 644: 630: 582: 581: 567: 519: 518: 504: 456: 455: 441: 318:The Walking Dead 278:The Walking Dead 191: 190: 176: 128: 116: 98: 57: 34: 1002: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 993: 992: 991: 990: 984:deletion review 973: 953: 936: 911: 869: 832: 772: 757:2012 interview, 650: 587: 524: 461: 398: 133: 124: 89: 75:Vincent M. Ward 73: 70: 67:Vincent M. Ward 55: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1000: 998: 989: 988: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 945: 944: 925: 924: 896: 895: 894: 878: 877: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 711: 710: 647: 584: 521: 458: 394: 393: 376: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 333: 332: 311: 310: 293: 292: 266: 265: 245: 194: 193: 130: 69: 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 999: 987: 985: 981: 976: 970: 964: 961: 960: 957: 956: 949: 948: 947: 946: 943: 940: 939: 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 923: 918: 914: 909: 905: 901: 898: 897: 892: 888: 884: 879: 875: 873: 868: 867: 857: 853: 849: 845: 844: 843: 840: 839: 836: 835: 828: 824: 820: 819:verifiability 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 802: 797: 792: 788: 785: 784: 783: 780: 779: 776: 775: 768: 764: 763: 758: 754: 750: 745: 741: 739: 737: 735: 733: 731: 728: 724: 720: 716: 713: 712: 706: 702: 699: 696: 692: 688: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 656: 653: 652:Find sources: 648: 643: 639: 636: 633: 629: 625: 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 600: 597: 593: 590: 589:Find sources: 585: 580: 576: 573: 570: 566: 562: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 543: 540: 537: 534: 530: 527: 526:Find sources: 522: 517: 513: 510: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 471: 467: 464: 463:Find sources: 459: 454: 450: 447: 444: 440: 436: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 404: 401: 400:Find sources: 396: 395: 392: 388: 384: 380: 377: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 359: 350: 346: 342: 337: 336: 335: 334: 331: 327: 323: 322:Silver Buizel 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 291: 287: 283: 282:Silver Buizel 279: 275: 271: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 246: 243: 239: 235: 231: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 189: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 139: 136: 135:Find sources: 131: 127: 123: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 974: 971: 958: 951: 935: 903: 899: 870: 837: 830: 786: 777: 770: 766: 760: 752: 726: 714: 700: 694: 686: 679: 673: 667: 661: 651: 637: 631: 623: 616: 610: 604: 598: 588: 574: 568: 560: 553: 547: 541: 535: 525: 511: 505: 497: 490: 484: 478: 472: 462: 448: 442: 434: 427: 421: 415: 409: 399: 378: 361: 269: 195: 183: 177: 169: 162: 156: 150: 144: 134: 121: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 932:Tokyogirl79 729:verifiable. 723:WP:GNGACTOR 677:free images 614:free images 551:free images 488:free images 425:free images 160:free images 742:While the 980:talk page 917:talk page 908:WP:NOTYET 883:Ymblanter 823:WP:SIGCOV 274:WP:NACTOR 254:• Gene93k 234:• Gene93k 210:WP:NACTOR 37:talk page 982:or in a 954:Schmidt, 900:Question 872:Relisted 833:Schmidt, 773:Schmidt, 767:incubate 715:Comment: 206:WP:BASIC 119:View log 39:or in a 937:(。◕‿◕。) 787:Comment 717:I feel 683:WP refs 671:scholar 620:WP refs 608:scholar 557:WP refs 545:scholar 494:WP refs 482:scholar 431:WP refs 419:scholar 383:Hekerui 166:WP refs 154:scholar 92:protect 87:history 56:MBisanz 904:delete 801:WP:GNG 791:WP:ENT 749:WP:SNG 744:WP:GNG 719:WP:ENT 655:Google 592:Google 529:Google 466:Google 403:Google 379:Delete 362:Delete 202:WP:GNG 138:Google 96:delete 50:delete 803:. -- 698:JSTOR 659:books 635:JSTOR 596:books 572:JSTOR 533:books 509:JSTOR 470:books 446:JSTOR 407:books 341:JFHJr 300:JFHJr 214:JFHJr 200:(see 181:JSTOR 142:books 126:Stats 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 913:J04n 906:per 887:talk 852:talk 848:Whpq 817:The 809:talk 805:Whpq 796:here 691:FENS 665:news 628:FENS 602:news 565:FENS 539:news 502:FENS 476:news 439:FENS 413:news 387:talk 370:talk 366:Whpq 326:talk 286:talk 270:Keep 258:talk 238:talk 174:FENS 148:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 753:But 705:TWL 642:TWL 579:TWL 516:TWL 453:TWL 188:TWL 117:– ( 910:. 889:) 854:) 811:) 727:is 685:) 622:) 559:) 496:) 433:) 389:) 372:) 347:) 328:) 320:. 306:) 288:) 260:) 252:. 240:) 232:. 220:) 212:. 204:, 168:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 919:) 915:( 885:( 850:( 807:( 709:) 701:· 695:· 687:· 680:· 674:· 668:· 662:· 657:( 649:( 646:) 638:· 632:· 624:· 617:· 611:· 605:· 599:· 594:( 586:( 583:) 575:· 569:· 561:· 554:· 548:· 542:· 536:· 531:( 523:( 520:) 512:· 506:· 498:· 491:· 485:· 479:· 473:· 468:( 460:( 457:) 449:· 443:· 435:· 428:· 422:· 416:· 410:· 405:( 397:( 385:( 368:( 345:㊟ 343:( 324:( 304:㊟ 302:( 284:( 256:( 236:( 218:㊟ 216:( 192:) 184:· 178:· 170:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 145:· 140:( 132:( 129:) 122:· 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
MBisanz
21:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Vincent M. Ward
Vincent M. Ward
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources
WP:GNG
WP:BASIC

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.