330:! That's helpful, I made some edits and added some additional citations from The New York Times and Professor David Bordwell, who is an author of numerous textbooks on film. It is difficult to find textbooks on the subject matter as they are currently being written (and if I am not incorrect, David Bordwell may very well turn his current blog into a textbook on digital projection). However I hope that these additional citations help to add a bit of credibility and verifiability to the entry?
258:
blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. An faq on a company web site is not really what we're looking for--even when their purpose is to define terms in their business field. Articles in technical magazines or journals, or material in standard textbooks,makes the best
216:
Albeit I am biased, being that I wrote the article, but I believe as a reference for someone researching film projection this is important. I always view
Knowledge as a reference and when I couldn't find anything on VPF, I felt it worth creating an article for reference.
230:
I'm not quite clear why you find this a "technical description" could you please clarify what about the article makes it a technical description and less of an encyclopedia entry? I would be happy to change the aspects that make it seem like a technical description!
253:
I think this is a subject about which we could and should have an article, but a
Knowledge article does need references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but
169:
225:
The article is a bit of a stub and could use some more work, but I'm not sure it should be deleted. Maybe it should be absorbed into the
Digital Cinema page if it can't function as a standalone?
130:
163:
279:
301:
103:
98:
392:
107:
66:
90:
184:
17:
151:
145:
451:
40:
432:
398:
387:
358:
339:
315:
293:
270:
244:
209:
72:
61:
141:
354:
200:
This article is a technical description and has nothing more to add. hence, it belongs more to
Wiktionary
94:
191:
447:
411:
205:
36:
335:
240:
382:
379:
177:
56:
53:
414:, the topic has been published fairly well. Seems more than a dictionary definition. Regards,
349:
The concept look encyclopedia and we appear to have a willing editor to fix the (many) issues.
157:
415:
350:
311:
289:
86:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
368:
218:
201:
331:
236:
266:
232:
307:
285:
124:
371:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
327:
261:
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
176:
378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
454:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:list of Business-related deletion discussions
190:
8:
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:
277:
302:list of Film-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
433:16:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
399:07:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
359:03:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
73:22:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
340:17:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
316:18:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
294:18:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
271:02:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
245:00:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
210:19:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
471:
443:Please do not modify it.
233:Wikitionary v. Knowledge
32:Please do not modify it.
219:Encyclopedia Reference
48:The result was
401:
318:
305:
296:
283:
87:Virtual Print Fee
79:Virtual Print Fee
462:
445:
430:
395:
390:
385:
377:
373:
306:
284:
195:
194:
180:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
458:
452:deletion review
441:
426:
422:
416:
410:- according to
393:
388:
383:
366:
137:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
457:
456:
436:
435:
424:
420:
404:
403:
402:
375:
374:
363:
362:
361:
343:
342:
320:
319:
297:
274:
273:
214:
198:
197:
134:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
455:
453:
449:
444:
438:
437:
434:
431:
429:
428:
427:
413:
409:
406:
405:
400:
396:
391:
386:
381:
376:
372:
370:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
303:
298:
295:
291:
287:
281:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
263:
257:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
227:
226:
222:
221:
220:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
442:
439:
419:
418:
417:
412:Google books
407:
367:
351:Stuartyeates
346:
323:
260:
259:sources.
255:
250:
229:
228:
224:
223:
215:
213:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
49:
47:
31:
28:
202:Wikishagnik
164:free images
423:rbitrarily
332:AzryckAnin
237:AzryckAnin
448:talk page
308:• Gene93k
286:• Gene93k
37:talk page
450:or in a
369:Relisted
131:View log
39:or in a
380:King of
326:Thanks
324:Comment
251:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
142:Google
108:delete
267:talk
185:JSTOR
146:books
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
408:Keep
355:talk
347:Keep
336:talk
312:talk
290:talk
241:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
328:DGG
262:DGG
256:not
192:TWL
129:– (
397:♠
357:)
338:)
314:)
304:.
292:)
282:.
269:)
243:)
208:)
172:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
52:.
425:0
421:A
394:♣
389:♦
384:♥
353:(
334:(
310:(
288:(
265:(
239:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.