345:.) The state of the current article is no reason to delete, and surely Homunculus will be able to do the work eventually and deserve our thanks. Not a good idea to merge with the real person's article. We (properly) have (separate) articles on Macbeth the real person, Macbeth the character, Macbeth the play, Lady Macbeth, even lesser characters like
454:
further elaborates on this and establishes that if no reliable sources allows to "discuss the reception and significance of notable works", then the article doesn't deserve a stand-alone article. Simply saying "add sources" is not a valid reason to keep the article. You have to prove that sources
235:— subject is certainly notable, though it is admittedly odd that the page is unreferenced. I could make a point of adding reliable source references (though it may need to wait a week or two). Alternately, we might consider merging this content with the main article on
427:
makes it quite clear that referencing is entirely optional, being only required for quotations or controversial points. If such references are required, the remedy is to add them, not to delete the entire article. AFD is not cleanup.
164:
488:
The only way to fix it is to find sources that discuss the reception and significance of the character. You should first look for sources before recommending conservation, maybe these sources don't exist.
336:
of the most populous nation on earth, the one whose "journey to the West" is the basic storyline frame; a story with countless spinoffs & adaptations and influences on
Chinese popular culture. (See
217:
Per WP:GNG. Article does not have independent reliable third party sources, as set out in notability guidelines. Referencing is not optional so without sources I propose that this page be not kept
158:
196:
423:, is a minor character in a soap opera. The article in question is a major character in one of the greatest works of oriental literature. The nomination is not policy-based as our
92:
87:
307:
96:
338:
119:
79:
124:
285:
474:- I support the call for more references, but this undeniably a notable character, a major part of a very famous novel. We should fix it, not delete.--
263:
is not. Given the age of the reference, I'm suspicious that the latter is true, and cannot support merging (deletion is not a viable outcome, per
179:
450:
does actually require "discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary" in articles about fiction.
342:
146:
83:
140:
497:
483:
464:
437:
407:
376:
358:
321:
299:
276:
248:
226:
210:
61:
136:
17:
75:
67:
186:
332:
Very notable. Surely there's a great number of references particularly applicable to a central character of one of the
333:
222:
518:
493:
460:
443:
372:
40:
152:
433:
218:
514:
403:
207:
57:
36:
489:
456:
368:
244:
429:
172:
479:
272:
447:
317:
295:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
363:
There is nothing proving the existence of references without a doubt in your comment, and as
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
399:
388:
354:
200:
53:
240:
455:
discussing the reception and significance" do exist, and you failed to do that, Warden.
364:
475:
268:
264:
420:
313:
291:
113:
451:
424:
350:
367:
your recommendation to keep is thus premature until sources are actually found.
391:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
236:
239:
as a section discussing adaptations of his story in literature and art.
346:
507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
349:
etc. This & the other main characters are quite comparable.
267:) until and unless a sincere search has proven fruitless.
197:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
171:
398:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
521:). No further edits should be made to this page.
339:List of media adaptations of Journey to the West
308:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
185:
8:
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:Note: This debate has been included in the
195:Note: This debate has been included in the
305:
286:list of China-related deletion discussions
283:
194:
255:Actually, sourcing present in articles
343:Journey to the West in popular culture
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
419:The current featured article,
76:Xuanzang (fictional character)
68:Xuanzang (fictional character)
1:
446:is not a valid argument and
365:notability is not inherited
334:Four Great Classical Novels
538:
498:16:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
484:08:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
465:16:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
438:07:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
377:16:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
62:01:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
408:18:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
359:09:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
322:22:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
300:22:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
277:19:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
249:13:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
227:13:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
211:18:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
510:Please do not modify it.
442:Invalid recommendation.
32:Please do not modify it.
259:optional; sourcing
444:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST
48:The result was
410:
324:
311:
302:
289:
219:Bonkers The Clown
213:
529:
512:
397:
393:
312:
290:
204:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
537:
536:
532:
531:
530:
528:
527:
526:
525:
519:deletion review
508:
490:Folken de Fanel
457:Folken de Fanel
386:
369:Folken de Fanel
202:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
535:
533:
524:
523:
503:
502:
501:
500:
469:
468:
467:
413:
412:
411:
395:
394:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
326:
325:
303:
280:
279:
252:
251:
215:
214:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
534:
522:
520:
516:
511:
505:
504:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
396:
392:
390:
385:
384:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
331:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
309:
304:
301:
297:
293:
287:
282:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
212:
209:
206:
205:
198:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
509:
506:
471:
421:Poppy Meadow
416:
387:
329:
260:
256:
232:
216:
201:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
425:core policy
417:Speedy Keep
400:Mark Arsten
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
448:WP:NOTPLOT
241:Homunculus
515:talk page
314:• Gene93k
292:• Gene93k
37:talk page
517:or in a
476:Danaman5
389:Relisted
269:Jclemens
261:existing
237:Xuanzang
120:View log
39:or in a
233:Comment
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
430:Warden
351:John Z
347:Banquo
341:&
265:WP:ATD
245:duihua
137:Google
97:delete
208:Smith
203:Cliff
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
494:talk
480:talk
472:Keep
461:talk
452:WP:N
434:talk
404:talk
373:talk
355:talk
330:Keep
318:talk
296:talk
273:talk
223:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
496:)
482:)
463:)
436:)
406:)
375:)
357:)
320:)
310:.
298:)
288:.
275:)
257:is
247:)
225:)
199:.
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
492:(
478:(
459:(
432:(
402:(
371:(
353:(
316:(
294:(
271:(
243:(
221:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.