Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Zan Perrion - Knowledge

Source 📝

200:
Nomination of page for individual who appears to have little notability and appears to be have been created for self promotion. He is involved in the "pick-up" industry which is notorious for unsubstantiated promises of success for men with the opposite sex and for shameless self publicity in an
169: 304:. If currently the article sounds promotional and/or there's a supposed COI, this is just an editorial issue, it could require a cleanup or even some rewriting to be as much as possible neutral... but 271:. It is also just as possible that others could voice opposing opinions - but since this is a soap box - it is not likely these will be represented here. I believe this article also has WP:COI issues 263:- I don't know if there is a policy on this but this articles references opinion rather than fact - which take such lionize the subject with such positive sentiments that the they not only create a 396: 443:, per users above, this article meets notability guidelines, and coverage does infact exist. Some of the nominator's concerns can be addressed without deletion. Thanks. 163: 236: 124: 418: 129: 207:
Not only is the topic seemingly non-notable, but it also appears to exist only because of multiple editors and should be deleted as per
97: 92: 17: 101: 249: 184: 151: 84: 53: 368: 355: 302: 296: 342: 293: 470: 40: 145: 204:
The referencing is extremely poor and no convincing material is available to suggest this page is notable.
59: 466: 382: 276: 141: 36: 451: 432: 410: 387: 317: 299: 280: 253: 222: 66: 305: 313: 191: 177: 232: 428: 406: 245: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
465:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
272: 88: 218: 157: 309: 208: 328: 289: 264: 424: 402: 268: 240: 118: 80: 72: 214: 444: 459:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:
Aufreiß-Seminar "Tear-off seminar: flamethrower and ovens."
397:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
114: 110: 106: 176: 231:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 473:). No further edits should be made to this page. 237:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 5 190: 8: 419:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 417:Note: This debate has been included in the 395:Note: This debate has been included in the 416: 394: 267:issue as well as being highly unreliable 7: 354:Hering, Fiona (September 22, 2008). 288:: lik it or not, the subject passes 343:""Do women and they will love you." 24: 341:Heremans, Tom (October 3, 2009). 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 235:). I have transcluded it to 490: 201:attempt to make profits. 67:06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 462:Please do not modify it. 452:13:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 433:01:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 411:01:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 388:00:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 318:20:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 281:19:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 254:19:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 223:18:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 356:"Casanova's in de RAI." 327:- The topic is passing 367:(September 21, 2008). 372:Süddeutsche Zeitung 306:AfD is not cleanup 229:Automated comment: 48:The result was 435: 422: 413: 400: 386: 54:non-admin closure 481: 464: 423: 401: 385: 383:Northamerica1000 380: 366: 353: 340: 243: 195: 194: 180: 132: 122: 104: 62: 34: 489: 488: 484: 483: 482: 480: 479: 478: 477: 471:deletion review 460: 381: 364: 351: 338: 241: 137: 128: 95: 79: 76: 60: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 487: 485: 476: 475: 455: 454: 437: 436: 414: 392: 391: 390: 376: 375: 362: 349: 333: 332: 321: 320: 283: 257: 256: 198: 197: 134: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 486: 474: 472: 468: 463: 457: 456: 453: 450: 449: 448: 442: 439: 438: 434: 430: 426: 420: 415: 412: 408: 404: 398: 393: 389: 384: 378: 377: 373: 370: 363: 360: 357: 350: 347: 344: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 323: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 297: 294: 291: 287: 284: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 258: 255: 251: 247: 244: 238: 234: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 211: 210: 205: 202: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 126: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77: 74: 71: 69: 68: 65: 64: 63: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 461: 458: 446: 445: 440: 371: 359:De Telegraaf 358: 346:De Standaard 345: 324: 285: 260: 228: 212: 206: 203: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 58: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 365:(in German) 273:OrenBochman 164:free images 81:Zan Perrion 73:Zan Perrion 352:(in Dutch) 339:(in Dutch) 467:talk page 425:• Gene93k 403:• Gene93k 310:Cavarrone 37:talk page 469:or in a 125:View log 39:or in a 242:Snotbot 209:WP:SOAP 170:WP refs 158:scholar 98:protect 93:history 329:WP:GNG 290:WP:GNG 265:WP:POV 261:Delete 233:step 3 142:Google 102:delete 269:WP:RS 215:Paxti 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 119:views 111:watch 107:links 16:< 447:Till 441:Keep 429:talk 407:talk 331:per: 325:Keep 314:talk 286:Keep 277:talk 219:talk 178:FENS 152:news 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 61:→TSU 50:keep 252:» 239:. 192:TWL 127:• 123:– ( 52:. ( 431:) 421:. 409:) 399:. 316:) 308:. 301:, 298:, 295:, 292:: 279:) 248:• 221:) 213:-- 172:) 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 56:) 427:( 405:( 379:— 374:. 361:. 348:. 312:( 275:( 250:c 246:t 217:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 121:) 83:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
non-admin closure
→TSU
06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Zan Perrion
Zan Perrion
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:SOAP
Paxti

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.