271:- Ugh. Okay, this one leaves a bad taste in my mouth. The problem with this article is that it is being written as if it were a medical condition, without there being any support for it being a medical condition. On the other hand, it is well sourced, as a term, from reliable sources, as a concept in pop-culture, or at least in modern counter culture (those damn kids and always needing to be on the phone all the time). As a cultural phenominon, it seems to be notable enough... there are multiple, indepedant reliable sources using the term, and the subject of the term (people paying attention to the fact that cell phones are now ubiquitous, and being upset that people seem to need them all the time now) seems obviously notable. The various sources all back up this being a cultural thing. Pity the article isn't written in terms of being a cultural phenomina. THAT SAID, I am opposed to deleting any article based solely on the current content of the article, ever. As much as this article sucks, I just can't bring myself to !vote delete.
377:
Abbasi said, 'professionals who study and treat phobias tend not to use all the Latin and Greek names that get tossed around on message boards and in the press.'... Psychiatrist Carol
Mathews said, "There might really be people out there with phobias to holes, because people can really have a phobia
292:
but span several years from 2010-2014. I don't think MEDRS applies as the article states "It is, however, arguable that the word "phobia" is misused and that in the majority of cases it is only a normal anxiety". That said I think there is an argument for deleting the SYNTH moving this article to a
368:
for an example of a better way it can be presented. I'm trying to work a little on nomophobia now. It's very similar to trypophobia in the sense that it's a pop psych neologism with enough coverage in mainstream media to warrant an article, but only primary research available as far as academic
253:
In short, a widely-reported press-release used the term, after which, it was occasionally revived. There's no evidence of the term being taken seriously by any significant number of people since then, however, and as a concept, it has very questionable validity.
243:
Even though nomophobia is a fairly new concept, there are validated psychometric scales available to help in the diagnostic, an example of one of these scales is the "Questionnaire of
Dependence of Mobile Phone/Test of Mobile Phone Dependence
194:
92:
87:
317:
369:
publications. Here are some quotes from the trypophobia article that I think sums up the deal with all of the random names of phobias that get press coverage and subsequently WP articles:
337:
147:
154:
188:
82:
412:
23:
17:
120:
115:
534:
495:
466:
449:
420:
401:
349:
329:
308:
280:
262:
65:
124:
209:
553:
288:- the article is well sourced about a notable topic, and the usage of the term does not seem to be concentrated around
176:
47:
364:
hit the nail on the head. It needs to be written like a cultural phenomenon as opposed to like a medical article. See
345:
325:
107:
293:
better name, if one can be found, to emphasize this is not a recognized medical condition but a cultural phenomenon.
445:
301:
170:
416:
341:
321:
549:
378:
to anything, but just reading what's on the
Internet, that doesn't seem to be what people actually have.
61:
43:
289:
234:
226:
166:
525:
441:
392:
295:
488:
202:
216:
436:
430:
238:
230:
257:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
475:
462:
276:
483:
516:
508:
384:
111:
182:
474:- even the briefest search for sources returns enough to satisfy GNG. Just look at the
457:
per arguments above. Multiple sources over almost a decade means the term passes GNG.
141:
458:
365:
361:
272:
229:). There's been a smattering of use after that, but nothing that rises to the
103:
71:
504:
512:
428:
The claim that this is not notable is clearly false. For example, see
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/page=Nomophobia (2nd nomination)
225:
Non-notable neologism from a somewhat widely-reported press release (
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:
that it should be being held to. A great deal of the article is
241:; for example, the last sentence at time of nomination reads:
437:
The Wiley
Handbook of Psychology, Technology and Society
318:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
137:
133:
129:
201:
215:
93:Articles for deletion/Nomophobia (3rd nomination)
88:Articles for deletion/Nomophobia (2nd nomination)
50:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:). No further edits should be made to this page.
338:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
507:ranging in dates from March 2008 to May 2016.
8:
336:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:Note: This debate has been included in the
335:
315:
482:. Yes, it's a neologism, and satisfies
480:sources which use the term in the title
246:- the source for that information does
80:
59:. Consensus is for article retention.
431:Encyclopedia of Mobile Phone Behavior
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
503:- Easily passes GNG, 119 hits from
78:
31:
294:
83:Articles for deletion/Nomophobia
231:Medical reliable sources policy
1:
573:
509:Merriam-Webster Unabridged
535:17:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
496:15:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
467:08:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
450:22:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
421:21:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
402:08:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
350:02:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
330:02:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
309:02:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
281:02:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
263:02:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
66:03:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
545:Please do not modify it.
511:added nomophobia to its
39:Please do not modify it.
250:mention the neologism.
77:AfDs for this article:
352:
342:Shawn in Montreal
332:
322:Shawn in Montreal
22:(Redirected from
564:
547:
532:
523:
515:in April 2016.--
493:
491:
399:
390:
307:
304:
298:
261:
220:
219:
205:
157:
145:
127:
64:
41:
27:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
560:
554:deletion review
543:
526:
517:
489:
487:
393:
385:
302:
296:
255:
162:
153:
118:
102:
99:
97:
75:
60:
55:The result was
48:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
559:
558:
538:
537:
498:
490:Rhododendrites
469:
452:
423:
405:
404:
382:
381:
380:
371:
370:
360:. Passes GNG.
354:
353:
333:
312:
311:
283:
223:
222:
159:
98:
96:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
53:
52:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
557:
555:
551:
546:
540:
539:
536:
533:
531:
530:
524:
522:
521:
514:
510:
506:
502:
499:
497:
492:
485:
481:
479:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
433:
432:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
391:
389:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
367:
363:
359:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:
299:
291:
287:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
259:
251:
249:
245:
240:
236:
232:
228:
218:
214:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
164:Find sources:
160:
156:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:North America
58:
51:
49:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
544:
541:
528:
527:
519:
518:
500:
477:
471:
454:
435:
429:
425:
413:92.9.158.191
411:per Fieari.
408:
395:
387:
376:
357:
300:
285:
268:
258:Adam Cuerden
256:
252:
247:
244:(QDMP/TMPD)"
242:
224:
212:
206:
198:
191:
185:
179:
173:
163:
150:
56:
54:
38:
35:
366:Trypophobia
297:Intelligent
290:WP:ONEEVENT
235:coatracking
227:WP:ONEEVENT
189:free images
520:Isaidnoway
476:number of
388:PermStrump
104:Nomophobia
72:Nomophobia
550:talk page
478:scholarly
442:Andrew D.
269:Weak Keep
239:synthesis
44:talk page
552:or in a
505:HighBeam
148:View log
46:or in a
513:lexicon
195:WP refs
183:scholar
121:protect
116:history
529:(talk)
484:WP:NEO
459:Roches
362:Fieari
273:Fieari
167:Google
125:delete
210:JSTOR
171:books
155:Stats
142:views
134:watch
130:links
16:<
501:Keep
486:. —
472:Keep
463:talk
455:Keep
446:talk
426:Keep
417:talk
409:Keep
396:talk
358:Keep
346:talk
326:talk
303:sium
286:Keep
277:talk
203:FENS
177:news
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
57:keep
494:\\
434:or
248:not
237:or
217:TWL
146:– (
465:)
448:)
440:.
419:)
348:)
340:.
328:)
320:.
279:)
197:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
461:(
444:(
415:(
398:)
394:(
386:—
344:(
324:(
275:(
221:)
213:·
207:·
199:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
169:(
161:(
158:)
151:·
144:)
106:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.