113:
152:
390:, but do not assert the opinions themselves. Editors should not be trying to "sell", "spin", or otherwise convince readers of the quality of the school. "One of the" and "widely recognized" are canonical weasel words: how many are among the best, what specific recognition, best on what criteria, how recent in the recognition, etc. If the statement can't stand without weasel words it lacks a neutral point of view. If a college or university was ranked 4th internationally in the most recent
171:
133:
191:
31:
98:
416:
to known authorities or substantiate the facts behind an argument by using facts and statistics. If a college is consistently rated among the best, who is doing the rating, how long or often is consistent, and what threshold constitutes the best? If a university is selective, whose criteria are being
255:
Just as there is no single, indisputably preeminent college or university, there is no single metric which definitively establishes the quality of a college or university. Every institution is different and its
Knowledge (XXG) article should emphasize these differences by summarizing what an academic
465:
As above, simply and neutrally state the facts. The statements above could likely be changed to "…is ranked A by X, B by Y, and C by Z" and "…was ranked A by X in 2007, 2008, and 2009" which is a neutral and substantiated presentation of verifiable facts without any POV, weasel words, or peacockery.
441:
to verify them. Recontextualizing or narrowing the criteria may increase an institution's standing in a ranking, but unless the source explicitly offers recomputed rankings of universities on their public or national basis (for example), it is inappropriate to perform these calculations yourself as
287:
representing current consensus about articles of higher education institutions. Motivated editors should direct their energies towards describing all the various aspects of an institution to a broader audience rather than emphasizing its quality using imprecise, context-free, or otherwise ambiguous
495:
in the first sentences of the lead paragraphs: it doesn't help the reader to know a university was ranked highly if he or she doesn't even know what or where it is in the first place! Moreover, the lead is not a section to astonish readers by establishing the quality of the college or university,
509:
Rankings should be neutrally worded without modifiers or disclaimers. Similarly, do not exclude notable rankings simply because they are inconveniently low or you disagree with their methodology. An article about a university is not the appropriate venue to debate the merits of various rankings'
355:
and let the reader decide: a college or university is not necessarily "good" because it excludes a large number of applicants, nor well-reputed simply because it is old, nor prestigious simply because of its alumni. For example, admission to a military academy or music conservatory might be more
572:
Claims that an institution "places highly" in rankings are just as vague as claims that it is "prestigious", "highly selective" and "excellent", and are more dishonest in that they seem to cite an authoritative source. Limit rankings to a single section rather than spreading them throughout the
577:
reported as numeric values with publication years and verifiable sources. Do not attempt to include every ranking by every publication for every school or program since some rankings are more notable than others. However, do not exclude notable rankings on the basis of not being in the Top X.
496:
only to serve as a summary of the rest of the article. Nor does the lead of the article have to include a preponderance of rankings and superlatives to establish the notability of a college or university since all accredited colleges and universities are inherently notable.
559:
Likewise, an encyclopedia article is not the appropriate venue to play out intercollegiate rivalries over who has more and better: describe information and statistics in absolute terms rather than relative to your rival institution(s) or in abstract
547:
It is tempting to replace claims of prestige or academic excellence with a cascade of related or unrelated facts intended to generate the same impression. While this is a large improvement over the vague claim, remember that a university article's
359:
Boosterism is particularly unpalatable to some
Wikipedians when describing institutions whose "elite" status is already widely acknowledged elsewhere. For instance, in an opening summary paragraph, simply noting that a university is "in the
510:
respective methodologies. If a reader wants to know about the methodology, they can follow the citation that should already accompany any ranking or the wikilink to the
Knowledge (XXG) article describing that ranking in more detail.
209:
Knowledge (XXG) articles on colleges, universities, and other academic institutions are often written by editors who currently or previously attended the institution or who work for the institution. Editors are often motivated by
593:
rely on undergraduate-only data and are only intended to rank or classify the undergraduate program, not the university as a whole. In this case, it is inaccurate to say that "University X is the 27th best university" when UX's
183:
351:. "Prestige", "reputation", "excellence", "exclusivity", and "selectivity" are often used imprecisely in order to create a positive impression of an institution's quality that cannot be verified or falsified.
446:
cannot be verified. Similarly, making historical statements or analyses about rankings without providing reliable sources stating the same is also original research, even if they are true.
540:"…has the second-largest student body, third-largest campus, fifteenth-largest faculty, seventh-largest research expenditures, sixth-most applicants, second-most award recipients …"
125:
298:
Incorporate information from university reports, faculty handbooks, or course catalogs to describe the administrative organization, academic programs, and research centers
288:
superlatives. There are many useful and reliable web resources published by an institution and other sources that can be incorporated into college and university:
716:
264:
rather than serving as a shrine to its various accolades and superlatives. Notable distinctions and recognition have their place in the article, but they
17:
112:
690:
505:"State University ranked 34th in publication X which only considered Y and Z. However, it ranked 3rd in publication A which considers B and C."
391:
721:
202:
16:
For the prevailing consensus on descriptions of reputations in higher education institutions' lead sections, see the request for comment at
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
163:
151:
537:"…has 65 Laureates, 102 Award Winners, 165 acres of land, 72 academic programs, 15% admissions rate, 13 national championships, …..."
144:
268:
of the article. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia to summarize and contextualize information about these complex institutions,
248:. A reader might be forgiven for concluding that Knowledge (XXG) only covers colleges and universities in the fictional town of
237:
574:
543:"Compared to X, Y has a larger student body, campus, faculty, research budget and lower admissions rate and failure rate."
711:
620:
No public or private university in the (region) can match the breadth and quality of the university's research endeavors
561:
706:
578:
Finally, do not use rankings in the lead as these are specific facts that should appear later in the article and give
269:
549:
463:
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.
413:
394:, state exactly that rather than contorting it into non-neutral and non-verifiable statements like those above.
175:
55:
117:
660:
652:
519:
479:
is the #3 ranked public university by
Magazine X. It is a public research university located in X,Y,Z."
352:
284:
65:
417:
used for this classification, how many students apply, and what percentage of students are admitted?
356:
competitive than an Ivy League university, even if the latter has higher average admissions scores.
666:
492:
292:
Visit the website for the archives to expand the information on its history, campus, and traditions
155:
672:
233:
39:
136:
579:
484:
348:
295:
Use the fact book or common data set to include more information on the student body and faculty
265:
221:
220:
in a favorable light even though this often conflicts
Knowledge (XXG)'s core policy against the
106:
Do not praise an academic institution; describe it using neutral language and verifiable facts.
552:
should be a summary of the most important facts about that institution in accordance with its
365:
313:
170:
678:
488:
304:
Search news archives like Google News or LexisNexis for historical coverage of the university
225:
43:
684:
646:
553:
462:
387:
211:
443:
438:
434:
429:"…11 of the 15 programs offered have been ranked in the top 10 over the past 9 years…"
309:
229:
132:
700:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
249:
455:"…is widely acknowledged as the preeminent university by most university rankings"
194:
190:
324:
collect and publish authoritative information about colleges and universities.
361:
216:
556:
weight. Move detailed listings of facts deeper into the body of the article.
301:
Review the Alumni
Association's website to include additional notable alumni
241:
693:– Infobox to concisely summarize major publications' university rankings
630:
is considered one of the premier institutions of higher learning in the
458:"…is historically recognized as the top university in A by X, Y, and Z."
321:
625:
is the one of the most highly-regarded institutions in the region..."
244:' to portray an academic institution in a positive light is termed
274:
Allow the facts to speak for themselves and let the reader decide.
189:
169:
150:
131:
111:
573:
article and be sure to include a comprehensive cross-section of
317:
92:
25:
383:"...is one of the premier institutions on the West coast..."
368:
succinctly establishes that the university is prestigious.
252:, where all colleges and universities are above average.
655:– Style guidelines specific to colleges and universities
527:
80:
73:
349:
Avoid vague terms of praise and ambiguous superlatives
364:" or is the "main" or "flagship" campus for a larger
344:"...is one of the most selective graduate schools..."
575:
rankings by national and international publications
426:"…was ranked third among public universities in X…"
272:to convince readers of the quality of the school.
585:Some popular rankings such as "Best Colleges" by
341:"…is a prestigious private liberal arts college…"
285:college and university article content guidelines
582:to one publication's rankings or methodologies.
377:"…is one of the best universities in the world…"
513:
610:Among the University's highly-ranked schools…
308:In the United States, organizations like the
8:
388:Assert facts, including facts about opinions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Higher education reputations
687:– Available to flag articles for boosterism
491:or elsewhere in the article. Make sure to
649:– WikiProject Universities and Colleges
403:"…is consistently rated among the best…"
322:National Center for Education Statistics
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
717:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
380:"…is widely recognized as a leader in…"
691:Template:Infobox US university ranking
392:Academic Ranking of World Universities
338:"…is a highly competitive university…"
222:abuse of Knowledge (XXG) for promotion
214:, loyalty, and pride to portray their
184:Nobel laureates are associated with it
433:These are both examples of potential
7:
514:It's not a score board or horse race
224:as well as the content policies on
353:Let the facts speak for themselves
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
663:– Do not use WP to advocate a POV
615:…is one of the best colleges in …
589:and "America's Best Colleges" by
409:"…is a highly selective college…"
406:"…has an impressive record in X…"
164:companies its alumni have founded
96:
29:
23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
568:Be concise, precise, and honest
266:should not be the primary focus
635:...is the most selective in...
162:university because of all the
143:university because of all its
1:
318:Chronicle of Higher Education
124:university because it is the
722:WikiProject Higher education
604:Other examples of boosterism
333:Avoid vague terms of praise
310:National Science Foundation
182:university because so many
738:
587:U.S. News and World Report
517:
372:Assert facts, not opinions
270:not an admissions brochure
201:university because of its
63:
15:
600:is actually ranked 27th.
564:(first, second, third).
450:Do not synthesize claims
104:This page in a nutshell:
681:– Neutral point of view
176:University of Cambridge
707:Knowledge (XXG) essays
421:Omit original research
328:Problems and solutions
206:
187:
167:
148:
129:
669:– Avoid peacock terms
597:undergraduate program
500:Do not parse rankings
193:
173:
154:
135:
118:University of Bologna
115:
54:, as it has not been
44:neutral point of view
675:– Avoid weasel words
212:conflict of interest
712:WikiProject Schools
487:to rankings in the
398:Substantiate claims
314:Carnegie Foundation
203:distinct traditions
156:Stanford University
126:oldest in the world
470:Avoid undue weight
232:. Using imprecise
207:
188:
168:
149:
137:Harvard University
130:
493:state the obvious
444:original research
435:original research
366:university system
110:
109:
91:
90:
729:
685:Template:Booster
530:
477:State University
439:reliable sources
414:Attribute claims
197:is actually the
178:is actually the
158:is actually the
139:is actually the
100:
99:
93:
83:
76:
33:
32:
26:
737:
736:
732:
731:
730:
728:
727:
726:
697:
696:
643:
606:
570:
534:
533:
526:
522:
516:
502:
489:lead paragraphs
472:
452:
423:
400:
374:
335:
330:
281:
97:
87:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
30:
24:
21:
12:
11:
5:
735:
733:
725:
724:
719:
714:
709:
699:
698:
695:
694:
688:
682:
676:
670:
664:
658:
657:
656:
642:
639:
638:
637:
632:
627:
622:
617:
612:
605:
602:
569:
566:
550:lead paragraph
545:
544:
541:
538:
532:
531:
523:
518:
515:
512:
507:
506:
501:
498:
481:
480:
471:
468:
460:
459:
456:
451:
448:
431:
430:
427:
422:
419:
411:
410:
407:
404:
399:
396:
385:
384:
381:
378:
373:
370:
346:
345:
342:
339:
334:
331:
329:
326:
306:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
280:
277:
242:words to avoid
236:, non-neutral
108:
107:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
36:
34:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
734:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
704:
702:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
674:
671:
668:
665:
662:
659:
654:
651:
650:
648:
645:
644:
640:
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
603:
601:
599:
598:
592:
588:
583:
581:
576:
567:
565:
563:
562:ordinal terms
557:
555:
551:
542:
539:
536:
535:
529:
525:
524:
521:
511:
504:
503:
499:
497:
494:
490:
486:
478:
474:
473:
469:
467:
464:
457:
454:
453:
449:
447:
445:
440:
436:
428:
425:
424:
420:
418:
415:
408:
405:
402:
401:
397:
395:
393:
389:
382:
379:
376:
375:
371:
369:
367:
363:
357:
354:
350:
343:
340:
337:
336:
332:
327:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
289:
286:
278:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
253:
251:
247:
243:
240:, and other '
239:
238:peacock words
235:
231:
230:verifiability
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
204:
200:
196:
195:Texas A&M
192:
185:
181:
177:
172:
165:
161:
157:
153:
146:
145:famous alumni
142:
138:
134:
127:
123:
119:
114:
105:
102:
95:
94:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
596:
595:
590:
586:
584:
580:undue weight
571:
558:
546:
528:WP:HORSERACE
508:
485:undue weight
483:Do not give
482:
476:
461:
432:
412:
386:
358:
347:
307:
282:
273:
261:
257:
256:institution
254:
250:Lake Wobegon
245:
234:weasel words
215:
208:
198:
179:
159:
140:
121:
103:
37:
661:WP:ADVOCACY
653:WP:UNIGUIDE
283:Review the
205:, unless...
186:, unless...
166:, unless...
147:, unless...
128:, unless...
81:WP:PRESTIGE
38:This is an
701:Categories
667:WP:PEACOCK
437:that lack
362:Ivy League
279:In general
246:boosterism
226:neutrality
217:alma mater
74:WP:BOOSTER
673:WP:WEASEL
66:Shortcuts
641:See also
520:Shortcut
679:WP:NPOV
120:is the
46:policy.
42:on the
647:WP:UNI
591:Forbes
554:WP:DUE
320:, and
442:this
40:essay
262:does
260:and
228:and
199:best
180:best
174:the
160:best
141:best
122:best
116:The
258:has
703::
316:,
312:,
475:"
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
