357:
925:. Whichever side you happen to be on, try to move the discussion towards consensus by getting pro/con points identified so that a new edit may be attempted as quickly as possible. Feel free to try a new bold edit during the discussion if the new edit reasonably reflects some aspect of the opposing editors' concerns. This approach quickly determines whether the important issues have been resolved; if not, it brings the core sticking points into focus.
495:
168:
585:
discussed until a compromise or consensus is reached. Each pass through the cycle may find a new, interested editor to work with, or new issue being disputed. If you follow the process as it is intended each time, you should eventually achieve consensus with all parties. As such, BRD is in general not an end unto itself; it moves the process past a blockage, and helps people get back to cooperative editing.
824:: If you browbeat someone into accepting your changes, you are not building consensus, you are making enemies. This cycle is designed to highlight strongly opposing positions, so if you want to get changes to stick both sides will have to bend, possibly even bow. You should be clear about when you are compromising and should expect others to compromise in return, but do not expect it to be exactly even.
716:, briefly explain why you reverted. You can encourage the bold editor to start a discussion on the article talk page if they want to learn more about why you reverted. Alternatively, start a discussion yourself on the article talk page about the issue. People feel more cooperative if you let them know that you're willing to listen to their case for the change. Otherwise, a revert can seem brusque.
60:
135:
300:
628:: Make only changes you absolutely need to. A bold edit doesn't have to be a huge edit, and keeping your edit focused is more likely to yield results than making an over-reaching change. If a bold edit might be controversial, consider adding "(revert if inappropriate)" or similar to the edit summary to alert others.
556:
BRD is not an excuse to revert any change more than once. This applies equally to bold editors and to reverters. If your reversion is met with another bold effort, then you should consider discussing instead of reverting. The talk page is open to all editors, not just bold ones. The first person to
364:
BRD is most useful for pages where seeking and achieving consensus in advance of the bold edit could be difficult, perhaps because it is not clear which other editors are watching or sufficiently interested in the page, though there are other suitable methods. BRD helps editors who have a good grasp
1025:
You make a bold edit, then open a discussion. The edit is found to be problematic or lacking, so it is reverted. This sometimes happens when people attempt to make an edit that has severe flaws or problems that cannot be resolved via other methods. If this cycle happens, it might be best for you to
968:
BRD is a way of letting you focus on one editor: You cared enough about the page to try to improve it, someone else cared enough to revert your bold change, and you both cared enough to find a compromise through discussion. This is an excellent collaborative style. But there may be other editors
1016:
You do not need to revert an edit before the discussion can start. If you see (or make) a bold edit and you want to talk about it, then you can click on the talk page and start discussing it. You might discover ways to refine it, or you might discover that you're satisfied with the edit as it is.
867:
You do not have to get it all done in one edit. If you can find consensus on some parts, make those changes, and let them settle. This will give everyone a new point to build from. Having completed one successful cycle, you may also find it easier to get traction for further changes, or you may
856:
If they don't want to, that's okay, but be sure to offer. The offer alone shows deference and respect. If that editor accepts, (1) the history will show who made the change and the other editor will have control over the precise wording (keeping you from applying a change different from the one
786:
As long as the discussion is moving forward, do not feel the need to respond to everyone, as this increases the chance of discussion losing focus and going far afield. Stay on point and pick your responses. If discussion dies off, you can always go back and get yourself reverted again to find (or
584:
After someone reverts your change, thus taking a stand for the existing version or against the change, you can proceed toward a consensus with the challenging editor through discussion on a talk page. While discussing the disputed content, neither editor should revert or change the content being
1053:
Don't stop editing, and don't discuss. Make a guess about why the reverter disagreed with you, and try a different edit to see whether that will be accepted. It's often helpful if your next effort is smaller, because that may help you figure out why the other editor objected to your change.
220:
is a fundamental principle of
Knowledge. All editors are welcome to make positive contributions. It's how new information is added to Knowledge. When in doubt, edit! Either the edit will get the attention of interested editors, or you will simply improve the page. Either is a good outcome.
3556:
1034:
You make a bold edit, then open a discussion. After the discussion, you or others boldly improve the edit based on the discussion suggestions. This cycle is useful if your edit is helpful, but needs to be improved, and if feedback would be valuable to improving the edit.
1596:
943:
period (3RR bright-line rule), do not edit that content in any manner that reverts any content, in whole or in part, even as little as a single word, for over 24 hours. Doing so just past the 24-hour period could be seen as gaming the system and sanctions may still be
1107:
an example of such a mistake: A revert with a rationale that you disagree with, or that does not make sense to you. Another case where the re-revert may be necessary is when an incumbent editor reverts without justification in the edit summary, which is a form
996:"BOLD, revert, discuss" doesn't work well in all situations. It is ideally suited to disputes that involve only a few people, all of whom are interested in making progress. There are many other options, and some may be more suitable for other situations.
2757:
969:
interested in that page, so a third editor might revert your compromise, or might revert your next attempt to improve it. If so, that's okay: You can repeat the BRD cycle with that third editor. Just start a new discussion, and find a new compromise.
2161:
303:
It is often hard to find out who to talk with to gain consensus. By making a bold edit you attract the attention of people who are genuinely interested in a page, and have it on their watchlist. You can then discuss your issues with them.
567:
BRD is not a valid course of action when using advanced permissions. Editors with permissions such as administrator or template editor can take actions which few editors are able to revert if they disagree, preventing the R step of
1626:
2892:
3443:
519:
for the reverter. If you tell someone to follow BRD when you revert their edits, then you need to follow BRD yourself, which means joining the discussion and explaining your substantive reasons for rejecting their edits.
3323:
2495:
956:
Because of the nature of
Knowledge, a BRD cycle may begin naturally, without either editor even realizing it. Once begun, its purpose requires that no reversion be counter-reverted. If this happens, something akin to
2852:
395:
BRD is best used by experienced
Knowledge editors. It may require more diplomacy and skill to use successfully than other methods, and has more potential for failure. Using BRD in volatile situations is discouraged.
2661:
2256:
1130:(see above), particularly among editors who already have a positive working relationship. Beware, though: To an outside observer, such "friendly reverts" may not be readily distinguishable from edit-warring, and
3696:
3004:
1641:
3706:
3972:
3967:
3258:
1963:
319:
While editing a particular page that many editors are discussing with little to no progress being made, or when an editor's concerns are not addressed on the talk page after a reasonable amount of effort.
49:
3636:
3383:
3448:
1308:
706:
a change to an article in the absence of explicit consensus, be sure you actually have a disagreement with the content of the bold edit (and can express that disagreement), not merely a concern that
207:
mandated by
Knowledge policy, but it can be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. In other situations, you may have better success with
3761:
2061:
3746:
3496:
2036:
1089:
If you genuinely believe the reversion was a mistake you might try speeding things up by reverting the revert, but you should explain why you think the other editor made a mistake in a note or
634:: Stop editing the page long enough to see if anyone objects. Depending on the nature of your change and the traffic on the page, this may take anywhere from mere minutes to more than a week.
2091:
1788:
3766:
3173:
2359:
1813:
1736:
1318:
710:
might disagree with the edit. A revert needs to present a path forward, either by expressing a concern with the content of the edit itself, or pointing to a previous discussion that did.
3213:
3193:
2156:
2126:
700:. Improving pages through collaborative editing is ideal. However, if you find yourself making reversions or near-reversions, then stop editing and move to the next stage, "Discuss".
1438:
287:
that reasonably addresses some aspect of those concerns. You can try this even if the discussion has not reached an explicit conclusion, but be sure to avoid engaging in any kind of
2450:
2176:
1938:
1453:
1393:
1368:
1358:
805:). It is OK to disagree with a past consensus, but use reasonable discretion when you want to revisit such issues. If you choose not to back off immediately, it will help if you:
1526:
3911:
1858:
3218:
3298:
3253:
3163:
3113:
2379:
2106:
2081:
915:
reverts, it is best not to escalate the situation by reverting again. Instead, try to build consensus through seeking additional input. Several methods for this are listed at
3806:
2096:
1731:
1716:
1217:
333:, and make what you currently believe to be the optimal changes based on your best effort. Your change might involve re-writing, rearranging, adding or removing information.
965:, so you can always come back later. Otherwise, if you have the energy and the time, use the suggestions on this page to "pull out". Then continue working as per consensus.
3133:
1696:
811:: You are trying to get the full and considered views of those who care enough to disagree with your edit. If you do not listen and do not try to find consensus, you are
640:: Be ready to start a discussion as soon as you notice that anyone has objected. If you want, you can even write your response while you are waiting to see what happens.
588:
If the BRD process works ideally (sometimes it does not), people will after a time begin to refrain from outright reversion, and edits will start to flow more naturally.
4020:
3288:
3203:
2319:
2171:
2076:
1691:
1651:
1506:
3916:
3009:
2922:
2520:
2261:
2086:
2011:
1746:
1721:
1646:
1428:
1258:
2897:
2842:
2827:
961:
an aircraft happens. If you're not feeling up to it, it might be best to walk away for a while. Unlike the immediate danger of an aircraft plummeting to the ground,
3343:
3293:
3148:
2440:
1778:
1661:
1541:
3876:
2505:
2251:
1988:
1913:
1483:
2560:
1101:
An example of such a mistake is when someone reverts your removal of duplicate material because they didn't realize that the same sentence was on the page twice.
3771:
3423:
3268:
3188:
2857:
2606:
2535:
2389:
1686:
3816:
3373:
2580:
2071:
1958:
1948:
1838:
1741:
1726:
840:
3358:
3328:
3138:
2887:
2882:
2419:
1868:
1823:
1753:
3671:
2116:
1491:
1205:
577:
Making bold edits may sometimes draw a response from an interested editor, who may have the article on their watchlist. If no one responds, you have the
3626:
3501:
1521:
406:...there is a dispute on the page, by editors with entrenched positions, and you are reigniting a debate that has achieved stalemate without consensus.
4059:
3388:
3103:
2500:
2186:
1968:
1953:
1798:
1711:
1328:
1313:
780:: The easiest way to intensify this cycle and make it unbreakable is to be uncivil. Try to lead by example and keep your partner in the same mindset.
3977:
3896:
3278:
3238:
2952:
2575:
2565:
2485:
2001:
1903:
1833:
1621:
2621:
3756:
3118:
2555:
2301:
1793:
1473:
1333:
1163:
1145:
Move on to another article. You might be able to improve a hundred articles in the time that it takes you to discuss this one. Why not move on?
2917:
2862:
2832:
1303:
3586:
3506:
2369:
2246:
1463:
410:
764:
If your bold edit was reverted, then do not re-revert to your version. If your reversion was reverted, then do not re-revert to your version.
4054:
3901:
3871:
3866:
3661:
3641:
3438:
3198:
2867:
2822:
2817:
2626:
2510:
2414:
2151:
1863:
1808:
1763:
1701:
1671:
1566:
1338:
832:: Don't assume that a re-revert edit summary can constitute "discussion": There is no way for others to respond without risking an edit war.
3183:
1783:
560:
BRD is not mandatory. Neither are editors obliged to start it nor are they obliged to stick to it just because you started it. They may try
3836:
3711:
3561:
3283:
2979:
2787:
2666:
2515:
2111:
1933:
1883:
1423:
246:
692:, is better than complete reversion. The other disputant may respond with another bold edit, or with a refinement on your improvement.
3851:
3791:
3716:
3208:
3178:
3098:
2927:
1898:
1888:
1853:
1666:
1571:
1293:
1045:
You edit, they edit, you edit again, with each edit improving the prior edit. This is successful, collaborative editing. Keep at it.
3861:
3726:
3701:
3681:
3581:
3353:
2812:
2721:
2681:
2585:
2241:
2226:
2101:
1706:
1556:
1511:
1468:
1443:
1403:
1253:
684:, first consider whether the original text could have been better improved in a different way or if part of the edit can be fixed to
4003:
3831:
3811:
3736:
3731:
3303:
2792:
2435:
2344:
2206:
2141:
2051:
2041:
2016:
1978:
1973:
1908:
1676:
1636:
1581:
1109:
1005:
935:
policy and get good-faith editors blocked even during a productive editing exchange. Any such edits must be clear attempts to try a
843:
if they insist on using only edit summaries, but one or the other is the proper forum for the discussion component of the BRD cycle.
546:
436:...the individual who reverts the bold change actually supports it, but is reverting as a proxy for some other, unidentified person.
85:
2289:
2907:
2399:
4025:
3891:
3428:
2716:
2701:
2616:
2191:
1536:
1283:
1278:
3821:
3631:
3601:
3566:
3393:
2872:
2782:
2696:
2339:
2309:
2181:
1363:
578:
722:: If your reversion is reverted, then there may be a good reason for it. Go to the talk page to learn why you were reverted.
211:. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient.
3987:
3856:
3686:
3413:
3313:
3123:
2999:
2912:
2877:
2802:
2772:
2636:
2470:
2460:
2409:
2236:
2221:
2146:
1918:
1768:
1611:
1398:
1343:
1268:
1198:
794:
539:
2570:
2902:
2797:
2762:
1591:
3962:
3776:
3691:
3453:
3398:
3318:
3273:
3228:
3223:
3108:
2942:
2737:
2445:
2266:
2046:
2021:
1928:
1923:
1803:
1516:
1433:
1348:
1263:
903:
Once discussion has begun, restoring one's original edit without taking other users' concerns into account may be seen as
532:
43:
37:
2837:
4013:
3786:
3666:
3546:
3521:
3348:
2984:
2947:
2937:
2540:
2480:
2334:
1631:
1606:
1561:
1458:
1413:
1388:
1378:
1353:
916:
270:
3906:
3721:
3606:
3531:
3418:
3338:
3308:
3158:
2777:
2747:
2711:
2601:
2465:
2384:
2166:
2031:
1996:
1843:
1601:
1551:
1546:
1273:
68:
2329:
4008:
3957:
3596:
3591:
3551:
3536:
3526:
3403:
3248:
3153:
2656:
2646:
2545:
2354:
2216:
1501:
1373:
797:. On the other hand, repeatedly rehashing old arguments without new reasoning might strike some editors as being
3982:
3939:
3751:
3616:
3516:
3476:
3433:
3378:
3368:
3363:
3333:
3168:
3143:
3128:
3083:
2969:
2691:
2631:
2364:
2201:
2136:
2131:
2121:
1873:
1496:
1248:
1230:
1191:
516:
447:... people are only discussing policy or theory, and are not applying reasoning or trying to negotiate consensus.
84:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
3656:
3611:
2974:
2847:
2807:
2611:
2349:
1878:
1323:
1178:
388:
939:
solution that reflects some aspect of the other editor's remarks. If you have reached three reverts within a
149:
is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets
3886:
3826:
3801:
3741:
3651:
3646:
3233:
3050:
2752:
2742:
2530:
2525:
1943:
1616:
1586:
1418:
958:
451:
284:
242:
230:
3846:
3796:
3576:
3571:
3541:
3030:
2994:
2989:
2686:
2490:
2324:
1848:
1681:
1656:
1531:
898:
455:
325:
Find an interested person, and reach a compromise or consensus with that person, in one-on-one discussion.
266:
581:
to continue editing. If your edit is reverted, the BRD cycle has been initiated by the reverting editor.
257:
your bold edit with the person who reverted you. To follow BRD specifically, instead of one of the many
3841:
3408:
3263:
2676:
2671:
2455:
2374:
2231:
1893:
1173:
1039:
695:
550:
391:
is currently opposed to making any changes whatsoever (when pages are frozen, "policy", or high-profile)
356:
262:
1298:
766:
Instead, take it to the talk page (see below). If you re-revert, then you are no longer following BRD.
3781:
3243:
3040:
2964:
1828:
1773:
1758:
1288:
252:
157:
911:. The objective is to seek consensus, not force one's own will upon other editors. If you encounter
3881:
3491:
3060:
3035:
3014:
2394:
2026:
1818:
1383:
1168:
1139:
427:
307:
200:
89:
72:
3055:
3045:
2959:
2932:
2196:
1448:
1083:
1065:
979:
878:
791:
Carefully consider whether "policy", "consensus", or "procedure" are valid reasons for the revert
738:
688:
some of the edit, and whether you would like to make that bold edit instead. Partial reversion,
685:
656:
600:
471:
347:
as needed, and reach an agreement. Apply your agreement. When reverts have stopped, you are done.
99:
3511:
2475:
2314:
2211:
1408:
904:
798:
561:
258:
234:
208:
76:
2767:
2651:
2641:
2550:
1214:
802:
337:
224:
173:
151:
494:
2404:
908:
775:
689:
433:...individuals revert bold changes but aren't willing to discuss improvements to the page.
540:
reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes
385:
Your view differs significantly from a rough consensus on an emotionally loaded subject.
283:
in discussion, when you have a better understanding of the reverter's concerns, you may
3676:
3621:
2706:
2006:
907:. These so-called "re-reverts" are uncollaborative and could incur sanctions such as a
812:
343:
Discuss the changes you would like to make with this VIP, perhaps using other forms of
214:
145:
403:...there is consensus in the community against the specific change you'd like to make.
4048:
3557:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
1131:
1116:
932:
858:
839:. You can use the article's talk page (preferred) or the editor's user talk page, or
836:
420:
273:
processes. Talk to that one person until the two of you have reached an agreement.
1150:
1094:
1090:
771:
373:
344:
330:
288:
179:
962:
857:
agreed upon). And, (2) such a practice prevents you from falling afoul of the
416:...the page is subject to some other access control. (Get the control lifted.)
241:
encourage reverting, but recognizes that reversions happen. Always follow the
17:
167:
2758:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
127:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge:Consensus and Knowledge:Be bold pages
545:
BRD is never a reason for reverting. Unless the reversion is supported by
504:
BRD is an optional process for experienced editors. BRD only works when
1183:
2162:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
793:: These sometimes get overused on consensus-based wikis even though
720:
If you revert twice, then you are no longer following the BRD cycle
1026:
step away from the article, and consider the discussion feedback.
355:
298:
166:
1627:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
50:
Knowledge:What editors mean when they say you have to follow BRD
3937:
3474:
3081:
2287:
1228:
1187:
1004:
Don't be bold with potentially controversial changes; instead,
462:
In short: boldly negotiate where no one has negotiated before.
299:
3444:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
591:
For each step in the cycle, here are some points to remember.
531:
BRD is not a justification for imposing one's own view or for
487:
129:
54:
1008:
first. Make no edits to the page until you have agreement.
726:
If people start making non-revert changes again, you are done
3324:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2496:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
868:
find you have reached a reasonable compromise and can stop.
557:
start a discussion is the person who is best following BRD.
2853:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2662:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2257:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1597:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
376:
and a bold edit is made as a compromise or middle ground.
3697:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
379:
Discussion has died out with no agreement being reached.
3707:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1073:
987:
886:
753:
746:
671:
664:
615:
608:
479:
426:...a single editor is reverting changes and exhibiting
233:. If you revert, be specific about your reasons in the
229:
an edit if you disagree with it and cannot immediately
114:
107:
3259:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2893:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1964:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
3005:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1642:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
1082:"WP:BRR" redirects here. Previously it redirected to
646:: Regardless of what others say, keep your composure.
444:... people haven't really thought things through yet.
1309:
Editing
Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
3996:
3950:
3023:
2730:
2594:
2428:
2300:
2060:
1987:
1482:
1241:
865:
Assume this revision will not be the final version.
3968:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3747:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1154:processes may also be useful to break a deadlock.
698:" process is the ideal collaborative editing cycle
340:your edit. You have now discovered your first VIP.
42:"WP:CYCLE" redirects here. You may be looking for
1231:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
2092:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2037:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1789:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3767:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3497:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3174:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1814:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1319:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
854:Let the other editor apply agreed-upon changes.
523:...then don't tell other editors to follow BRD.
3449:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
3194:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2360:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2127:Counting and sorting are not original research
1179:Knowledge:Editing policy § Try to fix problems
784:Talk with one or at most two partners at once.
174:Knowledge:Editing policy § Talking and editing
2157:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1439:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1199:
931:Repeatedly doing this can easily violate the
728:: The normal editing cycle has been restored.
8:
3687:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2451:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2177:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1454:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1394:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
1369:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
564:, or even an alternative not mentioned here.
31:
3219:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1939:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
409:...the page is protected. (You may request
382:Active discussion is not producing results.
365:of a subject to rapidly engage discussion.
3947:
3934:
3912:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3484:
3471:
3299:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3254:News coverage does not decrease notability
3164:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3114:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3091:
3078:
2297:
2284:
2107:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2082:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1238:
1225:
1206:
1192:
1184:
923:However, don't get stuck on the discussion
493:
265:to this part of the page, don't engage in
3807:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2097:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1717:Identifying and using independent sources
553:, the reversion is not part of BRD cycle.
161:with the person who reverted your change.
3973:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3134:Big events make key participants notable
1697:Formatting bilateral relations templates
199:strategies that editors may use to seek
155:, do not revert again. Instead, begin a
4021:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
3637:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
3384:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3289:Notability is not a level playing field
3204:How the presumption of notability works
2320:Contributing to complicated discussions
2172:How the presumption of notability works
1692:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1507:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
1164:Knowledge:Method for consensus building
3917:You should not write meaningless lists
3214:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2521:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2262:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2087:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1652:Don't hope the house will build itself
1429:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
1259:All Five Pillars are equally important
512:reverting editors follow the process.
368:Examples cases for use include where:
360:Consensus is stuck. BRD to the rescue!
261:, don't restore your bold edit, don't
3344:One sentence does not an article make
3294:Notability is not a matter of opinion
3010:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2923:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2441:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2380:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2012:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1779:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1542:An unfinished house is a real problem
1527:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
500:If you don't want to talk about it...
7:
3877:Things that should not be surprising
3572:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2898:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2843:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2828:Don't call people by their real name
2506:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1914:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
440:BRD is especially successful where:
269:, and don't start any of the larger
171:BRD is optional, but complying with
3772:No one cares about your garage band
3424:What is and is not routine coverage
3269:No one cares about your garage band
3189:Existence does not prove notability
2607:Assume the assumption of good faith
2536:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2390:Relationships with academic editors
2252:Why was the page I created deleted?
1687:Featured articles may have problems
1006:start a discussion on the talk page
963:Knowledge will be here a long while
562:one of the alternatives given below
3817:Please do not murder the newcomers
3374:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2858:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2581:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
2072:Adjectives in your recommendations
1959:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1949:What an article should not include
1839:The problem with elegant variation
1647:Don't get hung up on minor details
841:invite the editor to the talk page
714:In the edit summary of your revert
428:other forms of ownership attitudes
90:thoroughly vetted by the community
86:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
3139:Businesses with a single location
2420:You have a right to remain silent
1869:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1824:Potential, not just current state
1754:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
787:refind) other interested parties.
280:
4060:Knowledge essays about consensus
2888:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2883:Don't ignore community consensus
2117:Confusing arguments mean nothing
638:Expect resistance—even hostility
133:
58:
3389:Sources must be out-of-universe
3104:All high schools can be notable
2501:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2187:Identifying blatant advertising
1969:The world will not end tomorrow
1954:Knowledge is a work in progress
1799:Not everything needs a template
1712:How to write a featured article
1329:External criticism of Knowledge
1314:Editors will sometimes be wrong
517:get-out-of-discussion-free card
372:Two factions are engaged in an
3978:Avoid writing redundant essays
3897:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
3627:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3502:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3329:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
3279:Notability cannot be purchased
3239:Masking the lack of notability
2576:Knowledge is not about winning
2002:Copyediting reception sections
1904:Temporary versions of articles
1834:Principle of Some Astonishment
1622:Creating controversial content
1522:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
538:BRD is not a valid excuse for
237:or on the talk page. BRD does
1:
4004:About policies and guidelines
3757:List of jokes about Knowledge
3119:Articles with a single source
2566:Two wrongs don't make a right
2556:The rules of polite discourse
2486:It's not the end of the world
2247:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
1794:Not everything needs a navbox
1662:Don't "teach the controversy"
1474:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
1334:Here to build an encyclopedia
209:alternatives to this approach
44:Knowledge:WikiProject Cycling
38:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany
30:"WP:BRD" redirects here. For
4055:Knowledge supplemental pages
3587:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3507:Alternatives to edit warring
2370:Maintaining a friendly space
1464:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
917:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
817:"It's policy, live with it."
345:Knowledge dispute resolution
3872:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3867:The first rule of Knowledge
3662:Editing under the influence
3439:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
3199:Google searches and numbers
2918:Don't template the regulars
2833:Don't call the kettle black
2627:Be excellent to one another
2511:Revert notification opt-out
2415:We are all Wikipedians here
1864:Put a little effort into it
1809:Obtain peer review comments
1764:Introduction to structurism
1702:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1672:Editors are not mindreaders
1577:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1567:Beef up that first revision
1339:Leave it to the experienced
1304:Don't search for objections
456:getting down to brass tacks
189:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
27:Knowledge supplemental page
4076:
3902:Why not create an account?
3837:Requirements for adminship
3712:How to vandalize correctly
3642:Don't delete the main page
3562:Avoid using preview button
3284:Notability comparison test
2868:Don't fight fire with fire
2863:Don't eat the troll's food
2823:Don't call a spade a spade
2818:Don't bludgeon the process
2667:Encourage full discussions
2516:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2152:Don't attack the nominator
2112:But there must be sources!
1934:Try not to leave it a stub
1884:Source your plot summaries
1126:may function as a form of
1110:WP:Status quo stonewalling
1081:
1063:
977:
876:
736:
654:
598:
469:
399:In general, BRD fails if:
247:revert only when necessary
97:
33:Bundesrepublik Deutschland
29:
3946:
3933:
3852:Sarcasm is really helpful
3792:Notability is not eternal
3717:How to win a citation war
3487:
3483:
3470:
3179:Every snowflake is unique
3099:Advanced source searching
3094:
3090:
3077:
2980:No, you can't have a pony
2928:Do not insult the vandals
2788:Don't be high-maintenance
2345:Encouraging the newcomers
2296:
2283:
1889:Specialized-style fallacy
1854:Pruning article revisions
1682:Endorsements (commercial)
1667:Editing on mobile devices
1572:Blind men and an elephant
1547:Articles have a half-life
1294:Dissent is not disloyalty
1264:Avoid vague introductions
1237:
1224:
951:Additional considerations
815:. You should not accept
3862:The Night Before Wikimas
3727:Ignore every single rule
3702:How to get away with UPE
3582:Before they were notable
3354:Overreliance upon Google
3149:Common sourcing mistakes
2722:Settle the process first
2682:Imagine others complexly
2586:Writing for the opponent
2561:There is no common sense
2242:Unopposed AFD discussion
2227:Relisting can be abusive
2102:Avoid repeated arguments
1707:Give an article a chance
1557:Avoid mission statements
1517:Advanced text formatting
1512:Advanced article editing
1469:Knowledge is a community
1444:The rules are principles
1404:Product, process, policy
1254:Articles must be written
1049:Bold, revert, bold again
458:with concrete proposals.
267:back-and-forth reverting
141:This page in a nutshell:
3997:Policies and guidelines
3832:Requests for medication
3812:Please bite the newbies
3737:Mess with the templates
3304:Notability means impact
2838:Don't call things cruft
2813:Don't be the Fun Police
2743:Knowledge:Because I can
2622:Avoid the word "vandal"
2436:A thank you never hurts
2207:Liar liar pants on fire
2142:Deletion is not cleanup
2052:Writing better articles
2042:Write the article first
2017:Gender-neutral language
1989:Writing article content
1979:Writing better articles
1974:Write the article first
1909:Tertiary-source fallacy
1677:Encourage the newcomers
1637:Dictionaries as sources
1582:Build content to endure
813:wasting everyone's time
452:talking past each other
4026:Policy writing is hard
3892:Knowledge is an MMORPG
3732:Is that even an essay?
3429:What notability is not
3184:Existence ≠ Notability
2793:Don't be inconsiderate
2717:Read before commenting
2702:Mind your own business
2617:Avoid personal remarks
2192:Identifying test edits
1537:A navbox on every page
1492:100K featured articles
1289:Concede lost arguments
1284:Competence is required
1093:to reduce the risk of
830:Discuss on a talk page
822:Be ready to compromise
361:
312:
184:
32:
3822:Pledge of Tranquility
3567:Avoid using wikilinks
3394:Subjective importance
2908:Don't spite your face
2697:Keep it down to earth
2461:Beware of the tigers!
2400:Too long; didn't read
2340:Edit at your own pace
2310:Accepting other users
2077:AfD is not a war zone
1424:There is no seniority
1364:Neutrality of sources
1132:the three-revert rule
1021:Bold, discuss, revert
809:Listen very carefully
632:See what happens next
359:
302:
263:make a different edit
170:
3988:Quote your own essay
3857:Sausages for tasting
3682:Five Fs of Knowledge
3632:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3602:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3414:Vanispamcruftisement
3314:Notability sub-pages
3124:Avoid template creep
3084:Essays on notability
3000:There are no oracles
2783:Don't be a WikiBigot
2637:Call a spade a spade
2410:Unblock perspectives
2237:The Heymann Standard
2222:Overzealous deletion
2182:I just don't like it
1919:There is no deadline
1784:"Murder of" articles
1612:Common-style fallacy
1484:Article construction
1399:Process is important
1344:Levels of competence
1269:Be a reliable source
1124:bold, revert, revert
1060:Bold, revert, revert
795:consensus can change
547:policies, guidelines
3777:No one really cares
3692:Go ahead, vandalize
3454:Two prongs of merit
3399:Third-party sources
3319:Notabilitymandering
3274:No one really cares
3229:Inherent notability
3224:Independent sources
3109:Alternative outlets
2943:Nationalist editing
2913:Don't take the bait
2878:Don't help too much
2803:Don't be prejudiced
2773:Don't be an ostrich
2738:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2471:Deletion as revenge
2446:Advice for hotheads
2267:No Encyclopedic Use
2147:Does deletion help?
2047:Writing about women
1929:The deadline is now
1924:There is a deadline
1804:Nothing is in stone
1434:Tendentious editing
1349:Levels of consensus
1169:Knowledge:Short BRD
1030:Bold, discuss, bold
533:tendentious editing
336:Wait until someone
308:Knowledge:Consensus
88:as it has not been
73:Knowledge:Consensus
3787:No sorcery threats
3667:Embrace Stop Signs
3547:Assume good wraith
3522:Anti-Wikipedianism
3359:Perennial websites
3349:Other stuff exists
2985:Passive aggression
2948:No angry mastodons
2938:Hate is disruptive
2798:Don't be obnoxious
2763:Don't be a fanatic
2541:Most ideas are bad
2481:Forgive and forget
2290:Essays on civility
1899:Run an edit-a-thon
1632:Deprecated sources
1607:Citation underkill
1592:Chesterton's fence
1562:Be neutral in form
1459:Knowledge in brief
1414:Reasonability rule
1379:Oversimplification
1354:Most ideas are bad
1151:dispute resolution
362:
313:
285:attempt a new edit
271:dispute resolution
203:. This process is
185:
180:Knowledge:Edit war
4042:
4041:
4038:
4037:
4034:
4033:
3929:
3928:
3925:
3924:
3907:Yes legal threats
3722:Ignore all essays
3607:Complete bollocks
3532:Asshole John rule
3466:
3465:
3462:
3461:
3419:What BLP1E is not
3339:One hundred words
3309:Notability points
3073:
3072:
3069:
3068:
2873:Don't give a fuck
2748:Civil POV pushing
2712:Mutual withdrawal
2602:Assume good faith
2571:Knowledge clichés
2466:Civility warnings
2385:Please say please
2335:Editors' pronouns
2279:
2278:
2275:
2274:
2167:Follow the leader
2032:Use our own words
1997:Avoid thread mode
1844:Pro and con lists
1602:Citation overkill
1552:Autosizing images
1274:Civil POV pushing
859:three-revert rule
528:
527:
195:) is one of many
165:
164:
125:
124:
77:Knowledge:Be bold
69:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
4067:
3983:Finding an essay
3948:
3935:
3597:Butterfly effect
3592:Boston Tea Party
3552:Assume stupidity
3537:Assume bad faith
3527:Articlecountitis
3485:
3472:
3404:Trivial mentions
3249:Minimum coverage
3092:
3079:
2778:Don't be ashamed
2657:Discussing cruft
2647:Deny recognition
2546:Nothing is clear
2355:Expect no thanks
2298:
2285:
2217:Nothing is clear
2064:deleting content
1747:Tertiary sources
1502:Acronym overkill
1374:The one question
1239:
1226:
1219:
1215:Knowledge essays
1208:
1201:
1194:
1185:
1076:
990:
889:
756:
749:
704:Before reverting
682:Before reverting
674:
667:
618:
611:
579:silent consensus
497:
488:
482:
295:General overview
137:
136:
130:
117:
110:
62:
61:
55:
35:
21:
4075:
4074:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4066:
4065:
4064:
4045:
4044:
4043:
4030:
3992:
3963:Value of essays
3942:
3921:
3752:Legal vandalism
3617:Counting juntas
3517:Anti-Wikipedian
3479:
3477:Humorous essays
3458:
3434:What to include
3379:Run-of-the-mill
3369:Read the source
3334:Offline sources
3129:Bare notability
3086:
3065:
3019:
2970:No Confederates
2768:Don't be a jerk
2726:
2692:Keep it concise
2632:Beyond civility
2590:
2424:
2365:How to be civil
2330:Don't retaliate
2292:
2271:
2202:Keep it concise
2137:Delete the junk
2132:Delete or merge
2122:Content removal
2056:
2022:Myth vs fiction
1983:
1874:Robotic editing
1737:Science sources
1732:Primary sources
1722:History sources
1497:Abandoned stubs
1478:
1249:Article content
1233:
1220:
1212:
1160:
1143:
1087:
1080:
1079:
1072:
1068:
1062:
1051:
1043:
1032:
1023:
1014:
1002:
994:
993:
986:
982:
976:
953:
893:
892:
885:
881:
875:
850:
760:
759:
752:
745:
741:
735:
678:
677:
670:
663:
659:
653:
622:
621:
614:
607:
603:
597:
575:
486:
485:
478:
474:
468:
466:What BRD is not
450:... people are
389:Local consensus
354:
297:
134:
128:
121:
120:
113:
106:
102:
94:
93:
59:
53:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4073:
4071:
4063:
4062:
4057:
4047:
4046:
4040:
4039:
4036:
4035:
4032:
4031:
4029:
4028:
4023:
4018:
4017:
4016:
4011:
4000:
3998:
3994:
3993:
3991:
3990:
3985:
3980:
3975:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3954:
3952:
3944:
3943:
3938:
3931:
3930:
3927:
3926:
3923:
3922:
3920:
3919:
3914:
3909:
3904:
3899:
3894:
3889:
3884:
3879:
3874:
3869:
3864:
3859:
3854:
3849:
3844:
3839:
3834:
3829:
3824:
3819:
3814:
3809:
3804:
3799:
3794:
3789:
3784:
3779:
3774:
3769:
3764:
3759:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3734:
3729:
3724:
3719:
3714:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3657:Editsummarisis
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3612:Counting forks
3609:
3604:
3599:
3594:
3589:
3584:
3579:
3574:
3569:
3564:
3559:
3554:
3549:
3544:
3539:
3534:
3529:
3524:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3504:
3499:
3494:
3488:
3481:
3480:
3475:
3468:
3467:
3464:
3463:
3460:
3459:
3457:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3169:Don't cite GNG
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3144:But it's true!
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3095:
3088:
3087:
3082:
3075:
3074:
3071:
3070:
3067:
3066:
3064:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3041:WikiHarassment
3038:
3033:
3027:
3025:
3021:
3020:
3018:
3017:
3012:
3007:
3002:
2997:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2975:No queerphobia
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2945:
2940:
2935:
2930:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2910:
2905:
2900:
2895:
2890:
2885:
2880:
2875:
2870:
2865:
2860:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2840:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2740:
2734:
2732:
2728:
2727:
2725:
2724:
2719:
2714:
2709:
2704:
2699:
2694:
2689:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2612:Assume no clue
2609:
2604:
2598:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2589:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2533:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2432:
2430:
2426:
2425:
2423:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2350:Enjoy yourself
2347:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2306:
2304:
2294:
2293:
2288:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2270:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2068:
2066:
2063:
2058:
2057:
2055:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1993:
1991:
1985:
1984:
1982:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1966:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1879:Sham consensus
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1488:
1486:
1480:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1324:Explanationism
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1245:
1243:
1235:
1234:
1229:
1222:
1221:
1213:
1211:
1210:
1203:
1196:
1188:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1159:
1156:
1142:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:still applies.
1120:
1102:
1078:
1077:
1069:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1050:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1031:
1028:
1022:
1019:
1013:
1010:
1001:
998:
992:
991:
983:
978:
975:
972:
971:
970:
966:
952:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
920:
891:
890:
882:
877:
874:
871:
870:
869:
862:
849:
846:
845:
844:
827:
826:
825:
819:
788:
781:
767:
758:
757:
750:
742:
737:
734:
731:
730:
729:
723:
717:
711:
701:
696:WP:Bold-refine
676:
675:
668:
660:
655:
652:
649:
648:
647:
641:
635:
629:
620:
619:
612:
604:
599:
596:
593:
574:
571:
570:
569:
565:
558:
554:
543:
536:
526:
525:
491:
484:
483:
475:
470:
467:
464:
460:
459:
448:
445:
438:
437:
434:
431:
424:
417:
414:
407:
404:
393:
392:
386:
383:
380:
377:
353:
350:
349:
348:
341:
334:
327:
326:
323:
322:How to proceed
320:
317:
296:
293:
243:editing policy
206:
163:
162:
138:
126:
123:
122:
119:
118:
111:
103:
98:
95:
83:
82:
65:
63:
47:
41:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4072:
4061:
4058:
4056:
4053:
4052:
4050:
4027:
4024:
4022:
4019:
4015:
4012:
4010:
4007:
4006:
4005:
4002:
4001:
3999:
3995:
3989:
3986:
3984:
3981:
3979:
3976:
3974:
3971:
3969:
3966:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3955:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3941:
3936:
3932:
3918:
3915:
3913:
3910:
3908:
3905:
3903:
3900:
3898:
3895:
3893:
3890:
3888:
3887:Watchlistitis
3885:
3883:
3882:The WikiBible
3880:
3878:
3875:
3873:
3870:
3868:
3865:
3863:
3860:
3858:
3855:
3853:
3850:
3848:
3845:
3843:
3840:
3838:
3835:
3833:
3830:
3828:
3827:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3825:
3823:
3820:
3818:
3815:
3813:
3810:
3808:
3805:
3803:
3802:Play the game
3800:
3798:
3795:
3793:
3790:
3788:
3785:
3783:
3780:
3778:
3775:
3773:
3770:
3768:
3765:
3763:
3760:
3758:
3755:
3753:
3750:
3748:
3745:
3743:
3742:My local pond
3740:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3725:
3723:
3720:
3718:
3715:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3652:Edits Per Day
3650:
3648:
3647:Editcountitis
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3588:
3585:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3573:
3570:
3568:
3565:
3563:
3560:
3558:
3555:
3553:
3550:
3548:
3545:
3543:
3540:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3523:
3520:
3518:
3515:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3493:
3490:
3489:
3486:
3482:
3478:
3473:
3469:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3234:Insignificant
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3096:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3080:
3076:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3051:WikiLawyering
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3028:
3026:
3024:WikiRelations
3022:
3016:
3013:
3011:
3008:
3006:
3003:
3001:
2998:
2996:
2993:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2954:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2946:
2944:
2941:
2939:
2936:
2934:
2931:
2929:
2926:
2924:
2921:
2919:
2916:
2914:
2911:
2909:
2906:
2904:
2901:
2899:
2896:
2894:
2891:
2889:
2886:
2884:
2881:
2879:
2876:
2874:
2871:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2856:
2854:
2851:
2849:
2848:Don't cry COI
2846:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2831:
2829:
2826:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2808:Don't be rude
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2753:Cyberbullying
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2736:
2735:
2733:
2729:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2713:
2710:
2708:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2695:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2683:
2680:
2678:
2675:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2599:
2597:
2593:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2532:
2531:The last word
2529:
2527:
2526:The grey zone
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2433:
2431:
2427:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2305:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2286:
2282:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2069:
2067:
2065:
2059:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1994:
1992:
1990:
1986:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1944:Walled garden
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1769:Mine a source
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1617:Concept cloud
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1587:Cherrypicking
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1489:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1419:Systemic bias
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1223:
1216:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1197:
1195:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1146:
1141:
1138:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1092:
1085:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1059:
1057:
1055:
1048:
1046:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1029:
1027:
1020:
1018:
1012:Bold, discuss
1011:
1009:
1007:
1000:Discuss first
999:
997:
989:
985:
984:
981:
973:
967:
964:
960:
955:
954:
950:
942:
938:
934:
930:
927:
926:
924:
921:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
900:
895:
894:
888:
884:
883:
880:
872:
866:
863:
860:
855:
852:
851:
847:
842:
838:
835:
831:
828:
823:
820:
818:
814:
810:
807:
806:
804:
800:
796:
792:
789:
785:
782:
779:
777:
773:
768:
765:
762:
761:
755:
754:WP:BRDDISCUSS
751:
748:
744:
743:
740:
732:
727:
724:
721:
718:
715:
712:
709:
705:
702:
699:
697:
691:
687:
683:
680:
679:
673:
669:
666:
662:
661:
658:
650:
645:
644:Be respectful
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
627:
624:
623:
617:
613:
610:
606:
605:
602:
594:
592:
589:
586:
582:
580:
572:
566:
563:
559:
555:
552:
548:
544:
541:
537:
534:
530:
529:
524:
521:
518:
515:BRD is not a
513:
511:
507:
502:
501:
496:
492:
490:
489:
481:
477:
476:
473:
465:
463:
457:
453:
449:
446:
443:
442:
441:
435:
432:
429:
425:
422:
418:
415:
412:
408:
405:
402:
401:
400:
397:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
371:
370:
369:
366:
358:
351:
346:
342:
339:
335:
332:
329:
328:
324:
321:
318:
315:
314:
310:
309:
301:
294:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:
222:
219:
217:
212:
210:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
183:is mandatory.
182:
181:
176:
175:
169:
160:
159:
154:
153:
148:
147:
142:
139:
132:
131:
116:
112:
109:
105:
104:
101:
96:
91:
87:
80:
78:
74:
70:
64:
57:
56:
51:
45:
39:
34:
19:
18:Knowledge:BRR
3951:About essays
3940:About essays
3847:Rouge editor
3797:Oops Defense
3577:Barnstaritis
3542:Assume faith
3364:Pokémon test
3209:High Schools
3031:WikiBullying
2995:Superhatting
2990:POV railroad
2687:Just drop it
2491:Nobody cares
2325:Divisiveness
1849:Printability
1742:Style guides
1576:
1532:Amnesia test
1389:Paraphrasing
1149:
1147:
1144:
1128:bold, refine
1127:
1123:
1113:
1104:
1095:edit warring
1091:edit summary
1088:
1056:
1052:
1044:
1040:Bold, refine
1033:
1024:
1015:
1003:
995:
974:Alternatives
940:
936:
928:
922:
912:
896:
873:Edit warring
864:
853:
848:Bold (again)
833:
829:
821:
816:
808:
790:
783:
769:
763:
725:
719:
713:
708:someone else
707:
703:
693:
681:
672:WP:BRDREVERT
643:
637:
631:
626:Stay focused
625:
590:
587:
583:
576:
551:common sense
522:
514:
509:
505:
503:
499:
498:
461:
439:
419:...you lose
411:unprotection
398:
394:
367:
363:
305:
289:edit warring
281:bogging down
276:
275:
259:alternatives
253:
251:
238:
235:edit summary
225:
223:
215:
213:
196:
192:
188:
186:
178:
172:
156:
150:
144:
140:
66:
3958:Essay guide
3842:Rouge admin
3409:Video links
3264:No big loss
2953:just madmen
2903:Don't shout
2677:How to lose
2672:Get over it
2456:Be the glue
2375:Negotiation
2232:Relist bias
2062:Removing or
1894:Stub Makers
1727:Law sources
1657:Don't panic
1174:Negotiation
1084:WP:Desserts
887:WP:NOTSTUCK
686:WP:PRESERVE
454:instead of
316:When to use
279:. To avoid
67:This is an
4049:Categories
4014:Guidelines
3782:No, really
3762:LTTAUTMAOK
3244:Make stubs
2965:No racists
2707:Say "MOBY"
2429:Philosophy
2302:The basics
1859:Publicists
1829:Presentism
1774:Merge Test
1759:Inaccuracy
1242:Philosophy
1122:Sometimes
905:disruptive
801:(see also
799:disruptive
778:guidelines
772:Wikiquette
770:Adhere to
616:WP:BRDBOLD
480:WP:BRD-NOT
158:discussion
146:bold edits
71:about the
3492:Adminitis
3061:WikiPeace
3036:WikiCrime
3015:UPPERCASE
2395:Thank you
2027:Proseline
1819:Permastub
1384:Paradoxes
1299:Don't lie
1140:Let it go
803:rehashing
739:Shortcuts
657:Shortcuts
601:Shortcuts
352:Use cases
231:refine it
201:consensus
100:Shortcuts
48:See also
4009:Policies
3159:Coatrack
3056:WikiLove
3046:WikiHate
2960:No Nazis
2933:Griefing
2197:Immunity
1449:Trifecta
1279:Cohesion
1158:See also
1148:Several
1066:Shortcut
980:Shortcut
959:stalling
944:applied.
937:modified
929:Warning:
899:edit war
879:Shortcut
834:See also
776:civility
690:WP:PARTR
472:Shortcut
374:edit war
306:Compare
197:optional
152:reverted
115:WP:CYCLE
3672:Emerson
3512:ANI flu
2476:Failure
2315:Apology
2212:Nothing
1409:Purpose
1114:But see
941:24-hour
913:several
897:Do not
747:WP:BRDD
733:Discuss
665:WP:BRDR
609:WP:BRDB
573:Process
338:reverts
331:Be bold
254:Discuss
218:editing
143:Making
3154:Clones
2731:Don'ts
2652:Desist
2642:Candor
2551:Reader
1117:WP:QUO
1074:WP:BRR
988:WP:BRB
837:WP:QUO
651:Revert
226:Revert
108:WP:BRD
36:, see
2405:Truce
909:block
694:The "
508:bold
421:tempo
277:Cycle
79:pages
3677:Fart
3622:Crap
2007:Coup
1359:Need
774:and
595:Bold
568:BRD.
506:both
245:and
216:Bold
187:The
177:and
75:and
2595:Dos
1218:(?)
1105:Not
1097:.
933:3RR
549:or
510:and
239:not
205:not
193:BRD
4051::
1112:.
413:.)
291:.
249:.
81:.
46:.
40:.
1207:e
1200:t
1193:v
1119:.
1086:.
919:.
901:.
861:.
542:.
535:.
430:.
423:.
311:.
191:(
92:.
52:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
