116:
288:
article using the material extracted from this "significant coverage", then we may define "significant" as "sufficient to serve as the basis for a good encyclopedic article". In this way, the concept of notability becomes entirely a practical one: we include topics on which we can create legitimate articles, and exclude topics on which we cannot.
228:. It can be exhausting trying to search through hundreds of thousands of results for something that may meet these criteria, but narrowing your search can help. For example, if you are looking for references for an article on jazz saxophones from the 1930s, Google, Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo will find more targeted websites if you search for
485:. This criterion only applies to an article about a real person, individual animal, organization, Web content, or organized event. It does not mean "insert a sentence stating 'This subject is important and significant because ...". It means write and source the article in a way that makes it clear why this is an encyclopedia-worthy topic.
31:
160:. Though the creator or a major contributor may feel they did a good enough job of writing the article and providing sources, others may feel differently. Knowledge (XXG)'s policies collectively are quite complicated, and therefore, can be interpreted in a variety of ways. So a subject being barely notable leaves more room for the
98:
236:(in each case, use both sets of terms in quotes). If you are searching and not finding enough hits, try changing to a variant term for your search. For example, if you are looking for references for an article on bluegrass double bass, but you are not finding any good sources, if you use variant search terms like
440:
An article that satisfies
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability requirement simply is notable, even if the level of coverage does not exceed the minimum level required. Such an article cannot be validly deleted on the grounds that it is not notable due to lack of coverage (because deleting a notable topic for
318:
an article of their own, however. Suppose that we have some topic, X, which has a small amount of reliable secondary coverage; we can, for example, extract only three sentences of usable material from it. Should X have an article? Probably not; an article that remains a three-sentence stub forever
369:
A topic is eligible for coverage in
Knowledge (XXG) commensurate in extent to its coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject; topics for which there is insufficient useable material to support a separate article should be mentioned in broader articles or lists to the
175:
on an unprotected article. It only takes one person to propose an article for deletion. One who is capable of giving good arguments in favor of an article's deletion can be responsible for getting an article deleted, even if the creator feels it should be kept on the basis of the sources provided.
287:
The stumbling block in this scheme, then, is the precise definition of "significant coverage". How much coverage does a topic need, and in how many sources, before this coverage reaches the level of "significant"? Here, too, we may consider the needs of a potential article: if we must create an
503:
may be an exception, see below). A possible approach is not to refrain from creating an article unless you are sure it will be kept, but, rather, to go ahead and create it unless you are sure it should not be kept. Generally, self-censorship is unhelpful as you are depriving the community of the
464:
for an article to indicate why its subject is notable, but failure to do so is not a grounds for deletion. However, the notability of an article may be tested if an article is at deletion discussion. The "assertion of notability" thing is a misunderstanding: an article of a certain kind may be
184:
The best ways to prevent an article on a subject with bare notability is to improve it so its notability seems more obvious. A good approach would be to ask yourself, why would anyone want to read about this subject? Or what makes this subject important enough to be included in an encyclopedia?
406:
But what is the purpose of turning to the concept of notability in the first place? Notability is not a goal in and of itself; rather, it's a shorthand term that covers the availability of sources for an article on a topic. If a topic has no coverage in "reliable secondary sources that are
2980:
250:: Using books you already own or visiting your local library can produce additional information. A library might hold useful books or periodicals, or be staffed by professionals willing to assist in researching subjects. Many local libraries provide access to online resources such as
1020:
2181:
1585:
1050:
2867:
2316:
499:, and since such articles are generally harmless, there is no reason, except possible later deletion, to generally be cautious about creating topics that seem to be on the borderline of notability or that seem arguably notable (
538:
indicates that increased caution should be exercised when dealing with living or recently deceased persons. Barely notable living persons present an issue with sourcing, especially with self-published sources, either by others
2747:
1919:
2276:
2085:
1680:
3120:
597:
1387:
3060:
2807:
2428:
1065:
3130:
2872:
732:
3396:
3391:
2682:
3185:
1485:
3170:
2920:
1460:
343:
A topic is "semi-notable" if there is some usable coverage of it in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, but not a sufficient amount to write a good encyclopedic article.
1515:
1212:
3488:
3190:
2597:
1783:
1237:
1160:
742:
1362:
792:
782:
592:
488:
407:
independent of the subject", it will be virtually impossible to write an encyclopedic article regarding it, since it is the material from such sources which must form the core of any article.
2637:
2617:
1580:
1550:
559:, articles on such persons might also not be watched or maintained very often, allowing policy violations to creep in with lower chance of detection and violating the spirit of BLP. There is
504:
opportunity to decide whether they want to keep the article; but on the other hand, creating an article that later gets deleted results in burdening editors with wasted time and effort in an
441:
non-notability would be a paradox). Such an article is in possible danger of being deleted unless editors ignore the actual notability rules (in which case the grounds for deletion would be
862:
445:, not non-notability; and any editor proposing deletion on such grounds should expect to meet some resistance). Regardless, notability needs to be satisfied for an article to be retained.
1874:
1600:
877:
817:
950:
3335:
1282:
563:
that administrators may (but need not) delete an article on a relatively unknown living person when the person requests the article's deletion and there's no firm consensus against it.
2642:
2722:
2677:
2587:
2537:
1803:
1530:
1505:
3444:
3230:
1520:
1155:
1140:
852:
262:
because they are accessible to anyone with access to the internet, so when an off-web source is used, use references that provide as much bibliographical information as possible.
2557:
1120:
2712:
2627:
1743:
1595:
1500:
1115:
1075:
930:
3340:
2433:
2346:
1944:
1685:
1510:
1435:
1170:
1145:
1070:
682:
641:
2321:
2266:
2251:
2767:
2717:
2572:
1864:
1202:
1085:
965:
2004:
1382:
3300:
1929:
1675:
1412:
1337:
907:
1984:
3195:
2847:
2692:
2612:
2281:
2030:
1959:
1813:
1110:
349:
A topic is "notable" if there is enough usable coverage of it in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject to write a good encyclopedic article.
3240:
2797:
1495:
1372:
1262:
1165:
1150:
1377:
752:
2782:
2752:
2562:
2311:
2306:
1843:
1292:
1247:
1177:
3320:
1999:
3478:
3095:
1540:
915:
629:
3180:
897:
3050:
2925:
945:
2812:
2527:
1924:
1610:
1392:
1222:
1135:
737:
1670:
887:
3401:
2702:
2662:
2376:
1989:
1909:
1425:
1327:
1257:
1045:
3290:
2862:
2045:
2542:
1979:
1725:
1217:
757:
500:
2341:
2286:
2256:
727:
3010:
2930:
1793:
466:
3325:
3295:
3085:
3065:
2622:
2291:
2246:
2241:
2050:
1934:
1838:
1575:
1287:
1232:
1187:
1125:
1095:
1000:
990:
762:
3105:
2607:
1207:
892:
572:
323:
have some legitimate material about it, after all. A neater solution would be to include mention of X in some broader article or list; if all we
3260:
3135:
2985:
2707:
2403:
2211:
2090:
1939:
1535:
1357:
1307:
847:
3275:
3215:
3140:
2632:
2602:
2522:
2351:
1322:
1312:
1277:
1090:
995:
717:
3315:
397:
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
3285:
3150:
3125:
3005:
2777:
2236:
2145:
2105:
2009:
1665:
1650:
1525:
1130:
980:
935:
867:
827:
677:
241:
185:
Notability must be asserted bluntly and definitively. The best way to accomplish this is to back up your assertions with reliable sources:
106:
Be cautious with creating articles that are borderline notable. A subject that seems to be barely notable may really not be notable at all.
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3427:
3255:
3235:
3160:
3155:
2727:
2216:
1859:
1768:
1630:
1565:
1475:
1465:
1440:
1402:
1397:
1332:
1100:
1060:
1005:
51:
1713:
2331:
1994:
1823:
258:
which require a paid-for licence and so would otherwise be unavailable to users at home. Sources found on the web are often more easily
3449:
2852:
2140:
2125:
2040:
1615:
960:
707:
702:
3245:
3055:
3025:
2990:
2817:
2296:
2206:
2120:
1763:
1733:
1605:
787:
482:
882:
3411:
3280:
3110:
2837:
2737:
2547:
2423:
2336:
2301:
2226:
2196:
2060:
1894:
1884:
1833:
1660:
1645:
1570:
1342:
1192:
1035:
822:
767:
692:
622:
505:
115:
2326:
2221:
2186:
1015:
587:
3386:
3200:
3115:
2877:
2822:
2742:
2697:
2652:
2647:
2532:
2366:
2161:
1869:
1690:
1470:
1445:
1352:
1347:
1227:
857:
772:
687:
337:
A topic is "non-notable" if there is no usable coverage of it in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
3381:
2577:
2261:
3437:
3210:
3090:
2970:
2945:
2772:
2408:
2371:
2361:
1964:
1904:
1758:
1055:
1030:
985:
837:
812:
802:
777:
3330:
3145:
3030:
2955:
2842:
2762:
2732:
2582:
2201:
2171:
2135:
2025:
1889:
1808:
1590:
1455:
1420:
1267:
1025:
975:
970:
697:
1753:
940:
399:
372:
3432:
3020:
3015:
2975:
2960:
2950:
2827:
2672:
2080:
2070:
1969:
1778:
1640:
925:
797:
602:
560:
442:
393:
365:
3483:
3406:
3363:
3175:
3040:
2940:
2900:
2857:
2802:
2792:
2787:
2757:
2592:
2567:
2507:
2393:
2115:
2055:
1788:
1625:
1560:
1555:
1545:
1297:
920:
672:
654:
615:
327:
to write about X is three sentences, then a source which only allows for that is perfectly suitable for our purposes.
3080:
3035:
2398:
2271:
2231:
2035:
1773:
1302:
747:
141:
The article has plenty of references, but the references do not support the subject itself but rather pertain only
3310:
3250:
3225:
3165:
3075:
3070:
2657:
2474:
2176:
2166:
1954:
1949:
1367:
1040:
1010:
842:
577:
534:
Some editors are of the opinion that barely notable is still notable for most topics, but that
Knowledge (XXG)'s
3270:
3220:
3000:
2995:
2965:
2454:
2418:
2413:
2110:
1914:
1748:
1272:
1105:
1080:
955:
3265:
2832:
2687:
2100:
2095:
1879:
1798:
1655:
1317:
161:
722:
551:, and therefore secondary sources are of the essence, something such persons might lack. They might also be
3205:
2667:
2464:
2388:
1252:
1197:
1182:
712:
385:
43:
460:
says that notability depends on the existence of sources, not their immediate citation. It is, of course,
3305:
2915:
2484:
2459:
2438:
1818:
1450:
1242:
807:
544:
55:
17:
2479:
2469:
2383:
2356:
1620:
872:
517:
416:
297:
65:
319:
is not a particularly good idea. Should X be omitted from
Knowledge (XXG) entirely? Perhaps not; we
353:
In this system, notable topics would get their own articles, semi-notable ones would be mentioned in
2935:
1899:
1738:
1635:
832:
556:
168:
278:
tag on top of the page. This helps in the search for someone who can provide more reliable sources.
2075:
2065:
1974:
638:
540:
457:
157:
142:
39:
1828:
552:
3100:
3045:
2191:
2130:
1430:
582:
496:
172:
548:
535:
149:
272:
411:
An alternative view: Don't be cautious with creating articles that are borderline notable
209:
217:
197:
259:
131:
3472:
2981:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
201:
193:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
255:
213:
119:
Is coverage in that local newspaper going to be enough to satisfy the deletionists?
225:
221:
167:
Any registered user has the right to propose an article for deletion using the
410:
205:
477:; this is a lower standard than notability, and only provides surety against
2182:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
598:
Knowledge (XXG):An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing
156:
Articles that fit one or more of these descriptions may be in danger of
607:
138:
The article is presented with very few references and few can be found;
1586:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
152:(e.g., they are Facebook pages, blog pages, or promotional websites).
2868:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
555:, in which case Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on them.
251:
114:
1051:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
3361:
2898:
2505:
1711:
652:
611:
390:
362:
92:
25:
593:
Knowledge (XXG):I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground
357:
articles, and non-notable ones wouldn't be mentioned at all.
2748:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1920:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1388:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
130:, refers to when an article seemingly just minimally meets
2277:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2086:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1681:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1021:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
733:
Editing
Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
3121:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3131:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
525:
437:
difference between "bare notability" and other cases.
424:
388:
is among the more contentious ones in
Knowledge (XXG):
305:
80:
73:
3489:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
2683:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2317:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
2429:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1066:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
2873:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
3420:
3374:
2447:
2154:
2018:
1852:
1724:
1484:
1411:
906:
665:
547:. Barely notable living persons are rarely if ever
238:"bluegrass upright bass" OR "bluegrass bass fiddle"
208:does not seem to provide enough websites that meet
3392:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3171:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
793:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
557:Although this is not a valid argument in of itself
16:"WP:BARE" redirects here. Not to be confused with
1363:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
655:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
1516:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1461:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1213:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
489:WP:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground
3191:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2921:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2598:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1238:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
743:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
2618:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1784:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1551:Counting and sorting are not original research
360:Our "notability guideline" would then become:
212:, try using other forms of searching, such as
190:Search the web for more sources on the subject
3445:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3061:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
1581:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
863:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
623:
501:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
171:, and even a non-registered user can place a
148:The "references" provided are not considered
8:
3111:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1875:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1601:How to save an article proposed for deletion
878:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
853:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
818:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
2643:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
210:Knowledge (XXG)'s reliable sources criteria
3371:
3358:
3336:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2908:
2895:
2723:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2678:News coverage does not decrease notability
2588:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2538:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2515:
2502:
1721:
1708:
1531:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1506:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
662:
649:
630:
616:
608:
3231:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1521:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1141:Identifying and using independent sources
370:extent that the available sources allow.
330:We may thus define our terms as follows:
244:could also be helpful for eligible users.
180:Improving an article with bare notability
150:valid sources for establishing notability
3397:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2558:Big events make key participants notable
2005:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1383:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1121:Formatting bilateral relations templates
237:
233:
229:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3479:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
2808:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2713:Notability is not a level playing field
2628:How the presumption of notability works
1744:Contributing to complicated discussions
1596:How the presumption of notability works
1116:Formatting bilateral relations articles
931:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
3341:You should not write meaningless lists
2638:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1945:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1686:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1511:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1076:Don't hope the house will build itself
683:All Five Pillars are equally important
573:Knowledge (XXG):Existence ≠Notability
132:Knowledge (XXG)'s notability standards
2768:One sentence does not an article make
2718:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2434:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2347:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1865:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1804:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1436:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1378:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1203:Minors and persons judged incompetent
966:An unfinished house is a real problem
951:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
753:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
7:
3321:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3301:Things that should not be surprising
2996:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2322:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2267:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2252:Don't call people by their real name
2000:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
1930:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1338:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
506:Knowledge (XXG):Article for deletion
3196:No one cares about your garage band
3181:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
2848:What is and is not routine coverage
2693:No one cares about your garage band
2613:Existence does not prove notability
2031:Assume the assumption of good faith
1960:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1814:Relationships with academic editors
1676:Why was the page I created deleted?
1671:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1111:Featured articles may have problems
898:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
495:Since editors are encouraged to be
240:, you might get different results.
3241:Please do not murder the newcomers
2798:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2282:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1496:Adjectives in your recommendations
1373:What an article should not include
1263:The problem with elegant variation
1071:Don't get hung up on minor details
888:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
588:Knowledge (XXG):Why should I care?
126:, that can also be referred to as
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
3291:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
2863:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2563:Businesses with a single location
1844:You have a right to remain silent
1293:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1248:Potential, not just current state
1178:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
487:(For tips on how to do this, see
2312:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2307:Don't ignore community consensus
1541:Confusing arguments mean nothing
603:Knowledge (XXG):Minimum coverage
443:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules
96:
29:
23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2813:Sources must be out-of-universe
2528:All high schools can be notable
1925:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1611:Identifying blatant advertising
1393:The world will not end tomorrow
1223:Not everything needs a template
1136:How to write a featured article
738:Editors will sometimes be wrong
456:the notability of its subject.
3402:Avoid writing redundant essays
3051:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2926:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2753:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2703:Notability cannot be purchased
2663:Masking the lack of notability
1426:Copyediting reception sections
1328:Temporary versions of articles
1258:Principle of Some Astonishment
1046:Creating controversial content
946:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
893:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
578:Knowledge (XXG): NPOV deletion
475:credible claim of significance
1:
3428:About policies and guidelines
2543:Articles with a single source
2167:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
1990:Two wrongs don't make a right
1980:The rules of polite discourse
1910:It's not the end of the world
1218:Not everything needs a navbox
1086:Don't "teach the controversy"
758:Here to build an encyclopedia
512:Biographies of living persons
481:deletion, not examination at
230:"jazz saxophone" +"swing era"
134:. This may be the case when:
3316:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3011:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2931:Alternatives to edit warring
1794:Maintaining a friendly space
234:"jazz saxophone" +"big band"
3296:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3086:Editing under the influence
2623:Google searches and numbers
2342:Don't template the regulars
2257:Don't call the kettle black
2051:Be excellent to one another
1935:Revert notification opt-out
1839:We are all Wikipedians here
1288:Put a little effort into it
1233:Obtain peer review comments
1188:Introduction to structurism
1126:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1096:Editors are not mindreaders
1001:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
991:Beef up that first revision
763:Leave it to the experienced
728:Don't search for objections
486:
242:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
3505:
3326:Why not create an account?
3261:Requirements for adminship
3136:How to vandalize correctly
3106:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3066:Don't delete the main page
2986:Avoid using preview button
2708:Notability comparison test
2292:Don't fight fire with fire
2287:Don't eat the troll's food
2247:Don't call a spade a spade
2242:Don't bludgeon the process
2091:Encourage full discussions
1940:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1576:Don't attack the nominator
1536:But there must be sources!
1358:Try not to leave it a stub
1308:Source your plot summaries
553:notable for only one event
515:
469:if it does not provide an
414:
295:
63:
15:
3370:
3357:
3276:Sarcasm is really helpful
3216:Notability is not eternal
3141:How to win a citation war
2911:
2907:
2894:
2603:Every snowflake is unique
2523:Advanced source searching
2518:
2514:
2501:
2404:No, you can't have a pony
2352:Do not insult the vandals
2212:Don't be high-maintenance
1769:Encouraging the newcomers
1720:
1707:
1313:Specialized-style fallacy
1278:Pruning article revisions
1106:Endorsements (commercial)
1091:Editing on mobile devices
996:Blind men and an elephant
971:Articles have a half-life
718:Dissent is not disloyalty
688:Avoid vague introductions
661:
648:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Bare URLs
3286:The Night Before Wikimas
3151:Ignore every single rule
3126:How to get away with UPE
3006:Before they were notable
2778:Overreliance upon Google
2573:Common sourcing mistakes
2146:Settle the process first
2106:Imagine others complexly
2010:Writing for the opponent
1985:There is no common sense
1666:Unopposed AFD discussion
1651:Relisting can be abusive
1526:Avoid repeated arguments
1131:Give an article a chance
981:Avoid mission statements
941:Advanced text formatting
936:Advanced article editing
883:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
868:The rules are principles
828:Product, process, policy
678:Articles must be written
536:policy on living persons
483:WP:Articles for deletion
471:indication of importance
283:Significance of coverage
104:This page in a nutshell:
3421:Policies and guidelines
3256:Requests for medication
3236:Please bite the newbies
3161:Mess with the templates
2728:Notability means impact
2262:Don't call things cruft
2237:Don't be the Fun Police
2046:Avoid the word "vandal"
1995:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
1860:A thank you never hurts
1631:Liar liar pants on fire
1566:Deletion is not cleanup
1476:Writing better articles
1466:Write the article first
1441:Gender-neutral language
1413:Writing article content
1403:Writing better articles
1398:Write the article first
1333:Tertiary-source fallacy
1101:Encourage the newcomers
1061:Dictionaries as sources
1006:Build content to endure
3484:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3450:Policy writing is hard
3156:Is that even an essay?
2853:What notability is not
2608:Existence ≠Notability
2217:Don't be inconsiderate
2141:Read before commenting
2126:Mind your own business
2041:Avoid personal remarks
1616:Identifying test edits
961:A navbox on every page
916:100K featured articles
713:Concede lost arguments
708:Competence is required
639:Knowledge (XXG) essays
541:which is to be avoided
458:Knowledge (XXG):NEXIST
120:
3246:Pledge of Tranquility
2991:Avoid using wikilinks
2818:Subjective importance
2332:Don't spite your face
2121:Keep it down to earth
1885:Beware of the tigers!
1824:Too long; didn't read
1764:Edit at your own pace
1734:Accepting other users
1501:AfD is not a war zone
848:There is no seniority
788:Neutrality of sources
545:by the topic themself
118:
54:, as it has not been
3412:Quote your own essay
3281:Sausages for tasting
3056:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3026:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2838:Vanispamcruftisement
2738:Notability sub-pages
2548:Avoid template creep
2508:Essays on notability
2424:There are no oracles
2207:Don't be a WikiBigot
2061:Call a spade a spade
1834:Unblock perspectives
1661:The Heymann Standard
1646:Overzealous deletion
1606:I just don't like it
1343:There is no deadline
1208:"Murder of" articles
1036:Common-style fallacy
908:Article construction
823:Process is important
768:Levels of competence
693:Be a reliable source
583:Knowledge (XXG):Fart
386:notability guideline
3201:No one really cares
3116:Go ahead, vandalize
2878:Two prongs of merit
2823:Third-party sources
2743:Notabilitymandering
2698:No one really cares
2653:Inherent notability
2648:Independent sources
2533:Alternative outlets
2367:Nationalist editing
2337:Don't take the bait
2302:Don't help too much
2227:Don't be prejudiced
2197:Don't be an ostrich
2162:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1895:Deletion as revenge
1870:Advice for hotheads
1691:No Encyclopedic Use
1571:Does deletion help?
1471:Writing about women
1353:The deadline is now
1348:There is a deadline
1228:Nothing is in stone
858:Tendentious editing
773:Levels of consensus
3211:No sorcery threats
3091:Embrace Stop Signs
2971:Assume good wraith
2946:Anti-Wikipedianism
2783:Perennial websites
2773:Other stuff exists
2409:Passive aggression
2372:No angry mastodons
2362:Hate is disruptive
2222:Don't be obnoxious
2187:Don't be a fanatic
1965:Most ideas are bad
1905:Forgive and forget
1714:Essays on civility
1323:Run an edit-a-thon
1056:Deprecated sources
1031:Citation underkill
1016:Chesterton's fence
986:Be neutral in form
838:Reasonability rule
803:Oversimplification
778:Most ideas are bad
473:, also known as a
425:WP:IFINDOUBTCREATE
266:Look for an expert
145:to the subject, or
121:
3466:
3465:
3462:
3461:
3458:
3457:
3353:
3352:
3349:
3348:
3331:Yes legal threats
3146:Ignore all essays
3031:Complete bollocks
2956:Asshole John rule
2890:
2889:
2886:
2885:
2843:What BLP1E is not
2763:One hundred words
2733:Notability points
2497:
2496:
2493:
2492:
2297:Don't give a fuck
2172:Civil POV pushing
2136:Mutual withdrawal
2026:Assume good faith
1890:Civility warnings
1809:Please say please
1759:Editors' pronouns
1703:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1591:Follow the leader
1456:Use our own words
1421:Avoid thread mode
1268:Pro and con lists
1026:Citation overkill
976:Autosizing images
698:Civil POV pushing
404:
403:
377:
376:
206:DuckDuckGo search
110:
109:
91:
90:
3496:
3407:Finding an essay
3372:
3359:
3021:Butterfly effect
3016:Boston Tea Party
2976:Assume stupidity
2961:Assume bad faith
2951:Articlecountitis
2909:
2896:
2828:Trivial mentions
2673:Minimum coverage
2516:
2503:
2202:Don't be ashamed
2081:Discussing cruft
2071:Deny recognition
1970:Nothing is clear
1779:Expect no thanks
1722:
1709:
1641:Nothing is clear
1488:deleting content
1171:Tertiary sources
926:Acronym overkill
798:The one question
663:
650:
643:
632:
625:
618:
609:
528:
492:
467:speedily deleted
448:An article does
427:
391:
363:
308:
277:
271:
248:Look off the web
169:deletion process
100:
99:
93:
83:
76:
33:
32:
26:
3504:
3503:
3499:
3498:
3497:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3454:
3416:
3387:Value of essays
3366:
3345:
3176:Legal vandalism
3041:Counting juntas
2941:Anti-Wikipedian
2903:
2901:Humorous essays
2882:
2858:What to include
2803:Run-of-the-mill
2793:Read the source
2758:Offline sources
2553:Bare notability
2510:
2489:
2443:
2394:No Confederates
2192:Don't be a jerk
2150:
2116:Keep it concise
2056:Beyond civility
2014:
1848:
1789:How to be civil
1754:Don't retaliate
1716:
1695:
1626:Keep it concise
1561:Delete the junk
1556:Delete or merge
1546:Content removal
1480:
1446:Myth vs fiction
1407:
1298:Robotic editing
1161:Science sources
1156:Primary sources
1146:History sources
921:Abandoned stubs
902:
673:Article content
657:
644:
636:
569:
532:
531:
524:
520:
514:
431:
430:
423:
419:
413:
382:
380:Why notability?
314:Not all topics
312:
311:
304:
300:
294:
292:Semi-notability
285:
275:
269:
239:
235:
231:
182:
128:Semi-notability
124:Bare notability
97:
87:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
30:
24:
21:
12:
11:
5:
3502:
3500:
3492:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3471:
3470:
3464:
3463:
3460:
3459:
3456:
3455:
3453:
3452:
3447:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3435:
3424:
3422:
3418:
3417:
3415:
3414:
3409:
3404:
3399:
3394:
3389:
3384:
3378:
3376:
3368:
3367:
3362:
3355:
3354:
3351:
3350:
3347:
3346:
3344:
3343:
3338:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3288:
3283:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3258:
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3198:
3193:
3188:
3183:
3178:
3173:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3081:Editsummarisis
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3036:Counting forks
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2912:
2905:
2904:
2899:
2892:
2891:
2888:
2887:
2884:
2883:
2881:
2880:
2875:
2870:
2865:
2860:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2840:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2725:
2720:
2715:
2710:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2600:
2595:
2593:Don't cite GNG
2590:
2585:
2580:
2575:
2570:
2568:But it's true!
2565:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2519:
2512:
2511:
2506:
2499:
2498:
2495:
2494:
2491:
2490:
2488:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2465:WikiHarassment
2462:
2457:
2451:
2449:
2445:
2444:
2442:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2401:
2399:No queerphobia
2396:
2391:
2386:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2369:
2364:
2359:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2339:
2334:
2329:
2324:
2319:
2314:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2158:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2149:
2148:
2143:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2123:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2078:
2073:
2068:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2048:
2043:
2038:
2036:Assume no clue
2033:
2028:
2022:
2020:
2016:
2015:
2013:
2012:
2007:
2002:
1997:
1992:
1987:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1847:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1774:Enjoy yourself
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1730:
1728:
1718:
1717:
1712:
1705:
1704:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1688:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1482:
1481:
1479:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1417:
1415:
1409:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1303:Sham consensus
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
912:
910:
904:
903:
901:
900:
895:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
748:Explanationism
745:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
700:
695:
690:
685:
680:
675:
669:
667:
659:
658:
653:
646:
645:
637:
635:
634:
627:
620:
612:
606:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
568:
565:
549:public figures
530:
529:
521:
516:
513:
510:
480:
476:
472:
463:
455:
451:
436:
429:
428:
420:
415:
412:
409:
402:
401:
398:
395:
381:
378:
375:
374:
371:
367:
351:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
310:
309:
301:
296:
293:
290:
284:
281:
280:
279:
263:
245:
218:Google Scholar
181:
178:
154:
153:
146:
139:
112:
108:
107:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
36:
34:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3501:
3490:
3487:
3485:
3482:
3480:
3477:
3476:
3474:
3451:
3448:
3446:
3443:
3439:
3436:
3434:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3426:
3425:
3423:
3419:
3413:
3410:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3379:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3360:
3356:
3342:
3339:
3337:
3334:
3332:
3329:
3327:
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3311:Watchlistitis
3309:
3307:
3306:The WikiBible
3304:
3302:
3299:
3297:
3294:
3292:
3289:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3257:
3254:
3252:
3251:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3249:
3247:
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3226:Play the game
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3187:
3184:
3182:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3166:My local pond
3164:
3162:
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3076:Edits Per Day
3074:
3072:
3071:Editcountitis
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2913:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2897:
2893:
2879:
2876:
2874:
2871:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2856:
2854:
2851:
2849:
2846:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2831:
2829:
2826:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2746:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2736:
2734:
2731:
2729:
2726:
2724:
2721:
2719:
2716:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2658:Insignificant
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2520:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2504:
2500:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2475:WikiLawyering
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2448:WikiRelations
2446:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2405:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2395:
2392:
2390:
2387:
2385:
2382:
2378:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2370:
2368:
2365:
2363:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2320:
2318:
2315:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2272:Don't cry COI
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2232:Don't be rude
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2177:Cyberbullying
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2159:
2157:
2153:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2082:
2079:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2062:
2059:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2023:
2021:
2017:
2011:
2008:
2006:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1955:The last word
1953:
1951:
1950:The grey zone
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1851:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1706:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1684:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1491:
1489:
1483:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1368:Walled garden
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1193:Mine a source
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1041:Concept cloud
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1011:Cherrypicking
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
911:
909:
905:
899:
896:
894:
891:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
856:
854:
851:
849:
846:
844:
843:Systemic bias
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
699:
696:
694:
691:
689:
686:
684:
681:
679:
676:
674:
671:
670:
668:
664:
660:
656:
651:
647:
640:
633:
628:
626:
621:
619:
614:
613:
610:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
570:
566:
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
537:
527:
523:
522:
519:
511:
509:
507:
502:
498:
493:
490:
484:
478:
474:
470:
468:
461:
459:
453:
449:
446:
444:
438:
434:
426:
422:
421:
418:
408:
396:
392:
389:
387:
379:
368:
364:
361:
358:
356:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:
333:
332:
331:
328:
326:
322:
317:
307:
303:
302:
299:
291:
289:
282:
274:
267:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
243:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
202:Yahoo! search
199:
195:
194:Google search
192:: If a plain
191:
188:
187:
186:
179:
177:
174:
170:
165:
163:
159:
151:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
133:
129:
125:
117:
113:
105:
102:
95:
94:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3375:About essays
3364:About essays
3271:Rouge editor
3221:Oops Defense
3001:Barnstaritis
2966:Assume faith
2788:Pokémon test
2633:High Schools
2552:
2455:WikiBullying
2419:Superhatting
2414:POV railroad
2111:Just drop it
1915:Nobody cares
1749:Divisiveness
1273:Printability
1166:Style guides
956:Amnesia test
813:Paraphrasing
533:
494:
447:
439:
433:There is no
432:
405:
383:
359:
354:
352:
340:Semi-notable
329:
324:
320:
315:
313:
286:
268:: Place the
265:
256:Project MUSE
247:
214:Google Books
189:
183:
166:
162:deletionists
155:
127:
123:
122:
111:
103:
37:
3382:Essay guide
3266:Rouge admin
2833:Video links
2688:No big loss
2377:just madmen
2327:Don't shout
2101:How to lose
2096:Get over it
1880:Be the glue
1799:Negotiation
1656:Relist bias
1486:Removing or
1318:Stub Makers
1151:Law sources
1081:Don't panic
334:Non-notable
226:Yahoo! News
222:Google News
198:Bing search
164:' actions.
38:This is an
3473:Categories
3438:Guidelines
3206:No, really
3186:LTTAUTMAOK
2668:Make stubs
2389:No racists
2131:Say "MOBY"
1853:Philosophy
1726:The basics
1283:Publicists
1253:Presentism
1198:Merge Test
1183:Inaccuracy
666:Philosophy
526:WP:BAREBLP
260:verifiable
81:WP:MINIMUM
44:notability
2916:Adminitis
2485:WikiPeace
2460:WikiCrime
2439:UPPERCASE
1819:Thank you
1451:Proseline
1243:Permastub
808:Paradoxes
723:Don't lie
462:desirable
435:practical
306:WP:SEMI-N
143:trivially
66:Shortcuts
3433:Policies
2583:Coatrack
2480:WikiLove
2470:WikiHate
2384:No Nazis
2357:Griefing
1621:Immunity
873:Trifecta
703:Cohesion
567:See also
561:a policy
518:Shortcut
452:need to
417:Shortcut
298:Shortcut
173:PROD tag
158:deletion
3096:Emerson
2936:ANI flu
1900:Failure
1739:Apology
1636:Nothing
833:Purpose
346:Notable
74:WP:BARE
2578:Clones
2155:Don'ts
2076:Desist
2066:Candor
1975:Reader
479:speedy
454:assert
273:expert
1829:Truce
543:) or
355:other
252:JSTOR
224:, or
204:, or
40:essay
3101:Fart
3046:Crap
1431:Coup
783:Need
497:bold
384:The
325:want
316:need
254:and
2019:Dos
642:(?)
450:not
232:or
42:on
3475::
508:.
491:.)
400:”
394:“
373:”
366:“
321:do
276:}}
270:{{
220:,
216:,
200:,
196:,
631:e
624:t
617:v
539:(
46:.
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
