Knowledge

:Bots/Requests for approval/DASHBot 2 - Knowledge

Source 📝

610: 48: 587: 226: 419:
where it is not already piped? If so, that is probably fine, as I doubt it is used in this full capacity in many places, and once the bot run is done, these can be done manually. Equally, it would be fine I would have thought for the bot to add piping to an unpiped link while keeping the prose intact, if that is what you meant.
418:
en the UK and other jurdisdictions, so it is not helpful to make such generalisations. This is a bot, it won't know if it is changing the context of prose or not by removing UK or United Kingdom from article text. Tim, I am still unclear with your answer, are you saying the bot won't change the link
282:
There are plenty of articles where 'next uk general election' has been linked in its titled form without piping, because it makes sense in prose. What happens then? Obviously subbing 'uk general election, 2010' into a sentence is not good prose.
370:
MickMacNee, because it nearly all cases where it is used the fact the article is talking about British politics has already been established, and hence "UK" or "United Kingdom" is unnecessary and unsightly.
560:
has closed. I agree this is a job for AWB. I've started, but probably won't be able to finish for a few days. If anyone wishes to pick this up please do, otherwise I guess it will wait until then.
557: 655: 573: 300:
Tim, can you please change the code so that it changes the link title to "General Election 2010" within an election-result box, in accordance with the established convention?
297:
Someone needs to check all the pages once the bot has run anyway. "Next UK general election" and "Next United Kingdom general election" are near-invariably bad prose as it is.
172: 168: 433:
Yes, right now I would only be changing piped links. That way, the bot won't screw up any article prose. I could have the bot log all links that are
387:
I did not think that would be a good idea to do a mass renaming of links. I will change the bot to do that if there is consensus here, however.
267: 315: 253: 187: 21: 513: 88: 512:
Thanks earwig. I updated the code so that it will preserve the link name, so the displayed text will not change, only the link.
83: 401:
Wereon, I know for a fact it is used in article prose where it is necessary to distinguish betProxy-Connection: keep-alive
348:
there is a pipe. Im not sure what you mean by ""General Election 2010" within an election-result box"? Can you elaborate?
500: 118: 566: 103: 531: 261: 191: 526:
Note there are comparatively few links still needing moving, it may be better just to AWB the remaining ones.
517: 624: 602: 551: 536: 521: 505: 474: 451: 428: 396: 380: 357: 327: 309: 292: 78: 561: 98: 93: 528: 493: 470: 424: 323: 288: 140: 637: 272:
as those links will be needed for the 2011 elections. Will leave the link name in place. (] ==: -->
40: 620: 598: 547: 447: 392: 353: 457:
Or I could change unpiped links so that "next uk general election" remains the links name so:
376: 305: 609: 486: 466: 420: 319: 284: 216: 17: 649: 201: 616: 594: 543: 443: 388: 349: 129: 59: 47: 481:
Exclusion compliance is built into the Pywikipedia framework by default, through
372: 301: 149: 485:. You won't have to implement it yourself, only use that function. — 437:
piped for human review, If that would be better. Here is an example.
173:
Talk:United_Kingdom_general_election,_2010#Page_move.2C_revisited
630:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
636:
To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
542:
That would be fine, but we should wait for the RfD to finish.
39:
To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
314:
How is it bad prose? xyz will not happen until after the
367: 113: 108: 73: 169:Talk:United_Kingdom_general_election,_2010#Move.3F 164:Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): 465:The second option is fine imo if it can be done. 318:. ? Nothing wrong with that as far as I can see. 245:Nope, but has 2 BRFAS going at the same time : ) 33:The following discussion is an archived debate. 656:Withdrawn Knowledge bot requests for approval 8: 344:The bot would change only the base name 268:United_Kingdom_general_election, 2010 7: 316:next United Kingdom general election 254:Next United Kingdom general election 188:Next United Kingdom general election 366:Tim, like the second half of this: 184:Estimated number of pages affected: 591:Done - did some 240 pages with AWB 212:Will add the python code found on 28: 45:The result of the discussion was 608: 585: 224: 46: 135:Automatic or Manually assisted: 233:01:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1: 625:17:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 607:No more need for dashbot3. : 603:04:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 574:14:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 552:01:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 537:06:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 522:18:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 506:17:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 475:11:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 452:18:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 429:13:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 397:06:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 381:00:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 358:23:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 328:22:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 310:18:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 293:13:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 483:wikipedia.Page.botMayEdit() 672: 415:Cache-Control: max-age=0 633:Please do not modify it. 262:Next UK general election 192:Next UK general election 36:Please do not modify it. 194:has 283 links so thats 614:Withdrawn by operator. 237:Already has a bot flag 160:Replace all links to 52:Withdrawn by operator 22:Requests for approval 141:Programming language 202:Exclusion compliant 190:has 448 links and 158:Function overview: 571: 248:Function details: 663: 635: 612: 593: 589: 588: 567: 503: 498: 491: 484: 232: 228: 227: 221: 215: 50: 38: 671: 670: 666: 665: 664: 662: 661: 660: 646: 645: 644: 631: 586: 584: 563:Rambo's Revenge 501: 494: 487: 482: 462: 441: 279: 225: 223: 219: 213: 178:Edit period(s): 124: 63: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 669: 667: 659: 658: 648: 647: 643: 642: 627: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 509: 508: 478: 477: 460: 459: 458: 439: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 384: 383: 369: 361: 360: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 299: 298: 278: 275: 252:Change links 246: 199: 171: 123: 122: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 74:Approved BRFAs 71: 64: 62: 57: 56: 55: 29: 27: 18:Knowledge:Bots 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 668: 657: 654: 653: 651: 641: 639: 634: 628: 626: 622: 618: 615: 611: 606: 605: 604: 600: 596: 592: 575: 572: 570: 565: 564: 559: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540: 538: 534: 533: 530: 525: 524: 523: 519: 515: 514:67.142.130.12 511: 510: 507: 504: 499: 497: 492: 490: 480: 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 456: 455: 454: 453: 449: 445: 438: 436: 431: 430: 426: 422: 416: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 368: 365: 364: 363: 362: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 281: 280: 276: 274: 270: 269: 265: 263: 259: 256: 255: 250: 249: 244: 241: 238: 234: 231: 222: 218: 210: 207: 204: 203: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 179: 175: 174: 170: 166: 165: 161: 159: 155: 153: 151: 146: 144: 142: 137: 136: 132: 131: 128: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 66: 65: 61: 58: 53: 49: 44: 42: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 632: 629: 613: 590: 568: 562: 527: 495: 488: 442: 434: 432: 417: 414: 345: 271: 266: 260: 257: 251: 247: 242: 239: 236: 235: 229: 211: 208: 205: 200: 195: 183: 182: 177: 176: 167: 163: 162: 157: 156: 148: 147: 145:Pywikipedia 139: 138: 134: 133: 126: 125: 68: 51: 35: 32: 154:replace.py 150:Source code 532:Farmbrough 467:MickMacNee 421:MickMacNee 320:MickMacNee 285:MickMacNee 277:Discussion 186:Lets see, 152:available: 114:rights log 104:page moves 127:Operator: 109:block log 60:DASHBot 2 650:Category 84:contribs 20:‎ | 638:WT:BRFA 617:Tim1357 595:Tim1357 544:Tim1357 461:] → ] 444:Tim1357 440:] → ] 389:Tim1357 350:Tim1357 198:pages. 180:yearly 130:Tim1357 41:WT:BRFA 569:(talk) 496:Earwig 373:Wereon 302:Wereon 217:nobots 240:(Y/N) 89:count 16:< 621:talk 599:talk 556:The 548:talk 529:Rich 518:talk 471:talk 448:talk 425:talk 393:talk 377:talk 354:talk 324:talk 306:talk 289:talk 258:and 230:Done 196:731 143:(s): 119:flag 99:logs 79:talk 69:BRFA 558:RfD 489:The 435:not 264:to 206:(Y) 94:SUL 652:: 623:) 601:) 550:) 539:. 535:, 520:) 473:) 450:) 427:) 395:) 379:) 356:) 346:if 326:) 308:) 291:) 273:] 220:}} 214:{{ 640:. 619:( 597:( 546:( 516:( 502:@ 469:( 446:( 423:( 391:( 375:( 352:( 322:( 304:( 287:( 243:: 209:: 121:) 67:( 54:. 43:.

Index

Knowledge:Bots
Requests for approval
WT:BRFA

DASHBot 2
BRFA
Approved BRFAs
talk
contribs
count
SUL
logs
page moves
block log
rights log
flag
Tim1357
Programming language
Source code
Talk:United_Kingdom_general_election,_2010#Move.3F
Talk:United_Kingdom_general_election,_2010#Page_move.2C_revisited
Next United Kingdom general election
Next UK general election
Exclusion compliant
nobots
Next United Kingdom general election
Next UK general election
United_Kingdom_general_election, 2010
MickMacNee
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.