999:
called "The Homer-Stamford
Motorway". This last piece of information was actually obtained from a personal one-on-one interview that I had with a former Department of Highways employee several years ago. So, I challenge the person who originally wrote the QEW page to give me a list of their sources. Did (s)he just happen to interview the same Department of Highways employee that I did, or was the information merely copied from my website as I suspect? These are just two specific examples of pieces of information that I have very good reason to believe were just copied from my website. However, you can all be assured that I will not delete (or even question the source) of any information that is clearly "common knowledge". If you are going to obtain information from my website that is not "common knowledge", I ask that you properly credit my website as the source.
995:
acknowledgement. When I began "editing" these highway pages on Sunday, I was very careful to only delete information that was clearly obtained from my website. Anything that constituted "common knowledge" was deliberately left intact. Anyone with an odometer can measure how long the 401 is, so the length of that highway clearly constitutes "common knowledge". Anyone who has any background in the recent upheaval in
Ontario's Highway system knows all to well about the mass downloading that took place in 1997 and 1998. It would therefore not be appropriate for me to delete a reference to the loss of portions of, say, Hwy 7 in 1997-1998. This information has been well documented in several different sources/publications, so the fact that my website also states this information does not give me any rightful ownership claims to these "facts".
750:
scandal" would be just fine; the title should be whatever the thing the article is about is most commonly called, and as a
Canadian who's exposed to lots of Canadian news that's all I ever hear it being referred to as. The involvement of the Liberals and the mention that this scandal is set in Canada should be left up to the article text itself, IMO; there's no need to cram all that information into the title. Especially since as far as I'm aware there's nothing else that's called "the sponsorship scandal".
973:
citing that type of reference would be a no-no. A healthy compromise on this issue would be to place an outside link for history information that
Cameron has worked so hard to provide. Btw the Highway 404 page here resembles the 404 page on OntHighway.com. Now this information obviously can't be copyritten, but some of the control city information should be cited, as it is nearly word for word what appears on the Onthighways website, (which certainly would constitute plagerizing). --
1016:
invitation to
Cameron to get involved here as well. One of the challenges of this site is that since we don't always know exactly what other people are contributing, we don't necessarily know about copyright issues such as this until they're brought to our attention. But even if some of us do make mistakes sometimes, it's an excellent project with a great bunch of people involved, and I do think Cameron would be a very valuable contributor. Whadday'all say?
38:
1495:, but luckily they weren't.) I guess what I'm saying, in a nutshell, is we can't just use any old obscure detail to disambiguate; the title needs to be as unequivocally clear as possible about what the subject is going to be. Years of life aren't a clear disambiguator, and I don't think city of birth is, either, if what the person is known for isn't directly associated with that city. But YMMV.
1165:
I prefer the format "YYYY Canadian election" as one can use that in the body of articles without alteration. EG One can write "The
Liberals won the 2004 Canadian election" while "The Liberals won the Candian federal election, 2004" is quite awkward. If people really feel the use of the word "federal"
381:
No matter if we go the bot route or not, lots of communities need things beyond bare statistics; a claim to fame or a slice of the atmosphere elevate such an article beyond dull stubdom. Official sites are a start; Googling, checking travel guides and gazetteers, or a remembered impression of a visit
1960:
The way the "expand and improve" list is currently organised it is far too long to be useful. I'm wondering if a) we can prune it a bit and b) if we can organise it in order of priority so that those of us with some time can be directed to tackle them in some sort of order. I understand prioritising
1574:
In regards to the
Endicotts, I don't think it is correct to call the article on Endicott elder "James Endicott, Sr." for the same reason that "George Bush, Sr." is incorrect. The younger Endicott's biography, written by his son, refers to James Endicott and James Gareth Endicott, not Sr. and Jr so I
1502:
Disambiguate by occupation or point of fame first, nation second, regions last. More people are going to know the occupation or point of fame than are going to know the region or city of birth. I mean, I could tell you Avril
Lavigne is a singer, but I couldn't tell you her place of birth off the top
1337:
It could be candidates by election and MPs by parliament. The difficulty with this is that long lasting MPs will be in many different categories. Alternatively the division could be by party, but this would need massive
Liberal MP/candidate categories. A division by province would create a similar
1006:
In conclusion, I am not trying to be difficult or stubborn, nor am I trying to make money off of my research. My highways website is free for anyone to view at their leisure. All that I am asking is to be acknowledged and credited for information that I have uncovered only through countless hours of
1002:
In terms of photograph usage, I am generally very open to people using my pictures. Having said that, I insist that you email me to ask first, and that all users credit me (or my website) as the source beside the photo. I was extremely upset when I visited the
Knowledge website on Sunday, and saw my
998:
However, it is NOT "common knowledge" that there was a Hwy 2A that ran from Windsor to Tilbury in the 1930s. Although this is also a "fact", it is one that was only found through years of hard research. Likewise, it is NOT "common knowledge" that the QEW from St. Catharines to Niagara Falls was once
964:
I would like to admit that I am one of the persons who used information from his site for wikipedia articles. Information that has since been deleted. However, I did make sure to cite the information with a link plus as Bearcat mentioned you cannot copyright facts. That is what I did. I did not copy
646:
It's not nearly so much about their internal party affairs as their conduct in government. The term "sponsorship scandal" is in common use in Canada; googling shows that "federal sponsorship scandal," as an exact string, beats "liberal sponsorship scandal" by about 4640 to 2030 results. "sponsorship
371:
hmmm... Rambot has its flaws. Although I would not be opposed to the idea, I think user generated articles are far more superior. (obviously). However we could use it to put demographic information on existing pages. There is also the issue of uninocporated communities which need articles, and there
1027:
I know I'm a little bit late coming into the discussion, but I am very happy to say that I have had the pleasure of reading Cameron's excellent web site. In fact, I have spent many hours reading about the history of the highways of our great province, even before I was interested in editing Ontario
761:
which says in part: "When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Knowledge put into the search engine? The Knowledge is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the
1517:
The thing is, most people will name a person by occupation (or point of fame) before they name them by birthplace, especially a famous person. Think about a conversation between colleagues discussing someone: "Do you remember that guy James?" "Oh yeah, I know him, he works in Accounting." "No, not
1015:
Thank you for clarifying, Cameron. I have a better understanding of your concerns, and can more easily see where the issue lies. Thus, I'd like to propose that all Ontario highway articles on Knowledge should provide a link to the appropriate page on Cameron's site. But I'd also like to extend the
287:
The eventual plan is to only list census subdivisions (municipalities, indian reserves) you can see the grand list on the talk page. Lists of neighbourhoods and ever little community or whatever should be listed on the page for the municipality it is in. However, all the communities on the current
972:
I think that part of the problem with the 'plagerizing' problem was that none of the pages were actually cited. Very few if any actually said "Highway 401 was named in 1952" this information Courtesy Cameron Bevers (for example). Anyone attending any sort of post secondary institution would not
749:
Based on this, it looks to me like it's not unreasonable to call it the "Liberal sponsorship scandal", or just the "sponsorship scandal", and that the nationality is a needless redundancy unless it's actually being used commonly in the news to refer to this case. Personally, I think "Sponsorship
994:
Considering that this entire issue was brought up due to my actions on Sunday, I feel that I ought to throw in my "two cents worth". I have actually been keeping an eye on this website for several months now. My main concern with what has been taking place here is the obvious lack of any source
1944:
racism ("...in the hands of one Jew,") misrepresentation of genuine fact ("the editorial content of all of his newspapers would be homogenized"), and - on the other hand - some genuine and relevant fact I didn't want to just revert without addressing in some way. Hence the new, heavily sourced
1300:"Candidates for the Canadian House of Commons" would probably best be in keeping with the existing category for those elected, "Members of the Canadian House of Commons", I think. And, uh... no comment about the worthy-of-an-article bit at this time, except that VfD precedent seems to show a
1575:
don't think the elder Endicott's middle name was Gareth. Quite possibly he hasn't a middle name. They can't be distinguished by profession since they were both missionaries. The only way to distinguish them, therefore, is by period. The only other alternative I can think of is to call one
329:
It might also be worth starting a list of Canada-related topics that haven't been written up, if anybody wants to do that. Maybe just a barebones list on which people can add any redlinks they come across (or create) but don't feel knowledgeable enough (or interested enough) to write up
1961:
will have to be somewhat subjective and arbitrary but unless we put the list in some sort of order, either most pressing first or oldest article first (so in future new cases are added to the bottom of the list) in order to direct our work the list won't be of much use.
928:
copyrightable as intellectual property. Photos can be copyvio; actual text can be as well. But if the original authors of the Knowledge pages in question simply cite some of the same facts and figures in an article that isn't a textual replica of Cameron's page, that's
318:
is a list of suggested articles that haven't been created yet. I haven't systematically gone through them all (there's 78 pages worth!), but just on casual scanning I have caught some Canadian articles in the list. Maybe if we each volunteer to go through one page at a
781:
It needn't be. I just think it's wrong that you're looking at this from an entirely Canadian perspective, when it's meant to apply to a global audience. The US election is probably most commonly refered to in the US as "the election", but the title of the article is
965:
and paste his words on to the page. I just mentioned the facts. However I am feeling a little guilty about this, as I have emailed Cemeron before about photos for my website which he allowed me to use. (photos on my site by the way I have released under fair use).
801:
But "the election" is clearly ambiguous, there are elections going on all over the place all the time. "Sponsorship scandal" isn't ambiguous, as far as I'm aware. If failure to include geographic information in the title of a scandal is a problem, then pretty much
1191:. Although I voted for CFE, I don't feel strongly one way or t'other, I just really want it to be settled. Props to Bearcat for sorting this out. Does anyone know how to set up a 'bot to change all of the links in articles from "YYYY Canadian election" to the
275:, how exactly are we defining communities? Are we listing every named neighbourhood in Ontario right down to the level of local housing developments, or is there a minimum standard? Should we go right down to local subdivisions like The P Patch in
1601:
while his son was not. A James Endicott disambig page should be kept (thereby excluding simply having him as "James Endicott") since the son isn't widely known by his middle name but is generally known simply as James Endicott (or Jim Endicott).
1281:? This category would be part of Canadian people? Another side of me wonders if you are notable just because you have run in the election. This will mean a lot of articles about people who may or may not be worthy of articles. Comments please. --
949:. You can't copyright the length of a highway; you can only copyright the specific wording of the sentence in which the highway's length is noted. If another resource presents the same information in different words, it's not plagiarism
714:
Burrell scandal - a scandal in 2002 which arose from a number of allegations about the behaviour of the British Royal Family and their servants. Burrel was the butler who at the center of this, not sure if it counts. No nationality
1969:
I don't see a real problem with its current organization; its length, I think, is the more troubling aspect. Any attempt to impose 'priority' would be futile, in my opinion; I say let people tackle what they can, as they come.
1003:
photos for the QEW, 401, 409, and 427 being used without my knowledge or permission. I welcome Knowledge users to reinstate those four photos at their earliest convenience, providing that the source is appropriately credited.
1675:
In the article, I mentioned that Cheema may be the only Canadian politician to have served in more than one provincial legislature since Confederation (the caveat added because, obviously, there were politicians from the
614:
I don't understand this. As far as I can see, it is a scandal involving the Liberal Party of Canada, so why should it not state this in the title? This tells me, as a non-Canadian, specifically what the article is about.
829:
But none of those are specifically national, and none of those alternate names is quite so vague as "Sponsorship Scandal". It's equivalent to renaming "Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal" as "Sex abuse scandal".
1518:
that James, the supervisor." "Oh yeah, him!" is a scenario that's a lot more likely than "Oh yeah, I know James, he's from Anytown." "No, the other James, from Othertown." "Oh right, him!" ] 05:19, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1532:
case. Obviously there's going to be your rare exception, as in both of the Mister André Bachands. But let's say there's two John Smiths. What's the likelihood they're both Canadian rock stars? ] 03:32, 30 Nov 2004
674:
If this were Canadipedia, then this would make sense. However, it's not, and this is why it's too vague to an international audience. If not the current title, at least mention something that makes clear that it's
325:
is an even nastier piece of work, but it might help to catch Canadian-related articles that haven't been categorized. Again, maybe if we each volunteer to go through one page at a time, it might be easier for
786:. While "Sponsorship Scandal" might be understood Canadian audience, for all I, as an Australian know, it could be in Mozambique. Please, it's not a big thing - just have a title that describes what's there!
417:
Would it be possible to come up with a list? For Australia, we now have a list in a subpage of every federal MP and Senator without a page. If Canada has the same, maybe I can help in a couple of months.
100:
452:
I dont mean to boast, but my method should probably be used as it is the most prevalent. However, someone made a system which is rivaling mine as well which we could use. Here's an example of my method:
1713:
I think I wrote an article on someone a few months ago who served in both the BC legislature and a legislature in the Maritimes as well as the British House of Commons but I can't remember his name.
1865:
Actually, we don't consider it really necessary for you to tell us that you're doing this. We don't have a problem with this, so you can carry on without notifying us. Just put your entries into
924:
comment posted there. I have not previously attempted to investigate the validity of his claims. However, I have to note that facts and figures (his primary claim of plagiarism) are most certainly
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
86:
78:
73:
1362:
1546:
one of them changes parties in the future, the titles can be changed at that time to reflect a new point of disambiguation; right now, avoiding the party names on the grounds that one of them
1032:
group. That being said, I have tried my best to avoid any sort of copyright infringement. I appreciate all that Cameron has done, and I wouldn't want to diminish it in any way. As a fellow
699:
Pacific Scandal - involves the allegations of bribes being taken by Canada's Conservative government of Sir John A. Macdonald. Not even the nationality is mentioned in this article title.
1510:
Actually, most people that I know (my self included) know Avril is from Napanee and Paul is from Windsor. The problemw with putting their parties in is that what if they change parties?
438:
There has to be some uniform layout for the community pages as well. I have added a couple communities with what I think are nice formats that maybe we could apply to all communities at
342:
1220:
810:, which had a whole lot more without geographic information in the titles). I don't believe that's the case, though; check out the common names Knowledge policy I linked to above.
1691:
So, I'll pose the question here -- can *anyone* think of a Canadian politican other than Gulzar Cheema who has served in the legislature of more than one province since 1867?
17:
762:
titles should represent common usage." In a nutshell, "sponsorship scandal" is the common name for this thing and scandals are called by their common names here on Knowledge.
54:
1625:
which may be considered quasi-Canadian given that for many the last stop in the Underground Railroad was Canada. Anyone interested in voting for the nomination can go to
647:
scandal" gets 40700 (of course, including both subsets, our own current "Liberal Party of Canada..." usage, perhaps an obscure sponsorship scandal or two elsewhere, etc.
1720:
Oh, gosh, that's an interesting question. All the interprovincial politicians I can think of didn't quite meet just these requirements. For brainstorming value, though:
1479:
in their professional careers, that title tells me absolutely nothing about which one I'm going to find when I click on the link. Whereas if they were disambiguated as
1751:
has been mooted for political office in BC. I have hazy memories of other ex-Yukon MLAs getting around a bit politically - a visual memory of one being mentioned in
1457:
1274:
1824:
The page seems to be Locked please unlock it the truth must come out yes Belinda is a Socialist or to be pocitaly crect Belinda is a Social Democrat. - michaelm
733:
Iran-Contra scandal - both Iran and the Contras were involved, but the real scandal was the American Republican involvement and that's not mentioned in the title
496:
1583:
since the younger Endicott didn't have the title of Right Rev but I don't think its wikipedia style to include a title in the name of a biographical article.
1305:
758:
1945:
section on Editorial controversies, and two critical sites added to External links. Improvements much welcome - and we may all have to watch this one. :l
1430:, since there was another writer named William Whitehead in the UK), (c) sublocation on the rare occasion that even the country isn't enough (eg. the two
739:
Monica Lewinsky scandal - mentions one of the two major participants in the scandal but not the individual who was actually scandalized or his nationality
1402:
197:
I came across this, but it seems nobody is here! I'm going to look up all the Canadian Wikipedians and ask them to join up. ] 03:49, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
1247:. I preferred the YYYY at the beginning so that one would not need to use piped links all the time due to non-grammatical flow of the YYYY at the end.
454:
1598:
1309:
1090:
I prefer the "YYYY Canadian election" format. I don't think the federal qualifier is implict and thus unecessary. For instance no one would think
730:
Siemens scandal - mentions the company involved, but not the nationality (no, not German; this scandal led to the downfall of the cabinet of Japan)
1555:
1456:
What I have done for example if there is two people from Quebec with the same name, I will use their city of birth to disambiguate. For example
1304:
party candidate for the federal legislature of a major en country is putatively worthy of an article, at least if a few people push for it. See
1277:, that there are quite a lot of article/stubs about failed candidates of the last election. Do you think this is worthy of a new category, say
353:
I'd like to see some work on having all the communities in Canada eventually completed. A very big project indeed, but still an important one.
1669:
315:
309:
1381:
1361:
notability is having stood for election and lost. I'm not entirely convinced that we need a category for these people, other than possibly
696:
US Savings and Loan Scandal - The title mentions nationality but not which savings and loans companies or political parties were involved
1626:
1618:
1427:
1323:
need to be subdivided. In Canadian history there have been thousands of MPs and several times that number of major party candidates. -
1057:
279:, or should we only include communities that have, for example, their own postal code designation or their own telephone exchange code?
1320:
1278:
1330:
How would you suggest to sub-divide it? Current and past? I am not sure I would divide the Candidates one. I welcome your comments. --
845:
548:
23:
1866:
1219:
Can we put some effort into ensuring all the articles have both tables and text? At present several have one but not the other. See
1449:
is definitely not in keeping with Knowledge convention in these matters. I mention this because the page is less than a month old.
783:
534:
Have we yet figured out how to get a complete list of all places in Canada? Perhaps StatCan has a complete list for purchase? ;)
481:
563:
1828:
1166:
is required to distinguish between federal and provincial elections then lets use the format "YYYY Canadian federal election".
225:
1349:
I've voted on VfD in favour of keeping non-elected candidates where there was some other criterion of notability as well (eg.
200:
About time. I'm on hand to help if I can, but as I'm not Canadian, I don't have the knowledge at hand to draw up to-do lists.
1594:
1244:
1068:. For consistency's sake, we need to determine which naming convention to follow, and then move the pages that don't fit it.
934:
770:
Sorry, this turned out way longer than I was expecting. Shall I pare it down and/or move it over to the article's talk page?
272:
1706:
who represented *federal* ridings in more than one province ... but these examples don't count for the present challenge.)
1933:
1257:
1112:
Followup: Because after a week there had been no further response to this discussion except for Pdefer's, I changed the
957:
of the information. And on that basis, I see nothing to support a plagiarism claim. I think we need more evidence here.
754:
616:
301:
There are some utility links in Knowledge space that may be helpful to us if we want to try to coordinate our efforts.
736:
Whitewater scandal - named after a company involved in the scandal, but doesn't mention the Clintons or the nationality
443:
236:
623:
is outright laughable. Either one could also be considered POV, I think, for trying to hide the party's involvement.
580:? That is what it is generally called, and Google turns up no other uses for the term other than the Canadian one. -
1902:
1487:, or something along those lines, it'd be more straightforward. (If they'd both been in the same party, then I'd go
397:
in there quickly, and then somebody can go in, clean up and add stuff. It doesn't necessarily have to be either/or.
1415:
45:
1940:, made his directive public,") falsity ("That's more than 80 per cent of all of Canada's mass media..."), falsity
1808:
Could somebody revert our "Belinda Stronach is a socialist" friend. I've exhausted my three reverts of the day. -
1688:
legislatures). Someone has recently challenged me on this point, although without providing any other examples.
942:
276:
724:
Teapot Dome scandal - named after a geological formation, doesn't name the parties involved or the nationalities
1576:
1431:
1095:
1091:
1698:
who have *campaigned* at the provincial level in more than one province, and there are obviously figures like
1507:
Paul Martin is, but I've no clue where he comes from. It just makes things easier. ] 20:43, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1128:
the election articles are changed. Please, however, let's discuss and decide on what the convention should be.
1977:
Rather than prioritize, we could categorize; perhaps 'People', 'Events', 'Places and Organizations', etc...
1657:
305:
1786:
had made an oddly reverse migration, a federal win in Toronto to an obscure leadership of the Quebec NDP.
1363:
Category:Unelected Canadian political candidates who are notable enough for other reasons to not be deleted
721:
Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal - names the organization, nationality isn't relevant here I suspect
1756:
693:
Black Sox scandal - involved the White Sox, so the name of the party is kinda in the title but not really.
492:
222:
1008:
974:
904:
1925:
1910:
1794:
parties. Anjd who was the Alliance MP who had been a member of a dubious national parliament in Africa?
1580:
439:
1936:. It included a mix of head-slapping racism ("But Izzy, with even more brass than is customary for his
1843:
I created a stub today for geography articles in Canada. {{Canada-place-stub}} is the template thingy.
1776:
1760:
1622:
1158:
Agreed, plus the Cfe, YYYY format is consistant with those used for other elections on wikipedai. --
718:
Spiegel scandal - mentions the name of the magazine at the center of the scandal, but not nationality
1653:
1442:
1423:
1098:. The "Canadian federal election, YYYY" format is grammatically awkward and unnecessarily long. -
857:
620:
577:
288:
list must have a link to the municipality its in within its article before we can make the change.
1550:
someday return to politics under a different party affiliation is pretty much akin to saying that
523:
Any river, any lake, whatever the town is on. If it's not on a river, then ommit it all together.
1677:
1435:
1151:. The most improtant identifier is 'Canadian', not the year, so that is a more logical sequence.
1120:
format. SimonP raised his concerns at that time. The articles can be subsequently changed to the
874:
811:
771:
763:
1962:
1832:
1767:
federal office in Ontario (Peterborough? Tory?) in the 90s. Counting fed/municipal candidacies,
1714:
1630:
1603:
1584:
1224:
1167:
1079:, for one thing it makes the important "federal" distinction, and I like the date coming after.
346:
1759:
activist, and a sense of something else - but nothing concrete. I do remember talk of a former
831:
787:
624:
513:
419:
201:
1232:
1196:
1152:
1033:
1028:
highways on Knowledge. I also have enjoyed reading OntHwys and I am a member of the ontroads
807:
1802:
1787:
1783:
1695:
1665:
1522:
1511:
1472:
1461:
966:
882:
524:
504:
458:
411:
373:
354:
322:
289:
1851:
I also created one for biography articles in Canada. {{Canada-bio-stub}} is the template.
1752:
1739:
came to Windsor to teach and would make a fine Ontario MPP. (Meanwhile, wags have it that
1637:
1350:
1173:
Agree with AndyL. YYYY Canadian election is much less unwieldy. ] 22:07, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
920:
the "plagiarist" in question, I am familiar with Cameron's site and have previously noted
485:
365:
252:
1733:
1401:
has just prepared a report on the categorization of Canadian people. It is available at
844:
It sounds like there's enough differing opinion to put this to a vote. I'll set it up at
689:
Did a search for Knowledge articles with "scandal" in the title, these were the top 20:
1946:
1884:
1795:
1779:
1768:
1744:
1740:
1724:
was chief human rights officer in Nova Scotia and ombudsman of Manitoba, both possibly
1672:
government), before unsuccessfully running for the House of Commons earlier this year.
1641:
1313:
1212:
1041:
648:
596:
567:
535:
517:
466:
was acting as a section break on this page, making the page difficult to use properly.
446:
1978:
1971:
1906:
1748:
1736:
1729:
1707:
1703:
1385:
1354:
1331:
1294:
1282:
908:
861:
849:
727:
Profumo scandal - named after the person at the center of the scandal, no nationality
556:
383:
240:
708:
Harken Energy Scandal - mentions the company name in the title, but not nationality.
1877:
1859:
1852:
1844:
1817:
1721:
1563:
1496:
1450:
1374:
1290:
1248:
1130:
1069:
1017:
981:
958:
896:
467:
426:
398:
335:
280:
260:
208:
745:
Fatty Arbuckle scandal - redirects to Fatty Arbuckle. Doesn't mention nationality.
705:
Timeline of the Enron scandal - has the company name in the title, no nationality.
1858:
One now created for gov articles in Canada. {{Canada-gov-stub}} is the template.
1914:
1809:
1772:
1699:
1476:
1339:
1324:
1099:
1080:
921:
581:
361:
53:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1265:
I'm surprised nobody though of checking whether there was an exisitn decision.
1261:: Use this form - political division, date. IE. Canadian federal election, 1867
1883:
I'm glad you've let us know and I've made much use of your creations already.
566:, for instance. Much as that might... *stops myself, muttering "NPOV! NPOV!"*
1551:
1398:
1208:
1159:
1037:
946:
938:
1503:
of my head if you paid me. It goes the same for most politicians - I know
806:
of the scandal articles I mentioned above are incorrect (and I just found
551:
about changing the name of the relevant article; I'm thinking a change to
1661:
1036:, I say thank you to Cameron Bevers—can I buy you a beer or something? --
1681:
442:(I just noticed the cleanup stub but I thought it was nicely done) and
937:, one of the pages on which Cameron inserted his plagiarism claim, to
555:
is in order. If I see no objections, I'll move it, probably tomorrow.
24:
Knowledge:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion/Archive 1
1685:
1029:
500:
462:(NOTE: Moved to separate template page because the section break for
410:
I'd also like to see all of the Members of Parliament get pages too.
1338:
problem with too many MPs and candidates from Ontario and Quebec. -
1640:- come vote on our first article! Closes next Friday at 18:00 UTC.
1636:
Meanwhile, there seems to be a critical mass growing to revive the
480:
Just so you can compare, I actually did a Rambot-style article for
1937:
1438:, who at least were kind enough to be from different provinces.)
372:
are many of them. Especially in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia.
1694:(And, just to clear up any confusion: I can think of people like
1660:
politician who has served in the provincial legislatures of both
1445:
temporarily; I don't know if this is really the best choice, but
1418:
in the box at the top of this page. Knowledge policy is normally
312:
may be helpful in catching and categorizing Canada-related lists.
892:
873:
A very persistent anonymous person has been asserting that our
455:
Knowledge:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Community template
1929:
878:
702:
Watergate scandal - no nationality or party mentioned in title
32:
1422:
to disambiguate by years of life, but by (a) occupation (eg.
484:
with the census information that I could find for that town.
103:(Note that this index must be updated manually each 6 months)
1556:
The Canadian music video channel established in 1984 by CHUM
1312:; there are probably other examples of which I'm not aware.
382:
can add that extra touch to even the smallest town's entry.
1060:, I note that about half of them are named with the format
953:, because you don't own the information. You only own your
1648:
Serving in more than one provincial legislature, post-1867
1668:(2001-2004; he served as a minor cabinet minister in the
1373:
person who's ever stood in a Canadian election and lost.
1243:
This naming issue was originally raised in Feb. 2004 at
1231:
AndyL, I've set up new tables for 1887, 1891 and 1896.
516:
doesn't make sense as not all places are near a river.
343:
List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada
1542:
Neither of them is currently in the House of Commons.
1221:
Knowledge:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Elections
18:
Knowledge talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board
1382:
Category:Candidates for the Canadian House of Commons
1521:
I am aware of this, but they both were politicians.
1426:), (b) location if the occupation isn't enough (eg.
1321:Category:Members of the Canadian House of Commons
1279:Category:Candidates of Canadian federal elections
711:two articles on scandals in general, not relevant
1876:I just let you all know so you have it for use.
1782:'s federal run in Quebec while a student there.
846:Talk:Liberal Party of Canada sponsorship scandal
549:Talk:Liberal Party of Canada sponsorship scandal
1468:I'm a bit leery of that approach, too -- since
1357:), but have avoided voting on candidates whose
895:. Onthighways.com is not Cameron Bevers' site.
742:two redirects to previous articles on this list
1275:Results of the Canadian federal election, 2004
1140:format, as it's the more specific of the two.
221:lol...hey i guess i will try and help... Ă–Ä· -
1319:Both this proposed category and the existing
881:. Could someone look into this more closely?
497:Prescott and Russell United Counties, Ontario
8:
1728:each legislature. Depression-era BC premier
1306:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Rebecca Blaikie
1124:format if that is the consensus, as long as
207:Hell...some of us didn't know this existed!
1458:André Bachand (Quebec City-born politician)
1380:Thanks to all, I have created the category
1289:Here is an example, not to pick on anyone,
1269:Candidates of the Canadian federal election
759:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names)
543:Liberal Party of Canada sponsorship scandal
1775:go without saying; fewer may remember now-
1403:Knowledge:People by year/Reports/Canadians
916:While I feel the need to clarify that I'm
564:United States Republican Party War on Iraq
1393:Report on the categorization of Canadians
1365:, which might be a bit much. I fervently
951:even if they used your site for reference
562:That's reasonable enough - we don't have
1599:Moderator of the United Church of Canada
1310:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/David Varty
1075:Are we going to vote? If so, I vote for
1369:with the notion of Knowledge including
903:The anon has signed up for an account:
1652:A while ago, I created a web page for
51:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1928:effected a patently anti-Semitic pov
1007:research on this subject. Thank-you!
980:I think that may be a fair solution.
316:Knowledge:List of encyclopedia topics
310:Knowledge:List of lists/uncategorized
7:
1183:The vote seems to be 5 in favour of
491:Ive notice rambot style was used in
364:eventually accomplishing that task.
1909:because there is already a list at
1627:Knowledge:Collaboration of the week
1619:Knowledge:Collaboration of the week
1489:André Bachand (Richmond-Arthabaska)
1428:William Whitehead (Canadian writer)
1058:Category:Canadian federal elections
891:that link should actually point to
341:There are a number of red links at
1638:Canadian collaboration of the week
217:Hell i just found this...LOL.....
192:Someone needs to get this started!
31:
1867:Knowledge:Template_messages/Stubs
1763:environment minister running for
1816:The page seems to be protected.
784:U.S. presidential election, 2004
547:There's been some discussion at
482:Qualicum Beach, British Columbia
36:
1829:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
1562:change its name in the future.
1193:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1149:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1138:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1118:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1077:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1066:Canadian federal election, YYYY
1064:, and the other half are named
425:A list is easy enough to do...
1903:Category:The Greatest Canadian
1595:James Endicott (church leader)
1245:Talk:Canadian federal election
1205:XXth Canadian general election
935:Ontario provincial highway 409
877:articles are plagiarized from
273:List of communities in Ontario
1:
1934:CanWest Global Communications
1921:CanWest Global Communications
1743:'s real dream job is head of
226:14:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
1475:was notably associated with
755:Knowledge:Naming conventions
617:Canadian sponsorship scandal
553:Canadian sponsorship scandal
271:Clarification question: for
1755:'s "My Canada" as an early
1273:I noticed in this article,
1094:could be confused with the
444:Ladysmith, British Columbia
267:List of Ontario communities
237:Flatiron Building (Toronto)
183:Archive 20 (Jan - Jun 2014)
179:Archive 19 (Jul - Dec 2013)
175:Archive 18 (Jan - Jun 2013)
171:Archive 17 (Jul - Dec 2012)
167:Archive 16 (Jan - Jun 2012)
155:Archive 13 (Jul - Dec 2010)
151:Archive 12 (Jan - Jun 2010)
147:Archive 11 (Jul - Dec 2009)
143:Archive 10 (Jan - Jun 2009)
1996:
1812:21:31, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
1732:has been a Yukon official
1493:André Bachand (Missisquoi)
1485:André Bachand (Liberal MP)
1447:James Endicott (1865-1954)
1416:James Endicott (1865-1954)
1334:21:30, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
1327:21:02, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
1285:18:25, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
1258:Official naming convention
1203:What about the option for
852:13:40, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
595:That said, a good call...
559:01:16, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
386:01:48, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
338:03:34, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
243:23:12, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
163:Archive 15 (Jul- Dec 2011)
159:Archive 14 (Jan- Jun 2011)
139:Archive 9 (Jul - Dec 2008)
135:Archive 8 (Jan - Jun 2008)
131:Archive 7 (Jul - Dec 2007)
127:Archive 6 (Jan - Jun 2007)
123:Archive 5 (Jul - Dec 2006)
119:Archive 4 (Jan - Jun 2006)
115:Archive 3 (Jul - Dec 2005)
111:Archive 2 (Jan - Jun 2005)
1974:18:01, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
1965:15:16, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1949:06:33, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1917:02:23, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1880:23:31, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1873:23:26, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1862:23:05, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1847:00:11, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1835:08:35, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1798:09:48, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1644:18:58, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1613:Collaboration of the Week
1593:I guess the elder can be
1587:17:13, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1577:Right Rev. James Endicott
1525:06:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1514:03:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1499:20:30, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1464:18:10, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1453:17:21, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1388:21:41, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
1342:22:32, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
1297:18:27, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
1251:17:20, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
1227:03:07, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1199:20:36, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1170:03:16, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1087:04:37, 2004 Oct 31 (UTC)
1072:04:14, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
1011:05:26, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
943:Macdonald-Cartier Freeway
885:19:36, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
864:13:51, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
766:06:22, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
584:01:37, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
570:01:22, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
520:01:08, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
488:20:52, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
449:10:45, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
422:04:01, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
414:03:25, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
368:22:26, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
360:I'd actually like to see
357:21:19, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
349:04:25, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
283:00:38, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
263:01:48, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
1981:16:58, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
1887:06:36, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1855:00:51, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1820:22:42, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1717:07:31, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1710:06:46, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1633:21:46, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1606:17:25, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1566:15:49, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1441:I've moved the title to
1432:Fathers of Confederation
1377:16:57, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1316:20:13, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1235:20:36, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1133:00:01, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1102:23:54, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
1096:Prime Minister of Quebec
1092:Prime Minister of Canada
1020:23:53, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
977:22:47, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
969:19:09, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
961:06:28, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
899:08:45, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
834:08:53, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
814:08:15, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
790:07:16, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
774:06:25, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
651:06:10, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
627:04:25, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
599:01:58, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
538:11:01, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
527:01:29, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
512:Stating the place is on
507:22:01, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
429:05:36, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
401:05:36, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
376:22:48, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
292:01:03, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
211:03:02, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
204:07:04, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
1617:One of the nominees at
1481:André Bachand (Tory MP)
1215:03:02, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1155:17:04, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1144:03:50, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
1044:03:13, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
984:22:59, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
911:22:48, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
389:The bot route can be a
345:if anyone is interested
306:Knowledge:List of lists
1905:is up for deletion on
1771:, rest his heart, and
1162:02:04 17 Nov 04 (UTC)
1122:YYYY Canadian election
1114:YYYY Canadian election
1062:YYYY Canadian election
493:Lanark County, Ontario
1911:The Greatest Canadian
1581:James Gareth Endicott
440:Wasaga Beach, Ontario
251:Nobody ever wrote up
49:of past discussions.
1790:switched provinces,
1761:Prince Edward Island
1629:and add their name.
1623:Underground Railroad
1654:Gulzar Singh Cheema
1443:James Endicott, Sr.
1424:Moe Berg (musician)
1308:and to some extent
1187:and 3 in favour of
905:User:Cameron_Bevers
858:Sponsorship scandal
621:Sponsorship Scandal
578:Sponsorship Scandal
235:The article on the
1956:Expand and improve
1926:User:68.146.219.50
1777:Toronto councillor
1680:who served in the
1678:Province of Canada
1558:just because Much
1528:I'm arguing for a
1436:John Hamilton Gray
1136:I say go with the
939:Cameron's 409 page
893:The King's Highway
875:400-Series Highway
860:is the new title.
619:is too vague, and
239:needs a PD photo.
1554:should be titled
933:copyvio. Compare
808:Category:Scandals
334:Any other ideas?
297:A few suggestions
231:Flatiron Building
223:Spirit watcher 22
92:
91:
61:
60:
55:current talk page
22:(Redirected from
1987:
1872:
1803:Belinda Stronach
1788:Joe Peschisolido
1784:John Paul Harney
1696:Sharon Carstairs
1666:British Columbia
1143:
1116:articles to the
1084:
869:Ontario highways
323:Special:Allpages
277:Sault Ste. Marie
107:Archive 1 (2004)
98:
70:
63:
62:
40:
39:
33:
27:
1995:
1994:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1958:
1930:series of edits
1923:
1900:
1870:
1841:
1806:
1753:Preston Manning
1670:Gordon Campbell
1650:
1615:
1412:
1410:Disambiguations
1395:
1351:Rebecca Blaikie
1271:
1147:My vote is for
1141:
1082:
1053:
879:onthighways.com
871:
757:, specifically
545:
299:
269:
253:Steven Truscott
249:
247:Steven Truscott
233:
194:
186:
94:
66:
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1993:
1991:
1983:
1982:
1975:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1922:
1919:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1856:
1840:
1837:
1822:
1821:
1805:
1800:
1780:Adam Giambrone
1769:Tooker Gomberg
1745:Manitoba Hydro
1741:Howard Hampton
1664:(1988-93) and
1649:
1646:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1579:and the other
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1411:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1394:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1378:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1317:
1298:
1270:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1253:
1252:
1237:
1236:
1217:
1216:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1156:
1145:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1022:
1021:
1009:Cameron Bevers
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
975:24.103.215.190
913:
912:
870:
867:
866:
865:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
794:
793:
792:
791:
776:
775:
747:
746:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
697:
694:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
588:
587:
586:
585:
544:
541:
540:
539:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
510:
509:
508:
475:
474:
473:
472:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
379:
378:
377:
332:
331:
330:themselves...?
327:
320:
313:
298:
295:
294:
293:
268:
265:
255:before today?
248:
245:
232:
229:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
205:
193:
190:
188:
104:
99:
93:
90:
89:
84:
81:
76:
71:
59:
58:
41:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1992:
1980:
1976:
1973:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1964:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1920:
1918:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1897:
1886:
1882:
1881:
1879:
1875:
1874:
1868:
1864:
1863:
1861:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1846:
1838:
1836:
1834:
1830:
1825:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1811:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1749:Tony Penikett
1746:
1742:
1738:
1737:Howard Pawley
1734:
1731:
1730:Duff Pattullo
1727:
1723:
1718:
1716:
1711:
1709:
1705:
1704:Tommy Douglas
1701:
1697:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1673:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1647:
1645:
1643:
1639:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1612:
1605:
1600:
1597:since he was
1596:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1473:André Bachand
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1463:
1459:
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1409:
1404:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1355:David Watters
1352:
1348:
1341:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1268:
1266:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1226:
1222:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1086:
1085:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1010:
1004:
1000:
996:
983:
979:
978:
976:
971:
970:
968:
963:
962:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
927:
923:
919:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
898:
894:
890:
886:
884:
880:
876:
868:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
851:
847:
833:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
813:
809:
805:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
789:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
765:
760:
756:
751:
744:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
723:
720:
717:
713:
710:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
691:
690:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
650:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
598:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
583:
579:
576:Why not just
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
569:
565:
560:
558:
554:
550:
542:
537:
533:
526:
522:
521:
519:
515:
511:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
471:
469:
465:
460:
456:
451:
450:
448:
445:
441:
437:
436:
428:
424:
423:
421:
416:
415:
413:
409:
408:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
385:
380:
375:
370:
369:
367:
363:
359:
358:
356:
352:
351:
350:
348:
344:
339:
337:
328:
324:
321:
317:
314:
311:
307:
304:
303:
302:
296:
291:
286:
285:
284:
282:
278:
274:
266:
264:
262:
258:
254:
246:
244:
242:
238:
230:
228:
227:
224:
218:
210:
206:
203:
199:
198:
196:
195:
191:
189:
185:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
102:
97:
88:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
69:
65:
64:
56:
52:
48:
47:
42:
35:
34:
25:
19:
1959:
1951:
1941:
1924:
1901:
1842:
1826:
1823:
1807:
1791:
1764:
1725:
1722:Gordon Earle
1719:
1712:
1693:
1690:
1674:
1651:
1635:
1616:
1573:
1559:
1547:
1543:
1529:
1504:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1469:
1455:
1446:
1440:
1419:
1413:
1370:
1366:
1358:
1301:
1291:Michael Oddy
1272:
1264:
1256:
1240:
1233:Kevintoronto
1223:for details
1218:
1204:
1197:Kevintoronto
1192:
1188:
1184:
1182:
1153:Kevintoronto
1148:
1137:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1111:
1081:
1076:
1065:
1061:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
955:presentation
954:
950:
947:his 401 page
930:
925:
917:
888:
887:
872:
856:It is done.
843:
803:
752:
748:
688:
561:
552:
546:
463:
461:
394:
390:
340:
333:
300:
270:
256:
250:
234:
219:
216:
187:
106:
105:
95:
67:
50:
44:
1827:Please see
1773:John Turmel
1726:officers of
1700:John Turner
1523:Earl Andrew
1512:Earl Andrew
1477:Quebec City
1462:Earl Andrew
1034:Waterlooian
967:Earl Andrew
883:Adam Bishop
525:Earl Andrew
505:Earl Andrew
464:Communities
459:Earl Andrew
412:Earl Andrew
374:Earl Andrew
355:Earl Andrew
290:Earl Andrew
43:This is an
1871:Denelson83
1142:Denelson83
715:mentioned.
486:Denelson83
366:Denelson83
1947:Samaritan
1885:Samaritan
1839:New Stubs
1796:Samaritan
1642:Samaritan
1552:MuchMusic
1314:Samaritan
1185:CFE, YYYY
1051:Elections
753:See also
675:Canadian.
649:Samaritan
597:Samaritan
568:Samaritan
536:SD6-Agent
518:SD6-Agent
514:any river
447:SD6-Agent
395:something
393:, to get
326:everyone.
87:Archive 5
79:Archive 3
74:Archive 2
68:Archive 1
1979:Radagast
1972:Radagast
1708:CJCurrie
1662:Manitoba
1386:YUL89YYZ
1367:disagree
1332:YUL89YYZ
1295:YUL89YYZ
1283:YUL89YYZ
1195:format?
909:Darkcore
862:Radagast
850:Radagast
557:Radagast
384:Radagast
319:time...?
241:Rmhermen
96:Archives
1878:Spinboy
1860:Spinboy
1853:Spinboy
1845:Spinboy
1818:Spinboy
1765:I think
1682:Ontario
1658:Liberal
1564:Bearcat
1530:general
1497:Bearcat
1470:neither
1451:Bearcat
1414:I note
1375:Bearcat
1249:RedWolf
1189:YYYY CE
1131:Bearcat
1070:Bearcat
1018:Bearcat
982:Bearcat
959:Bearcat
897:Bearcat
499:and in
468:Bearcat
427:Bearcat
399:Bearcat
336:Bearcat
281:Bearcat
261:Bearcat
209:Bearcat
46:archive
1915:Beland
1913:. --
1907:WP:CFD
1810:SimonP
1686:Quebec
1434:named
1340:SimonP
1325:SimonP
1100:SimonP
1083:Pdefer
1030:Yahoo!
582:SimonP
501:Ottawa
362:Rambot
1963:AndyL
1938:tribe
1833:AndyL
1715:AndyL
1631:AndyL
1604:AndyL
1585:AndyL
1560:might
1548:might
1533:(UTC)
1371:every
1302:major
1241:NOTE:
1225:AndyL
1168:AndyL
941:, or
812:Bryan
772:Bryan
764:Bryan
391:start
347:AndyL
101:Index
16:<
1942:with
1792:then
1702:and
1684:and
1656:, a
1491:and
1483:and
1399:Docu
1359:only
1213:Talk
1209:timc
1207:? --
1160:Jord
1056:Re:
1042:Talk
1038:timc
922:this
889:NOTE
832:Ambi
788:Ambi
625:Ambi
420:Ambi
308:and
202:Ambi
1932:to
1898:CFD
1831:-
1757:RPC
1747:.)
1621:is
1505:who
1420:not
1126:all
945:to
931:not
926:not
918:not
804:all
257:Wow
1869:.
1735:.
1544:If
1460:.
1384:--
1353:,
1293:--
1211:|
1040:|
907:.
848:.
503:.
495:,
457:.
259:.
181:•
177:•
173:•
169:•
165:•
161:•
157:•
153:•
149:•
145:•
141:•
137:•
133:•
129:•
125:•
121:•
117:•
113:•
109:•
83:→
1405:.
470:)
57:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.