570:; that is to say that an individual article's next edit's improvement factor can only take values which are a simple multiple of some integer, and that the value of this multiple depends fundamentally on the subject and the article. Statistical encyclodynamicists therefore use probabilistic models. Although the theory is disputed, many of its predictions are borne out by experiment. For instance for a Knowledge article it has often been noted that it is only possible to state with degrees of probability what its next edit's improvement factor will be: all of the possible values are theoretically superimposed until some external agent (known as a
563:
degree of accuracy if the article has an indeterminate CQ, and conversely that any edit to an article whose CQ is known to a high level of accuracy has an indeterminate improvement factor. The model is further complicated by the observation that an edit is not itself a fundamental component of the encyclopedia: once an edit has been submitted to the article universe, it may decay and only parts of it may persist.
21:
642:, its embedded hyperlinks, the discussion page, the edit history, its categorisation, and the various discussions of its content in other parts of Knowledge. Independent observers tend to believe that the existence of these extras tends to increase a real Knowledge article's observed CQ over a corresponding article in a "conventional" encyclopedia.
558:), which is not known at the time of its submission. This leads to the theory that for an individual edit it is in principle impossible to measure its instantaneous improvement factor at the same time as its contribution to the article's completeness. A fallacy often encountered is that it is the
449:
is the study of factors affecting the value of Φ over time. It is a relatively recent discipline, because until relatively recently encyclopedia editions were studied as immutable objects rather than as the subjects of dynamic processes. The fundamental item of interest in encyclodynamics is the
233:
A real encyclopedia article can in principle be measured against its corresponding perfect article to give its CQ, which is usually taken to range from 0 (non-existent) to 1 (perfect article). There is no consensus on how to measure a real article's CQ. Indeed there is a spectrum of opinion from
625:
Classical encyclodynamics leads many
Knowledge editors to believe that the best way to increase Knowledge's completion index is to concentrate on maximising the improvement factor of each individual edit, and thus they concentrate on making enhancements to articles about notable subjects. Others
621:
Acceptance of the concept of completeness index has several consequences for
Knowledge editors. These include the inevitable conclusion that the deletion of a superfluous article (one with NQ less than zero) tends to increase the value of Φ, and the improvement of an article about a subject with
562:
of an edit's improvement factor that brings about this "uncertainty", but statistical encyclodynamics has shown that an edit actually does not possess these two properties simultaneously. This leads to the counter-intuitive prediction that an edit's improvement factor can only be known to a high
659:
one) with a high NQ must tend to increase the value of Φ. On the other hand immediatists argue that if an article's CQ can be negative then the creation of an article with a high NQ need not increase the value of Φ and can, in fact, decrease it. However eventualists point out that if CQ can be
691:
These debates are ongoing, mainly because no-one has ever observed a perfect encyclopedia article, and no-one has succeeded in measuring the absolute value of any subject's NQ. These are major challenges to the encyclopedic community. One day, the NQ of the subject of this essay may even be
589:
have precisely the same magnitude as the original edit. This may be due to the effect of extraneous factors not modelled in classical encyclodynamics; for instance the reversion of an edit with a value –θ may have a value considerably greater than θ if it has a particularly enlightening edit
242:
who believe that a real article's CQ can be negative. A concept that was proposed in the 20th century is the perfect anti-article (one containing nothing but misinformation on every important aspect about the subject) which has a CQ equal to -1. Fortunately, for reasons which no-one has
683:
Some
Knowledge editors participate in AFD in the belief that it is the best means yet devised of measuring whether a subject's NQ is positive, and removing those found to be negative. Immediatists sometimes argue successfully for an article's deletion, even if they acknowledge its
645:
Knowledge editors often take comfort in the fact that
Knowledge, a particularly high-temperature encyclopedia whose average edit's improvement factor is positive, has an inherently decreased obsoletion rate compared with lower-temperature (for example, printed) encyclopedias.
585:; in other words if an edit has an improvement constant θ then its reversion has improvement constant -θ. However one reason for the triumph of statistical encyclodynamics is that in high-temperature encyclopedias it has been observed that the reversion of an edit does not
48:, which measures the state of completion relative to a theoretical perfect encyclopedia. Its study falls into two disciplines: encyclostatics and encyclodynamics. There is as yet no consensus on the correct method for the measurement of its components, such as a subject's
59:
Acceptance of the concept of completeness in an encyclopedia has particular philosophical consequences for
Knowledge editors. Certain kinds of Knowledge disputes can be explained by the differing interpretation of concepts used in the calculation of completeness index.
77:(NQ). The NQ is usually taken to range from +1 (absolute requirement) to -1 (absolute superfluity). There is no consensus on the correct method of objectively measuring a potential subject's NQ. The possibility of a negative NQ is not universally accepted. Extreme
667:
existing articles contribute a positive completion quotient. Others hold that — even if the eventualist-inclusionist argument is valid — it is the absolute completeness index that is the more meaningful measurement, because only this is a measure of the approach to
626:
believe that the best way to deal with individual edits whose improvement factor appears to be negative is to revert them quickly. To this end these
Wikipedians are often to be found scrutinising recent changes for degradations (sometimes termed
206:
593:
Another field of study in encyclodynamics is the change in the perfect article universe with time. Over time it has been observed that the number of potential subjects with positive NQ tends to increase, and hence the value of
613:, are observing the interactions between articles of varying notability quotient and atomic edits of varying improvement factor in an attempt to reconcile the theoretical model with the physical encyclopedic universe.
654:
Disputes about completeness occasionally arise among
Knowledge editors between eventualists and immediatists. Eventualists argue that if an article's CQ cannot be negative, then the creation of an article (even a
637:
Statistical encyclodynamics on
Knowledge has to take account of "uncertainty" over and above studies of other encyclopedias, because a Knowledge article consists not only of its article text, but also its
538:
Classical encyclodynamics ran into problems as it fails to predict certain observed phenomena. For this reason, although it is still a valid model for many encyclopedic studies, it is being superseded by
225:. Some suspect that this value is a fundamental universal constant, others propose that it may depend on cultural and psychological factors, while still others believe that it is a transfinite number.
314:
400:
518:
243:
satisfactorily explained, we inhabit a universe where articles vastly outnumber anti-articles, and for most purposes in encyclostatics it turns out that anti-articles can be ignored.
531:. Measuring each edit's improvement constant separately in this way allows the theory to predict the overall quality of the encyclopedia in the future. This approach is known as
432:
348:
465:, roughly equivalent to the rate of change of articles with time dE/dt. The encyclopedic temperature is related to the quantity of energy being put into the encyclopedia.
214:
is the subset of Ω for which NQ is greater than 0 (since a perfect encyclopedia does not contain articles about subjects with negative NQ these do not count towards Φ
598:
also increases. Thus the absolute completeness of an encyclopedia with an encyclopedic temperature of absolute zero will tend to decrease. This process is called
622:
positive NQ also tends to increase the value of Φ — with improvements to articles about subjects of high NQ bringing about a proportionally bigger increase in Φ.
115:
473:
One approach to modelling the increase or decrease in Φ is to treat it as the result of many individual edits, each of which has a clearly defined
663:
The theory that neither a subject's NQ nor its CQ can be negative attracts some inclusionist-eventualist
Wikipedians, who logically conclude that
634:). They believe that provided all edits with negative θ are cancelled out, then the remaining edits will automatically lead to an increase in Φ.
44:
is a fundamental property of an encyclopedia, measuring its current state of completion. This measure is further refined in the
660:
negative then any vandalism of an article with negative NQ will tend to increase the value of Φ more than its deletion would.
554:
Statistical encyclodynamics posits that an edit's improvement factor is a function of the time for which it will survive (its
258:
355:
482:
574:) actually presses the "Save page" button to allow the edit to be observed and thus collapse the article's
434:
equal to 1 is by definition absolutely complete. As the value of Φ for any real encyclopedia approaches Φ
408:
324:
680:, and measurements of Knowledge's absolute completeness index are correspondingly much smaller.
610:
218:, and articles about subjects with a NQ of zero do not contribute to the completeness index).
201:{\displaystyle \Phi _{\Omega }={\sum _{\Omega _{+}}{CQ\times NQ}}={\sum _{\Omega _{+}}{NQ}}}
672:
completeness; if NQ is deemed to be positive for all potential subjects then the value of Φ
29:
78:
239:
238:
who believe that a non-empty real article always has a CQ greater than zero, to
235:
551:
Statistical encyclodynamics models changes in Φ using probabilistic arguments.
676:
is also correspondingly larger because all potential articles are part of Ω
92:(denoted by Ω). Even a subject with a negative NQ has a perfect article.
438:, the encyclopedia may also be said to approach absolute completeness.
246:
The set of all existing articles in a real encyclopedia is called its
81:
argue that no potential subject has a NQ which is negative or zero.
523:
In this model, edits with negative improvement constant are called
73:
Each potential subject for an encyclopedia article has an inherent
630:) and reverting them quickly (this activity is technically called
688:
to have a positive NQ, because they believe its CQ is negative.
253:
A real encyclopedia's completeness index (Φ) is simply given by
701:
15:
581:
In classical encyclodynamics, all processes are held to be
527:, and those with positive improvement constant are called
88:
about it. The set of all perfect articles is called the
461:
In all encyclodynamics a fundamental measurement is the
702:
The most up-to-date and detailed study of anti-articles
309:{\displaystyle \Phi ={\sum _{\omega }{(CQ\times NQ)}}.}
221:
No research has yet convincingly proposed a value for Φ
566:
It also appears that an edit's improvement factor is
485:
411:
358:
327:
261:
118:
395:{\displaystyle {\hat {\Phi }}=\Phi /\Phi _{\Omega }}
512:
426:
394:
342:
308:
200:
35:Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
602:, and the rate at which it occurs is called the
99:(CQ): CQ is defined as 1 for a perfect article.
84:For each potential subject, there is a Platonic
28:material that is kept because it is considered
8:
513:{\displaystyle \theta =NQ\times \Delta CQ}
484:
413:
412:
410:
386:
377:
360:
359:
357:
329:
328:
326:
279:
273:
268:
260:
189:
181:
176:
171:
150:
142:
137:
132:
123:
117:
611:article accelerators across the world
7:
102:The perfect article universe has a
501:
415:
387:
383:
374:
362:
331:
262:
178:
139:
124:
120:
14:
609:Practical encyclodynamicists, in
19:
427:{\displaystyle {\hat {\Phi }}}
418:
365:
343:{\displaystyle {\hat {\Phi }}}
334:
298:
280:
1:
650:Disputes about completeness
576:improvement factor function
547:Statistical encyclodynamics
541:statistical encyclodynamics
405:Any real encyclopedia with
320:absolute completeness index
46:absolute completeness index
718:
617:Consequences for Knowledge
533:classical encyclodynamics
469:Classical encyclodynamics
463:encyclopedic temperature
90:perfect article universe
692:measured as positive.
514:
428:
396:
344:
310:
202:
560:attempted measurement
515:
454:, commonly called an
429:
397:
345:
311:
203:
97:completeness quotient
54:completeness quotient
483:
409:
356:
325:
259:
116:
69:Perfect completeness
75:notability quotient
50:notability quotient
26:This page contains
600:encyclopedic aging
510:
475:improvement factor
424:
392:
340:
306:
278:
198:
188:
149:
104:completeness index
42:Completeness index
421:
368:
337:
269:
248:article namespace
229:Real completeness
172:
133:
95:An article has a
52:and an article's
39:
38:
709:
519:
517:
516:
511:
433:
431:
430:
425:
423:
422:
414:
401:
399:
398:
393:
391:
390:
381:
370:
369:
361:
349:
347:
346:
341:
339:
338:
330:
315:
313:
312:
307:
302:
301:
277:
207:
205:
204:
199:
197:
196:
187:
186:
185:
167:
166:
148:
147:
146:
128:
127:
23:
22:
16:
717:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
707:
706:
698:
679:
675:
652:
640:what links here
619:
604:obsoletion rate
597:
549:
481:
480:
471:
447:Encyclodynamics
444:
442:Encyclodynamics
437:
407:
406:
382:
354:
353:
323:
322:
257:
256:
231:
224:
217:
213:
177:
138:
119:
114:
113:
109:
86:perfect article
71:
66:
20:
12:
11:
5:
715:
713:
705:
704:
697:
694:
677:
673:
651:
648:
618:
615:
595:
548:
545:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
488:
470:
467:
452:article change
443:
440:
435:
420:
417:
389:
385:
380:
376:
373:
367:
364:
336:
333:
305:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
276:
272:
267:
264:
230:
227:
222:
215:
211:
195:
192:
184:
180:
175:
170:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
145:
141:
136:
131:
126:
122:
107:
70:
67:
65:
64:Encyclostatics
62:
37:
36:
34:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
714:
703:
700:
699:
695:
693:
689:
687:
681:
671:
666:
661:
658:
649:
647:
643:
641:
635:
633:
629:
623:
616:
614:
612:
607:
605:
601:
591:
588:
584:
579:
577:
573:
569:
564:
561:
557:
552:
546:
544:
542:
536:
534:
530:
526:
521:
507:
504:
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
478:
476:
468:
466:
464:
459:
457:
453:
448:
441:
439:
403:
378:
371:
351:
321:
316:
303:
295:
292:
289:
286:
283:
274:
270:
265:
254:
251:
250:(denoted ω).
249:
244:
241:
237:
228:
226:
219:
208:
193:
190:
182:
173:
168:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
143:
134:
129:
111:
105:
100:
98:
93:
91:
87:
82:
80:
79:inclusionists
76:
68:
63:
61:
57:
55:
51:
47:
43:
32:
31:
25:
18:
17:
690:
685:
682:
669:
664:
662:
656:
653:
644:
639:
636:
631:
627:
624:
620:
608:
603:
599:
592:
586:
582:
580:
575:
571:
567:
565:
559:
555:
553:
550:
540:
537:
532:
529:improvements
528:
524:
522:
479:
474:
472:
462:
460:
455:
451:
446:
445:
404:
352:
319:
317:
255:
252:
247:
245:
240:immediatists
236:eventualists
232:
220:
209:
112:
103:
101:
96:
94:
89:
85:
83:
74:
72:
58:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
27:
572:contributor
556:persistence
525:degradation
110:) given by
583:reversible
350:is simply
632:RC patrol
628:vandalism
590:summary.
568:quantized
477:θ, where
318:Then the
696:See also
670:absolute
234:extreme
30:humorous
686:subject
450:atomic
210:where Ω
657:stubby
587:always
456:edit
665:all
606:.
578:.
543:.
535:.
520:.
502:Δ
499:×
487:θ
458:.
419:^
416:Φ
402:.
388:Ω
384:Φ
375:Φ
366:^
363:Φ
335:^
332:Φ
290:×
275:ω
271:∑
263:Φ
179:Ω
174:∑
158:×
140:Ω
135:∑
125:Ω
121:Φ
106:(Φ
56:.
33:.
678:+
674:Ω
596:Ω
594:Φ
508:Q
505:C
496:Q
493:N
490:=
436:Ω
379:/
372:=
304:.
299:)
296:Q
293:N
287:Q
284:C
281:(
266:=
223:Ω
216:Ω
212:+
194:Q
191:N
183:+
169:=
164:Q
161:N
155:Q
152:C
144:+
130:=
108:Ω
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.