Knowledge (XXG)

:Content assessment - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

2087: 2036: 2077: 2247: 2211: 1880: 575: 351: 2319: 908: 210: 2283: 842: 31: 2088: 2083: 2086: 2091: 96: 2084: 2080: 2082: 2085: 189:
It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. If there is disagreement over the quality rating of an article, then it should be discussed on
2072:
to see that version of the article. Please note that until 2008, a C-Class rating did not exist on the project, and as such this grading is retroactive. Also, in 2006 references were much less used, and inline references were quite rare; a barely-B-Class article today would typically have many more
2089: 2692:
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). See
869:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a 2081: 2720:
Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
1396:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
2090: 1490:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
642:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. 150: 2092: 2093: 146: 1385:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
1355:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
2141:
tracks assessment data (article quality and importance data for individual WikiProjects) assigned via talk page banners. If you would like to add a new WikiProject to the bot's list, please read the instructions at
2636: 1294: 874: 1486:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
2105: 2703:
Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best
788: 170:
set any quality rating that they believe is appropriate, except for the GA, FA, and A-class ratings. GAs (Good Articles) are generally reviewed by a single independent editor after a nomination at
166:
Most grades are assessed by individual editors according to the criteria on this page. Generally speaking, all editors, including editors who have written or improved an article, are encouraged to
820:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
1603:
A topic for which details are subject to change often. The article covers a future topic, e.g., a forthcoming election or album release, and article content may change as new information arises.
141:
article assessments, offering a prediction based on structural characteristics of the page (e.g. sectioning and references) that correlate with quality, for the class tag. These tags are then
110:
The following system is used to assess the quality of a Knowledge (XXG) article. The system is based on a letter scheme that reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though
2647:, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes. 1037:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 851:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
179: 1034: 2143: 155: 2639:
generally requires the agreement of at least two editors, and the "GA" and "FA" labels should be used only on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as
2612:
The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the
1771: 183: 1336: 955: 1462:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
983: 761: 277:
can often reveal more topical projects. For instance, if you wrote about a Kenyan astronomer, you might want to search for "Biography", "Kenya", and "Astronomy" to find
2821: 2811: 1236: 859: 2676: 2622:
Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Knowledge (XXG) as a whole.
2006:
Note that some WikiProjects deal exclusively with non-mainspace content and may use their own customised assessment schemes tailored to a specific purpose: see
1169: 386:
exemplifies Knowledge (XXG)'s very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
142: 2735: 2007: 987: 979: 823:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
784: 776: 556:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
2068:" as an example, demonstrates the typical profile for an article's development through the levels. Hold the mouse over a number to see key events, and 2661:
parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use
1304: 1253: 971: 533: 477: 318: 2816: 2801: 870: 792: 365: 175: 38: 1203:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
2149:
The global summary table below is computed by taking the highest quality and importance rating for each assessed article in the main namespace.
1633:(SIA) page falls under this class. These are List articles about a set of items of a specific type that also share the same (or similar) name. 2694: 1361: 1328: 1314: 757: 529: 376: 2049:. Please help update this Knowledge (XXG) page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on 2806: 1189: 926: 589: 513: 171: 2779: 1902: 104:
Anyone can add a quality assessment below GA-class, regardless of WikiProjects. Higher ratings require more formal processes and consensus.
2711: 2665:
in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they are currently designated as such. Tools in the
2050: 1267: 54: 2710:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate
1700: 1436:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
975: 600: 2773: 1240: 1109: 922: 882:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
431: 286: 278: 2181: 1057: 1045: 182:
have opted out of the standard quality scale, and use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as
2760:, a currently maintained tool that helps fill in assessments and other parameters for WikiProject banners. A complete remake of 2191: 2186: 2176: 2014: 1956: 1807: 1683: 1653: 1341:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
1161: 866: 138: 1931: 2741: 1963: 1630: 1517: 1276: 676:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. 458: 1910: 1717: 1597: 265:
classes are fairly subjective; at those ratings, the best way to improve the article is to look at the specific criteria for
2644: 1948: 1938: 1892: 1513: 1207: 383: 361: 282: 2689:
Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do?
2119:
scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also the template
1520:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. 2411: 1828: 1425: 2657:
above; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, go to the article's talk page and set the
1459: 1352:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
1263: 1173: 1026: 753: 745: 654: 525: 521: 387: 46: 2785: 2469: 2440: 2196: 1985: 1853: 1507: 1478: 311: 122: 2747: 1896: 1540:
Some WikiProjects omit some of the standard classes, most often A-Class, especially when they lack an assessment team.
1357: 1318: 1257: 1030: 967: 707: 673: 467: 2776:, a historical initiative of the Wikimedia Foundation to engage Wikimedia readers in the assessment of article quality 1623: 444:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
1660: 585: 497: 2324: 2252: 2216: 2123: 1885: 1870: 1750: 1529: 912: 579: 355: 2640: 1165: 1096: 1000: 936: 543: 517: 417: 413: 2761: 2382: 2353: 2288: 1380: 1226: 846: 1124: 1084: 623: 441: 421: 2210: 1723:
May be used to identify redirects that could be expanded into articles, or articles with content that could be
811:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
350: 2722: 1567: 886: 274: 270: 1879: 129:
tag for assessment based on other Talk tags or based on editor selected values. Editor assistance tools like
2767: 2589: 2246: 574: 304: 1992: 1839: 1430:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
1061: 454: 449: 197:
have been assessed. Several other languages are also using this assessment system or a derivative thereof.
1998: 1820: 2770:, a script that stylizes links on Knowledge (XXG) according to the assessed quality of the target article 2026: 1971: 1783: 1724: 1402:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
163:
were introduced, so editors only have to rate an article once and it applies to all associated projects.
121:
The quality assessments are mainly performed by Knowledge (XXG) editors, who tag Talk pages of articles;
1942: 1786:. The precise application of these grades may vary depending on their usage by individual WikiProjects. 1864: 1690: 1549: 808: 749: 63: 50: 693: 239:. They represent the amount of work needed to bring the article to the next rating, which depends on 224: 2754:) that finds articles' assessment information from the talk page and puts it in the article's header 2282: 1734: 1406: 1387: 841: 726: 248: 1526:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge (XXG) articles, appropriately named and organized.
1523:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
231:
like A/B/C/D/F or other rating systems (10-point scale, 5-star system, etc.) that you might see on
2751: 1917: 1835: 1239:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach 1146: 1142: 741: 658: 650: 509: 216: 167: 115: 1838:
falls under this class. These are typically found in the Draft namespace, but may also be in the
1185: 1291:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1150: 20: 2757: 1977: 1282: 780: 496:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see 134: 130: 1774:
which utilises a parallel scheme of "CL-Class", "BL-Class" and "AL-Class" for list articles.
1755:
A page that does not fit into any other category. Used as a "catch-all" by all WikiProjects.
1016: 160: 1923: 1015:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
480:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
2635:
In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, assessing an article as
2613: 1967: 1313:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
1297:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. 669: 111: 2138: 885:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
553:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
1113:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 1782:
Further grades are commonly used by WikiProjects to categorize relevant pages in other
1448:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
1271: 269:-Class and aim to satisfy those. Specific feedback can often be obtained on a relevant 236: 865:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
2795: 1845: 1814: 412:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are 689: 487: 1570:
use other assessments for mainspace content that do not fit into the above scale:
1206:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
873:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. 542:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
1606:
Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event draws near.
1696:
The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.
2677:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Knowledge (XXG)/Assessment#Requesting an assessment
1307:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
1860: 1483:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
1342: 722: 500:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
273:'s talk page. Those can usually be found on the talk page of the article, but 744:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
1331:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
406:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; 1303:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
1123:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1095:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
626:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
232: 2764:, a script for tagging articles' talk pages with assessment information. 1210:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
588:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
364:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
1639:
An SIA need not follow the formatting rules for disambiguation pages
1609:
Material added might be speculative and should be carefully sourced.
228: 2675:
To have an independent editor review an article, post a request at
2041:
Parts of this Knowledge (XXG) page (those related to the fact that
1669:
Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created.
390:
for all Knowledge (XXG) articles, it has the following attributes.
19:"WP:CLASSES" redirects here. For the catalogue of CSS classes, see 1455:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
1405:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
1270:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
668:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for 2065: 2042: 1327:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
1293:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
925:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from 2030: 1666:
The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title.
204: 90: 25: 2744:, an essay on the criteria and purpose of article assessments 791:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
174:. FAs (Featured Articles) are reviewed by several editors at 2075: 1325:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
659:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
486:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical 2616:
to prepare for static releases of Knowledge (XXG) content.
2695:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Guide#Article tagging
49:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
2144:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot
1442:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
1772:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
1741: 1707: 1673: 1643: 1613: 1557: 1495: 1466: 1413: 1368: 1266:, and any important or controversial material which is 1214: 893: 827: 560: 400:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; 184:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
78: 71: 2013:
For an index of all WikiProject assessment pages, see
1445:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
2725:
is the process designed to provide detailed comments.
688:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
2158: 729:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. 721:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, 512:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct 247:the depth of coverage of the topic, which greatly 2738:, the previous version superseded by this version 1730:Content may not yet exist for the desired topic. 956:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 2736:Knowledge (XXG):Article assessment (historical) 2079: 2073:references than this article did in late 2006. 1636:The page lists related items of the same name. 37:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG) 2008:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Portals/Assessment 1941:page falls under this class; may also include 1343:technical terms should be explained or avoided 828:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events 758:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content 612:It features professional standards of writing. 2669:section can help with the assessment process. 2159:All rated articles by quality and importance 312: 8: 2782:, a potential use of WikiProject assessments 2672:How can I ask for an article to be assessed? 2064:This clickable imagemap, using the article " 2822:Knowledge (XXG) article assessment criteria 2780:Knowledge (XXG):Data mining Knowledge (XXG) 2717:Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 2609:What is the purpose of article assessments? 2045:has been downgraded to B-Class) need to be 45:Editors should generally follow it, though 2812:Knowledge (XXG) project content guidelines 2155: 1699:Ensure that the redirect is appropriately 530:criteria for inclusion of non-free content 327: 319: 305: 299:WikiProject article quality grading scheme 1966:falls under this class; may also include 1863:falls under this class; may also include 2208: 1788: 1572: 1321:does not need to be followed rigorously. 348: 2280: 2190: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2106:separate scale for rating articles for 1335:The article presents its content in an 1311:The article is reasonably well-written. 839: 161:project-independent quality assessments 1877: 420:and are supported by inline citations 2774:Knowledge (XXG):Article Feedback Tool 2244: 572: 7: 2700:What if I don't agree with a rating? 2318: 2316: 2021:Evolution of an article – an example 1903:File:Felis silvestris silvestris.jpg 1614:Next United Kingdom general election 1315:of the standard of featured articles 1301:The article has a defined structure. 907: 905: 2788:– List of articles by their quality 2195: 958:; spelling and grammar are correct; 867:Knowledge (XXG):Article development 756:images and other media satisfy the 145:, which generates output such as a 2817:Knowledge (XXG) article assessment 2802:Knowledge (XXG) editing guidelines 2742:Knowledge (XXG):Assessing articles 2654: 450:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy 253:Note that the differences between 53:. When in doubt, discuss first on 14: 1949:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Japan 954:the prose is clear, concise, and 807:It is not the subject of ongoing 528:images or media must satisfy the 16:Knowledge (XXG) editing guideline 2317: 2281: 2245: 2209: 2034: 2015:Category:WikiProject assessments 1878: 1737:when updating the encyclopedia. 1337:appropriately understandable way 906: 840: 573: 470:, including the provision of: 349: 208: 94: 29: 2807:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 assessments 2748:Knowledge (XXG):Metadata gadget 2151: 440:: it is not subject to ongoing 194: 2707:Aren't the ratings subjective? 1574:Other WikiProject assessments 1035:could reasonably be challenged 366:WP:Featured article candidates 176:WP:Featured article candidates 1: 2666: 1761:Depends on the type of page. 1758:Depends on the type of page. 1663:page falls under this class. 1170:valid non-free use rationales 785:Bulleted and unbulleted lists 2786:Category:Articles by quality 2115:, which is unrelated to the 1891:Any file which has attained 875:WikiProject Military history 710:and its supplementary pages. 153:. For more information, see 2723:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review 2650:How do I assess an article? 2619:Are these ratings official? 2614:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program 2027:outreach:Life of an Article 1439:A useful picture or graphic 927:WP:Good article nominations 657:if they contain any of the 590:WP:Featured list candidates 518:acceptable copyright status 243:the quality of the writing 195:over eight million articles 172:WP:Good article nominations 2838: 2024: 1871:File:Flag of Australia.svg 1790:Non-mainspace assessments 1733:Editors are encouraged to 1547: 1530:List of literary movements 1017:the layout style guideline 871:featured article candidate 388:policies regarding content 221:no relationship whatsoever 61: 55:this guideline's talk page 18: 2762:User:Kephir/gadgets/rater 2168: 2163: 2154: 781:accessible to all readers 674:content-forking guideline 651:sourced where they appear 584:The article has attained 377:featured article criteria 360:The article has attained 342: 339: 336: 333: 330: 190:the article's talk page. 2632:Who can assess articles? 1995:falls under this class. 1920:falls under this class. 1817:falls under this class. 1727:off to form a new page. 1693:falls under this class. 1512:Meets the criteria of a 1458:Providing references to 1215:Discovery of the neutron 102:This page in a nutshell: 2768:User:N8wilson/AQFetcher 1268:likely to be challenged 1188:to the topic, and have 762:are labeled accordingly 672:; does not violate the 432:fairly and without bias 2096: 2010:for one such example. 1999:User:Legoktm/afcnew.js 1821:Category:George Orwell 1496:Lineage (anthropology) 1472:(as of September 2014) 1433:More detailed criteria 1393:More detailed criteria 1246:More detailed criteria 1241:good article standards 932:More detailed criteria 857:The article meets the 854:More detailed criteria 793:alternative (alt) text 601:featured list criteria 598:The article meets the 595:More detailed criteria 534:be labeled accordingly 459:too-close paraphrasing 374:The article meets the 371:More detailed criteria 2697:for more information. 2100:Importance assessment 2095: 1778:Non-mainspace content 1711:(as of October 2016) 1617:(as of October 2019) 1501:(as of December 2014) 1074:Broad in its coverage 966:it complies with the 923:good article criteria 777:uses proper formating 706:It complies with the 484:appropriate structure 416:against high-quality 287:WikiProject Astronomy 279:WikiProject Biography 1677:(as of August 2019) 1588:Editing suggestions 1585:Reader's experience 1374:(as of January 2024) 1058:copyright violations 1046:no original research 1006:no original research 520:. Images follow the 494:consistent citations 430:: it presents views 225:grading in education 219:mentioned here have 1791: 1745:(as of March 2018) 1575: 1558:WP:NONSTANDARDCLASS 1544:Non-standard grades 1254:suitably referenced 1127:or content dispute. 1033:. All content that 894:Battle of Nam River 653:, and they provide 649:(b) statements are 622:It has an engaging 340:Editing suggestions 337:Reader's experience 193:As of August 2024, 118:are also factors. 2627:Assessing articles 2097: 1789: 1742:Free City of Mainz 1708:American breakfast 1573: 1277:citation templates 1231:The article meets 1220:(as of April 2019) 1166:copyright statuses 1137:, if possible, by 988:list incorporation 917:The article meets 634:Comprehensiveness. 546:where appropriate. 275:searching for them 217:assessment ratings 143:collected by a bot 2758:User:Evad37/rater 2645:featured articles 2596: 2595: 2587: 2586: 2124:importance scheme 2070:click on a number 2062: 2061: 2058: 2004: 2003: 1978:Template:Magnapop 1768: 1767: 1647:(as of May 2018) 1631:set index article 1535: 1534: 1518:set index article 1419:(as of June 2018) 1190:suitable captions 1172:are provided for 1083:it addresses the 899:(as of June 2014) 670:stand-alone lists 566:(as of June 2018) 422:where appropriate 294: 293: 283:WikiProject Kenya 249:varies by subject 178:. Be aware that 108: 107: 89: 88: 39:editing guideline 2829: 2750:, a script (and 2664: 2590:About this table 2322: 2321: 2320: 2286: 2285: 2250: 2249: 2214: 2213: 2156: 2152: 2128: 2122: 2078: 2054: 2038: 2037: 2031: 1924:Portal:Biography 1893:featured picture 1883: 1882: 1792: 1744: 1710: 1676: 1646: 1616: 1576: 1560: 1514:stand-alone list 1502: 1498: 1473: 1469: 1460:reliable sources 1420: 1416: 1375: 1371: 1362:style guidelines 1286: 1264:reliable sources 1258:inline citations 1237:B-Class criteria 1221: 1217: 1208:featured article 1194: 1193: 1178: 1177: 1174:non-free content 1155: 1154: 1129: 1128: 1115: 1114: 1101: 1100: 1089: 1088: 1078: 1077: 1066: 1065: 1050: 1049: 1039: 1038: 1027:reliable sources 1021: 1020: 1010: 1009: 992: 991: 960: 959: 949: 948: 911: 910: 909: 900: 896: 860:A-Class criteria 845: 844: 834: 833:(as of May 2018) 830: 813: 812: 797: 796: 766: 765: 748:, with succinct 731: 730: 712: 711: 698: 697: 678: 677: 663: 662: 655:inline citations 644: 643: 637: 636: 628: 627: 614: 613: 578: 577: 567: 563: 522:image use policy 488:section headings 468:style guidelines 418:reliable sources 384:featured article 362:featured article 354: 353: 328: 321: 314: 307: 212: 211: 205: 133:apply automated 112:language quality 98: 97: 91: 81: 74: 33: 32: 26: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2792: 2791: 2732: 2686: 2684:Common concerns 2662: 2629: 2606: 2601: 2592: 2135: 2126: 2120: 2102: 2094: 2076: 2035: 2029: 2023: 1780: 1740: 1706: 1672: 1642: 1612: 1564: 1563: 1556: 1552: 1546: 1500: 1494: 1471: 1465: 1452: 1451: 1434: 1418: 1412: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1373: 1367: 1358:Manual of Style 1349: 1348: 1345:where possible. 1319:Manual of Style 1295:A-Class article 1280: 1252:The article is 1247: 1219: 1213: 1200: 1199: 1183: 1182: 1159: 1158: 1133: 1132: 1119: 1118: 1107: 1106: 1094: 1093: 1082: 1081: 1072: 1071: 1056:it contains no 1055: 1054: 1043: 1042: 1025: 1024: 1014: 1013: 998: 997: 970:guidelines for 968:Manual of Style 965: 964: 953: 952: 943: 942: 933: 898: 892: 879: 878: 855: 832: 826: 817: 816: 803: 802: 770: 769: 735: 734: 716: 715: 708:Manual of Style 702: 701: 684: 683: 667: 666: 648: 647: 641: 640: 632: 631: 618: 617: 608: 607: 596: 565: 559: 550: 549: 466:It follows the 448:compliant with 410:well-researched 372: 326: 325: 237:product reviews 209: 203: 95: 85: 84: 77: 70: 66: 58: 30: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2835: 2833: 2825: 2824: 2819: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2783: 2777: 2771: 2765: 2755: 2745: 2739: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2718: 2715: 2712:to let us know 2708: 2705: 2701: 2698: 2690: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2673: 2670: 2651: 2648: 2633: 2628: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2610: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2588: 2585: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2559: 2554: 2548: 2547: 2542: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2521: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2494: 2493: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2465: 2464: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2450: 2447: 2444: 2436: 2435: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2407: 2406: 2401: 2398: 2395: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2378: 2377: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2360: 2357: 2349: 2348: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2328: 2313: 2312: 2307: 2304: 2301: 2298: 2295: 2292: 2277: 2276: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2256: 2241: 2240: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2205: 2204: 2199: 2194: 2189: 2184: 2179: 2173: 2172: 2167: 2161: 2160: 2134: 2131: 2101: 2098: 2060: 2059: 2039: 2022: 2019: 2002: 2001: 1996: 1989: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1960: 1952: 1951: 1946: 1935: 1927: 1926: 1921: 1914: 1906: 1905: 1900: 1897:featured sound 1889: 1874: 1873: 1868: 1857: 1849: 1848: 1843: 1840:User namespace 1832: 1824: 1823: 1818: 1811: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1779: 1776: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1747: 1746: 1738: 1731: 1728: 1721: 1713: 1712: 1704: 1697: 1694: 1687: 1679: 1678: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1661:disambiguation 1657: 1649: 1648: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1627: 1619: 1618: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1562: 1561: 1553: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1524: 1521: 1510: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1463: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1410: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1383: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1365: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1332: 1322: 1308: 1298: 1288: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1211: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1180: 1130: 1116: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1091: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1052: 1040: 1022: 995: 994: 993: 980:words to watch 962: 934: 931: 930: 915: 902: 901: 897: 890: 887:WP:Peer review 883: 880: 864: 856: 853: 852: 849: 836: 835: 831: 824: 821: 818: 815: 814: 800: 799: 798: 767: 746:usage policies 732: 719:Visual appeal. 699: 681: 680: 679: 664: 645: 629: 615: 597: 594: 593: 582: 569: 568: 564: 557: 554: 551: 548: 547: 537: 503: 502: 501: 498:citing sources 491: 481: 464: 463: 462: 445: 435: 425: 407: 401: 373: 370: 369: 358: 345: 344: 341: 338: 335: 332: 324: 323: 316: 309: 301: 297: 292: 291: 213: 202: 199: 180:a few projects 106: 105: 99: 87: 86: 83: 82: 75: 67: 62: 59: 44: 43: 34: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2834: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2797: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2749: 2746: 2743: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2706: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2678: 2674: 2671: 2668: 2660: 2656: 2655:quality scale 2652: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2641:good articles 2638: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2598: 2591: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2474: 2472: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2437: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2326: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2290: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2275: 2272: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2254: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2219: 2218: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2140: 2132: 2130: 2125: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2099: 2074: 2071: 2067: 2057: 2052: 2051:the talk page 2048: 2044: 2040: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2020: 2018: 2016: 2011: 2009: 2000: 1997: 1994: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1976: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1888: 1887: 1881: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1846:Draft:Example 1844: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1787: 1785: 1777: 1775: 1773: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1726: 1722: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1688: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1662: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1569: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1543: 1541: 1539: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1468: 1464: 1461: 1457: 1454: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1423: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1401: 1389: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1351: 1344: 1340: 1338: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1284: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1249: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1191: 1187: 1181: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1105: 1098: 1097:summary style 1092: 1087:of the topic; 1086: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1063: 1059: 1053: 1047: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 996: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972:lead sections 969: 963: 957: 951: 950: 946: 941: 940: 938: 928: 924: 920: 916: 914: 904: 903: 895: 891: 888: 884: 881: 876: 872: 868: 862: 861: 850: 848: 843: 838: 837: 829: 825: 822: 819: 810: 806: 801: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 773:Accessibility 768: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 733: 728: 724: 720: 714: 713: 709: 705: 700: 695: 692:headings and 691: 687: 682: 675: 671: 665: 660: 656: 652: 646: 639: 638: 635: 630: 625: 621: 616: 611: 606: 605: 603: 602: 591: 587: 586:featured list 583: 581: 576: 571: 570: 562: 558: 555: 552: 545: 544:summary style 541: 538: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504: 499: 495: 492: 489: 485: 482: 479: 475: 472: 471: 469: 465: 460: 456: 452: 451: 446: 443: 439: 436: 433: 429: 426: 423: 419: 415: 411: 408: 405: 404:comprehensive 402: 399: 396: 395: 393: 392: 391: 389: 385: 379: 378: 367: 363: 359: 357: 352: 347: 346: 329: 322: 317: 315: 310: 308: 303: 302: 300: 296: 290: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229:review scores 226: 222: 218: 214: 207: 206: 200: 198: 196: 191: 187: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 164: 162: 158: 157: 156:Using the bot 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 119: 117: 113: 103: 100: 93: 92: 80: 76: 73: 69: 68: 65: 60: 56: 52: 48: 42: 40: 35: 28: 27: 22: 2658: 2653:Consult the 2581: 2576: 2571: 2566: 2561: 2556: 2551: 2544: 2524: 2517: 2497: 2490: 2468: 2461: 2439: 2432: 2410: 2403: 2381: 2374: 2352: 2345: 2323: 2309: 2287: 2273: 2251: 2237: 2215: 2201: 2169: 2164: 2148: 2136: 2116: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2069: 2063: 2055: 2046: 2012: 2005: 1984: 1955: 1930: 1909: 1884: 1852: 1827: 1806: 1781: 1769: 1716: 1682: 1652: 1644:USS Yorktown 1622: 1596: 1568:WikiProjects 1565: 1537: 1536: 1491:significant. 1487:significant. 1360:and related 1334: 1324: 1310: 1305:lead section 1300: 1290: 1287:is optional. 1272:<ref: --> 1251: 1232: 1138: 1134: 1120: 1108: 1085:main aspects 1073: 1044:it contains 1031:cited inline 1005: 999: 945:Well-written 944: 937:good article 918: 858: 804: 772: 738:Media files. 737: 718: 703: 685: 633: 619: 609: 599: 539: 505: 493: 483: 478:lead section 476:: a concise 473: 453:and free of 447: 437: 427: 409: 403: 398:well-written 397: 381: 375: 298: 295: 266: 262: 258: 254: 252: 244: 240: 220: 192: 188: 165: 154: 126: 120: 109: 101: 36: 2104:There is a 2056:(July 2023) 1701:categorized 1164:with their 1135:Illustrated 696:facilities. 271:WikiProject 159:. In 2023, 2796:Categories 2525:Unassessed 2514:1,362,231 2511:5,011,744 2455:2,800,866 2426:1,616,966 2170:Importance 2139:WP 1.0 bot 2133:Statistics 2108:importance 2025:See also: 1943:help pages 1865:timed text 1784:namespaces 1369:Psychology 1184:media are 1160:media are 1062:plagiarism 1001:Verifiable 805:Stability. 694:table sort 686:Structure. 455:plagiarism 414:verifiable 151:statistics 47:exceptions 2637:"A-Class" 2582:8,064,375 2577:1,771,828 2572:5,029,010 2518:7,635,694 2462:3,879,637 2433:2,554,822 1993:user page 1972:userboxes 1798:Criteria 1770:See also 1582:Criteria 1409:problems. 889:may help. 809:edit wars 561:Cleopatra 442:edit wars 394:It is: 139:Lift Wing 123:some bots 72:WP:ASSESS 64:Shortcuts 51:consensus 2730:See also 2667:See also 2663:|class=B 2541:409,597 2508:955,928 2505:238,979 2498:Assessed 2484:193,667 2458:764,612 2452:278,375 2429:411,428 2423:415,577 2397:308,736 2394:135,115 2112:priority 1964:template 1957:Template 1899:status. 1815:category 1808:Category 1801:Example 1691:redirect 1684:Redirect 1654:Disambig 1591:Example 1550:Shortcut 1283:cite web 1279:such as 1186:relevant 1141:such as 1125:edit war 754:Non-free 750:captions 526:Non-free 514:captions 343:Example 334:Criteria 233:homework 125:set the 79:WP:1.0/A 21:WP:CLASS 2704:rating. 2604:Purpose 2567:957,157 2562:239,447 2545:428,681 2538:17,266 2502:66,812 2491:338,427 2487:68,884 2481:53,868 2478:17,145 2449:31,501 2420:92,341 2417:18,510 2404:606,557 2400:91,788 2391:54,017 2388:16,901 2375:196,247 2371:23,410 2368:68,803 2365:54,295 2362:32,816 2359:16,923 2339:19,483 2336:14,733 2165:Quality 2117:quality 2047:updated 1968:modules 1939:project 1932:Project 1867:pages. 1735:be bold 1674:Jackson 1407:cleanup 1388:cleanup 1329:infobox 1262:It has 1256:, with 1235:of the 1110:Neutral 984:fiction 921:of the 740:It has 690:section 540:Length. 508:It has 428:neutral 2752:gadget 2557:66,933 2535:1,229 2475:4,863 2446:4,283 2346:46,480 2342:1,740 2333:7,310 2330:3,214 2231:1,943 2228:2,407 2225:2,487 2222:1,574 1918:portal 1911:Portal 1795:Label 1718:Needed 1598:Future 1579:Label 1317:. The 1168:, and 1162:tagged 1143:images 1121:Stable 986:, and 976:layout 789:tables 779:to be 742:images 727:colour 725:, and 723:tables 704:Style. 610:Prose. 510:images 506:Media. 474:a lead 438:stable 261:, and 201:Grades 168:boldly 116:layout 2659:class 2552:Total 2412:Start 2310:2,507 2274:2,426 2238:8,591 2202:Total 1836:draft 1829:Draft 1725:split 1566:Some 1538:Note: 1426:Start 1397:flow. 1151:audio 1149:, or 1147:video 1139:media 1004:with 775:. It 620:Lead. 490:; and 331:Class 259:Start 131:Rater 127:class 2532:468 2529:121 2470:List 2441:Stub 2303:581 2300:789 2297:683 2294:364 2267:699 2264:769 2261:679 2258:180 2234:180 2182:High 2137:The 2066:Atom 2043:Atom 1991:Any 1986:User 1962:Any 1937:Any 1916:Any 1861:file 1859:Any 1854:File 1834:Any 1813:Any 1764:N/A 1689:Any 1659:Any 1629:Any 1508:List 1479:Stub 1467:Ball 1414:Wing 1275:and 1273:tags 1029:are 939:is: 787:and 771:(c) 760:and 736:(b) 717:(a) 624:lead 532:and 516:and 285:and 255:Stub 241:both 235:and 215:The 149:and 135:ORES 114:and 2643:or 2599:FAQ 2306:90 2270:99 2197:??? 2192:Low 2187:Mid 2177:Top 2110:or 1970:or 1895:or 1624:SIA 1516:or 1233:all 1179:and 1090:and 1060:or 1051:and 961:and 919:all 457:or 245:and 227:or 223:to 147:log 137:or 2798:: 2325:GA 2253:FL 2217:FA 2146:. 2129:. 2127:}} 2121:{{ 2053:. 2017:. 1974:. 1945:. 1886:FM 1842:. 1751:NA 1703:. 1285:}} 1281:{{ 1145:, 1099:). 982:, 978:, 974:, 935:A 913:GA 877:). 783:. 752:. 604:: 580:FL 524:. 382:A 380:: 356:FA 281:, 257:, 186:. 2714:! 2679:. 2383:C 2354:B 2289:A 1390:. 1381:C 1364:. 1339:. 1260:. 1243:. 1227:B 1192:. 1176:; 1153:: 1076:: 1064:. 1048:; 1019:; 1008:: 990:. 947:: 929:. 863:: 847:A 795:. 764:. 661:. 592:. 536:. 461:. 434:; 424:; 368:. 320:e 313:t 306:v 289:. 267:B 263:C 251:. 57:. 41:. 23:.

Index

WP:CLASS
editing guideline
exceptions
consensus
this guideline's talk page
Shortcuts
WP:ASSESS
WP:1.0/A
language quality
layout
some bots
Rater
ORES
Lift Wing
collected by a bot
log
statistics
Using the bot
project-independent quality assessments
boldly
WP:Good article nominations
WP:Featured article candidates
a few projects
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
over eight million articles
assessment ratings
grading in education
review scores
homework
product reviews

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑