349:, we should add context, and not take it for granted that the reader knows who is Washington or will follow the link. The context, however, should be limited to what's needed for the current article. In this example, "President George Washington" or "General George Washington" (as opposed to just "George Washington") would be enough, as it clarifies why he would be considered a notable visitor. Try to keep a balance: provide context about other topics that may be relevant to the topic of the article, but don't lose focus of the
650:
1094:
113:
371:. Does this help explain Amanda Portemanteau as a whole? Not really; this section simply rambles on about the conspiracy theory without linking back to her again. This section only mentioned her once and never again linked it back to that conspiracy theory. We don't clearly know for sure whether it's about the journalist or the conspiracy theory.
619:, unacceptable material would include sources which extend too much beyond the individual, such as sources which focus on criticism of Islam in general. The same principle applies to sections within an article; critical sources must keep focus on the scope of the section and must not deviate from the subject at hand (for more information, see
35:
98:
247:- even if each subsection has its own references, and because it implies that the original subject (the "rack") is itself something that is very bad because of the added subsections. Sometimes, when there is already a well-balanced article about a subject, someone who wants to push a more biased view of that subject will
739:
fix an article by balancing it out with more facts but are in no way required to do so. It is inappropriate to "even out the percentage of bias" by adding fluff, such as minute details of a subject's life. These are considered scarves, hats, and gloves, and along with the coats, obscure the coatrack,
502:
is a mammal with fur. In this fur, there are many fleas. The flea is an insect of the order
Siphonaptera which is wingless insect with mouthparts adapted for piercing skin and sucking blood. Fleas are external parasites, living by hematophagy off the blood of mammals (including wolves and humans) and
374:
However, it may be the case that a person may be notable for propagating an outrageous conspiracy. If there is such a significant connection between the object (the conspiracy theory) and the subject (the author of the conspiracy theory), the conspiracy theory should be explained in the article in a
834:
were ideologically opposed to biographies, thinking too much ink had been spilled on hagiographies of "Great Men" (kings, church fathers) instead of the common person, and largely banned biographies; dissenting contributors would then hide biographies in other articles – for example, a biography of
487:
Marion Crane is the mother of Thomas
Washington, an American politician of the Independent party, who had him when she was 16 years old and was an unwed teen mother. Crane raised him as a single mother, and ... (here are personal details and attacks about the poor, otherwise non-notable woman ....
321:
While the article talks about XYZ and its relation to George
Washington, it does so very briefly and quickly moves on to applying biased negative opinions ("a terrible general, a lousy President") and facts (perhaps George Washington did own slaves at the time: nonetheless, the presentation of that
463:
John Doe works as a journalist. He has given over 30 years of long and faithful service to his newspaper. However, one day, he made the terrible mistake of nearly reporting an unchecked fact that came within a whisker of ruining an innocent person's life. Because he did this, he is an evil person.
791:
is…" or by using a specific title possibly using parenthetical disambiguation, to show the article's limited scope. When the article is properly framed this way, it is not necessary to expand the article to cover every possible usage for balance – that content can be added over time and either
766:
An article about an astronaut might mostly focus on his moon landing. A moon trip that took only a tiny fraction of the astronaut's life takes up most of the article. But that does not make it a coatrack article. The event was a significant moment in the subject's life, and his main claim to
384:
Jim W. Hales is a notable athlete/musician/actor. On Day XX/XX/XXXX (Day/Month/Year) he converted from religion X to religion Y. Isn't it nice how he saved his soul that way? Here are some more fun facts about religion Y, the greatest religion in the world: (endless paragraphs, and bullet lists
337:
It's better to just say "George
Washington ate at XYZ on a date", and link to a George-specific article. "General George Washington slept here during the XYZ campaign" is also reasonable, if being a military general on the campaign was part of the reason he slept here. So is "Future President
795:
It would be reasonable to include brief information of the background behind a key detail, even if the background has no direct relevance to the article's topic, as long as such information is used sparingly and does not provide any more explanation than a reasonably knowledgeable reader would
144:
to make it appear as if they were all examples of the same thing. A similar effect can result when an article's original author writes too much about the background and loses sight of the title. Either way, the existence of a "hook" in a given article is not a good reason to "hang" irrelevant,
696:
A common fact picking device is listing great numbers of individual people's quotes criticizing the nominal subject, while expending little or no effort mentioning that the criticism comes from a small fraction of people. That small fraction thus gets a soapbox that is far larger than reality
575:
If an article about a famous journalist mostly describes a conspiracy article he once wrote, the reader will leave the article with the false impression that the journalist's career is mostly about that conspiracy theory, and possibly that he is a vocal advocate of the theory (which can cause
602:
If an article is mainly on a criticism of a person or a topic, critical sources must keep focus on the scope of the article. This type of coatrack can occur when an editor tries to discredit a person or a controversial topic rather than keeping focus on the aim and scope of the article (see
375:
way that connects the object and the subject together. The point of this example is that any further added content must be linked back to the original subject; in this fictional example, relevant content was added about the subject Amanda
Portemanteau, but there is no text describing this.
3559:
1599:
593:
An article might have a disproportionately large "criticism" section, giving the impression that the nominal subject is hotly contested by many people, when in fact the criticism is merely selected opinions. This, too, gives the reader a false impression about reality,
786:
An article with a title that can have several meanings, or a term that is used differently in different fields of study, is not a coatrack if it only covers one definition. In this case, the article should be properly framed by beginning with "{In the field of X}
2760:
161:
of the subject. In the extreme case, the nominal subject gets hidden behind the sheer volume of the bias subject(s). Thus the article, although superficially true, leaves the reader with a thoroughly incorrect understanding of the nominal subject. However, this
2164:
458:
Knowledge (XXG) policy specifically prohibits articles whose primary purpose is to disparage a particular person or topic. Articles about a particular person or topic should not primarily consist of criticisms of that person or topic. For example:
211:
Below are simplified sketches of some common types of coatracks in articles. (Of course, Knowledge (XXG) policies disallow texts like "a terrible general", but a "politically correct" way to say so would make examples much longer, up to the
519:
This sort of case begins with facts about the main topic (perhaps a type of flea which is specific to wolves), then launches into more sub-topics (still dealing with fleas, but on a much broader scale) about which the writer has prepared
1629:
3446:
334:"coats" on this coatrack, leading to a biased, slanted article. Since the example here is linked to a person of high notability, the statements most likely will be called into question and/or deleted on the spot without discussion.
2895:
708:
Responding to a coatrack article depends on the nature of the article. If the article discusses some second subject more than the subject in the title, and it's otherwise a good article, often the easiest solution is to simply
3326:
2498:
2855:
4213:
2664:
2259:
3699:
1966:
3639:
3386:
3007:
1644:
3709:
441:
It has been reported that halibuts may be evil invading robots from the planet Ko-trak. I shall now take this opportunity to give you a long lecture on extraterrestrial robots: … (Conspiracy
Theories to follow).
3451:
1311:
3975:
3970:
3261:
1064:
1059:
681:. Instead of finding a balanced set of information about the subject (positive and negative), a coatrack goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias. As such, fact picking is a breach of
397:
bias (expounding on and singing the praises and all the positives about
Religion Y, never mind the negatives) totally goes off the deep-end and leaves the rest of Mr. Jim W. Hales's Personal Life in the dust.
362:
Amanda
Portemanteau is a journalist. One day she wrote an article about Conspiracy Theory X. The main points of Conspiracy Theory X are as follows... followed by paragraph after paragraph about the conspiracy
3764:
2064:
231:
that unifies all of these examples under one general topic, then that can be appropriate. And if the examples include both good and bad, or favorable critiques as well as negative criticism, that can be
3749:
367:
In this example, the topic seems to be a journalist named Amanda
Portemanteau. She also appears to have written one news article about Conspiracy Theory X. Suppose that the conspiracy theory was about
239:
But if editors have just strung together a lot of things that might seem related but are not linked together by references, and then present these individual article sections as Bad Things, the act of
3499:
2039:
203:
becomes a coatrack, it is a problem that requires immediate corrective action. Items may be true and sourced, but if a biography of a living person is essentially a coatrack, it needs to be fixed.
2094:
1791:
4275:
3769:
3176:
2362:
1816:
1739:
1321:
1941:
1371:
1361:
3216:
3196:
2159:
2129:
568:
to one particular topic within the scope of the article creates an article that, as a whole, is less than truthful. When confronted with a potential coatrack article, an editor ought to ask:
1441:
628:
For example: in Source 1, Alice says something related to Topic A. In Source 2, Bob says that Alice is a bad person. Source 2 should not be used to criticize Alice in an article on Topic A.
2453:
2179:
1456:
1396:
1529:
3914:
1861:
3221:
407:
Dr. Fronkensteen is a doctor known for his extensive research pioneering wongo juice as a cancer cure ... (Article then glosses over normal biographical details, except when useful as
4198:
3301:
3256:
3166:
3116:
2382:
2109:
2084:
977:
474:
4023:
3809:
2099:
1734:
1719:
1431:
528:") in an attempt to hide the coatracking. If the excess content is accurate and well-sourced, it may be appropriate to move it to a more relevant article (in this example, maybe "
3136:
1699:
3291:
3206:
2322:
2174:
2079:
1694:
1654:
1509:
3919:
3012:
2925:
2523:
2264:
2089:
2014:
1749:
1724:
1649:
1261:
1220:
2900:
2845:
2830:
3346:
3296:
3151:
2443:
1781:
1664:
1544:
2583:
1961:
3879:
2508:
2254:
1991:
1916:
1486:
2563:
653:
A biased bowl of exclusively red cherries, which in this case excludes the dark purple cherries. This is similar to how the coatrack is being obscured by the clothing.
3774:
3426:
3271:
3191:
2860:
2609:
2538:
2392:
1689:
992:
4218:
4193:
4183:
3819:
3376:
2074:
1951:
1841:
1744:
1729:
1956:
1331:
923:
3361:
3331:
3141:
2890:
2885:
2422:
1871:
1826:
1756:
4069:
3899:
2578:
815:
Material that is supported by a reliable, published source whose topic is directly related to the topic of the article, is not using the article as a coatrack.
4280:
4249:
3674:
2119:
1494:
1208:
967:
779:. An article that presents factual information (including criticism) about a discredited scientific theory is also not a coatrack; relevant guidelines are at
700:
Even though the facts may be true as such, the proportional volume of the hand-picked facts drowns other information, giving a false impression to the reader.
3759:
1476:
3629:
3504:
1524:
3391:
3106:
2503:
2189:
1971:
1801:
1714:
1316:
944:
2249:
1466:
848:
3980:
3281:
3241:
2955:
2568:
2488:
2004:
1906:
1836:
1624:
1054:
876:
3869:
3441:
2624:
3121:
2558:
2304:
1796:
1336:
581:
330:? If so, can this be sourced?). The rest of the paragraphs have little to do with XYZ – the main Article – itself and continue to "hang" other negative
2920:
2865:
2835:
1306:
3589:
3509:
2372:
735:
Editors are not required to fill out the article so that more time is spent on non-biased matters in order to keep biased content. Instead, editors
3904:
3874:
3664:
3644:
3201:
2870:
2825:
2820:
2629:
2513:
2417:
2154:
1866:
1811:
1766:
1704:
1674:
1579:
1569:
1341:
1028:
615:, unacceptable material would include sources which focus too much on individuals. In articles which focus on criticism of an individual, such as
243:
these article sections to the parent article to associate the subject with them makes the parent article a coatrack. It's undesirable because it's
3684:
3186:
1786:
1471:
227:
An article about some phenomenon might include multiple subsections, each of which is supposedly an example of the article's subject. If there is
188:, or they can accidentally evolve through excessive focus on one or more aspects of the subject. In either case, the article should be corrected.
3839:
3714:
3564:
3286:
2982:
2790:
2669:
2518:
2114:
1936:
1886:
1426:
1033:
3854:
3794:
3719:
3211:
3181:
3101:
2930:
1901:
1891:
1856:
1669:
1574:
1296:
3894:
327:
3864:
3729:
3704:
3584:
3356:
2815:
2724:
2684:
2588:
2244:
2229:
2104:
1709:
1559:
1514:
1446:
1406:
1256:
4090:
949:
368:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
4006:
3834:
3814:
3739:
3734:
3306:
2795:
2438:
2347:
2209:
2144:
2054:
2044:
2019:
1981:
1976:
1911:
1679:
1639:
1584:
301:; George Washington was a terrible general and a lousy President, he owned slaves, lied about chopping down a cherry tree, … (followed by
51:
2292:
2910:
2573:
2402:
4028:
3431:
2719:
2704:
2619:
2194:
1539:
1286:
1281:
1023:
916:
3824:
3634:
3604:
3569:
3396:
2875:
2785:
2699:
2342:
2312:
2184:
1366:
1171:(in French). Vol. 17 (1 ed.). France: André le Breton, Michel-Antoine David, Laurent Durand, and Antoine-Claude Briasson. pp. 630–635
717:
did not discuss the law at all, and instead discussed how doctors declare a person as dead. In this case, the article was renamed to
1461:
4168:
3990:
3859:
3689:
3416:
3316:
3126:
3002:
2915:
2880:
2805:
2775:
2639:
2473:
2463:
2412:
2239:
2224:
2149:
1921:
1771:
1614:
1401:
1346:
1271:
1201:
1069:
1007:
633:
In short, if something distracts too much from the focus, scope, and aim of the Knowledge (XXG) article, it is probably a coatrack.
2905:
2800:
2765:
1594:
3965:
3779:
3694:
3456:
3401:
3321:
3276:
3231:
3226:
3111:
2945:
2740:
2448:
2269:
2049:
2024:
1931:
1926:
1806:
1436:
1351:
1266:
1166:
1074:
3960:
3156:
2840:
1079:
4016:
3789:
3669:
3549:
3524:
3351:
2987:
2950:
2940:
2543:
2483:
2337:
1634:
1609:
1564:
1416:
1391:
1381:
1356:
871:
421:
732:
is borderline, and if there is little chance the article can be salvaged, deletion of the entire article may be appropriate.
728:
and trim off excessive biased content while adding more balanced content cited from reliable sources. In extreme cases, when
322:
fact is likely to cause a strong emotional reaction in the reader) and statements that are spurious, uncited, and unsourced (
4223:
4203:
4178:
3909:
3724:
3609:
3534:
3421:
3341:
3311:
2780:
2750:
2714:
2604:
2468:
2387:
2169:
2034:
1999:
1846:
1604:
1554:
1549:
1276:
4244:
2332:
1519:
909:
4011:
3599:
3594:
3554:
3539:
3529:
3406:
3251:
2659:
2649:
2548:
2357:
2219:
1504:
1376:
891:
4055:
4270:
4228:
4100:
4062:
3985:
3942:
3754:
3619:
3519:
3479:
3436:
3381:
3371:
3366:
3336:
3171:
3146:
3131:
3086:
2972:
2694:
2634:
2367:
2204:
2139:
2134:
2124:
1876:
1499:
1251:
1233:
1194:
1098:
1049:
987:
881:
713:
so that its title matches its content. Then, re-format the article as required. As an example, the article once titled
541:
840:
718:
3659:
3614:
2977:
2850:
2810:
2614:
2352:
1881:
1326:
259:
for criticism of the subject. The same problem also arises when a coatrack is loaded with coats that present only a
181:
makes it clear that "coatrack" articles are a particularly pressing problem where living individuals are concerned.
479:
An especially nasty type of article also violates multiple taboos and Knowledge (XXG) rules, like a poorly written
3889:
3829:
3804:
3744:
3654:
3649:
3236:
3053:
2755:
2745:
2533:
2528:
1946:
1619:
1589:
1421:
997:
982:
896:
886:
771:. A reader is not misled by the focus on the moon trip. In some cases where an event in a person's life is the
4173:
4129:
3849:
3799:
3579:
3574:
3544:
3033:
2997:
2992:
2689:
2493:
2327:
1851:
1684:
1659:
1534:
1162:
677:
3844:
3411:
3266:
2679:
2674:
2458:
2377:
2234:
1896:
604:
453:
1301:
4156:
4095:
3784:
3246:
3043:
2967:
1831:
1776:
1761:
1291:
768:
643:
346:
393:
bias (negative, unsourced comments, facts presented in a non-neutral fashion/light), this Coatrack has an
4151:
3884:
3494:
3063:
3038:
3017:
2397:
2029:
1821:
1386:
1002:
55:
616:
608:
584:). The coverage of the journalist in Knowledge (XXG) needs to reflect the coverage of the journalist in
4123:
3058:
3048:
2962:
2935:
2199:
1451:
749:
658:
620:
547:
272:
65:
524:
information and may make occasional tangential reconnections (hopefully) to the original main topic ("
823:
The use of coatracks, though not the term, dates to the influential 18th century French encyclopedia
612:
4188:
4105:
3514:
2478:
2317:
2214:
1411:
847:
around biographies of prominent figures would embed social histories in their biographies; e.g. the
649:
408:
4117:
2654:
2644:
2553:
1217:
959:
780:
196:
167:
43:
1131:
1120:
166:
largely critical articles about subjects that actually are discredited; see the tips laid out at
4162:
4146:
2407:
1154:
776:
565:
248:
244:
213:
146:
141:
855:
4111:
3679:
3624:
2770:
2709:
2009:
725:
710:
682:
233:
192:
133:
844:
686:
200:
178:
174:
805:
585:
256:
228:
17:
859:
729:
106:
Articles about one thing shouldn't be loaded up with unrelated things to make a point.
4264:
3560:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
1158:
901:
797:
775:
notable thing about them, it may make sense to only have an article on the event and
691:
in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources
475:
Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions § Notability is inherited
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
836:
825:
809:
801:
564:
The contents of this type of coatrack article can be superficially true. However,
480:
724:
If the coatracked content consists of bias and opinion, the best response is to
714:
642:"WP:CHERRY" redirects here. For the picking of specific areas of sources, see
570:
what impression does a reader unfamiliar with the topic get from this article?
504:
464:
Here is some more information about this incident… (and so on, and so forth).
1168:
Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers
2761:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
136:
about something else. The nominal subject is functioning as an overloaded
353:
article and don't provide more context than what would be really needed.
137:
1186:
430:
112:
4047:
184:
Coatrack articles can be created purposefully to promote a particular
2165:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
3447:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
950:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
111:
1630:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
529:
525:
433:
is a species of fish. Brief factual information about halibuts.
389:
This is "All About George" but in reverse, instead of having an
185:
128:, and instead gives more attention to one or more connected but
4051:
3940:
3477:
3084:
2290:
1231:
1190:
905:
342:
explains why someone might care that George Washington did so.
800:
could explain that the term arose from the biblical character
92:
29:
830:
where they were used to hide biographies. The editors of the
140:, obscured by too many "coats" – additional topics that were
3327:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2499:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1967:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
411:, and instead focuses on material relating to wongo juice.)
2856:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2665:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2260:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1600:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1312:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
195:
policy - in particular, the requirement that articles be
3700:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
170:(Knowledge (XXG):Fringe theories) for more information.
116:
This coat rack is partially obscured by a hat and coats.
3710:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
843:, his birthplace. Conversely, encyclopedias which were
757:
666:
555:
280:
80:
73:
4276:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
3262:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2896:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
3008:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1645:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
124:
is a Knowledge (XXG) article that gets away from its
3452:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
4237:
4139:
4083:
3999:
3953:
3026:
2733:
2597:
2431:
2303:
2063:
1990:
1485:
1244:
1042:
1016:
958:
937:
4214:How to apply WP:NOR's "Directly related" principle
3971:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3750:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1372:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1060:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
1942:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1234:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
4250:Category:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
2095:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2040:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1792:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3770:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3500:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3177:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1817:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1322:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
796:require. An article on the anatomical feature
3197:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2363:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2130:Counting and sorting are not original research
877:Knowledge (XXG):Masking the lack of notability
297:George Washington visited/slept/worked/ate at
255:the "bad" things, about that topic; a sort of
191:Coatrack articles run against the fundamental
4063:
4024:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3640:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2160:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1442:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1202:
917:
858:" of European History under the biography of
675:Often the main tool of a coatrack article is
8:
4114:(verifiability does not guarantee inclusion)
3690:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2454:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2180:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1457:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1432:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1397:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
854:presents all information on the post-Roman "
424:used to connect otherwise unrelated issues.
3222:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
385:describing the positive side of Religion Y)
251:on which to hang all the "bad" things, and
4199:Notability is not relevance or reliability
4070:
4056:
4048:
3950:
3937:
3915:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3487:
3474:
3302:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3257:News coverage does not decrease notability
3167:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3117:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3094:
3081:
2300:
2287:
2110:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2085:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1241:
1228:
1209:
1195:
1187:
978:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
924:
910:
902:
740:and are also good candidates for removal.
379:Some Famous Dude Did It so It Must Be Good
132:Typically, the article has been edited to
3810:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2100:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1720:Identifying and using independent sources
3976:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3137:Big events make key participants notable
2584:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1962:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1700:Formatting bilateral relations templates
1065:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
792:merged or split through normal editing.
777:not have an article on the person at all
648:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
4281:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
3387:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3292:Notability is not a level playing field
3207:How the presumption of notability works
2323:Contributing to complicated discussions
2175:How the presumption of notability works
1695:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1510:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
1146:
338:George Washington visited", because it
289:In an article whose article subject is
3920:You should not write meaningless lists
3217:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2524:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2265:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2090:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1655:Don't hope the house will build itself
1262:All Five Pillars are equally important
305:of content, all about George and with
3347:One sentence does not an article make
3297:Notability is not a matter of opinion
3013:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2926:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2444:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2383:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2015:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1957:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1782:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1545:An unfinished house is a real problem
1530:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1332:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
808:, or an outline of the full story of
7:
3900:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3880:Things that should not be surprising
3575:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2901:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2846:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2831:Don't call people by their real name
2579:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2509:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1917:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
596:even though the details may be true.
357:A Journalist Mentioned It in Passing
3775:No one cares about your garage band
3760:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3427:What is and is not routine coverage
3272:No one cares about your garage band
3192:Existence does not prove notability
2610:Assume the assumption of good faith
2539:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2393:Relationships with academic editors
2255:Why was the page I created deleted?
2250:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1690:Featured articles may have problems
1477:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
159:fails to give a truthful impression
4219:Meaningful examples in pop culture
4194:Indirect relevance is sometimes OK
4184:What claims of relevance are false
3820:Please do not murder the newcomers
3377:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2861:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2075:Adjectives in your recommendations
1952:What an article should not include
1842:The problem with elegant variation
1650:Don't get hung up on minor details
1467:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
932:Handling miscellaneous information
872:Knowledge (XXG):Be neutral in form
249:create a separate coatrack article
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
3870:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3442:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3142:Businesses with a single location
2423:You have a right to remain silent
1872:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1827:Potential, not just current state
1757:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
175:biographies of living individuals
2891:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2886:Don't ignore community consensus
2120:Confusing arguments mean nothing
1093:
1092:
968:But for Napoleon, it was Tuesday
892:Knowledge (XXG):No trojan horses
96:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
3392:Sources must be out-of-universe
3107:All high schools can be notable
2504:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2190:Identifying blatant advertising
1972:The world will not end tomorrow
1802:Not everything needs a template
1715:How to write a featured article
1317:Editors will sometimes be wrong
882:Knowledge (XXG):Fringe theories
402:The Mono-Topic Fringe Biography
173:Enforcement of the policies on
153:Problems with coatrack articles
3981:Avoid writing redundant essays
3630:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3505:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3332:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
3282:Notability cannot be purchased
3242:Masking the lack of notability
2005:Copyediting reception sections
1907:Temporary versions of articles
1837:Principle of Some Astonishment
1625:Creating controversial content
1525:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1472:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1055:Avoid writing redundant essays
580:problems if the journalist is
542:Knowledge (XXG):But it's true!
1:
4245:Template:Handling miscellanea
4007:About policies and guidelines
3122:Articles with a single source
2746:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2569:Two wrongs don't make a right
2559:The rules of polite discourse
2489:It's not the end of the world
1797:Not everything needs a navbox
1665:Don't "teach the controversy"
1337:Here to build an encyclopedia
897:Knowledge (XXG):Cherrypicking
887:Knowledge (XXG):Stay on topic
3895:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3590:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3510:Alternatives to edit warring
2373:Maintaining a friendly space
993:"In popular culture" content
345:Remember that, according to
201:biography of a living person
4091:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
3875:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3665:Editing under the influence
3202:Google searches and numbers
2921:Don't template the regulars
2836:Don't call the kettle black
2630:Be excellent to one another
2514:Revert notification opt-out
2418:We are all Wikipedians here
1867:Put a little effort into it
1812:Obtain peer review comments
1767:Introduction to structurism
1705:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1675:Editors are not mindreaders
1580:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1570:Beef up that first revision
1342:Leave it to the experienced
1307:Don't search for objections
841:Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth
839:was hidden in the entry on
719:Medical definition of death
535:
454:Knowledge (XXG):Attack page
369:why chickens cross the road
347:transparency of piped links
328:chopping down a cherry tree
179:what Knowledge (XXG) is not
4297:
3905:Why not create an account?
3840:Requirements for adminship
3715:How to vandalize correctly
3685:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3645:Don't delete the main page
3565:Avoid using preview button
3287:Notability comparison test
2871:Don't fight fire with fire
2866:Don't eat the troll's food
2826:Don't call a spade a spade
2821:Don't bludgeon the process
2670:Encourage full discussions
2519:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2155:Don't attack the nominator
2115:But there must be sources!
1937:Try not to leave it a stub
1887:Source your plot summaries
747:
704:What to do about coatracks
656:
641:
545:
539:
472:
451:
270:
149:or biased material there.
63:
4132:(list selection criteria)
3949:
3936:
3855:Sarcasm is really helpful
3795:Notability is not eternal
3720:How to win a citation war
3490:
3486:
3473:
3182:Every snowflake is unique
3102:Advanced source searching
3097:
3093:
3080:
2983:No, you can't have a pony
2931:Do not insult the vandals
2791:Don't be high-maintenance
2348:Encouraging the newcomers
2299:
2286:
1892:Specialized-style fallacy
1857:Pruning article revisions
1685:Endorsements (commercial)
1670:Editing on mobile devices
1575:Blind men and an elephant
1550:Articles have a half-life
1297:Dissent is not disloyalty
1267:Avoid vague introductions
1240:
1227:
1163:d'Alembert, Jean-Baptiste
1088:
804:; a regurgitation of the
303:paragraph after paragraph
3865:The Night Before Wikimas
3730:Ignore every single rule
3705:How to get away with UPE
3585:Before they were notable
3357:Overreliance upon Google
3152:Common sourcing mistakes
2725:Settle the process first
2685:Imagine others complexly
2589:Writing for the opponent
2564:There is no common sense
2245:Unopposed AFD discussion
2230:Relisting can be abusive
2105:Avoid repeated arguments
1710:Give an article a chance
1560:Avoid mission statements
1520:Advanced text formatting
1515:Advanced article editing
1462:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1447:The rules are principles
1407:Product, process, policy
1257:Articles must be written
812:would not be necessary.
293:(a location in America)
104:This page in a nutshell:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Coatrack
4084:Policies and guidelines
4000:Policies and guidelines
3835:Requests for medication
3815:Please bite the newbies
3740:Mess with the templates
3307:Notability means impact
2841:Don't call things cruft
2816:Don't be the Fun Police
2625:Avoid the word "vandal"
2574:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2439:A thank you never hurts
2210:Liar liar pants on fire
2145:Deletion is not cleanup
2055:Writing better articles
2045:Write the article first
2020:Gender-neutral language
1992:Writing article content
1982:Writing better articles
1977:Write the article first
1912:Tertiary-source fallacy
1680:Encourage the newcomers
1640:Dictionaries as sources
1585:Build content to endure
938:Policies and guidelines
851:Encyclopædia Britannica
685:by a failure to assign
515:there are in the world)
4271:Knowledge (XXG) essays
4029:Policy writing is hard
3735:Is that even an essay?
3432:What notability is not
3187:Existence ≠Notability
2796:Don't be inconsiderate
2720:Read before commenting
2705:Mind your own business
2620:Avoid personal remarks
2195:Identifying test edits
1540:A navbox on every page
1495:100K featured articles
1292:Concede lost arguments
1287:Competence is required
1218:Knowledge (XXG) essays
1080:Knowledge (XXG) essays
744:What is not a coatrack
654:
517:
490:
466:
445:
413:
387:
365:
319:
117:
3825:Pledge of Tranquility
3570:Avoid using wikilinks
3397:Subjective importance
2911:Don't spite your face
2700:Keep it down to earth
2464:Beware of the tigers!
2403:Too long; didn't read
2343:Edit at your own pace
2313:Accepting other users
2080:AfD is not a war zone
1427:There is no seniority
1367:Neutrality of sources
683:neutral point of view
652:
617:Criticism of Muhammad
609:Criticism of religion
496:
485:
473:Further information:
461:
452:Further information:
426:
405:
382:
360:
295:
263:view of the subject.
193:neutral point of view
115:
54:, as it has not been
4169:Relevance of content
3991:Quote your own essay
3860:Sausages for tasting
3635:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3605:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3417:Vanispamcruftisement
3317:Notability sub-pages
3127:Avoid template creep
3087:Essays on notability
3003:There are no oracles
2786:Don't be a WikiBigot
2640:Call a spade a spade
2413:Unblock perspectives
2240:The Heymann Standard
2225:Overzealous deletion
2185:I just don't like it
1922:There is no deadline
1787:"Murder of" articles
1615:Common-style fallacy
1487:Article construction
1402:Process is important
1347:Levels of competence
1272:Be a reliable source
1070:Quote your own essay
1008:Relevance of content
613:Criticism of atheism
416:The Criticism Gambit
130:tangential subjects.
4078:Relevance and scope
3780:No one really cares
3695:Go ahead, vandalize
3457:Two prongs of merit
3402:Third-party sources
3322:Notabilitymandering
3277:No one really cares
3232:Inherent notability
3227:Independent sources
3112:Alternative outlets
2946:Nationalist editing
2916:Don't take the bait
2881:Don't help too much
2806:Don't be prejudiced
2776:Don't be an ostrich
2741:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2474:Deletion as revenge
2449:Advice for hotheads
2270:No Encyclopedic Use
2150:Does deletion help?
2050:Writing about women
1932:The deadline is now
1927:There is a deadline
1807:Nothing is in stone
1437:Tendentious editing
1352:Levels of consensus
607:). For example, in
469:The Yo Mama Article
409:appeal to authority
157:A coatrack article
4120:(levels of detail)
3790:No sorcery threats
3670:Embrace Stop Signs
3550:Assume good wraith
3525:Anti-Wikipedianism
3362:Perennial websites
3352:Other stuff exists
2988:Passive aggression
2951:No angry mastodons
2941:Hate is disruptive
2801:Don't be obnoxious
2766:Don't be a fanatic
2544:Most ideas are bad
2484:Forgive and forget
2293:Essays on civility
1902:Run an edit-a-thon
1635:Deprecated sources
1610:Citation underkill
1595:Chesterton's fence
1565:Be neutral in form
1417:Reasonability rule
1382:Oversimplification
1357:Most ideas are bad
711:rename the article
655:
448:The Attack Article
236:and encyclopedic.
222:Something Very Bad
118:
4258:
4257:
4209:Coatrack articles
4179:Relevance emerges
4159:(content removal)
4045:
4044:
4041:
4040:
4037:
4036:
3932:
3931:
3928:
3927:
3910:Yes legal threats
3725:Ignore all essays
3610:Complete bollocks
3535:Asshole John rule
3469:
3468:
3465:
3464:
3422:What BLP1E is not
3342:One hundred words
3312:Notability points
3076:
3075:
3072:
3071:
2876:Don't give a fuck
2751:Civil POV pushing
2715:Mutual withdrawal
2605:Assume good faith
2469:Civility warnings
2388:Please say please
2338:Editors' pronouns
2282:
2281:
2278:
2277:
2170:Follow the leader
2035:Use our own words
2000:Avoid thread mode
1847:Pro and con lists
1605:Citation overkill
1555:Autosizing images
1277:Civil POV pushing
1108:
1107:
973:Coatrack articles
856:Migrations Period
422:criticism section
281:WP:ALLABOUTGEORGE
245:unsourced overall
207:Typical coatracks
110:
109:
91:
90:
16:(Redirected from
4288:
4072:
4065:
4058:
4049:
3986:Finding an essay
3951:
3938:
3600:Butterfly effect
3595:Boston Tea Party
3555:Assume stupidity
3540:Assume bad faith
3530:Articlecountitis
3488:
3475:
3407:Trivial mentions
3252:Minimum coverage
3095:
3082:
2781:Don't be ashamed
2660:Discussing cruft
2650:Deny recognition
2549:Nothing is clear
2358:Expect no thanks
2301:
2288:
2220:Nothing is clear
2067:deleting content
1750:Tertiary sources
1505:Acronym overkill
1377:The one question
1242:
1229:
1222:
1211:
1204:
1197:
1188:
1181:
1180:
1178:
1176:
1151:
1136:
1130:
1125:
1119:
1096:
1095:
926:
919:
912:
903:
760:
669:
586:reliable sources
558:
536:"But it's true!"
283:
267:All About George
220:Compilations of
164:does not include
142:grouped together
122:coatrack article
100:
99:
93:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
4296:
4295:
4291:
4290:
4289:
4287:
4286:
4285:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4254:
4233:
4229:Content removal
4165:(stay on topic)
4135:
4130:WP:LISTCRITERIA
4126:(content split)
4101:Image relevance
4079:
4076:
4046:
4033:
3995:
3966:Value of essays
3945:
3924:
3755:Legal vandalism
3620:Counting juntas
3520:Anti-Wikipedian
3482:
3480:Humorous essays
3461:
3437:What to include
3382:Run-of-the-mill
3372:Read the source
3337:Offline sources
3132:Bare notability
3089:
3068:
3022:
2973:No Confederates
2771:Don't be a jerk
2729:
2695:Keep it concise
2635:Beyond civility
2593:
2427:
2368:How to be civil
2333:Don't retaliate
2295:
2274:
2205:Keep it concise
2140:Delete the junk
2135:Delete or merge
2125:Content removal
2059:
2025:Myth vs fiction
1986:
1877:Robotic editing
1740:Science sources
1735:Primary sources
1725:History sources
1500:Abandoned stubs
1481:
1252:Article content
1236:
1223:
1215:
1185:
1184:
1174:
1172:
1155:Encyclopédistes
1153:
1152:
1148:
1143:
1134:
1128:
1123:
1117:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1084:
1075:Value of essays
1050:Essay directory
1038:
1029:Popular culture
1012:
988:Handling trivia
954:
945:Trivia sections
933:
930:
868:
821:
806:Book of Genesis
764:
763:
756:
752:
746:
706:
673:
672:
665:
661:
647:
640:
566:undue attention
562:
561:
554:
550:
544:
538:
495:
477:
471:
456:
450:
444:
439:
418:
404:
381:
359:
287:
286:
279:
275:
269:
225:
209:
155:
126:nominal subject
97:
87:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4294:
4292:
4284:
4283:
4278:
4273:
4263:
4262:
4256:
4255:
4253:
4252:
4247:
4241:
4239:
4235:
4234:
4232:
4231:
4226:
4221:
4216:
4211:
4206:
4201:
4196:
4191:
4186:
4181:
4176:
4171:
4166:
4160:
4154:
4149:
4143:
4141:
4137:
4136:
4134:
4133:
4127:
4121:
4115:
4109:
4103:
4098:
4093:
4087:
4085:
4081:
4080:
4077:
4075:
4074:
4067:
4060:
4052:
4043:
4042:
4039:
4038:
4035:
4034:
4032:
4031:
4026:
4021:
4020:
4019:
4014:
4003:
4001:
3997:
3996:
3994:
3993:
3988:
3983:
3978:
3973:
3968:
3963:
3957:
3955:
3947:
3946:
3941:
3934:
3933:
3930:
3929:
3926:
3925:
3923:
3922:
3917:
3912:
3907:
3902:
3897:
3892:
3887:
3882:
3877:
3872:
3867:
3862:
3857:
3852:
3847:
3842:
3837:
3832:
3827:
3822:
3817:
3812:
3807:
3802:
3797:
3792:
3787:
3782:
3777:
3772:
3767:
3762:
3757:
3752:
3747:
3742:
3737:
3732:
3727:
3722:
3717:
3712:
3707:
3702:
3697:
3692:
3687:
3682:
3677:
3672:
3667:
3662:
3660:Editsummarisis
3657:
3652:
3647:
3642:
3637:
3632:
3627:
3622:
3617:
3615:Counting forks
3612:
3607:
3602:
3597:
3592:
3587:
3582:
3577:
3572:
3567:
3562:
3557:
3552:
3547:
3542:
3537:
3532:
3527:
3522:
3517:
3512:
3507:
3502:
3497:
3491:
3484:
3483:
3478:
3471:
3470:
3467:
3466:
3463:
3462:
3460:
3459:
3454:
3449:
3444:
3439:
3434:
3429:
3424:
3419:
3414:
3409:
3404:
3399:
3394:
3389:
3384:
3379:
3374:
3369:
3364:
3359:
3354:
3349:
3344:
3339:
3334:
3329:
3324:
3319:
3314:
3309:
3304:
3299:
3294:
3289:
3284:
3279:
3274:
3269:
3264:
3259:
3254:
3249:
3244:
3239:
3234:
3229:
3224:
3219:
3214:
3209:
3204:
3199:
3194:
3189:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3172:Don't cite GNG
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3149:
3147:But it's true!
3144:
3139:
3134:
3129:
3124:
3119:
3114:
3109:
3104:
3098:
3091:
3090:
3085:
3078:
3077:
3074:
3073:
3070:
3069:
3067:
3066:
3061:
3056:
3051:
3046:
3044:WikiHarassment
3041:
3036:
3030:
3028:
3024:
3023:
3021:
3020:
3015:
3010:
3005:
3000:
2995:
2990:
2985:
2980:
2978:No queerphobia
2975:
2970:
2965:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2737:
2735:
2731:
2730:
2728:
2727:
2722:
2717:
2712:
2707:
2702:
2697:
2692:
2687:
2682:
2677:
2672:
2667:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2617:
2615:Assume no clue
2612:
2607:
2601:
2599:
2595:
2594:
2592:
2591:
2586:
2581:
2576:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2501:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2481:
2476:
2471:
2466:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2441:
2435:
2433:
2429:
2428:
2426:
2425:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2400:
2395:
2390:
2385:
2380:
2375:
2370:
2365:
2360:
2355:
2353:Enjoy yourself
2350:
2345:
2340:
2335:
2330:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2309:
2307:
2297:
2296:
2291:
2284:
2283:
2280:
2279:
2276:
2275:
2273:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2182:
2177:
2172:
2167:
2162:
2157:
2152:
2147:
2142:
2137:
2132:
2127:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2092:
2087:
2082:
2077:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2061:
2060:
2058:
2057:
2052:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2032:
2027:
2022:
2017:
2012:
2007:
2002:
1996:
1994:
1988:
1987:
1985:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1882:Sham consensus
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1491:
1489:
1483:
1482:
1480:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1374:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1334:
1329:
1327:Explanationism
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1248:
1246:
1238:
1237:
1232:
1225:
1224:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1206:
1199:
1191:
1183:
1182:
1159:Diderot, Denis
1145:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1126:
1113:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1046:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1037:
1036:
1034:Trivia Cleanup
1031:
1026:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
964:
962:
956:
955:
953:
952:
947:
941:
939:
935:
934:
931:
929:
928:
921:
914:
906:
900:
899:
894:
889:
884:
879:
874:
867:
864:
860:Attila the Hun
820:
817:
762:
761:
753:
748:
745:
742:
705:
702:
689:to viewpoints
671:
670:
662:
657:
639:
636:
635:
634:
630:
629:
625:
624:
605:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
599:
598:
590:
589:
560:
559:
551:
546:
537:
534:
513:kinds of fleas
511:the different
494:
491:
470:
467:
449:
446:
438:
435:
427:
417:
414:
403:
400:
395:Ultra-Positive
391:Ultra-Negative
380:
377:
358:
355:
309:- if anything
285:
284:
276:
271:
268:
265:
224:
218:
208:
205:
154:
151:
108:
107:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4293:
4282:
4279:
4277:
4274:
4272:
4269:
4268:
4266:
4251:
4248:
4246:
4243:
4242:
4240:
4236:
4230:
4227:
4225:
4222:
4220:
4217:
4215:
4212:
4210:
4207:
4205:
4202:
4200:
4197:
4195:
4192:
4190:
4187:
4185:
4182:
4180:
4177:
4175:
4172:
4170:
4167:
4164:
4161:
4158:
4157:WP:IRRELEVANT
4155:
4153:
4150:
4148:
4145:
4144:
4142:
4138:
4131:
4128:
4125:
4122:
4119:
4116:
4113:
4110:
4107:
4104:
4102:
4099:
4097:
4094:
4092:
4089:
4088:
4086:
4082:
4073:
4068:
4066:
4061:
4059:
4054:
4053:
4050:
4030:
4027:
4025:
4022:
4018:
4015:
4013:
4010:
4009:
4008:
4005:
4004:
4002:
3998:
3992:
3989:
3987:
3984:
3982:
3979:
3977:
3974:
3972:
3969:
3967:
3964:
3962:
3959:
3958:
3956:
3952:
3948:
3944:
3939:
3935:
3921:
3918:
3916:
3913:
3911:
3908:
3906:
3903:
3901:
3898:
3896:
3893:
3891:
3890:Watchlistitis
3888:
3886:
3885:The WikiBible
3883:
3881:
3878:
3876:
3873:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3851:
3848:
3846:
3843:
3841:
3838:
3836:
3833:
3831:
3830:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3828:
3826:
3823:
3821:
3818:
3816:
3813:
3811:
3808:
3806:
3805:Play the game
3803:
3801:
3798:
3796:
3793:
3791:
3788:
3786:
3783:
3781:
3778:
3776:
3773:
3771:
3768:
3766:
3763:
3761:
3758:
3756:
3753:
3751:
3748:
3746:
3745:My local pond
3743:
3741:
3738:
3736:
3733:
3731:
3728:
3726:
3723:
3721:
3718:
3716:
3713:
3711:
3708:
3706:
3703:
3701:
3698:
3696:
3693:
3691:
3688:
3686:
3683:
3681:
3678:
3676:
3673:
3671:
3668:
3666:
3663:
3661:
3658:
3656:
3655:Edits Per Day
3653:
3651:
3650:Editcountitis
3648:
3646:
3643:
3641:
3638:
3636:
3633:
3631:
3628:
3626:
3623:
3621:
3618:
3616:
3613:
3611:
3608:
3606:
3603:
3601:
3598:
3596:
3593:
3591:
3588:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3576:
3573:
3571:
3568:
3566:
3563:
3561:
3558:
3556:
3553:
3551:
3548:
3546:
3543:
3541:
3538:
3536:
3533:
3531:
3528:
3526:
3523:
3521:
3518:
3516:
3513:
3511:
3508:
3506:
3503:
3501:
3498:
3496:
3493:
3492:
3489:
3485:
3481:
3476:
3472:
3458:
3455:
3453:
3450:
3448:
3445:
3443:
3440:
3438:
3435:
3433:
3430:
3428:
3425:
3423:
3420:
3418:
3415:
3413:
3410:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3373:
3370:
3368:
3365:
3363:
3360:
3358:
3355:
3353:
3350:
3348:
3345:
3343:
3340:
3338:
3335:
3333:
3330:
3328:
3325:
3323:
3320:
3318:
3315:
3313:
3310:
3308:
3305:
3303:
3300:
3298:
3295:
3293:
3290:
3288:
3285:
3283:
3280:
3278:
3275:
3273:
3270:
3268:
3265:
3263:
3260:
3258:
3255:
3253:
3250:
3248:
3245:
3243:
3240:
3238:
3237:Insignificant
3235:
3233:
3230:
3228:
3225:
3223:
3220:
3218:
3215:
3213:
3210:
3208:
3205:
3203:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3190:
3188:
3185:
3183:
3180:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3143:
3140:
3138:
3135:
3133:
3130:
3128:
3125:
3123:
3120:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3108:
3105:
3103:
3100:
3099:
3096:
3092:
3088:
3083:
3079:
3065:
3062:
3060:
3057:
3055:
3054:WikiLawyering
3052:
3050:
3047:
3045:
3042:
3040:
3037:
3035:
3032:
3031:
3029:
3027:WikiRelations
3025:
3019:
3016:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3006:
3004:
3001:
2999:
2996:
2994:
2991:
2989:
2986:
2984:
2981:
2979:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2966:
2964:
2961:
2957:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2851:Don't cry COI
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2811:Don't be rude
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2756:Cyberbullying
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2738:
2736:
2732:
2726:
2723:
2721:
2718:
2716:
2713:
2711:
2708:
2706:
2703:
2701:
2698:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2688:
2686:
2683:
2681:
2678:
2676:
2673:
2671:
2668:
2666:
2663:
2661:
2658:
2656:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2638:
2636:
2633:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2618:
2616:
2613:
2611:
2608:
2606:
2603:
2602:
2600:
2596:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2580:
2577:
2575:
2572:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2534:The last word
2532:
2530:
2529:The grey zone
2527:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2500:
2497:
2495:
2492:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2482:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2472:
2470:
2467:
2465:
2462:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2450:
2447:
2445:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2436:
2434:
2430:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2389:
2386:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2374:
2371:
2369:
2366:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2310:
2308:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2285:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2173:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2151:
2148:
2146:
2143:
2141:
2138:
2136:
2133:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2123:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2106:
2103:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2083:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2072:
2070:
2068:
2062:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2008:
2006:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1997:
1995:
1993:
1989:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1947:Walled garden
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1772:Mine a source
1770:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1620:Concept cloud
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1590:Cherrypicking
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1508:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1490:
1488:
1484:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1422:Systemic bias
1420:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1226:
1219:
1212:
1207:
1205:
1200:
1198:
1193:
1192:
1189:
1170:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1150:
1147:
1140:
1133:
1127:
1122:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1101:
1100:
1091:
1090:
1087:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1041:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
998:Insignificant
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
983:Example cruft
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
965:
963:
961:
957:
951:
948:
946:
943:
942:
940:
936:
927:
922:
920:
915:
913:
908:
907:
904:
898:
895:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
869:
865:
863:
861:
857:
853:
852:
846:
842:
838:
833:
829:
827:
818:
816:
813:
811:
807:
803:
799:
793:
790:
784:
782:
778:
774:
770:
759:
755:
754:
751:
743:
741:
738:
733:
731:
727:
722:
720:
716:
712:
703:
701:
698:
694:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:
668:
664:
663:
660:
651:
645:
644:WP:CHERRYPICK
637:
632:
631:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
601:
600:
597:
592:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
573:
572:
571:
567:
557:
553:
552:
549:
543:
533:
531:
527:
523:
516:
514:
510:
506:
501:
498:The wolf, or
492:
489:
484:
482:
476:
468:
465:
460:
455:
447:
443:
436:
434:
432:
425:
423:
415:
412:
410:
401:
399:
396:
392:
386:
378:
376:
372:
370:
364:
356:
354:
352:
348:
343:
341:
335:
333:
329:
326:he lie about
325:
318:
316:
313:- to do with
312:
308:
304:
300:
294:
292:
282:
278:
277:
274:
266:
264:
262:
258:
257:walled garden
254:
250:
246:
242:
237:
235:
230:
229:good sourcing
223:
219:
217:
215:
206:
204:
202:
198:
194:
189:
187:
182:
180:
176:
171:
169:
165:
160:
152:
150:
148:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
114:
105:
102:
95:
94:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
4208:
4174:Out of scope
3954:About essays
3943:About essays
3850:Rouge editor
3800:Oops Defense
3580:Barnstaritis
3545:Assume faith
3367:Pokémon test
3212:High Schools
3161:
3034:WikiBullying
2998:Superhatting
2993:POV railroad
2690:Just drop it
2494:Nobody cares
2328:Divisiveness
1852:Printability
1745:Style guides
1535:Amnesia test
1392:Paraphrasing
1173:. Retrieved
1167:
1149:
1097:
1043:About essays
1017:WikiProjects
972:
850:
837:Isaac Newton
832:Encyclopedie
831:
826:Encyclopedie
824:
822:
814:
810:original sin
798:Adam's apple
794:
788:
785:
772:
765:
736:
734:
723:
707:
699:
695:
690:
678:fact picking
676:
674:
638:Fact picking
595:
577:
569:
563:
522:way too much
521:
518:
512:
508:
499:
497:
486:
481:Yo Mama joke
478:
462:
457:
440:
428:
419:
406:
394:
390:
388:
383:
373:
366:
361:
350:
344:
339:
336:
331:
323:
320:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
296:
290:
288:
260:
252:
240:
238:
226:
221:
210:
190:
183:
172:
163:
158:
156:
134:make a point
129:
125:
121:
119:
103:
41:
4124:WP:CONSPLIT
3961:Essay guide
3845:Rouge admin
3412:Video links
3267:No big loss
2956:just madmen
2906:Don't shout
2680:How to lose
2675:Get over it
2459:Be the glue
2378:Negotiation
2235:Relist bias
2065:Removing or
1897:Stub Makers
1730:Law sources
1660:Don't panic
715:legal death
621:WP:CSECTION
540:Main page:
500:Canis lupus
81:WP:COATRACK
42:This is an
4265:Categories
4106:WP:CONTEXT
4096:Notability
4017:Guidelines
3785:No, really
3765:LTTAUTMAOK
3247:Make stubs
2968:No racists
2710:Say "MOBY"
2432:Philosophy
2305:The basics
1862:Publicists
1832:Presentism
1777:Merge Test
1762:Inaccuracy
1245:Philosophy
1141:References
1024:Laundromat
769:notability
730:notability
697:warrants.
687:due weight
505:ad nauseam
503:birds... (
241:connecting
4224:Inclusion
4204:Exclusion
4152:Relevance
4118:WP:DETAIL
4108:(linking)
3495:Adminitis
3064:WikiPeace
3039:WikiCrime
3018:UPPERCASE
2398:Thank you
2030:Proseline
1822:Permastub
1387:Paradoxes
1302:Don't lie
1132:Off-topic
1121:Coat rack
1112:Templates
1003:Listcruft
781:WP:FRINGE
667:WP:CHERRY
437:Criticism
332:unsourced
261:favorable
216:threat.)
199:. When a
168:WP:FRINGE
66:Shortcuts
4238:See also
4163:WP:TOPIC
4012:Policies
3162:Coatrack
3059:WikiLove
3049:WikiHate
2963:No Nazis
2936:Griefing
2200:Immunity
1452:Trifecta
1282:Cohesion
1165:(eds.).
1157:(1751).
1099:Category
866:See also
845:centered
758:WP:WINAC
750:Shortcut
659:Shortcut
548:Shortcut
493:The Flea
273:Shortcut
197:balanced
138:coatrack
4189:Germane
4112:WP:ONUS
3675:Emerson
3515:ANI flu
2479:Failure
2318:Apology
2215:Nothing
1412:Purpose
819:History
789:topic Y
726:be bold
556:WP:BITR
431:halibut
363:theory.
351:current
340:briefly
234:neutral
74:WP:COAT
4140:Essays
3157:Clones
2734:Don'ts
2655:Desist
2645:Candor
2554:Reader
1175:8 July
960:Essays
507:about
311:at all
307:little
4147:Scope
2408:Truce
849:1911
582:alive
578:major
214:TL;DR
147:undue
44:essay
3680:Fart
3625:Crap
2010:Coup
1362:Need
1177:2013
802:Adam
773:only
611:and
532:").
530:Flea
526:Wolf
253:only
186:bias
177:and
2598:Dos
1221:(?)
737:may
509:all
324:did
315:XYZ
299:XYZ
291:XYZ
4267::
1161:;
1135:}}
1129:{{
1124:}}
1118:{{
862:.
783:.
721:.
693:.
623:).
488:).
483::
429:A
420:A
317:).
120:A
4071:e
4064:t
4057:v
1210:e
1203:t
1196:v
1179:.
925:e
918:t
911:v
828:,
646:.
588:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
