125:, contentious material is primarily that, if untrue, would clearly cause harm to the subject. There are plenty of facts or phrasings in editorial dispute that will not rise to the level of "Person X is a child molester" or "Person Y is addicted to controlled substances". The more tenuous and disputed the actual harm should be, the less weight a BLP argument holds, and the less community support there will tend to be for using extraordinary measures (ignoring
24:
84:
200:
policy for the removal of deficiently sourced "contentious" material, you may be blocked for edit warring. In borderline cases, this is unlikely, as long as the community can assume good faith that you sincerely thought you were following BLP's guidance. Take special care that all prongs of the BLP
169:
Notify users of the perceived issue and revert as appropriate. Explicitly state that a BLP issue applies when making a second or subsequent reversion. If an administrator, prefer page protection before blocking in most cases. If an editor inserts clearly inappropriate material in multiple places,
170:
blocking is entirely appropriate, but content disputes between editors familiar with (though perhaps having differing perspectives on) Knowledge (XXG) policies should rarely escalate to such a level. Just because you are making content comply with the BLP policy does not give you the right to be
217:
type of argument, which serves to alienate and bully other editors. Editors who cry "BLP!" in an inappropriate context should be warned that such stifles free discussion, and that they may be blocked for disruptive editing if invoking BLP as justification for an edit when BLP clearly did not
245:
Referencing this essay in a discussion may be taken as an easy method of dismissing another editor's concerns. Given the importance of the biographies of living persons policy, make an effort to understand the editor's view before responding with a link here.
137:
If someone has been convicted of multiple counts of murder and grand theft, it's not a BLP violation to mention those facts with appropriate sourcing, even though most editors would agree such facts reflect poorly on the subject. See
115:
Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be
182:
It's perfectly OK to block someone for unapologetically accusing a living person of manslaughter, even if you've recently edited that same article. It's not OK to block someone for citing
157:
without support should not be extended the same benefit of the doubt that might otherwise be extended to an editor in good standing who made a similar assertion that wasn't based on an
154:
213:
Because of the importance of BLP, and the extra sanctions administrators may invoke to enforce it, citing BLP in inappropriate circumstances can be seen as a
106:
to give an advantage to one side in an editing dispute. This essay attempts to outline good and bad uses of invoking BLP as a justification for an edit.
102:
policy includes a few exceptional editing powers that have been granted to prevent or reduce harm to living persons, these can be abused as some sort of
196:
If the community, via local or global consensus, disagrees with the claim that your reversions were justified by the BLP policy's exception to the
263:
153:... especially to edits introduced by other editors who have extensive and collaborative edit histories. For example, drive-by editors who
43:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
44:
201:
policy, as currently written, are met before invoking its powers to ignore 3RR: if an objectionable statement has a reliable source, it
258:
197:
139:
48:
228:
58:
184:
92:
Insisting that a non-BLP issue is in fact a BLP crisis is not helpful to building an encyclopedia.
32:
103:
171:
147:
126:
122:
99:
36:
158:
161:. In any case, the problematic material should be removed from the article immediately.
142:
for how to describe people notable for other things who have been convicted of a crime.
252:
214:
193:
If you think it's a valid BLP issue, raise the issue without threatening an edit war
51:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
210:
Invoking BLP in clearly inapplicable cases has a chilling effect on discussion
179:
Egregiousness must exceed involvement for involved administrator action.
129:
or summarily blocking an editor) to "enforce" such BLP considerations.
205:
be removed repeatedly without regard to the edit warring policy.
78:
18:
236:
66:
117:
removed immediately and without waiting for discussion
166:
Use the least disruptive means to solve the problem.
174:to someone who disagrees with you in good faith.
8:
110:"Contentious" should be narrowly construed
45:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
114:
7:
188:in a manner with which you disagree.
49:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
264:Knowledge (XXG) essays about BLP
82:
22:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1:
100:biographies of living persons
159:independent, reliable source
140:Knowledge (XXG):Crime labels
280:
226:
121:Looking at the history of
56:
155:assert sexual orientation
90:This page in a nutshell:
259:Knowledge (XXG) essays
47:, as it has not been
185:The Washington Post
148:Assuming Good Faith
118:
116:
96:
95:
77:
76:
271:
239:
86:
85:
79:
69:
26:
25:
19:
279:
278:
274:
273:
272:
270:
269:
268:
249:
248:
243:
242:
235:
231:
225:
223:Crying "CRYBLP"
134:Facts are facts
83:
73:
72:
65:
61:
53:
52:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
277:
275:
267:
266:
261:
251:
250:
241:
240:
232:
227:
224:
221:
220:
219:
211:
207:
206:
194:
190:
189:
180:
176:
175:
167:
163:
162:
151:
144:
143:
135:
131:
130:
111:
94:
93:
87:
75:
74:
71:
70:
62:
57:
54:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
276:
265:
262:
260:
257:
256:
254:
247:
238:
234:
233:
230:
222:
216:
212:
209:
208:
204:
199:
195:
192:
191:
187:
186:
181:
178:
177:
173:
168:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
145:
141:
136:
133:
132:
128:
124:
120:
112:
109:
108:
107:
105:
101:
91:
88:
81:
80:
68:
64:
63:
60:
55:
50:
46:
40:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
244:
237:WP:CRYCRYBLP
215:Godwin's law
202:
198:edit warring
183:
113:BLP states,
97:
89:
30:
31:This is an
253:Categories
104:trump card
98:While the
67:WP:CRYBLP
229:Shortcut
150:applies.
59:Shortcut
172:incivil
218:apply.
203:cannot
123:WP:BLP
37:WP:BLP
33:essay
127:3RR
35:on
255::
119:.
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.