Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/February 2023 - Knowledge

Source 📝

362:
is insufficient to detect too-close paraphrasing, copying from newspapers.com clippings (which Earwig cannot see), or content taken from offline sources. Content was often copied from sandbox to the article in one initial edit, which should be examined. Other diffs to examine are listed at the
504:
If you have access to an offline source, you may be asked during the GAR to place a significant enough quote from that source on article talk that all of the following can be evaluated: source-to-text integrity, copyright violations including too-close-paraphrasing, and
578:(which will be culled to remove those that will undergo an independent GAR). It is suggested to place a list of the removed sources on article talk or in Further reading for future reference, and re-evaluate the remaining content, as there may still be 661: 141: 678: 672: 153: 728: 690: 575: 249: 109: 617:. For example, check the talk page to see if someone placed content from the offline source there. If your edits complied with all, discuss that on talk. If still necessary, bring the issue to admin attention at the 657: 136: 668: 148: 114: 411:}} can be used on talk pages to denote presumptive removal/stubbing, presumptive deletion, and copyvio removal respectively (the latter can also be used in combined copyvio and presumptive removals). 708: 160: 501:
If you can locate sources online (for example, books at archive.org or articles at newspapers.com) please add them and verify content cited to them, or list them on the article talk page
428: 364: 290: 96: 344:
Insertion of decidedly private materials, such as personal correspondences containing private information, inserted by Doug Coldwell; any inclusion of personal information should be
686: 516: 268: 119: 701: 177: 297:
applies, but there may be other problems. One specific concern is the extensive use of old and offline sources that cannot be checked, and may be misrepresented. There may be:
614: 530: 204: 341:
Sources cited separately from the text they claim to represent, sometimes paragraphs away, which can conceal close paraphrasing or other forms of copyright problems.
677:
If you want to opt out of these messages, or if you would like to receive messages even if you weren't one of the GA reviewers, you can add or remove yourself from
74: 697: 172: 441:
If you believe the GA should be delisted, you don't need to do anything. Unless someone else plans to open a GAR independent from those processed
525:
Once the GARs are completed, anyone can stub any article on the list not passing GAR by removing any content cited to inaccessible sources (see
566:
can be removed at any time from any article; the AN proposals do not supersede legal policy, although the AN encouraged editors to hold off
17: 768: 653: 421: 67: 635:
Any delisted GA is eligible to be resubmitted for GA consideration, but you should be certain that everything in
570:
until the GAR processes are in place. After February 20, any content cited to an offline source can be removed
717: 689:
the articles on which they planned to open an independent reassessment; those articles were removed from the
461:
If you believe the GA status might be retained, and plan to initiate an independent GAR to that effect, see
386: 229:
Users are encouraged to wait on stubbing articles until the GAR process has had sufficient time to complete.
307:; content copied from sources; or failure to attribute, quote or re-word content from public domain sources 219:
are delisted via a global process except for those articles where a reviewer has indicated an independent
639:
above has been considered, and that any content cited to offline content has been dealt with as explained.
318:) including misrepresentation of sources, inappropriate use of dated sources or non-independent sources 475:
To retain GA status, you need to be willing to open an independent GAR (according to the timeline at
416:
If a page cannot be salvaged or presumptive deletion is expedient, replace its entire content with {{
280:
1. What kinds of concerns need to be re-evaluated in these GAs and other content by the same editor?
563: 345: 329: 264: 34: 371:
If you find any of the copyright issues above, remove it and start a talk page discussion, but
300: 582:, source-to-text integrity problems, or POV remaining even after the article is stubbed (see 417: 704:(those where an independent reassessment was not indicated) to effect a mass delisting by: 538: 408: 223:
will be opened and can vouch for/verify content of all sources, including offline sources
732: 610: 579: 526: 480: 393: 321: 304: 294: 242: 762: 743: 627: 470:
3. I believe one of these GAs can retain its GA status or be improved: what do I do?
404: 392:
after removing the copyvio. It is not always necessary to use revision deletions on
379: 325: 234: 220: 618: 400: 315: 238: 226:
Users may remove any content Doug Coldwell added that is cited to an offline source
212: 311: 23: 591:
5. I stubbed one of the articles on the master list but my edit was reverted.
335:
Claims from very old sources not backed by, or contradicted by, modern sources
184: 216: 124: 479:) and able to verify all content cited to online and offline sources (see 427:
Add your findings related to copyright under the article listing at the
267:, and any questions specific to the Doug Colwell GA reassessment on the 248:
The master list of articles to be reassessed for GA status can be found
509:
If you plan to open an independent GAR (separate from those processed
424:. The page will likely be deleted after a week if it is not rewritten. 693:
so the remainder on the list could be processed for delisting by bot
522:
Open the independent GAR after the mass bot run (around February 23)
420:}} and follow the instructions on that template to list the page at 749:
After GARs are completed, articles not passing can be stubbed (see
245:
on those articles or attempting to assure GA status is retained.
445:, the GA will be delisted automatically when the bot runs (see 403:}} (specifically {{subst:CCI|name=20210315}} for this case), {{ 378:
If a copyvio is material to the content of the page, request
537:), so in deciding whether to pursue a GAR, consider whether 519:
so the article will not be delisted in the bot group run
289:
and information in links to other discussions there. A
286: 260: 42: 241:(GAs). It describes items to check and consider when 338:
Copyright issues in images uploaded by Doug Coldwell
233:
This page outlines the process and timeline for the
436:2. I passed one of these GA: what do I need to do? 359: 548:4. How and when should I stub a GA on the list? 498:) and discuss any problems found on article talk 452:If you want to improve the article anyway, see 746:can be opened and will be processed as normal 355:How do I evaluate and handle copyright issues? 375:, as that creates another copyright problem. 373:do not copy copyvio material to the talk page 8: 541:can be preserved based on accessible sources 263:. Please raise any general questions at the 685:Editors had until February 20 to indicate 429:3-page contributor copyright investigation 365:3-page contributor copyright investigation 310:Source-to-text integrity problems (either 75: 68: 605:If so, review the article talk page (see 713:Automated closure and incorporation to 431:; feedback will help advance the effort 199:Good article reassessment/February 2023 707:Automated setup of a GAR page with a 513:), indicate so by listing the article 7: 600:. Did you follow those instructions? 491:process outlined below is complete. 554: 488: 476: 446: 291:Contributor copyright investigation 256: 97:Copyright contributor investigation 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 31: 729:subject to an intent to open GAR 630:a delisted article on the list? 50: 324:issues that might originate in 259:details of the GAR merger were 564:Knowledge's copyright policies 120:Intent to open independent GAR 1: 494:Re-evaluate the content (see 261:finalized on February 8, 2023 702:processing the remaining GAs 673:GA reviewers of the articles 644:Implementation and timeline 422:Knowledge:Copyright problems 285:Be familiar with all of the 207:closed with consensus that: 92:DC Good article reassessment 619:Administrators' noticeboard 611:presumptive deletion policy 785: 750: 742:The remaining independent 736: 662:all relevant GA talk pages 636: 606: 597: 583: 534: 531:January 2023 AN discussion 495: 462: 453: 205:January 2023 AN discussion 32: 769:WikiProject Good articles 615:January 2023 AN consensus 237:(GAR) of several hundred 235:Good article reassessment 62:contributor investigation 485:Please do not open a GAR 580:too-close-paraphrasing 562:Content that breaches 305:too-close-paraphrasing 687:on the talk page here 626:6. Can I resubmit to 293:has been opened, and 696:On February 26, the 553:For timing, see the 481:presumptive deletion 394:presumptive removals 326:conflict of interest 295:presumptive deletion 654:mass message sender 330:Ludington, Michigan 137:Article talk notice 328:, for example, on 301:Copyright problems 161:GAR delisting page 574:remaining on the 572:from the articles 568:on content in GAs 380:revision deletion 332:-related articles 316:original research 196: 195: 58:GAR reassessment 22:(Redirected from 776: 722: 716: 658:talk page notice 399:The templates {{ 391: 385: 243:stubbing content 185:Petscan 23790505 167:Scripts and bots 149:User talk notice 77: 70: 51: 45: 27: 784: 783: 779: 778: 777: 775: 774: 773: 759: 758: 720: 718:Article history 714: 709:standard notice 698:GAN Review Tool 646: 632: 593: 555:#Implementation 550: 489:#Implementation 477:#Implementation 472: 447:#Implementation 438: 389: 383: 357: 282: 277: 257:#Implementation 221:GA reassessment 178:Bot instruction 173:GAN Review Tool 81: 49: 48: 41: 37: 29: 28: 24:Knowledge:DCGAR 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 782: 780: 772: 771: 761: 760: 757: 756: 755: 754: 740: 725: 724: 723: 711: 694: 683: 682: 681: 665: 660:was posted to 645: 642: 641: 640: 631: 624: 623: 622: 603: 601: 592: 589: 588: 587: 560: 558: 549: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 539:broad coverage 523: 520: 517:talk page here 506: 502: 499: 471: 468: 467: 466: 459: 458: 457: 437: 434: 433: 432: 425: 414: 413: 412: 397: 387:copyvio-revdel 356: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 342: 339: 336: 333: 319: 308: 281: 278: 276: 273: 269:talk page here 231: 230: 227: 224: 194: 193: 190: 189: 188: 187: 182: 181: 180: 164: 163: 158: 157: 156: 146: 145: 144: 128: 127: 125:Sdzerobot list 122: 117: 112: 110:Master GA list 101: 100: 99: 94: 83: 82: 80: 79: 72: 64: 63: 61: 59: 57: 55: 47: 46: 38: 33: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 781: 770: 767: 766: 764: 752: 748: 747: 745: 741: 738: 734: 730: 727:Articles not 726: 719: 712: 710: 706: 705: 703: 699: 695: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 675: 674: 670: 666: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 649: 643: 638: 634: 633: 629: 625: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 602: 599: 595: 594: 590: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 559: 556: 552: 551: 547: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 521: 518: 514: 512: 507: 503: 500: 497: 493: 492: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 469: 464: 460: 455: 451: 450: 448: 444: 440: 439: 435: 430: 426: 423: 419: 418:subst:copyvio 415: 410: 406: 402: 398: 395: 388: 381: 377: 376: 374: 370: 369: 368: 366: 361: 354: 347: 343: 340: 337: 334: 331: 327: 323: 320: 317: 313: 309: 306: 302: 299: 298: 296: 292: 288: 287:AN discussion 284: 283: 279: 274: 272: 270: 266: 265:GAR talk page 262: 258: 253: 251: 246: 244: 240: 239:Good articles 236: 228: 225: 222: 218: 217:Doug Coldwell 214: 213:Good articles 210: 209: 208: 206: 201: 200: 192: 191: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 162: 159: 155: 152: 151: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139: 138: 135: 134: 133: 132: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 115:Reviewer list 113: 111: 108: 107: 106: 105: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 85: 84: 78: 73: 71: 66: 65: 60:and Copyright 56:February 2023 53: 52: 44: 40: 39: 36: 25: 19: 671:was sent to 647: 571: 567: 510: 508: 484: 442: 409:subst:cclean 372: 358: 312:verification 254: 247: 232: 202: 198: 197: 166: 165: 130: 129: 103: 102: 91: 86: 691:master list 346:oversighted 154:MMS targets 142:MMS targets 733:be stubbed 700:completed 609:) and the 487:until the 449:section). 407:}}, and {{ 405:subst:CCId 303:including 87:Main pages 679:this list 648:Outline: 401:subst:CCI 54:Pages for 763:Category 667:Another 613:and the 557:section. 511:en masse 443:en masse 43:WP:DCGAR 35:Shortcut 576:GA list 515:at the 131:Notices 751:#FAQ 4 737:#FAQ 4 669:notice 656:(MMS) 637:#FAQ 1 607:#FAQ 1 598:#FAQ 4 584:#FAQ 1 535:#FAQ 4 529:, the 496:#FAQ 1 463:#FAQ 3 454:#FAQ 3 382:using 360:Earwig 735:(see 104:Lists 16:< 744:GARs 731:can 596:See 533:and 527:PDEL 255:The 250:here 211:All 76:edit 69:view 628:GAN 505:POV 483:). 322:POV 314:or 275:FAQ 215:by 765:: 721:}} 715:{{ 652:A 586:). 390:}} 384:{{ 367:. 271:. 252:. 203:A 753:) 739:) 664:. 621:. 465:. 456:. 396:. 348:. 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
Knowledge:DCGAR
Shortcut
WP:DCGAR
view
edit
DC Good article reassessment
Copyright contributor investigation
Master GA list
Reviewer list
Intent to open independent GAR
Sdzerobot list
Article talk notice
MMS targets
User talk notice
MMS targets
GAR delisting page
GAN Review Tool
Bot instruction
Petscan 23790505
January 2023 AN discussion
Good articles
Doug Coldwell
GA reassessment
Good article reassessment
Good articles
stubbing content
here
#Implementation
finalized on February 8, 2023

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.