643:. Because Knowledge is not based on personal knowledge but on published sources, you are no more qualified than anyone else. If you can give reliable sources about your uncle (or anyone or anything else) then go ahead and do so: but, without such sources, there can be no article on Knowledge. Please understand that this is not a vendetta and it is not personal. It is not an insult to not have a Knowledge article. The reaction would be exactly the same if you wrote articles about my family without providing sources to show that they're notable. As has been said several times, there is no problem with having
711:, following up my earlier question: has she as a deputy representative actually taken a place in parliamentary deliberations and voting? If so, she's notable--using an analogy of the same standards as we use for athletes, that the people nominally on a team actually have to play in a regular season game, not just be there in reserve.
558:
and Astrid E. Kruse
Andersen my parents. I will not speak for them here because theis lifes speak for them selves! Why is more then one entry from the same family problematic? I can't understand that this is a criteria for delition. Obviously it is so and some of the partisipants here don't want to
743:
I do appriciate your concern, and this is (hopefully) not onely my advocacy for family! Hopefully you will se that this is not just a personal vendetta. There are allways a possibility that mistakes have been done. There have been people "out there" trying to erase the "Kruse"-family, and I think
553:
to call Erilng Ove Kruse my uncle! Who would be more qualified to write about him? Probably onely his sons and sisters. I wisited him a couple of months ago, and he told about
Svalbard and the war. How he met with Shetlands Larsen and giving support to the smallbouts getting people out of Norway.
577:
I appreciate your sentimentality for your family, but you have failed to give a rational argument grounded in
Knowledge policy. Your contribution history shows a long pattern of recreating these articles after they're repeatedly deleted with overwhelming consensus. Some things don't belong in an
950:
I do appriciate your concern, and I do have red the "WP:GNG" and the essey "Other stuff exists"! I'm on line with this. What I'm adressing is the practice: Too many people are too concerned with deliting other peoples work. I think there has evolved a culture of "outing" others, or taking other
507:
Procedure was applied correctly, the nominator has a familial conflict of interest and no new evidence of notability has been presented. A note on the medals. The
English version of the article and some Norwegian versions before the current one claimed that Kruse had won the Forsvarets
986:, the AFD was closed correctly, there is a clear consensus that this gentleman is not notable, within the meaning of that word on Knowledge. That doesn't mean that he did not serve honourably and professionally, but thousands do, and more is required for an encyclopedia article.
846:
Because all articles on
Knowledge must obey Knowledge's policies and people feel that the articles you listed do not. The articles about members of your family are by no means the only articles currently nominated for deletion: hundreds are proposed every week.
188:(born 15 March 1944) is a Norwegian politician for the Socialist Left Party. She served as a deputy representative to the Norwegian Parliament from Nordland during the term 1993–1997. Agree, she is notable, and she is the mother of the norwegian Rock Star
689:
is another good example. Both parents and all nine children have individual articles, in addition to the one on the family itself. But each and every one of them is separately established to meet the project's notability requirements. -
393:- My impression is that someone is trying to put the Kruse genealogy in English Knowledge via an article on Erling Ove Kruse (born 10 August 1922 in Oslo; a decorated Norwegian Colonel) and his ancestors and descendants:
224:
Deletion review formatting has been appropriately fixed. I also note that the user recreated the article right after posting this deletion review and making a comment on the AFD after its closure (
443:
433:
422:
951:
contributors down, and especially new ones, like mee. This is a problem you should be more aware of! I don't want to be a "pain in the ass", my agenda is to adress a problem ...
867:, are considered to be unfit for an article on Wiki. How come, an entry about the internationally recognized musician and arranger, Assistant Professor at the University of Oslo
196:), but compared to Erling Kruse she is (sorry) a dwarf! Well - this is not my problem, but sorry to say so, but you make fools og Knowledge by showing this sort of ignorance!
375:
I can't see how that could have closed without deletion. What we need are some reliable independant sources and they appear lacking. I also see that the article has been
448:
167:
967:
I can see the need for someone to do the "clean up" job, and delete none current stuff. But, there might be need for conciderations about how this is carried out!
515:
only mentions the campaign and service medals, and not the Medal of Merit. Thus, the medals for which sources exist show nothing more than that he was a soldier.
307:
per above comments. Unanimous vote to delete by several uninvolved editors, which was properly handled by the deleting admin. This was not an abuse of process.
454:
48:
34:
863:
May be I'm slow, but how come, an internationally recognized composer, author and
Professor of Composition at the Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo
43:
155:
918:
488:
that Astrid E. Kruse
Andersen is his/her own mother. That makes Erling O. Kruse his uncle, and this article's deletion was after the book.
314:
88:
508:
fortjenestemedalje (Armed Forces Medal of Merit) in addition to the five campaign and service medals. However, the citation to the
184:
I`m impressed! You delete a
Norwegian Warhero - congratulations! (... Yes I know, he is norwegian, but ...) Let`s see (to compere):
39:
176:
539:
245:
AfD closed with unanimous consensus to delete. Based on the evicence Kruse fails to meet either the relevant notability essay (
639:, not on personal knowledge. Obviously, your family is important to you but what matters on Knowledge is whether a subject is
554:
Shame on you for this delition!! Erling will be 90 this summer! Shame for deliting my mother too! I'm very proud to call late
595:
871:
are nominated for delition? Go to the entrys and make up your own mind about these entries - to me it is incomprehensible!!
21:
212:
231:, but if admin wants to temporarily restore for purposes of this DRV, I certainly will not stand in the way of that. --
727:
I don't know if this is the right arena for that discussion, but yes she has taken place and this has now been added.
908:
535:
1002:
534:. Nomination basically disputes the underlying notability standards, not the discussion or its inevitable close.
105:
17:
925:
781:
622:
578:
encyclopedia. Your persistence is admirable, but sometimes if you keep on trying it just makes you look worse.
321:
274:
83:
825:
695:
668:
656:
653:
418:
125:
934:
In point of fact, neither of the two articles mentioned by Knuand above has been nominated for deletion.
990:
976:
960:
943:
929:
902:
893:
what is required for a subject to be classed as notable and, therefore, suitable for a wikipedia page.
880:
856:
841:
787:
753:
736:
722:
699:
680:
628:
604:
572:
543:
524:
497:
470:
383:
363:
346:
325:
297:
280:
235:
94:
821:
732:
662:
555:
466:
437:
351:
262:
258:
200:
121:
70:
935:
894:
848:
672:
516:
355:
939:
913:
898:
852:
813:
777:
676:
618:
520:
489:
401:
359:
309:
270:
78:
75:
868:
809:
665:
659:
586:
493:
232:
829:
691:
650:
647:
246:
185:
972:
956:
876:
837:
749:
568:
481:
208:
911:. The notability of other people has no bearing whatsoever on this particular discussion.
817:
728:
644:
462:
407:
189:
987:
864:
797:
762:
686:
413:
261:. Page temporarily restored for the discussion. Note also that the page in question is
193:
485:
886:
805:
773:
766:
718:
640:
610:
579:
342:
293:
254:
250:
228:
801:
770:
636:
614:
428:
380:
968:
952:
872:
833:
745:
564:
509:
204:
796:
Then, how come, all my entries about the Kruse-family are marked for deletion:
713:
337:
379:
so if this does get overturned we need to see about attributing this.
290:-No indication that process wasn't followed. DRV is not AfD round two.
376:
335:
What exactly is a "deputy representative" to the parliament?
269:
Jusst Kruse, so I have corrected the above appropriately. -
444:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dag Anders
Grothaug Kruse
434:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Astrid E. Kruse
Andersen
225:
162:
148:
140:
132:
192:(and sister in-laws with the Mayor of Bergen, Norway
423:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jannike Kruse Jåtog
769:. This is about ensuring that Knowledge articles
449:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Erling O. Kruse
377:translated from the Norwegian bokmal wikipedia
776:; not about trying to "erase" your family. -
744:this is a good reason for a new revision ...
8:
227:). I have speedy deleted the recreation per
257:argument fails as Drevland meets guideline
104:The following is an archived debate of the
455:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Just Kruse
63:
885:Please, just stop. Stop. Read this page:
671:, provided all are individually notable.
637:verifiability through reliable sources
7:
1005:of the page listed in the heading.
609:Aside from what Specs said, please
28:
1001:The above is an archive of the
641:important to the world at large
1:
804:, are nominated for deletion
907:I'd encourage that you read
352:Norwegian Parliament#Members
1028:
991:04:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
977:20:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
961:20:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
944:21:00, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
930:18:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
903:13:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
881:13:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
857:12:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
842:12:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
788:16:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
754:22:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
737:06:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
723:19:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
700:18:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
681:17:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
629:17:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
605:17:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
573:16:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
544:12:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
525:09:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
498:08:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
471:06:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
384:02:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
364:08:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
347:00:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
326:22:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
298:22:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
281:22:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
236:21:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
95:18:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
1008:Please do not modify it.
826:Astrid E. Kruse Andersen
243:Closing admin's comment:
111:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
635:Knowledge is based on
559:have "Kruse" at Wiki.
74:– Deletion endorsed –
889:. That will tell you
536:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
615:no original research
814:Anine Kruse Skatrud
613:, and consider the
419:Jannike Kruse Jåtog
402:Anine Kruse Skatrud
108:of the page above.
869:Even Kruse Skatrud
820:, or are deleted:
812:, are redirected:
810:Even Kruse Skatrud
1015:
1014:
767:assume good faith
763:There is no cabal
611:assume good faith
601:
592:
556:Bjørn G. Andersen
482:article's creator
451:(now at this DRV)
438:Bjørn G. Andersen
421:(which now is at
217:
203:comment added by
1019:
1010:
921:
916:
784:
625:
602:
597:
593:
588:
584:
317:
312:
296:
277:
216:
197:
179:
174:
165:
151:
143:
135:
113:
91:
86:
81:
64:
53:
33:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1006:
1003:deletion review
919:
914:
822:Erling O. Kruse
818:Benedikte Kruse
786:
782:
627:
623:
596:
587:
580:
408:Benedikte Kruse
315:
310:
291:
279:
275:
263:Erling O. Kruse
198:
175:
173:
170:
161:
160:
154:
147:
146:
139:
138:
131:
130:
122:Erling O. Kruse
109:
106:deletion review
89:
84:
79:
71:Erling O. Kruse
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1025:
1023:
1013:
1012:
997:
996:
995:
994:
980:
979:
964:
963:
948:
947:
946:
932:
905:
861:
860:
859:
793:
792:
791:
790:
780:
778:The Bushranger
757:
756:
741:
740:
739:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
687:Jackson family
633:
632:
631:
621:
619:The Bushranger
547:
546:
528:
527:
501:
500:
474:
473:
459:
458:
457:
452:
446:
441:
431:
426:
416:
411:
405:
396:
395:
394:
387:
386:
369:
368:
367:
366:
329:
328:
301:
300:
284:
283:
273:
271:The Bushranger
239:
238:
194:Trude Drevland
186:Jørun Drevland
182:
181:
171:
158:
152:
144:
136:
128:
116:
115:
100:
99:
98:
97:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1024:
1011:
1009:
1004:
999:
998:
992:
989:
985:
982:
981:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
962:
958:
954:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
931:
927:
923:
922:
917:
910:
906:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:Jannike Kruse
803:
799:
795:
794:
789:
785:
783:One ping only
779:
775:
772:
768:
765:, and please
764:
761:
760:
759:
758:
755:
751:
747:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
715:
710:
707:
701:
697:
693:
688:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
670:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
624:One ping only
620:
616:
612:
608:
607:
606:
603:
600:
594:
591:
585:
583:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:Shame on you!
557:
552:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
506:
503:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
450:
447:
445:
442:
439:
435:
432:
430:
427:
424:
420:
417:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
399:
398:
397:
392:
389:
388:
385:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
339:
334:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
318:
313:
306:
303:
302:
299:
295:
289:
286:
285:
282:
278:
276:One ping only
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:WP:POLITICIAN
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
223:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
195:
191:
187:
178:
169:
164:
157:
150:
142:
134:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
112:
107:
102:
101:
96:
92:
87:
82:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
1007:
1000:
983:
912:
890:
802:Philip Kruse
712:
708:
692:TexasAndroid
598:
589:
581:
560:
550:
531:
511:
504:
477:
436:(Husband is
429:Philip Kruse
410:(a redirect)
404:(a redirect)
390:
372:
336:
332:
308:
304:
287:
266:
242:
221:
199:— Preceding
190:Sivert Høyem
183:
110:
103:
69:
59:20 June 2012
58:
49:2012 June 21
35:2012 June 19
865:Bjørn Kruse
798:Bjørn Kruse
414:Bjørn Kruse
909:this essay
830:Just Kruse
729:Geschichte
617:policy. -
510:Norwegian
463:Uzma Gamal
247:WP:SOLDIER
988:Lankiveil
936:Dricherby
895:Dricherby
849:Dricherby
709:question2
673:Dricherby
551:I'm proud
517:Dricherby
512:Who's Who
356:Dricherby
249:) or the
229:WP:CSD#G4
44:2012 June
915:elektrik
582:Specs112
490:Mentoz86
333:Question
311:elektrik
294:Fyre2387
233:MuZemike
213:contribs
201:unsigned
20: |
984:Endorse
891:exactly
660:members
654:article
532:Endorse
505:Endorse
478:Endorse
391:Comment
381:Spartaz
373:Endorse
305:Endorse
288:Endorse
177:restore
141:history
76:King of
969:Knuand
953:Knuand
887:WP:GNG
873:Knuand
834:Knuand
774:policy
746:Knuand
669:family
565:Knuand
563:Why??
255:WP:WAX
251:WP:GNG
205:Knuand
920:SHOOS
719:talk
657:about
484:says
480:- he
343:talk
316:SHOOS
222:Note:
163:watch
156:links
52:: -->
16:<
973:talk
957:talk
940:talk
926:talk
899:talk
877:talk
853:talk
838:talk
828:and
816:and
808:and
800:and
771:meet
750:talk
733:talk
696:talk
685:The
677:talk
648:than
645:more
569:talk
540:talk
521:talk
494:talk
486:here
467:talk
360:talk
322:talk
209:talk
149:logs
133:edit
126:talk
32:<
832:?!
714:DGG
651:one
461:--
338:DGG
267:not
168:XfD
166:) (
22:Log
975:)
959:)
942:)
928:)
901:)
879:)
855:)
840:)
824:,
752:)
735:)
721:)
698:)
679:)
663:of
571:)
542:)
523:)
496:)
469:)
362:)
354:.
345:)
324:)
292:--
265:,
253:.
215:)
211:•
93:♠
42::
993:.
971:(
955:(
938:(
924:(
897:(
875:(
851:(
836:(
748:(
731:(
717:(
694:(
675:(
666:a
599:c
590:t
567:(
538:(
519:(
492:(
465:(
440:)
425:)
358:(
341:(
320:(
207:(
180:)
172:|
159:|
153:|
145:|
137:|
129:|
124:(
90:♣
85:♦
80:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.