332:. As already discussed at the AfD, he is just known for Sonicflood, and that article has already his relevant details. Few more relevant lines might be added there, if you have the relevant sources. But there isn't enough coverage of him for a standalone article, even if we ignore the normal standards of
78:
Like so many DRV's, this discussion is a mix of re-arguing the merits of the article itself and arguing about the process. We're supposed to be evaluating only the process here. In any case, there's no clear agreement here, so I'm closing this as NC. My suggestion is to let this be for a while and
280:
is such a horrible thing at AfD. The final relist was pointless as there was already consensus, pace the bludgeoning, that the article shouldn't exist as a standalone article (the nom's rationale counts too). The no consensus close was likely based on no further discussion happening after the
336:
here. In spite of some attempts to source the BLP, there are just four sourced lines as of now. In short, the BLP will remain mostly unsourced & might get bombarded with different tags in the future. In fact, at least one of the tags was wrongly removed recently –
281:
pointless final relisting. The consensus was that there shouldn't be an article, and there was no consensus between deletion and redirection, therefore we go with redirection since it is the more conservative option. Problem solved.
377:
I don't know which solo album you are talking about, but the few mentions he received here & there are mostly in relation to
Sonicflood. And he fails every notability guideline for a standalone BLP. So it all comes down to
224:. There were only two !votes in favor of Redirection, which in my opinion is never enough for any consensus whatsoever. Also, Walter Görlitz's !vote was not "I like it", though his comment was in my opinion an improper use of
298:
Not much of anything solely on this guy I'll grant you, but there is probably enough to support a NC outcome. From a "re-argue the AfD" viewpoint, a lot of decent sources seem to take it for granted you'll know who he is
358:
Are you sure? The listing on
Billboard was with his name, not Sonicflood. I don't know the area very well and I'd never heard of this guy before, but it looks like he had a successful solo album that made the charts.
196:. Second keep !voter provided few sources which mention the subject in passing, along with giving a link of an album's promo. None of them even remotely proves the subject's notability. In fact, it was wrongly
340:. BTW, I have nothing against the subject or religions. But we have to think it from the perspective of an encyclopedia. Rest of the stuff is nicely explained by TonyBallioni above. Thanks. -
565:
NAC was clearly inappropriate as it was performed by the article creator, who had also opined in the discussion, and the Speedy Keep rationale given was not in line with
48:
34:
43:
518:
310:. It could probably have been closed as a redirect, but I don't think it is wrong to call it a NC. And the charting on his own may make a difference?
185:
167:
253:
Actually, there were three redirect !votes before the second relisting, and each one of them explained their rationale quite clearly. -
535:
Non-admin closure (with a speedy keep result) by an editor whom had rendered an opinion on the subject Afd. Additionally, the closer
39:
506:
155:
240:
21:
527:
176:
605:
456:
408:
105:
17:
594:
578:
556:
445:
391:
368:
349:
319:
290:
262:
244:
213:
94:
286:
277:
476:
383:
341:
254:
205:
189:
591:
552:
540:
387:
345:
258:
236:
209:
91:
472:
429:
282:
193:
544:
364:
315:
307:
80:
576:
436:
125:
84:
382:
and, as exhaustively discussed at the AfD, redirect is the only plausible ATD here. -
588:
584:
548:
536:
379:
333:
232:
225:
88:
566:
302:, the Christian Today article and a few others). He also appears to have charted (
303:
300:
83:
provides guidance on that. Likewise, if somebody feels it should be redirected,
228:. This needs to be relisted. We need more input. There really was no consensus.
543:) is the creator of the article in question. This instance is a clear case of
360:
329:
311:
201:
569:
121:
70:
192:
is not a !vote count. There were two keep !votes & one of them was
433:– Disruptive non-admin closure by article creator reverted. –
200:
for the second time, as there was consensus to redirect it to
204:
after the first relisting. And then it was wrongly closed. -
513:
499:
491:
483:
338:
197:
162:
148:
140:
132:
583:I've backed out the obviously (and trout-worthy)
304:https://books.google.com/books?id=hA8EAAAAMBAJ
79:if somebody still feels it should be deleted,
8:
455:The following is an archived debate of the
104:The following is an archived debate of the
422:
63:
306:) on Billboard on his own which may meet
186:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jeff Deyo
328:The points you've made are relating to
7:
608:of the page listed in the heading.
411:of the page listed in the heading.
87:seems like the right advice. – --
28:
604:The above is an archive of the
407:The above is an archive of the
184:It is regarding the closure of
595:19:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
579:18:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
557:18:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
446:22:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
392:20:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
369:21:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
350:16:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
320:23:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
291:21:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
276:bad NAC and an example of why
263:16:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
245:04:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
214:22:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
95:11:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
631:
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
611:Please do not modify it.
462:Please do not modify it.
414:Please do not modify it.
111:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
587:and relisted it. --
274:Overturn to redirect
459:of the page above.
108:of the page above.
226:Arguments to avoid
618:
617:
444:
421:
420:
59:15 September 2017
49:2017 September 16
35:2017 September 14
622:
613:
574:
563:Overturn/re-open
545:Knowledge:BADNAC
530:
525:
516:
502:
494:
486:
464:
443:
441:
434:
423:
416:
179:
174:
165:
151:
143:
135:
113:
64:
53:
33:
630:
629:
625:
624:
623:
621:
620:
619:
609:
606:deletion review
570:
526:
524:
521:
512:
511:
505:
498:
497:
490:
489:
482:
481:
460:
457:deletion review
437:
435:
412:
409:deletion review
175:
173:
170:
161:
160:
154:
147:
146:
139:
138:
131:
130:
109:
106:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
628:
626:
616:
615:
600:
599:
598:
597:
581:
533:
532:
522:
509:
503:
495:
487:
479:
467:
466:
451:
450:
449:
448:
419:
418:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
372:
371:
353:
352:
323:
322:
293:
278:WP:Relist bias
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
248:
247:
182:
181:
171:
158:
152:
144:
136:
128:
116:
115:
100:
99:
98:
97:
61:
56:
47:
44:2017 September
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
627:
614:
612:
607:
602:
601:
596:
593:
590:
586:
582:
580:
577:
575:
573:
568:
564:
561:
560:
559:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:User:Mrgrockz
529:
520:
515:
508:
501:
493:
485:
478:
474:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
463:
458:
453:
452:
447:
442:
440:
432:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
417:
415:
410:
405:
404:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:
375:
374:
373:
370:
366:
362:
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
272:
271:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
178:
169:
164:
157:
150:
142:
134:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
112:
107:
102:
101:
96:
93:
90:
86:
82:
77:
76:No Consensus.
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
610:
603:
571:
562:
534:
461:
454:
438:
428:
413:
406:
295:
283:TonyBallioni
273:
229:
221:
190:WP:CONSENSUS
183:
110:
103:
75:
69:
58:
473:Thiripuram
439:Sandstein
430:Thiripuram
330:Sonicflood
296:endorse NC
202:Sonicflood
194:WP:ILIKEIT
122:Jeff Deyo
71:Jeff Deyo
589:RoySmith
549:SamHolt6
384:NitinMlk
342:NitinMlk
308:WP:MUSIC
255:NitinMlk
241:contribs
233:Mr. Guye
206:NitinMlk
198:relisted
89:RoySmith
81:WP:RENOM
20: |
528:restore
492:history
177:restore
141:history
85:WP:BOLD
592:(talk)
585:WP:NAC
334:WP:GNG
222:Relist
92:(talk)
567:WP:SK
514:watch
507:links
361:Hobit
312:Hobit
163:watch
156:links
52:: -->
16:<
572:Crow
553:talk
541:talk
500:logs
484:edit
477:talk
388:talk
380:ATDs
365:talk
346:talk
316:talk
287:talk
259:talk
237:talk
210:talk
149:logs
133:edit
126:talk
32:<
519:XfD
517:) (
243:)
239:) (
168:XfD
166:) (
22:Log
555:)
547:.
390:)
367:)
348:)
318:)
289:)
261:)
212:)
188:.
74:–
42::
551:(
539:(
531:)
523:|
510:|
504:|
496:|
488:|
480:|
475:(
386:(
363:(
344:(
314:(
299:(
285:(
257:(
235:(
230:—
208:(
180:)
172:|
159:|
153:|
145:|
137:|
129:|
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.